|
Current Status (including past) on Craptsy
- They created non-standard transactions (bigger than 100KB)
- I mined their transactions for free, for quite some time.
- They have stolen ~0.9 BTC in the meantime from me in a "waiting game".
- They fail to broadcast transcations, offered them to mine those transactions, if they send me the raw transaction.
- Craptsy (or anyone else) never gave me with a raw transaction to mine.
Hence im now done with craptsy. No more mining of their non-standard transaction.
Tickets on issues are just closed, blatantly ignored or im told "its in process/your on a list", tough there's nothing that needs weeks of work (its just a missing withdrawal).
Unless this gets resolved, i wont help craptsy nor anyone who uses it again (including myself of course).
|
|
|
|
If you have polled upstream and the recommended value for queue is 1, why use 0.
its a fix for a problem years ago. everyone who still uses/recommends it dosnt know anything about what hes doing  i revoke my statement above. seems there is still crappy HW out that needs this setting. I'm using S3s. I may experiment with other queue settings to see if there's a noticeable change / difference. mainly devices with really poor CPU power struggle with the queue (under 100% load), thats why disabling it decreases stales. |
|
|
|
If you have polled upstream and the recommended value for queue is 1, why use 0.
its a fix for a problem years ago. everyone who still uses/recommends it dosnt know anything about what hes doing i revoke my statement above. seems there is still crappy HW out that needs this setting. |
|
|
|
i wonder if "those trolls" just try to accumulate tons of cheap ANC, then vanish and wait for a price rise... toomany trolls are just well, being stupid and trolls without any reason/good arguments.
Its probably one or two trolls registering new usernames. Several usernames post same kind of brain-dead "funny" photos accompanied by "words of wisdom". yes. it's getting way too obvious. |
|
|
|
|
i wonder if "those trolls" just try to accumulate tons of cheap ANC, then vanish and wait for a price rise... toomany trolls are just well, being stupid and trolls without any reason/good arguments.
|
|
|
|
If you have polled upstream and the recommended value for queue is 1, why use 0.
its a fix for a problem years ago. everyone who still uses/recommends it dosnt know anything about what hes doing |
|
|
|
2) Non standard transactions being propagated by Cryptsy. These transaction are more 100kb in size. By default anoncoin clients do not send out transaction of these size and standard miners do not accept them. Cryptsy has refused to acknowledge that they are doing anything wrong. And then what? Coins will stay in then middle of nowhere forever? Cryptsy said The transaction does not need to be resent as it is a valid transaction. but you told non standard transaction. I thing you should patch anoncoin client asap because when this "non standard transaction" has valid txID and in that case it's a valid and should be send and confirmed. nope, see my post above. its not about having a "valid" txID nor anything like this. the problems lies in creating too big transactions. seems they managed to even lower the fee more which resulted in failure of tx broadcast (there is a limit). How can you be sure about too long transactions? They still refuse all requests to post a raw transaction from his mempool. The only thing we know is "Cryptsy do not broadcast some kind of transactions" The right way IMHO: - Cryptsy post a stuck raw transaction and all we will see what is going on. - Update your client to broadcast any transaction without limit, or reasonable one. If his API really use sendtoaddress the problem with too big transactions is your I mean in anc node soft the mintxfee is designed to disallow spam txs, otherwise every node would have to process those and store it in their mempool, ie a simple DoS vector this is not anc specific, its in any coin forked from bitcoin (unless its a really old codebase). if you have a stuck TX, send me the output of getrawtransaction and i'l put it into my node(s), as im a main I2P/TOR/clearnet gateway/node, the tx will be broadcasted successfully and everyone can mine it, unless its violating mintxfee rules and then i can only mine it myself. |
|
|
|
Craptsy is now refusing to do anything to get their stuck TX's resolved: <yoyo> K1773R: craptsy responded upon the request to give raw transaction to me (they had closed ticket) by their usual rambling about fixing this issue with anoncoin devs
<yoyo> damn its worse than before they dont even broadcast nor are willing to give raw transaction now
<K1773R> yoyo: you see! they refuse to do anything
They refuse to give me/us the transactions and refuse (no idea if its with intent) to broadcast the TX. Therefore, all TX created by craptsy for ANC cannot be mined unless they change this again. We had enough problems with Craptsy, this shows just another case of them refusing to follow the protocol or care about its customers. Please stay away for your own sake. |
|
|
|
lol who said ZC will be emplement into Anoncoin - nonsense and scam...
The developers of ZC clearly wrote that their goal was Bitcoin but Bitcoin foundation rejected ZC's team offer.
btw ZC team is a group of scientist who work for the grants to find out something new and testing ZK protocol.
there is no connection between ZeroCash and AnonCoin except SCAM.
You, Sir, are a complete moron! We refer ZC to ZeroCoin, not ZeroCash. Read the wiki, understand it or go elsewhere. |
|
|
|
all of my withdrawals are confirmed and show a txID but none can be found in the blockchain / explorer.
same issue here dont use craptsy, no problem its not like we showed they dont care about running a proper setup. now they fail to broadcast txs, part of it is your own fault. i have posted enough about this issue. |
|
|
|
when you try to withdraw from cryptsy it says something about negative balance.. so totally fucked up, this coin can't be moved anywhere.
nope, its the sole fault of the modified *coind's/settings i was not able to create so big txs with our current codebase. |
|
|
|
Some of our user give us a feedback that their deposit is not credited. Our engineer check those deposit and find there are no record on block chain. So if there are deposit issue, please check block chain first. Please note: Our ANC withdrawal works well. We have also made Proof of Reserve. Total amount of ALL Users:115949.9262 Address of the Cold Storage:AQ4X6FMaSwX4ARenfK1mCTNAfa46TUnCR5 You must login to our website to check above information. BTC38 team Thanks! Im happy seeing a exchange which proper *coind configs/source. |
|
|
|
2) Non standard transactions being propagated by Cryptsy. These transaction are more 100kb in size. By default anoncoin clients do not send out transaction of these size and standard miners do not accept them. Cryptsy has refused to acknowledge that they are doing anything wrong. And then what? Coins will stay in then middle of nowhere forever? Cryptsy said The transaction does not need to be resent as it is a valid transaction. but you told non standard transaction. I thing you should patch anoncoin client asap because when this "non standard transaction" has valid txID and in that case it's a valid and should be send and confirmed. nope, see my post above. its not about having a "valid" txID nor anything like this. the problems lies in creating too big transactions. seems they managed to even lower the fee more which resulted in failure of tx broadcast (there is a limit). |
|
|
|
Please fix the transaction issue. This is most important issue than zerocrash.
Why ANC always stuck while other coin is not.
That is very upset.
Cryptsy now dosnt even broadcast transactions, therefore they cannot be mined! I think they did bad things when they made too big txs, this now is just hilarious. |
|
|
|
My last post on bitcointalk.
I yearned for ANC since 2013, I tried to advertise it, I put in a few ideas and a little bit of work, not too much.
I told people how great it will and would be, I made them think it was on testnet on the 15th, I changed their way of thinking and some of the people bought, cuz they liked the idea.
Now I stand a fool - Just as I stood like a fool with Zetacoin.
It won't happen to me again, because this incident made me lose all trust in people on the internet. Even the people who supposedly did work on something and seemed legit even at second sight.
I won't come back to crypto anymore - I lost so much... and I gained too little, and I don't mean that moneywise.
Goodbye.
This. I totally agree. I've finally come to the conclusion - this whole scene - including BTC - is a scam. play or be played. sorry brother. the whole scene isn't a scam. Yes there are bad and scam coins but there are legit projects going on. You just have to weed out the bad ones. Yes there will be some losses along the way but everyone has dealt with loses here. You only lose if you give up. ANC and zerocash aren't the only ZK implementation coins. At the very least look around a bit before making a decision to leave crypto. In the grand scheme of things the crypto community is small, we can't afford to lose members. Please show me another project working on ZC implementation. |
|
|
|
Man, the gobitgo guide for JohnTheRipper installation turned out to be much more work and hazzle than I thought. It stops at point 5.6 "nano Makefile" where what comes up is nowhere near the picture in the guide. So no closer to opening my wallet. Walletrecoveryservices is building in temptation, but 1000 anc is a very stiff price  What is your problem? Send me a PM if its privat. |
|
|
|
My point of view.
- I believe the Dev Team HAS TO do something about the issues in cryptsy and bittrex, no matter what you think of them or bitching about who is coming to who with this issue, it can't be to have a coin and exchanges which are having major trouble and creating false txs since weeks!!! OBVIOUSLY nobody has a real solution nor really want to help them figuring it out at all - Everything I see is "It's this and that, do it or don't, u are a crappy exchange anyways" - It's not the way to behave.
With not doing so you are willing to sacrifice the stashes of many people around here and of many who want to buy into Anoncoin, so yeah ...
- Zerocoin: Well, another week, I'm very familiar with delays and every delay turned out to be a total disaster in my world- I tend to think it's different with Anoncoin but we will see.
- Anoncoin MM, Patch etc: We were informed about a coming HardFork, curiously awaited.
You know, with K1 who was (WAS) able to easily mine the false txs but now is not able to do so quickly anymore - it's damn important that the developers act fast.
I would not recommend anybody to buy ANC as of right now, I'm excited for Zerocoin, but the blockchain is a destaster.
That's my view.
We are working on it. |
|
|
|
I just want my fucking coins because dumps are happening and I dont have access to my funds. Im getting furious.
Calm down bro, don't panic. While some listen to FUD and dump, others are buying more ANC for cheap. I highly doubt prices will be this low in another week once Zerocoin beta has started. You will get your coins back. I don't see why there is a rush. Why would you want to sell at these prices anyway? If you are nice, I know of someone (K1773R) who I am sure would be happy to help mine the stuck transaction for you.... See this message: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg8870717#msg8870717meeh can you give us the status of the AuxPow fork? I assume you are working on it so that Gnosis can keep focusing on Zerocoin. Thanks! I already have picked up some stuck txs. But as the relation of network hash vs me has gotten bigger, i only rarely (magnitude of days/weeks) find a block. Tough, if you have some miners and want to help get your stuck tx mined, i can give you my pool address |
|
|
|
Just to confirm, which wallet should we be using now??
If you wanted to use mine, then dont. I did shutdown my DNS seed. Use the official one. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
