So you're going to make the payments to participants soon? Then you can post the transaction IDs for those once you've made them, for my ease of mind, you know.

Same thing, right? There should be transactions you can provide to show us, instead of having to take your word for it.
If it is a legit project, how come the website is dead?

---

You haven't responded what you are going to do about Tonal Quantum and the bounty you have started for them.

Also, your reasoning how a "40-45% monthly ROI" on loans is sustainable in any possible way would be fun to read.

There is a one word answer for this question.

Hhampuz.

Did you consider to start doing something yourself and help with moderation by eg reporting the threads/posts you see as problematic to moderators?

I know this is slightly off topic here (would probably better fit into a dedicated thread), but since OP mentions the ICO and the bounty, it's worth having a look at what ughh123 does outside of Tonal Quantum.
Checking further back into the portfolio of ughh123, I've found at least two more problematic campaigns.


HDX seems to have vanished after their ICO closed in late May, with the Bounty being unpaid (supposedly due for payment on June 10).
ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3286687.0
ughh123 bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3390939.0


XPV ended in May as well, and has not been paid yet. The website for the ICO is down at this point, as are telegram/social media channels.
ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2848863.0
ughh123 bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3313079.0

OP says people are supposed to be paid on June 10th, doesn't seem like this happened.

Has this been paid yet? Watching to see if there is any payment being made.

11,728 right now, thanks for the mention

EDIT: 12k crossed.

Since this campaign has no escrow or any protection for participants whatsoever,
everyone considering to join this or already being a part of it should be aware of the following accusation:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4466973.0

Watching for the response of Arshe26 who manages a bounty campaign on behalf of XCOV.

Watching, mainly for the response of ughh123 to this and the resulting actions they take in regards to their already running bouties on behalf of Tonal Quantum.

---

The introduction text for Maria Filatova is taken from SmartStartupToken's Maria Kolitsida.

---

And the picture source for Scott Pierce is a russian photography site as well.

In that case, you would not have any problems explaining this, right?

Payments for the last four completed rounds have been processed (402464dc357aa17698f65d5fca73075bde7fbcd223e467052c3c38f315a830f1).

---

I did consider the change in post counts a few weeks ago and thus check posts based on dates, not based on starting post counts, so all your posts are acounted for.

---

Anyone not minding the (somewhat regular) delays and currently looking to join this campaign please write me a PM so I can review your application.
Thanks to everyone already part of this campaign for keeping their cool and staying calm despite the annoying long waits.

3 singles for me, payment following shortly.

Because middle-europe is in UTC+2 during summer due to daylight saving, you fool.

Before the announced end date?

https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/timezone/utc1

It's not even over yet.

Forum time is UTC, thus 22:30 at UTC+1 would bring us to 21:30 forum time

You're holding a public auction, people comment on the auction itself (thus it's not off topic), I don't see the issue here.

Unless you change the terms once again.

---

So, we started off with a reserve of 1.8BTC, which you reasoned in having a standing offer of 1.65BTC ^[1], an offer you have claimed to have refused (makes sense, if you expect to get 1.8BTC or more for it).
When being pointed out how far out of reality this expectation was, your rebuttal has been that you do not intend to sell the bar if your expectations are met ^[2], so far so good.
Now fast forward to today, and so far, you have first lowered the reserve below your 1.65BTC refused offer ^[3] (makes no sense to me), then removed it completely (also makes no sense given [2]), and resulting from that altered the auction terms by delaying the end point ^[4].

Your constant twitching, backing out or changing of terms is the only thing offending your auction, not the comments pointing out what you do.

---

[1]: [2] [3]: [4]:

0.008BTC

I've reached out to lightlord through absy (thanks for that) and last I've heard, the escrow is supposed to be refilled soon.
As soon as we have an escrow top off, we can roll out payments for the outsanding rounds.

I stick to full round payments as they are easier for accountability. I don't like doing half rounds or anything, as it can get complicated to understand quickly.
As others have pointed out already, I previously managed and paid this campaign and the bitvest campaign in sync,
as I see them as connected (they are sister campaigns of some sort, and when the bitvest campaign is filled for some ranks, I suggest users to join this one).

With the recent lack of escrow refills for the Bitvest campaign however, this has caused a stop for this campaign as well, even though there are still funds in escrow.
To avoid unnecessary delays (I know they are annoying for some of you guys) from this point onward, I'll no longer consider the status of the other campaign,
meaning delays and double/triple rounds will be only specific to one campaign (the one lacking funds).

Payments are going to be made this week and for all outstanding rounds, yes.
As there are a lot of posts and applications to go through, they will probably take a little longer.

Morning krogo

9 for me, please.