This does mean though, that data is treated even more poorly that one could suspect. Being Shopify their e-commerce platform partner, it turns out that, seemingly, data is held both by Shopify and Ledger (something that I have not managed to read on their website). That is gross to say the least. As a customer, you are providing (and wishing you hadn’t) data to Ledger (and any thung in the aftermaths). I doubt any purchaser was aware that data was retained by Shopify. Most companies tend to admit somewhere, either in their terms of service, or in their privacy policies, that the company will or reserves the right to share (usually a lot of) information relating to the customer or the customer's orders. And Ledger is no exception: https://shop.ledger.com/pages/privacy-policyWe may also transmit some of your data to third parties such as payment services, infrastructure, logistics, and other services providers. We enter into contractual arrangements with these third parties to ensure that personal data they could have to process for the provision of their tasks is adequately secured and that your privacy is protected. These providers have privacy policies which you may refer to for information about how they process your information and how to exercise your data subjects’ rights as provided under Applicable Laws. All personal data processed by these third parties shall solely be used to perform the services they provide to us and for the purposes set out in this Privacy Policy.
In certain circumstances and only where required by Applicable Laws, we may disclose some of your data to competent administrative or judicial authorities or any other authorized third party. emboldening mine Is the buyer aware of all providers that get to access their data and possibly store them indefinitely? |
|
|
|
Przy ostatniej bańce też był podobny spadek, potem kolejne ATH w ciągu kolejnych dni i dopiero potem tendencja spadkowa/zjazd.  |
|
|
|
Całkiem sensownie napisane jak na państwową instytucję. Czy osoby, które są najmniej doinformowane, oraz do których ten przekaz powinien być kierowany to przeczytają to już niestety inna sprawa. Cały czas tylko nie mogę się przyzwyczaić do ich upodobania do zrównywania pieniądza fiducjarnego z włoskim producentem samochodów... |
|
|
|
I doubt Chipmxer is charging the same for their service as they did when bitcoin was worth a few k and adjust it accordingly with the market. Their fees have always been voluntary/donation-based. With more economic activity as price rises (as evidenced by higher BTC transaction fees) it stands to reason there'd also be more users using ChipMixer. But it might not all be 1:1, and seeing that DarkStar_ has merited suchmoon, the participants of this campaign should be prepared for reductions in rates paid. The 2nd highest paying campaign pays barely more than half what ChipMixer pays per post but with a smaller weekly post limit, and the 3rd highest is some shitcoin campaign with $6/post but with an even lower weekly post limit, and none of them are accepting new members. |
|
|
|
Well they do some mining. So they want cash to pay bills while they hold the btc from mining.
Pretty safe hedge. And as price increases the more important is it going to be that miners don't sell too much or they will depress the price. I bet neither would TSMC be keen on accepting bitcoins in lieu of fiat for their chips. @ malevolent
I am going to read the articles thanks.
First 2 were good. Third one I need to subscribe.
I wonder if we really cant get much gear for the whole year.
I actually like it if true.
Most of their articles are paid (and not cheap) but someone often archives them anyway. https://web.archive.org/web/20210105101623/https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20210105PD205.html |
|
|
|
Fair points. It's not just the vulnerability itself which makes me wary of Trezor products, though, but also their response to it. They have very much tried to down play it, saying that everyone should be using a passphrase anyway and so the attack doesn't matter, when they know full well that only a minority of advanced users use passphrases, and only a minority of them use a passphrase which is long and complex enough to match the security of a seed phrase. Nowhere on their main website does it tell people they should be using a passphrase, and nowhere in their new user set up guide does it tell people to use a passphrase. That doesn't reassure me that they would be open and honest about other critical vulnerabilities.
If your use case of a hardware wallets is as cold storage which you only ever use in the privacy of your own home, then sure, this attack vector is incredibly unlikely. But if your use case is carrying it with you everywhere you go and frequently using it in public to buy goods and make transactions, then this attack vector potential makes them more risky than a simple mobile wallet.
I think they downplayed it because there is nothing short of designing a new device from scratch for them to do. Three clicks, trezor.io -> trezor wiki -> Security -> first link, are needed to know that using a passphrase is essential to get maximum security. At least they admit themselves they don't talk enough about passphrases: link. I'm not concerned about them hiding other vulnerabilities because the product is too popular and too many people, their competitors included, would have gladly taken the opportunity to talk about them. In practice simple mobile wallets with malware is what leads to people losing their bitcoins, not hypothetical attacks where a thief saw someone with a Trezor and decided to steal one to extract a seed before the owner manages to find their seed backup because he saw a Defcon/Blackhat conference talk about Bitcoin hardware wallets and put in the work to learn how to extract the seed  And that's assuming the owner doesn't only keep pocket change on their 'main'/decoy wallet without a passphrase. |
|
|
|
|
Obstawiam cenę BTC na poziomie $62831.85 na minutę przed końcem marca. Liczba nie poparta żadnymi obliczeniami. Pewnie przyjdzie mi rewidować predykcję.
|
|
|
|
masz na mysle gielde bez rejestracji?
Tak, LTC nigdzie prawie nie użyje, a do tego rośnie wolniej niż BTC, który przekroczył poprzednie ATH o 100%, a LTC jest w połowie dochodzenia do poprzedniego ATH. Sprawdzałem tylko na kantorach, które pojawiają się w portfelu na stronie Trezora. Nie żebym się dziwił, koszty transakcji, sprawdzanie czy adres nie jest 'podejrzany', klienci wymieniający mniejsze kwoty mający tendencje do bycia bardziej problematycznymi to dobre powody do niezmieniania minimalnej kwoty transakcji. |
|
|
|
Bump. This topic just came to my mind when discussing the forum's alleged unfriendliness towards newcomers here. Even if it's too long I don't think it's a bad idea, better something than nothing, and I'd expect people registering their accounts on Internet forums in 2021 to be more inclined to read a bit than their discordian-twitterati counterparts. I also like suchmoon's idea from a couple posts above. |
|
|
|
I am echoing some sentiments from members that I have seen over the years: plenty of people have turned away from Bitcointalk for the very reasons that I mentioned - lack of scam protection apart from this really convoluted trust system that you need to learn - the barriers to entry for Newbies aren't solely limited to posting obligations. Outside of the topic of scamming, new users effectively have no on-boarding process and are left (mostly) to their devices. Never mind figuring out merit and trust, good luck even finding out it exists if you're the average user that sees the first board "Bitcoin Discussion", reads a few shitty threads, and thinks that the forum is a waste of time. Would it help if the Beginners & Help section was the first thing they saw? Maybe perhaps this thread, too? Especially when, relative to the stats, the view count of the four year-old thread gets outpaced with less than a quarter of that time. I'm not sure if the "Users Online" portion is accurate. Seems to always be sub-1000, according to the history here too.
The forum just seems to be exceptionally unfriendly to new faces. I think there was a welcome message of sorts for newbies about the Trust system. And there was supposed to be a general one about the forum, too. But I've created a new account and I don't see anything so it seems it may have never been put into place. The users that are incentivized to join Bitcointalk in this case would be those that value the freedoms provided by the forum, including freedom to create thousands of scam coin announcements, airdrops at no/low-cost, publish ponzi threads, write bland and uninteresting content Thankfully the worst of them are confined to boards outsiders have no need of visiting. Only theymos, Cyrus and Global mods can ban non-newbies and trolls almost always needed to be really disruptive before they got banned. If reporting doesn't help start a topic about the specific troll. The more people complain about something the more likely it is that something is going to be done. |
|
|
|
I've almost to the point that it becomes tedious to send or receive coins, because I have to triple check everything. I've definitely made mistakes in the past with traditional fiat currencies, and Bitcoin. I mostly solved it by having a more easily accessible 'hot wallet' for smaller transactions. Receiving is less inconvenient with watch-only wallets. Although striving to have maintain as much privacy as possible makes everything more inconvenient. Unfortunately, with Bitcoin its very easy to misplace a decimal point, since you work with decimal points much more often than traditional currencies.
Personally, I don't find it to be a difficulty, but I'm extra careful when dealing with different units, e.g. BTC and mBTC, etc. Data from formatted disk could be restored but to ensure no body could get them he has applied one of the the wiping technique which MiniTool Drive Wipe app has and I guess it was DoD standard method. Chance to recover data from such disk would be miserable even if it were sent to forensic lab.
Probably not in this case according to what he claims to have been told by the company which released the password manager: I tried everything  I was on a support call with the password manager company and they help do a thorough search. The problem is that this manager is actually really good and it avoids history and caching as a security feature. They even wipe memory after use. The only downside is the stupid thing with not auto-saving. |
|
|
|
Dzisiaj Pan Kuczyński w radio 357 zapytany o bitcoina wypowiedział sie, ze to dla niego banka, Patrząc na wykresy, wygląda jak bańka. Samo w sobie nic złego, popyt przewyższył podaż w wystarczającym stopniu i tyle. Wg mnie to opiera sie na przekonaniu, ze btc nie ma tzw "instrinct value" wg mnie błędnym, chociaz fakt faktem moje wyliczenia tej wartosci zostaly juz dawno przekroczone - tylko do jakiego poziomu doprowadzi nas "parabolic growth"? *intrinsic Polecam raport od Kraken: The Great Debate Bitcoin & Intrinsic ValueI kiedy bedzie nastepna korekta 15%+ oraz jak zareaguja wtedy alty??
Tego nikt nie wie na 100%, choć można patrzeć na przepływy do i z giełd np. z viewbase. Przepływy BTC i USDT mogą przekładać się na wzrosty altcoinów po ich kupnie. |
|
|
|
Rozumiem, że wszyscy otrzymali też nagrody od @Flangler? Bo należy mu sie przynajmniej chociaz spora dawka meritow za taki wkład! Jesli chodzi o kolejna edycje to jestem w trakcie prac nad nia  Tak, potwierdzam że otrzymałem nagrody zarówno od adamvp jak i od Flanglera, wielkie dzięki. Szkoda tylko, że nigdzie nie mogę wymienić na BTC bez logowania się. |
|
|
|
Alexa is completely unreliable. I say that as someone that has had an Alexa top 1000 site and had access to the server side stats.
Lol anyone finding bct via a nutildah link is likely in for an interesting read.
Willing scam facilitator for pay who attempts to delete his own history out of shame DT member, sig spammer and trust abuser.
Nice intro to the site. All of these are largely irrelevant to a newbie who registered to ask a question or participate in discussions. Anyway, whilst the merit system is in place I wouldn't expect any 2017 or even 13 volume increases.
Once word is out that a system is corrupt and broken and cuts off opportunities for new members it's hard to fix.
Sadly you will see other places outgrow the original bitcoin community. There are better places to go to for people with short attention spans preferring flashy websites. It's also worth admitting that the market offers now more channels to communicate with like-minded people than discussion forums, and some people are just going to innately prefer them, there's nothing wrong in that. Bitcointalk is an archaic forum running on old software.
Bitcointalk does not delete scams.
Instead, its moderators refrain from making that choice for you, letting you be the arbiter.
Additionally, it even allows ponzi operators to create their threads in their own specialized place!
How lovely! I'm sure that 99% of Bitcoin users would aptly say, "no need to change anything"
Ah, and if you're a Newbie trying to learn about Bitcoin? Ask a question. Wait 6 minutes to ask another question. Wait between two to four weeks to bypass that limit, or pay to get into this forum of which you have no use.
Anything to do with policing scams would involve occasionally treating non-scammers as scammers (for example by raising the barrier of entry to start threads in some boards), and giving other users a false sense of security as smarter scammers inevitably scam them. Not to mention the extra resources needed for all of that, there's a reason the Trust system was introduced in 2013 and the SCAMMER tags were depreciated. It's also not unusual for new users to have to wait a bit before posting again to combat spam. Agree on the software being archaic, though. [snip]
The forum's primary purpose of existing isn't making people rich from bounties and signature or avatar campaigns. Alexa ratings are pretty useless. The ratings are calculated based on the pages surfed by the users who have Alexa extension downloaded in their browser. Now tell me how many of you have Alexa extension downloaded? Considering Indian section is pretty inactive and there aren't many Indians on forum, India coming at second spot is certainly due to me. I have Alexa installed since 2018. I guess nutildah has Alexa installed too and he uses search engine to login to his profile.  Well, if not then it's pretty impresive. Dang. I didn't realise that. That is pretty much worthless. What motivation does someone have to install the extension? I could understand if they get paid for it somehow, but I doubt it. Seems that data can come from the websites themselves as well if they've included the Alexa script, but still how many of them do? Reminds me of how worthless TV ratings are. In the UK at least there's a Broadcasters Board and they recruit a mere 12,000 people to report back to them about what they're watching and how they rate the program. Given that there's 66+ million people in the UK I'm not sure how they're meant to represent the entire population, and especially not accurately. That's one good thing about streaming services as they know exactly how many people are watching. Toolbars aren't used anymore since their popularity peaked probably over a decade ago, it's from Alexa's scripts on websites but mostly from extensions (25k different extensions according to Alexa). 12k/66m can be enough, all depends if the sample of the population is representative which is the difficult part but shouldn't be a problem when given enough thought how to do it. |
|
|
|
To nie cena dostosowuje się do opłacalności wydobycia tylko poziom trudności kopania do ceny (+ poprawka na niepewność). Oczywiście przy obecnym kursie dzienna wartość wykopywanych BTC to $37M, a roczna ponad $13.5B, więc hmm... wiara w BTC przez właścicieli kopalni będzie mieć duży wpływ na cenę (czy się utrzyma), bo liczba chętnych kupujących nie jest też nieskończona. Tu gdzie jest większość kopalni ( https://cbeci.org/mining_map) sam prąd jest bardzo tani. Ciekaw jestem jak będzie z przyrostem hashrate'u, bo to determinuje jaki udział w kosztach będzie mieć prąd jak poziom trudności kopania wzrośnie. Przy obecnych cenach jak się utrzymają powinien dogonić, ale TSMC, który jest źródłem większości chipów do koparek ma tyle zamówień, że może to trochę potrwać, zwłaszcza na 5nm, z których oprócz Bitmain korzysta i korzystać będzie Apple, AMD (własne CPU i konsole Sony/MS), Qualcomm, Nvidia i Mediatek z dużych/znanych firm. |
|
|
|
Not a place where one shill their tokens but rather where you can discuss strategies, what factors made your investment work, what did not, etc.
The closest thing we have now regarding this is Trading discussion, but these two things differ a lot.
If you want to a place not for shilling but for discussing investments in tokens, your topic belongs in one of the altcoin boards. For non-Bitcoin investments there's Off-topic but Serious Discussion and Ivory Tower and often Economics should also fit. For Bitcoin investments if Trading Discussion doesn't feel like the right board for your specific topic, then Economics, Speculation, or maybe the top-level Marketplace board or the Securities board would be a better fit. |
|
|
|
BTC potrzebował niecałych 3 dni, aby dalej sunąć w przestworza po ponad 18% spadku. Lubię czytać te nasze posty i sentyment jaki jest w danej chwili, a także wygląda na t, że zaczynają się pojawiać poważne sygnały anty krypto od władz.
Pomimo wszystkonic nie jest w stanie wybić BTC z trendu, jestemy na pełnym gazie i ja pęknie bariera 35,000$, to nawet 50K jest możliwe.
Widzę pewną przeszkodę na drodze, ale nawet jeśli by miała mieć wpływ to raczej nie z dnia na dzień. 15 stycznia mija Bitfinexowi chyba ostatni już termin na dostarczenie pewnych dokumentów: https://www.coindesk.com/nyag-tether-bitfinex-loan-documents-coming-weeksJest pewna możliwość, że jak go nie dotrzymają to przyjdzie nam oglądać tąpnięcia związane z ograniczeniem działalności Bitfinex/Tether, choć tu też zależy czy Amerykanie mieliby wystarczająco silne argumenty w kontakcie z organami ścigania innych krajów, bo trochę to grubymi nićmi szyte są te próby ścigania firm nie obsługujących amerykańskich klientów pod pozorem ochrony swoich obywateli. Zawsze też Chiny mogą znowu 'zakazać Bitcoina' A tak poza tym to gdy edytuje ten post właśnie przebiliśmy barierę $39k i jedziemy dalej. $40k przed północą czasu CET? |
|
|
|
Masz źródło bardzo taniego prądu (idealnie okolice kilka centów/kWh) i (dostęp do odpowiedniej mocy)? Przy normalnych polskich stawkach kopanie tylko opłaca się póki poziom trudności kopania nie dogoni (albo chyba że cena pierwsza poleci), tzn. krócej niż komuś kto ma prąd 75% taniej. No i musisz mieć pewność, że jaki byś sprzęt nie kupił, to że dojdzie na czas. Inaczej możesz zostać ze sprzętem, który mało na siebie zarobi, i za który dostaniesz mniej, bo nie jesteś jedynym co sprzedaje. Ew. sprzedając w odpowiednim momencie komuś z kraju, gdzie jest tańszy prąd, ale też z dnia na dzień nie znajdziesz kupca. Ogólnie to polecam pytań tutaj w przypadku kopania BTC: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=14.0Altcoinów tu na początek: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=160.0https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
