For this season, I think it will be right to actually focus more on bitcoin trading now because anyone that is trading altcoins at this time that the markets are bleeding so much is doing so at his or her own risk.  The best time to actually make much in trading is during bull run, and as we can see that only bitcoin is still the one that has been in its bull run since 3 months ago, and many people are beginning to pump their altcoins for bitcoin.

The only thing that is good about altcoins right now is just to buy them and hold since they are very cheap, this season will favor more of holders than traders, I mean holder can buy very low now and then wait for altcoins season for them to make so much money.

What if the judge is Satoshi Nakamoto lol? I believe that the disadvantages he stated is not convincing enough for the judge, and the way the judge sounds, seems I can see that the fate of cryptocurrency in India has already been decided, and I am sure that here will pass a positive judgment in favor of cryptocurrency.

I really don’t see this case as anything meaningful to me, it is just a waste of time, even if the government ban cryptocurrency in India, it will still not stop people from using it, and whatever law they pass has no effect on the whole world, so what is the point when they have other important things that they need to attend to as regards their country’s development and growth which acceptance of bitcoin is even supposed to be part of it.

Imagine that 40% drops from the total cap of bitcoin market today, what do you think will happen to the market cap, and not to talk of when they dump their own investment itself, if they really want to test it, I mean to know the real cause of project dumping and crashing, then the same way that they have limited the percentage of bounty hunters is the same way that they need to limit the percentage that they give to these investors, which to me is quite too much and then they will see the effect of it on the market now.

If they can take this bold step, they will surely see a turn around and lower the rate at which these projects do dump. If investors are really interested in multiplying their money, then I feel the interest they get on their capital alone is enough.

I am not sure that anyone will be arguing that at all with everything most people have seen in the market on the development of bitcoin and there isn't much point to even be comparing them both, bitcoin will always reign ahead of them in everything but we need to also fully understand that there are sometimes that altcoins too could be extremely profitable.

One thing that I do notice about altcoins is that if they want to increase, they can really increase far more than what bitcoin can even get to at once, but they are not always sustained, their increase is very seasonal unlike bitcoin that could go low and high severally within a very short space of time, so investment in both of them would really be the wisest choice for people to make.

It would have been a little more easier if they had plenty review for you to be able to look at the percentage if negative review in it , to me, if in a comment section, the negative review is more than 20% , then I assume that such site or project cannot be trusted, but now that it has negative review, I would not know what exactly made him give such review.

The best way to find out Is if there is a way for you to send the personal private message asking why, but rather than going through all that, why don’t you just take some few months to learn trading by yourself, it is really going to benefit you more than relying on someone or some sort of site to help you double your money through trading, it would save you all these doubts and stress.

I think it was more due to Lebron being injured and not seen as the alpha in that team. I mean we are talking about Lebron bringing Cavs team to finals just two years ago and last year he wasn't capable of bringing Lakers to playoffs. Do you really think that was because of Lebron himself not playing well?

Lebron could bring any team to finals even on west conference but you have to give him the ability to actually rule the team, if he can do that than he can actually basically be like playing nba2k20 with the players on the court. Lakers young core wasn't ready for that so they screwed up and now they are gone of course. This year it will be much better because they have players like AD and Danny Green who will be much better for Lebron, Rondo was great too, shame Cousins got injured, that would have been awesome too.

I agree with you mate, I always see people who list out their achievements from gambling and talk about their skills as those who have been paid by the casinos to do so, because  in real life being an expert gambler is quite impossible. The game is unpredictable, so how can anyone be an expert or boast of skills? It’s absurd. I understand the aspect of experience as an added advantage but definitely not skills.

I have been gambling for roughly over 10 years now and my friends would always expect me to give them a strategy that would work for each games and I am wondering if I have that for myself either lol. This is a game of lucky that we all try to see how our luck plays out. Let’s not be deceived, there is no professional gamblers anywhere in the world.

I may have heard about this steemit, the name sounds very familiar and I hope it’s not the same site that got many gamblers frustrated at some point when it crashed lol. The dangers we encounter as gamblers are numerous and sometimes I am tempted to say the most risky profession online is gambling and this is for those of us that take gambling for a profession.

Well, I started gambling with fiat and this is many years ago, those days we were more of offline gamblers using casino houses, so we had no other payment choice than fiat but these days bitcoin gambling has taken over. It gives more profit and more efficient.

Who said so, I think that the gaming industry are even the ones that has accepted the use of cryptocurrency more than every other industries we have there, let me mention some of the big games to you, such as BMI Gaming, dice, craps, keno, video poker, roulette and many more, they all play these game in bitcoin now, so they are gradually expanding, they might still be few but their number still corresponding with the level of acceptance of bitcoin generally.

The more the adoption of bitcoin grows, the more some of these gaming industries will also start to adopt the use of bitcoin for their game too, so we should just look at the future, majority of them have plans for it, but they are just trying to watch as things takes its shape in crypto generally.

I have started seeing lots of courses that is being taken by many colleges and even given certificates in the blockchain studies generally and since cryptocurrency is a product of blockchain, they must surely teach a section of it, so as blockchain is being taught, crypto is also become a part of the future of the newer generation, we may not see the big adoption of crypto that we want in our own generation.

I believe that in future generation, everything about payment will all be in form of cryptocurrency, and before then also, we will see many schools accepting the use of bitcoin as payment. There is this country that has already legalizes the use of bitcoin as payment of salaries which does not exclude the lecturers that we have in those school, so this is how it will all begin.

They are just indulging in a fight that they cannot win, even if US ban cryptocurrency today, that will still not stop it from moving forward and to get the world leaders to come together to ban it will be extremely impossible because some of those world’s leader too are already benefiting from the use of cryptocurrency in their country, sop stopping it is like removing a working feature from their system.

What I see in future is that the bitcoin will be accepted, no doubt about that, they will only introduce some sort of regulations that may not favor people, just as the US government has demand for Binance to separate its citizen to another platform which they are ready to do, but not in accordance with the will of the users, so many people may not like that idea.

It doesn’t matter, like TRON majority of us do you which is actually TRX but then we still understand they are one, everyone that see ripple already understands that the op was referring to ripple, which I agree with you that ripple was not worth it as an investment.

I don’t see how the usage of the coin has kept it for that long, I guess it is just hype and the fact they are cheap and people are expecting too much from them based on their previous high increase that is asking people still put in little investment and holding on to the coin. Ripple has more of holders than they have users of the coin, and I think they will eventually get tired and dump the remaining of their coin when they no longer see much development of the coin.

The only thing that I see with the SCO is that it gives investors guarantee of having a success, which means that their time and money put in the ICO would not be a wasted one, so investor can really on getting profit with no doubt, but don’t think that it is still free of scam, the SCO is a method itself, and anyone could come up with the idea that he is coming up with an SCO project and still be scam.

Every investor of any form of system of crowd funding must be ensure that the project is indeed as it claims, we must ensure that we make enough research also on the team, and at least with this SCO, I don’t think that there is any point working with anonymity like ICO does, anything that makes it anonymous makes it fishy again and I would not trust the system because scammers could still hide under its anonymity.

You call all those coins alternatives? Now look at it, what is the status of those coins that you call alternative now? Is bitcoin still not growing while they are seriously declining, I thought you said they are alternatives, if they are alternatives, how come they watched bitcoin grow to $19800 in that last bull run, and how come they still watched bitcoin grow to $13800 in that last high that we got recently.

Look at much news that are coming up today, which coin are they all associating with? Still bitcoin. Don’t be deceived by those altcoins that are just here to play, bitcoin remain the only top coin and some other few to altcoins in the market like Ethereum, Binance and other altcoins that are within the scope of top 50 coins in the crypto market.

We don’t need Facebook to release any coin for bitcoin to rise because Facebook never played any role in the last bull run of bitcoin, in fact the bull run would have been more than that if not because they were using their system to cancel and discourage ICO, now that they have come up with their own crypto, they expect them to just run smoothly.

I think they are reaping what they did to great projects then, they condemned them too and now they are being condemned also. Do unto other as you wish to be done unto, the same way that bitcoin rose to the top in that 2017 without Facebook is the way that bitcoin will rise now to the top with so many other projects that are more relevant to bitcoin market than Facebook. I am expecting this bakkt to have at least some effects.

Well that is what it is, it is an alternative to fiat, and even if we are using it as digital assets, it is still going to be an alternative to it also, and the main concept of bitcoin is to be an alternative, so anyone that is making it the only source of payment and investment should be sole responsible for his actions on whatever happen through the crypto, that is why it is stated to be a risky investment and never should anyone take some risk that is not worth it, like risk of taking loan, although the system of utility of bitcoin is really worth it and the investment of it could also be worth it, but cannot be all the time, there are times that the system will not work in our direction or to our expectation, so we have to know how to deal with that then.

That is exactly my point, the guy is just trying to work ahead of selling his token down, he might be a guru and might have known the concept of how satoshi created his coin, but he would be a fool to come publicly and then portray himself as satoshi when he is not, and this is obviously glaring that he is just trying to make some fraudulent project because someone who has not been sincere about his project from onset, what do you expect of him then, I think that people should juts ignore him for now and be very careful about whatever is released and then associated to him.

There is a coin that he mentioned in his article and that coin will never see the light of the day, because the name of the coin alone sounds scary and the fact he is from Pakistan, maybe all these terrorist groups tech man.

It Is not so easy man not to hold your coin knowing the future that is ahead of your investment in bitcoin, there are so many people that has practice holding and gotten money that business would not have ever given them in life, but I agree with you in one way, we need to learn to separate utility from investment, because in your own case, you were simply paid for your work and you deserve to remove it at that point even if bitcoin later increases.

If you put money in for the purpose of saving it there, I don’t think any of this advice is really necessary because there are so many of us that has kept money in bank for so long and nothing has climbed on it, and there is a system that is willing to reward you for keeping money in the market for a while.

If care is really not taking fast, that good thing will really turn bad again for many investors who would fail to also always do their own due diligent even if it is an IEO project.

Many investors are just investing now based on the fact that the project has a tag of IEO on them forgetting the fact that it may also be an IEO for scammers, and I can see some unpopular exchanges too beginning to conduct IEO as if it is something so easy like ICO, and these low exchanges would never bring out a quality project, so what we may still see in the market are projects that have no real use case, except project that comes from  platforms like that of Binance exchange and some other popular exchanges that we all know, if I would ask anyone to join IEO, it should be that of Binance.

Yes we will get there, at least with these giant companies all looking at cryptocurrency solution to apply to their current system, things would begin to get much more difficult for government now in declaring cryptocurrency illegal and they might start looking for several ways to just adopt the system and then control it, I mean probably regulate it.

There is just a part I am usually not much comfortable with all these their release, I am not comfortable with so many tokens that is being released, it would only be creating unnecessary competition, which will make them not be an investment instrument because how many projects would people have to consider to invest in at the same time, money is yet to circulate within the current ones in the market, talks of these coming like Facebook, gram and many other ones.