The downside of course is you will have to pay a fee and even if their service is paid there is no guarantee that the investigation will turn out well and they will recover your funds.
It's literally on their front page and you don't have to scroll too far: "We do not charge an initial fee, the success fee is counted from recovered assets." If they were proposing to do it any other way no one would trust them. |
|
|
|
|
Last emails about reported posts that I can find in my inbox are from 2018/01/09. So if you reported at least one post until that date, all Administrators (duh), Global Moderators and Moderators who have jurisdiction over the reported post can see the email address associated with your bitcointalk account at the time that you made the report.
|
|
|
|
If you want to deposit money within few minutes consider using some of the exchanges that allow you to deposit with either a credit or debit card. Or use BitPanda which allows you to deposit with either paypal or skrill.
These usually suffer from low transaction limits, high fees, or (most likely) both. SEPA transfers are close to free, especially when transacting higher amounts of money. |
|
|
|
I just tested it (using Tor), and these are the options:
Must be a new and recent thing then. OP can still ask someone to create an account for them or start a topic about this in Services. |
|
|
|
I mean, I believe we can wait a long time again before to see an exchange with instant SEPA.
Some small relatively unkown places such as bitvavo or paynote (not really a proper exchange) seem to be supporting instant SEPA. |
|
|
|
Tu nie chodzi o jakieś granie. To innowacyjna kryptowaluta, która nie jest oparta na POW ani POS tylko na POP (proof of person). Działa to tak, że każdy NODE jest pojedynczą osobą o sile głosu 1. Nie jesteś więc w stanie wykonać ataku 51% bo nigdy nie będziesz miał więcej niż 1 głos.
Ale mogę założyć dużo kont i tak zrobić atak 51%? Otóż nie, bo na straży tego stoi walidacja użytkowników - 5 trudnych captcha które trzeba rozwiązać co 5 dni o ściśle określonej godzinie w ciągu 2 min. Po walidacji przez kolejne 5 dni możesz być nodem, przetwarzać transakcje kopiąc jednocześnie walutę. Jak ta kryptowaluta zacznie cokolwiek być warta to death by captcha czy podobne usługi zaczną to obsługiwać. |
|
|
|
I never did any real research on him since he didn't go through with the interview. Maybe he is a good topic for an article. The main reason I didn't go through with with writing an article anyway was because other people had said that he was really young at the time (17 or 18).
According to some dox I think he was close to that, yeah, same age as Zhou Tong of Bitcoinica infamy. That's old enough to know right from wrong. |
|
|
|
I hear what you are saying, but I do not understand how the trust system now would prevent an anonymous person doing this again? Actually if theymos removed him directly when this went down, then it seems to me the trust system is far weaker now. Does theymos now do kyc on all DT1? I would say theymos adding him to DT1 only further legitimized him, now more people than in the past are aware that being DT1/DT2 is more of a sign that a given user gives accurate ratings rather than them being inherently trustworthy. Back then I think there were like ~6 users on DT1, now there are around a hundred, being DT1 means nowhere near as much as it used to and that's a good thing. |
|
|
|
So then are we saying that Tradefortress is not UNDENIABLY a scammer? it is speculation that he scammed and was not hacked? was he not refunding people also in recent years? If so what exactly do you mean that is is "good" that the trust system has evolved?
What does this instance here demonstrate is the "good" part about the evolution? I just want to understand what you mean? I'm being generous here with my speculation. He didn't refund everything that he lost/scammed. I'm not even sure if he himself knows how much he still owes. It's good that the Trust system has evolved so that hopefully never again a single anonymous person will be allowed to scam so much money from so many people. People have placed way too much trust in him than they should have for their own good. |
|
|
|
Speaking of irony and TradeFortress, he used to be one of the most trustworthy users here, theymos even added him to DT1 back when it had only a handful of manually added forum members. He was also very vocal when it came to security and scammers himself later either becoming a victim to a hack or exit scamming (probably a mixture of both). Good that the Trust system has evolved since those times. |
|
|
|
I think "Mentions" page in btc.com explorer also comes in handy to check if the address has been previously used in scam or not. For instance: Here is the address that FriendlyChemist ( scammer) used a lot: https://btc.com/1P86ApfWg62kwz1Zb1anYxrAN1LkRGwDdR and the "Mentions" page directly links to the accusation thread and the known alts report post. BTW I am also not happy with explorers not throwing a warning. Even a disqus comment section like etherscan has should be enough. Blockchain.info used to allow people to 'tag' transactions, I think that ended when they realized they don't want to spend time on moderating what people typed there. |
|
|
|
What details that are need to be provided? I would rather use https://walletrecoveryservices.com/ than to this one they do ask out 20% as fee but at least they've been trusted by community unless if you do offer something less. Why not try to had some vouch to prove out your capability on recovery service? Those are two different services serving different needs. I'd be interested on the success rate, time frame for recovery and the fees charged by OP's service after a year of running this kind of business. Some scammers aren't the brightest people so perhaps something will come out of this - one singular positive thing of spying on everyone. |
|
|
|
Manager: HhampuzNazwa kampanii: Roobet.comJakie rangi: Full, Sr., Hero, Legendary Ile do zarobienia: Full 0.00025, Sr. 0.0003, Hero/Legendary 0.00035 BTC/post. Maks. 25 postów/tydz. będzie liczona. Dodatkowe informacje: posty z działów lokalnych się nie liczą; posty musza mieć >150 znaków. |
|
|
|
|
Zależy ile banknotów wypada, jak tylko jeden to widocznie można przeoczyć skoro więcej niż jedna osoba zwraca na to uwaɡę.
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Tor to za mało na pełnoprawną anonimowość jest mnóstwo innych sposobów fingerprintowania użytkowników. Do tego adresy węzłów publiczne i pół-publiczne są banowane przez różne usługi 'ochrony stron', więc VPN jakiś i tak się przydaje.
|
|
|
|
Nikt nie odpowiedział, a chciałbym wiedzieć dokładnie, jak to teraz wygląda i gdzie się te telefony rejestruje? Od razu w sklepie przy zakupie, czy może gdzieś w urzędzie miasta?
Wyżej pisałem, jest tak: Można zarejestrować u listonosza, w banku, na poczcie, w kiosku ruchu, w salonie i gdzieś tam jeszcze.
Osoba rejestrująca musi mieć tylko dowód osobisty, nic więcej. Zaproponujesz coś do picia i pan pod sklepem się pewnie zgodzi wziąć na siebie rejestrację  |
|
|
|
|
^ yeah, the license is more to protect the owner and legitimize his new income stream wrt paying taxes and whatnots.
|
|
|
|
Which would you recommend for fiat trading? That depends on what's available at your jurisdiction, it's hard to recommend anything as almost every exchange suffers from various problems, it's more about picking your poison if you really must deal with fiat. |
|
|
|
Within a month I’ve been trying to develop a strategy for earning money on BaB, but nothing good has come of it. It turns out to make an algorithm that can work 5 hours bringing a plus, then 5 hours nothing, and then go to minus, this is the best script I have made. If anyone knows the grail, give a hint where to dig.
Invest in the site's bankroll or start your own site if you have the means, i.e. stop gambling, these are your moneymaking grails. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
