Im scared that its moving up this quick...should I be?
No. This is the slowest it's moved for Bitcoin. Volatility has been quite low recently. |
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly, minus the "holy". My thoughts, minus the "fuck". |
|
|
|
 Come on, let's pick up the pace. How about we go for at least 50 images a day? |
|
|
|
So what do you think, are we seeing a rally or just a limited supply while people wait for December?  Also with December coming are we headed for the perfect storm of stuff like: 1. BFL ASIC in October (well maybe in october) 2. Elections in November 3. bitcoins halfing in December'ish 4. Europe funding problems 5. China slowing Could we see insane numbers and them boom a flood of coins? December brings Christmas, and people selling coins. This statement was made up completely and doesn't have any evidence at all. Don't blame me for blatant speculation! |
|
|
|
I'm going to be the wet blanket and say that perhaps we might suffer a small correction in the low double digits  I'm fully expecting a correction to the high single digits. But as the saying goes, "fall down once, stand up twice". |
|
|
|
Sorry to those who bet that we'd be above $10 by the end of July... you were off by one day.  $10 was really a psychological barrier. This really made my day! |
|
|
|
2100: 1/10000 of the way (0.01%)  Every 2100 images we count brings us 1/10000 closer.
|
|
|
|
|
This post corrects an out-of-sync. The next post should describe the number 2095 in images.
|
|
|
|
|
I will buy more BTC. Why not?
|
|
|
|
I'll give you .00000001 BTC for all the ShitCash you have.
Actually no, I won't. I'll have to wait until bitcoin becomes more divisible into smaller units. Sorry.
I'll one up you. 0.00000002 BTC for at least 5000 ShitCash. |
|
|
|
|
Done. 54 days until we hear the results...
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't this drastically increase board size increase? A huge board is not optimal.
|
|
|
|
Your info is not correct. 1.7 million USD is not millions.
This is simply splittin' hairs And "Get your coins off BTC-e NOW" doesn't sound good at all.
Any sane person would. Great example to other exchanges!
You must be referring to the recent partnership between BTC-e, Coblee and BCEX, right? They all knew ahead of time the 51% attack was a hoax. Mike Splitting hairs or not. Don't make things bigger than they are. It has got nothing to with insanity. To many people, including me, BTC-e is one of the best sites with great volumes and alt-currencies. Its been very profitable. And I am willing to take the risk with many others. I'm referring to sites like Bitcoinica. They all knew? So what? I know things too, that does't mean I'm going to sing like a bird. Did your mother not tell you that speech is silver, silence is gold? Coblee was not sure what to think of that. Created a checkpoint. And Dear Forum Members,
I have nothing to do with Litecoin.
It's confusing to some users when I post something and it might look like I am the official Litecoin spokesperson.
Thats not true, I'm just another investor.Good luck proving that you are not coblee's sockpuppet. I believe you, but clearly many members of this forum won't. |
|
|
|
It seems more like a Man-in-the-Middle attack, there would have been sniffing involved in uncovering the secret keys. It is also possible that a simple XSS "Cross-Site-Scripting" vulnerability been involved in revealing the secrets "it could be the account number field  ". Except this API key shouldn't be doing anything that would be overly vulnerable to XSS. MiM is possible, but if LR isn't using HTTPS, or they were not verifying the certificate chain (entirely possible) then someone is an idiot. I often hear man-in-the-middle attacks mentioned, but how do they work exactly? I mean, I know the attacker is able to position himself between the target and whatever server the target is trying to reach, but how on earth does he do this? By poisoning the DNS cache of the target? Or through some other means? I mean, I find it pretty hard to understand how I can connect to a site, and someone can somehow inject himself into the path between me and the site. However the above scenario is HIGHLY unlikely, to the point I have a better chance of answering my door to find mila kunis there ready to be my sex slave AND my wife being ok with it. What if Mila Kunis is your wife? |
|
|
|
Mois j'aime manger des frites....  Et j'aime manger des poissons Je pense qu'il devrait être: Et j'aime manger les poissons. Parce que après "aime", on utilise l'article defini. |
|
|
|
I want about $100k/year. This works out to about 10,000btc/year. Pirate pays 6.5% per week compounded weekly, so I just need 10000/(1.065)^52 or about 379 bitcoins to retire.
You can't assume his current rates will last forever. (several months ago) Bitscalper pays 5% per day compounded daily, so I just need 10000/(1.05)^365 or about 0.0002 BTC to retire. Maybe if I get 0.0005 BTC from dailybitcoins I will be rich! |
|
|
|
I've been wondering the same thing. Chart time:  (I apologize for the bad quality; these charts are screenshots and the Linux charting programs just can't compete with the Windows ones I used.) |
|
|
|
Not yet.
Translation: "I want to buy bitcoins at < $10 for the next year" Not really. Not counting my house, most of my net worth is in BTC already.Sure, it would be nice, but we're not there yet. More power to you! I'm hoping for the best also, but my crystal ball isn't clear enough to justify more than 5% networth in BTC at this time. Anything past that and I wouldn't be sleeping well at night. A significant amount of my net worth is in BTC. I think this is healthy as long as I can liquidate it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
