It does, the bolded part does.
The investors share profit from the house edge games (key words being profit here),
profit doesnt equal net loses of the players, as affiliate rewards and faucets have to be factored in,
which is both shown in the detailed investment calculations available to all investors.

---

Quote from the FAQ:

"We take 30% of the profit/losses that are made in a 1-hour interval. Also, when calculating profit/losses, faucets and referral rewards are factored in"

Quoting for reference.

Payments processed (3e8299efaed1b2d7219c50dbb7267ce552e1ed5114d9fc5fb578d3170620fa6f).

---

I'll announce new enrollments tomorrow, together with adjustments to the campaign period/schedule.

Payments for this round have been processed (1170513f883f06d529a502d2fa7c1743056ef9d2e96c2fbe78cbb00c0a698f43).

---

I'll announce new enrollments tomorrow, together with adjustments to the campaign period/schedule.

---

Yes, two week rounds reduce transaction fees, which is especially important for junior members and members who are getting smaller inputs from us.
Less payrounds means less inputs means less fees when moving the earnings from the campaign.

Update your signature/avatar.

Payments for the last round processed (e9dee60997e7b74fc6764d879b3d1d512454282450bb98485caefda64860c234).

We'll stick to bi-weekly payments, since I haven't heard anyone weighting in against it.

Numbers for this month are as following:

BTC investment: 0.192% increase.
ETH investment: 1.472% increase.
LTC investment: 1.623% increase.
XMR investment: 1.255% increase.
STRAT investment: 0.315% increase.
DOGE investment: 2.348% increase.
DASH investment: 2.304% increase.
PPC investment: 4.820% increase.
GRC investment: 2.212% increase.

Average return assuming same investment in all coins: 1.838% increase.

---

Annualized returns have been added.
The direct EV I don't want to do, but I did calculate rollovers for each bankrolls, which loosely correspond to your expected returns.

Both BTC and ETH have seen a pretty low rollover this month, with 46% and 66% (both of them have scaling problems, we're coming out of the CryptoKitties month after all).
However, both coins also have a huge bankroll compared to the other coins available at CG, so this might be a factor as well.
LTC, which shortly had fee problems as well, in comparison shows a decent rollover (120%).

They are.
The winning ticket number always links to the page for the draw.

---

What you're looking at is the draws in the 30 days before the "Bitcoin Lottery #129" draw, not a list of all draws made.

Once again, last 30 days.

Got API-y.
Check above.

While looking a bit deeper into this, I've stumbled upon something I just had to share.

Remember Donna, the pretty face on their "team"?
She's not on linked.in but luckily, everyone is on instagram these days, right?
Donna Khyuz - Crypto Developer, ICO & Blockchain Expert

Well, only her profile looked like this a few days ago:

You wouldnt be making posts just for your sig campaign, would you?
Nah, because that would be a bad thing to do, right?

Didn't bother much with it, the namejacking thing put me off to start with.
Then there is their team being combined off google and instagram.
Chances Ledger will support that should be somewhere between 0 and nothing.

It's a 2 week round and we're likely going to stick with that.
With current transaction fees, bi-weekly rounds provide considerable advantages for everyone.
They reduce transaction costs during payrounds, as well as once the payment is spent (less, but higher inputs -> smaller transaction sizes).

Hey all,
I've been taking a short break over the holidays, hope all those of you that celebrate them had a nice time.
We'll do a double round payment on Sunday.

As a few of you had already asked me to hold payments for several rounds, I'm also considering switching over to bi-weekly payments as standard.
Not only saves it txfees for the payrounds, it also saves txfees for you, as you'll have less/bigger inputs for your spending.

It's a fork if it carries over the chain and the first block of "B2X" is built on top of Bitcoin's block #501,451
(thus the hash pointer in the block header references that block).
A scan as an airdrop with a completely new chain would do it doesn't carry over blocks, it only carries over balances.
Forks and airdrop scans are different, "B2X" advertises itself as fork, thus I call it one.

It wasn't.
Different people using the same name in order to gain publicity for their project (which is different from the original project in several aspects) doesn't mean SegWit2x gets continued.
The people behind this "B2X" and the people originally working on SegWit2x are completely different, the parameters of both forks are as well.

The original announcement from Voorhees and others indicated the 2x fork simply being delayed, not called off.
However, since then, BTC1 code was found to be faulty (meaning a 2x fork couldn't have happened even if they planned to continue),
and Garzik abandoned the project to work on his ICO.
How much chance all that together means for 2x activating any time, I don't know.

We could still very much use a 2MB consensus mainchain hardfork.

What a bunch of great people, maybe next time they can hire actual developers,
instead of instagram models and pictures off google.

It's a fork, not a "scan".

Depends on LedgerWallet.

Standard procedure, this one isn't different from any others.

It's been integrated via the API.
http://api.crypto-games.net/v1/LottoTickets/username/ticker/#round
So for your tickets last round, you'd have to check
http://api.crypto-games.net/v1/LottoTickets/Dellwin435/btc/227

Interesting to see that both sites that held an ICO/created a token are down massively, compared to those sites that accept direct bankroll investments.

The new one, Betcoin JessiCassandra

Betcoin Jessica and Betcoin Paul are going on a couples trip.

Payments processed (62d907ee732d9ca6209633a14610cd88c20d95bb0e8c7a5adf18aa8f0668982a).

---

Set your things.

Payments processed (d8134b7320dcf617fa2d11da07d2efb7d6d2901f1432fdc5956cb5cbae831842).

---

Set your things.

Enrolled on probation, set your things.

We've been running a few 2 week rounds in the past, it's my go-to option whenever I dont receive an escrow refill in time.
Other options would include pausing the campaign, which is painful not only for me, but also for you guys.
Two week rounds allow us to keep the campaing going without interrupting, even though the escrow isnt refilled in time.

You've been with us for a very long time, and you've been paid every week so far, haven't you?
I'm surprised to see a post like that, especially from a user being part of this campaign for as long.

---

Seems there's been a slight miscommunication with lightlord over the escrow refills. I've received one for BitVest, and already informed him I'll need one for 777 as well.
Payments for the last two weeks are rolling out once that arrives.