Just for clarification, total supply and circulating supply details are not enough to tell how valuable a coin will turn out to be, we have seen countless projects with low supply like 10 million and turn out to be a shitty show while a billion supply might do well if the team control how tokens are been release with a proper schedule mechanism. You need to check the team background and what they represent individually and their past record. You also need to check what they aim, not some unrealistic products that they will promise and fail. That's what all the projects does today, just hype and lies.

I'm waiting to see what is going to be the opium of the new trend that will drive people crazy to invest into altcoins this bull run. Last season was full of crazy memes and it comes to a point where people were acting like zombies, hard to control because to tell them to run away from these tokens is like telling them to stop eating their favorite food but look at all the meme projects today, I pity some people that pour their live savings into this HYIP investment because they are nothing but ponzi investments.

Decentralized exchange doesn't hold coins, when you interact with dex it's more likely you have the private key to that coin, they don't hold and will never hold a coin for you. The responsibility and what you do it with are in the owners hand. For the decentralized ones that works on protocol, your coins will stay right in your wallet, they only need your permission to connect the wallet with the exchange to interact with it.

Centralized exchanges doesn't give you custody of your coins, they have everything right under their palm and they can do whatever they want to do. But I understand OP reason for giving some credits to centralized exchanges. Centralized exchanges have more listed coins than decentralized ones because it's easy to implement tokens and coins on them than dex. To do that on dex, you will have to bridge multiple blockchains before you can trade which is a tedious work to do. However, the risk in involved in bridging is highly risky as well also.


If they try that, they will not only be losing customers, their token will crash heavily because even when a team do have a say in a protocol, the community is the biggest contributors to the exchange. The highest they can do is to flag some IP address that will be coming to the exchange but they will not try to implement kyc.

Mortgage is for people has a functioning government and job to pay back. In my country, we don't leave in houses in that system, rather we live in a conducive house you can pay rent for and the price depends on the development of the area. Reason why we don't do mortgage here is because the interest rate and inflation will kill you while you are still alive paying for the house you plan to pay on installment for the rest of your life when the minimum wage is very little to survive. I believe this applies to some other countries as well.

Real estate is not a small business to even begin with, but you are right about buying crypto instead of Real estate. However, it also depends on where you live, there are places that since there developing stage have not for once experience war or conflicts and are doing well today in that real estate you are running from but I agreed that it's not a wise decision to that in war zones.

In addition, I hope you also know that cryptocurrency is also a risky investment, you have to be vigilant of the type of coin you buy, when to buy and where to keep them. More precisely, buy bitcoin because all other coins depends on its growth and it is circulated by institutional investors that want to see it grow in value because they also hold bitcoin.

In as much as I think Artificial intelligence is growing rapidly over the internet, I still think it will remain within the reach of internet. AI only has the knowledge of what is been programmed into his system, AI can't do without human as well. What I think AI is going to do for human is to help reduce efforts and time spent in doing or carrying out works that we do.

If a doctor spent 13 hours a day for research, AI will help him in doing research to reduce that time to 6 - 7 hours of time to do his research, but as I said AI cannot exist on their own, they need the help of intelligent men to built this, without them understanding the nature of human, it cannot be established or program into this machine that can help humans.

However, I'm concerned about how lazy people will become if they depend on this AI of a thing. People now use AI to write articles, do research and also assignment and this is going to a challenge because it will make student become too lazy to do things on their own. Imagine having a graduate who use AI to write an article throughout his entire time in school can't write it by himself after graduation. Who is going to impact real knowledge to the younger generations. Real Education will die with the revolution of AI.

We learn in our own stories, either one way or the other but if you think that people left you because you have nothing again, then that should be in the past, growing back shouldn't be an achievement to show them that you made it back but a fulfillments that you think having money could put things together but human being will disappoint you at anytime, make back the money that makes you happy but never to make same mistake by using money to impress people, another set will come around and when you encounter another mistake again, they will leave you when you need them the most, foundation of love and friendship should never have anything to do with money.

If I have millions today in excess, the first people that I will impress is my family because blood is thicker than anything else, even if after investing or spent all my money on my family and we had a misunderstanding, we will surely come back together sometimes because that's what family is all about. Your parents, siblings will look out after you in difficult situations but some friends and foes will abandoned you in a tight spot.

The only place you can secure your crypto money is your personal wallet, thinking that an exchange will bail you out if something happens in the future is another mistake that will cost you losing everything to an exchange. If you have coins on exchanges, it's better you take them out because that is not how self custody work, you can wake up one day and find out you have nothing under you anymore because you don't have the private keys and when you have no keys, you don't control such assets and if they chose not to pay back, you can't do nothing but to beg to have access to your one crypto.

You remember what happen to FTX, how the exchange went from being one the most to been one with nothing because the team were disorganized, some stole assets through back door that till today, nothing has been recovered from them, and crypto doesn't have any insurance that cover this company.

If you are insurance company, you will not accept to run insurance for any crypto companies because that's one of the biggest and riskiest investment any company will want to insurance. Even if they received money for insurance, the day it might want to collapsed, you will need more to settle this company. Some may even played dirty just to have money from insurance company, nothing safe about insurance here.

Whichever trend you follow, there is a profit but timing is essential. When market is bullish, is very easy to follow, buy and hold until you see that you have had enough profit already but when they get enough satisfaction, many of them don't even know when to stop, they get caught on the emotional agitation of the market that a coin is making another new time high which they should have exited in the first place. Short traders use this opportunity to counter trade the trend and when small mistake happens, the free fall began and you know what? The profit of short traders is always bigger than the long traders because it is difficult for the market to go up than for it to go down. It's possible for the market to shed blood bath of -50% than for it to make 50% upward and will remain there.

However, whether pro trend or the opposite, we need the two of them to balance the market especially in the futures. You can't long a market is the short order book traders are empty, they have to be a balance between two traders who think in opposite trend to decide the trend of the market. But if we all think in the same direction, it will make bitcoin to grow more but practically, that's impossible.

Casemiro has missed matches several times, 3 in a row when he got red cards on two d occasion and Manx United did fine, they did well. If I remember correctly, that was when they were moving up and down between 3rd and 4th place and despite the speculations and oppression, they did fine in the outcome of those matches Casemiro was absent but his effort in their midfield is undeniable.

Fulham should not be a problem for Manchester United and I don't think that guy is getting sacked even if he lose that match. The worst case have not happened yet and I believe he is not going to stay back and watch Manchester United reach that level unless he doesn't want to remain in Manchester United. Fulham so far this season has done well playing against 3 teams that came from Championship to Premier League this season but the rest of the matches are not encouraging and I have assurance that Manchester United will used them uplift their place in the standing.



Forget about style of play in this situation. Sometimes, even the manager are helpless with the position of the club because you can't do much even with the best squad. That's life and we should understand that Managers are doing great work to display the progress of the team to the owners but it doesn't just work the way they want it to be. There is a loser and a winner and each managers come for the latter when they meet in battle but only one person will make it.

You do know that there are some people that enjoy gambling, just maybe for the fun of it. You know what we enjoy individually is different, what you think is boring might be lively to another, what you think is negative might  be positive to another person, fun is subjective to individuals. I think physical base casino can't even be term as a lonely place, people go there to hangout with and play with their machines games.

My advice is that if someone is lonely, I will advise you not to engage in gambling because even if it is a fun thing to do, it's better you do another thing that will give you joy than gamble, it will become a norm and then when norm become a permanent thing in your life, I don't think anyone will ever want to be on phone gambling all days of their life because it's going to affect you Mr activities and people around you, might even cost you a relationship with other people around you.

In as much as I think there is more to privacy when you gamble with crypto, I don't think there is much privacy people have in gambling with crypto because what is the use of crypto and then you were asked to do KYC, is there any privacy left in that to be protected? I don't think so except for the casinos that doesn't request for KYC but we have just few of them that have good games.

Another  logicalreason I think people gamble with crypto is because they want to avoid taxes. When a regular based gambler played with fiats, they deposit and withdraws through fiats and in some countries, you pay taxes from this games that you win but with crypto especially when you are not ready to convert to fiat, they keep their profit in crypto.

The last but not the least, some people don't like to leave their money in fiat because they don't appreciate, they rather lose value due to inflation but with bitcoin for example, you can keep compiling more bitcoin in profit and when the market moves, they gain more instead of fiat that will remain domant without appreciating in value.

I wouldn't mind taking online courses about gambling challenges, gambling addiction, gambling philosophy and psychology but taking a course about strategies to win, that's a red flag for me. No way I'm going to do that unless I see someone that is willingly to teach me new bet strategy which I know have winning history and not some random teacher that want me to buy a course because I want to master gambling.

Instead of this, why not go to YouTube and search for what you want to learn, atleast those channels will not ask you to do paid courses. They will teach you base on their experience and how they understand it, they will not share you what you don't like because even in the comments section, you will know if you are in the right place to learn or just wasting time and there are more and more of channels to learn more from. I don't vibe all these classes.

I saw this when it was trending on Twitter the other days, some were supporting the guy who copied the code to play the game and some where supporting the real owner of the code that share it to the public. So many argument here there and I came to a conclusion that sometimes, you need to be private and it's not everything you bring to the public but I understand his feelings, using a token to bet and then turn out a jarkpot is a crazy experience.

We need to understand something about been a punter(bettors with large gambling base), because they share code of games doesn't mean they are entitled to what anyone win or lose. If people win from your games, it means you are very good predictive games and more followers will follow you and with more fans, you can use them for marketing and adverts.

The guy in particular was very wrong to criticize him for giving him small amount. What does he have to say about codes he shared in the past that were very bad, didn't win anything and they loss everything? Before some of them win bets, it takes 29 days of 30 days to lose all the bets in this days and will win just one out of the 30 days. Now why not pay for the losses of the followers he has been sharing code bets to, that's bad of him to expect something from his followers, this is greed I must say.

I don't blame people that are overreacting to the club performance. Look at the situation of the club, if you are also the fans, you will be mad. Conceded 3 goals to Manchester City and then lose another to Newcastle with the same 3 goals conceded. The club isn't in good shape even when they won good place among the top 4 that proceeded to the Champions League, even in the Champions League, they are not doing good.

I dont know how Manchester United are going to go out of this position but isn't Erik Ten Hag is gradually turning to Pochettino, not too much differences, they make you happy today and the next day, they have started again the usual poor performance and that's why even as sometimes their performance is fair, I don't watch their match because I'm not even a fan but they break heart every weekends which is bad.

There is no defensible reason why you are discrediting Manchester United, in their next matches each team still have equal fairness of match awaiting to be played. That means each team have another work to do to qualify in this match because even Bayern don't know what will happen to them after the home matches they have played. Manchester United might surprised you when next they play Copenhagen as this one of the weak team among them, if they win this one and win one between Bayern Munich and Galatasaray, no doubt Manchester United will make it to that stage.


Bayern and Galatasaray doesn't have much much record in the past, most likely none but the recent match they just played was awesome. Galatasaray display maturity but their dominant cam around the end of the match which was already late to make good use of the chances but I think the reason why the game change was because Bayern already had their way into their net and since it was Galatasaray home game, I expect them to react that way to try to cover for shame that will happen after the match, they should have done so in the beginning of the match and not towards the ending.

If I'm the president, I will not he happy about this gambling consumption numbers. This is bad for a country that says they have a functioning government. This manifest government laziness and improper provision of youths. If you check the number of people that are betting everyday on sportybet, 1Xbet, Msport, and many other sport bookies, you will understand that almost all the youths indulge into gambling that was designed for entertainment has now turn to a place to look for money.

I like how they expose this gambling platforms that has been milking the states, they might not be doing it indirectly but they don't pay their taxes, always give wrong reasons why they don't have customers but actually, they do because even if people don't bet everyday, Saturday and Sundays are fix matches and Tuesday for Premier League, Champions League and other European leagues are all play in these days and sure money comes into their platforms but find excuses to avoid taxes.

Nigerians love gambling though, 65m engage in gambling is something to be checked. Imagine a new gambling companies seeing this stats, it will invite them to come get there own share of $900M people waste on gambling everyday. The government need to do something about these numbers.

I don't get how some gamblers have so much confidence to stake huge amount of money on a single game. The risk is high and to make the ticket worse, he bet on a game that is highly competitive, match like Elclasico is not something I will want to put huge amount of money on, the odds might he tempting as he was given a straight win of Real Madrid over Barcelona but when the match began, it was Barcelona that open the match with a goal, I wonder how tense he will be during that match.

Risk to ratio should always be far >>> than the amount you are trying to stake in match. Like staking 100k in any amount to get 270k is too risky for me but I can stake low amount on such type of single games because even anything should later happen to my prediction, I will not feel any pain of losing money. If I even go high in this kind of situation, then I will know that I have exceeded my limit of gambling, not longer for fun but waste of my resources.

Should I say you fund it effortlessly without thinking twice and that's because you enjoy gambling as an entertainment and fun. If you really are skeptical of how much you spend into betting, I believe you will have a second thought before making that decision because you will even think of what will happen if you lose the money you deposited into the gambling platform.

Did you have thought of making this post if you win a substantial amount from your two deposit? I think its a norm for gamblers to bet when they have free money to let go. I believe the 10 dollar deposits you made twice where money you can let's go else you will not make that 2 deposits. I believe even now that I'm replying your post, you might have done another deposit just to play one or two games in hope to get some profits, that's gambling for you.

Relax and enjoy gambling if you have the fund and if you think you are over doing it, take a rest or maybe you change your strategy of playing. There is loss but you should have days of joy that give you good return from your plays.

Real Madrid knows assets and they knows players that is going to play a key role in the team. Even the players that are signed knows for sure that Real Madrid is a dream club with plenty of potential, more reason why even players that come on loan wish to be permanent residence of the club. Kepa for instance was loaned from Chelsea after Courtois sustained injury and barely just 2 weeks into the club, he already giving good testimonies and want to stay after the loan, can u imagine that. 

Real Madrid historically has lot of Champions League and it's a dream of every player to have one in their gallery, even Mbaperl carrier is not completed without having that trophy. Even Haaland has that already on the first year of his stay in Manchester City and that's the reason Mbape want to leave PSG and focus on a club like Real Madrid that has 13 Champions League and will win many more in the future, more likely now as Bellingham has fixed Benzema absent from the team.

You must be a business tycoon who enjoy time with gambling. You might be the first gambler that had gambling as fun without feeling remorseful of the loss because that amount you just lost in a session is a huge amount. If some gamblers can make what you lost in to stake gambling platform, they will appreciate.

Loss is inevitable, as people win the gambling platforms will also profited from losses as well to balance the equilibrium state of break-even point, if that don't happen, I believe most of this casinos and bookies will cease to exist. However, you should have stake lower amount with little games. Losing such amount of money in a week is wasting resources in my opinion though but what do I know, I don't have the money but I'm making corrections.

No way I'm going to have this big loss, I have had my share of losses but even within my range of money I use for betting, the losses are not more than my profit, there are times I get losses but even with that when I do average loss, it doesn't go above the profit I have made over the seasons.

In as much as I feel for Chelsea, I don't want to believe he didn't have much players in the transfer period. They had more than 10 outgoing players and the same time had good inflow of players as well, you can read on this article to see for yourself. Now, with this resources what does he need again to win a trophy for Chelsea? His excuse are the old players weren't signed by him and I'm like what of other managers that are killing shows with their own teams, Pochettino need to do better.

Pertaining to nkuku with injury, he can't say that boy is his only hope to had goals. If he keep using that to justify his failure, then I will say he doesn't know ball, he was there to his position not by performance but either by bribe, or by trickery.


Last season, Newcastle and Manchester United met twice and the two teams displayed commitment in their home matches. The first leg when Manchester United host Newcastle in Old Trafford, the red devils did a clean sheet and won Newcastle and when it was Newcastle turn to host Manchester City, they did made clean sheet as well. The two teams are strong but this season, I'm not sure about that because the last time they challenge eachother, the two teams were sitting on top 4 but now, Newcastle is fair but Manchester United is worse and I think Manchester United might lose.