None. There is a condition, your faucets are not available. But there is no requirement to get your account unblocked.

Let's look at the definition:
"Extortion (also called shakedown, and, in a legal sense incorrectly, exaction) is obtaining benefit through coercion." (Source: Wikipedia)
"Coercion (/koʊˈɜːrʒən, -ʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to act in an involuntary manner by use of threats or force." (Source: Wikipedia)

You are being offered the option to have your account without the faucets or leave it be blocked, thus there is no involuntary act, since you can decide on your own.
There also is no threat against you, nor is there any force being applied to you. Nobody forces you to deposit and gamble. Nobody forces you to open the site and log into your account.
All you are doing is out of your own decision. You're being offered an option, not extorted.


That's a lie. Your account has already been unblocked. With the disabled faucets, as announced.

I don't have to pretend anything. I'm a pretty straight shooter, anybody who knows me can confirm that.
I tell things how they are, I tell things how I see them. I get knocked for my behavior a lot due to me not pretending anything.

That's not how things work, is it? Laws change, rules change. You're not exempt from new rules simply because you are old.
Insisting on being allowed to continue your faucet abuse is laughable.

So, let me get this right, you are against an image of yours being posted here, because that's copyrighted by you, but you have no issue with copying and sharing the intellectual property of others.
Seems like you are applying sort of a double standard.

You were making death threats in this thread. I am responding to the death threats you make in this thread.
If you do not want to have death threats be a topic in here, you should not have started making them right here.

Death threats should not be accepted regardless of who voices them and regardless of against whom they are made.
No, nobody should be allowed to make death threats against you, but simply because you have been wronged in that way does not give you the right to respond in the very same way.
Eye for an eye is a barbaric, outdated sense of justice. Someone supposedly fighting for Human Rights should have a moral standard that is several levels above that.

Get a dictionary, look up the definition of extortion. Offering you the option to unblock your account without the faucet is not extortion (note how you can make the decision there),
its a way for you to get back your account you loved so much, the one that was in such good standing. Unless all you said so far was just one big lie, of course.
Then I can see how you wouldn't want that and insist on getting the faucets.

Also, it's nothing exclusive to you, if you read just one of the posts in this thread, I know reading is not your favorite thing, but you really should start doing it.
It's connected to a new approach towards faucet farming.

---

It was linked ten times to you, let me make that 11:
https://blog.crypto-games.net/2019/08/faucet-usage-and-faucet-abuse-in-depth.html

Part of the ToS for ages is this rule:
"8.3. Continuous withdrawing of earnings from faucet is forbidden and leads to your account being blocked."

Nothing fascist in Switzerland indeed.

You act like you are entitled to the faucets, like you deserve them, have a right to get them.
The faucets are a gift from the site, removing them, altering them, decreasing them, all of those are well in the right of the site.
It doesn't matter when the rule decision was made, you'll have to follow them one way or another.

Also, for pete's sake, work on your manners. Calling something stupid instead of actually addressing it and making any kind of point isn't going to lead you anywhere.
You can call the anti-abuse rules stupid all you like. That's not gonna lead to you being allowed to resume your abuse.

But you claim everyone is getting blocked without reason anyway. So they would have nothing to be afraid of, if they are already blocked.
Your logic does not compute, either of those statements has to be wrong, if not indeed both.

What exactly does that proof again? Nothing, I know, but do elaborate on your thinking, what do you think you've shown with that?

One sided? You get to respond, don't you.
You could use your responses to prove them wrong, instead of cursing and insulting.

Teaming up with GP, that speaks volumes.
I'm actually surprised there is a second person who could rise to that level.
Didn't think we'd find one that quickly, if ever.

---

That is what a forum is made for.
If you were searching for something else, you might be on the wrong website.

Ever wondered why nobody is speaking up to agree with you? Does that not give you reason to pause and consider your position?
You're literally the only one with this stance. If what you say was even remotely true, shouldn't there be dozens of people to support your claims?

All of your posts are in our thread, I'll take that as a compliment. You really have to like CG to keep this engaged.
Also, thanks for bumping the thread again and again to make sure new players find their way to the site.

You're the one who has been playing fast and loose with the truth.
You're the one who has shown themselves to have lied in this thread.

Both those vouchers worked. Someone claimed them before you, vouchers are only valid once, for the first user to claim them.

If you didn't get one in the mail, here's your chance to grab one:

CPNJ-*GO-XR8I-*3GV-V0NK (* is a number from 0 to 9)
O6N-8PGQ-SS6H-**ZM-2U2O (* is a number from 0 to 9)
3YJS-FMU-P0A-8YV*-I4D* (* is a number from 0 to 9)

You're opted into the newsletter, that is independent from having an active account on CryptoGames.
What you have to do is scroll down to the end of it, click unsubscribe and remove your email from the list.
As easy as that. It's not spam, you had to opt-in to receive it. As soon as you opt-out, you will not receive any more newsletter updates.

You're the one trying to run a site and wanting people to trust you with their money.
I'm expecting you to act appropriately to that fact, regardless of how everyone else acts.

No, they are criticizing you based on your behaviour on here, and honestly, there is enough going on to criticize.
This very response of yours being one of those things.

You forgot to actually lock the thread, simply writing it doesn't do that.

---

I think you're making a wrong statement about the situation there.
The tag doesn't give any ammunition, you are being called out over something you did in the past, your actions, not my rating.
Yes, the rating makes your past actions easier to find, but that's the point of a trust rating, after all.
Nothing in those discussions is about the neutral rating left to your account, the discussions are about what you did in the past in regard to claiming other people's work in your portfolio.

Further it references the thread in which the situation was laid out and discussed.
Everyone who sees it can read that thread and make up their own mind.

Holy shit, there is so much wrong with that rather short message. I guess we've entered the phase where you realize you are f*cked and go badshit crazy.
Let us digest:

1) What people do at other sites is none of your concern. It holds no weight in this thread, it holds no weight on your site. It simply does not matter for our little discussion.
2) Gambling big amounts does not equal problem gambling. Just because someone gambles a huge amount, they are not addicted. Similar, people that gamble smaller amounts still might have gambling issues.
3) Gambling addiction is a problem, and you as operator of a site should be supportive of those affected. Try getting them help, instead of publicly shaming them. Because that's disgusting.
4) Even if the user in question was a problem gambler, that does not give you the right to steal from them. The logical conclusion of "you're addicted thus I keep your funds" is ridiculous. There is no proper reason for theft.
5) Last I checked, gambling addiction was not illegal. Theft however is. If anybody goes to jail in this little scenario of ours, I'd say it's the thief, not the gambler.

---

Apparently not well enough.

That address supposedly belongs to ladygaga2000. The only way the OP (sending side) could sign from the receiving address is if they are, as alleged, indeed also ladygaga2000.