Listen bro, take all that legalese back to the court room. The escrow for all intents and purposes was a third party. It was a forum name with an anon identity. Point final.
Your final point remains indefensible and will be quickly laughed out of court with a contempt citation, as there is 20 BTC on the line for a libel case. One intent and purpose was to fraudulently obtain escrow fees, otherwise none of the Quickseller escrows where Quickseller admitted to being the NON-THIRD PARTY, but 1/2 COUNTERPARTY, fraudulent escrow agent, would have been a paid service; they would have ALL been free, yet still not by OED definition - ONLY indefensible bullshitter definition, "escrows". But at the time no one was the wiser.
AKA an element of fraud. |
|
|
|
Got caught out doing what? Running a business?  I'm going to need a BTC-signed YES or NO answer, from Bobsurplus (using 1BobSurplusHa1ha8ha4HaL0Lo7SurplusBob), to the following question: Do you, Bobsurplus, support the business of fraud and/or self-dealing - which is what some may falsely define as "escrowing for yourself" "self-escrow" "middlemanning for yourself" "self-middlemanning"? Is your legal name TheButterZone? You're a fraud. Indefensible bullshit to say a username with no legal name duplication requirement (statutes infringing human rights or struck down by the courts are invalid), nor claim thereof, is fraud. Staff, please investigate Bobsurplus as a Quickseller alt if you agree that they fit the profile. They can investigate all they want. I'm not quickseller nor have I ever been. What Im saying is that the forum rules make it ok for people to have multiple forum accounts. Therefore it is not fraud if he uses one of those accounts to do business. It is business. 1 out of 2 exclusive parties to a trade, cannot be the escrow agent by definition. Regardless of whether restitution was made, fraud occurred if 1 out of 2 exclusive parties pretended to be an escrow agent. Defending the indefensible ad infinitum justifies a lifetime permaban of all accounts. Once again... I'm going to need a BTC-signed YES or NO answer, from Bobsurplus (using 1BobSurplusHa1ha8ha4HaL0Lo7SurplusBob), to the following question:
Do you, Bobsurplus, support the business of fraud and/or self-dealing - which is what some may falsely define as "escrowing for yourself" "self-escrow" "middlemanning for yourself" "self-middlemanning"?
ETA: Oops, not a valid BTC address. Well, I need a clearsigned answer nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Got caught out doing what? Running a business? I'm going to need a BTC-signed YES or NO answer, from Bobsurplus (using 1BobSurplusHa1ha8ha4HaL0Lo7SurplusBob), to the following question: Do you, Bobsurplus, support the business of fraud and/or self-dealing - which is what some may falsely define as "escrowing for yourself" "self-escrow" "middlemanning for yourself" "self-middlemanning"? Is your legal name TheButterZone? You're a fraud. Indefensible bullshit to say a username with no legal name duplication requirement (statutes infringing human rights or struck down by the courts are invalid), nor claim thereof, is fraud. Staff, please investigate Bobsurplus as a Quickseller alt if you agree that they fit the profile. |
|
|
|
Got caught out doing what? Running a business? I'm going to need a BTC-signed YES or NO answer, from Bobsurplus (using 1BobSurplusHa1ha8ha4HaL0Lo7SurplusBob), to the following question: Do you, Bobsurplus, support the business of fraud and/or self-dealing - which is what some may falsely define as "escrowing for yourself" "self-escrow" "middlemanning for yourself" "self-middlemanning"? ETA: Oops, not a valid BTC address. Well, I need a clearsigned answer nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Everyone's account should begin with negative trust of several million and be forced to slowly dig their way out of it.
21 million risked BTC, to be precise, then as they build trust based on the amount of BTC they were trusted with and didn't screw anyone out of it, that is subtracted as a negative number from the -21 million (ex. (-21000000)-(-5)=-20999995). Any risked and lost BTC negative rated as such will be added back as a negative number (ex. (-20999995)+(-5)=-21000000) . Unfortunately, there's no evidence required of BTC transfers, and no way to prove all the private keys involved in the transfers weren't exclusively controlled by the same person using different usernames. |
|
|
|
I am not TF, (at least) one of the admins looked into this a long time ago and they have informed me they do not believe I am TF.
Which admin, liar?There is a possibility you are TF. No there isn't. If admins looked into things and stated a belief that was 100% reality a "long" time ago, that means that nothing could possibly happen between then and now that would require re-looking into things and/or changing investigation techniques to restate a belief that is/isn't still 100% reality.  |
|
|
|
I think Wardrick was a respected member of the community.
*Fixed spelling of https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=85316WTF? It's never acceptable/excusable to "joke" about someone being a murderer unless you have probable cause to suspect them of being a murderer or everyone can see public records they have been convicted of same. Wardrick indefensibly "joked" that I was a murderer, twice. <ZERO respect. |
|
|
|
Quickseller is too young to do anything but get robbed by a lawyer over in the US
explains a lot. I also imagine the fake 20 BTC legal fund falls under the QS philosophy of justified dishonesty. It's not fake if Quickseller moves 20 BTC from one exclusively controlled private key to another. That requires me being Quickseller, which obviously is not the case. It would be fun if you could sign a message from the bitcoin addresses used. If one person controls the private keys to all the BTC addresses used, that person can sign messages from each of them as well and post those signed messages from as many BCT usernames as they control. "obviously"? When it comes to ANY user that provably has alts (as opposed to me, having a hard enough time just keeping up with TheButterZone topics and business)...  |
|
|
|
Quickseller is too young to do anything but get robbed by a lawyer over in the US
explains a lot. I also imagine the fake 20 BTC legal fund falls under the QS philosophy of justified dishonesty. It's not fake if Quickseller moves 20 BTC from one exclusively controlled private key to another. |
|
|
|
|
[reserved]
I don't wager my own money, only OPM.
BTC tipping address in my profile.
|
|
|
|
Go to http://en.lichess.org/setup/friend and post your game links here. First to click it will get the player seat, everyone after that will be able to watch. local rule: When your game is over, delete your game link so people don't waste their time clicking it. |
|
|
|
IANAL but  |
|
|
|
This is ironic coming from someone who launders money via StarBucks gift cards aka Bitcards11 Is this what it looks like when you "go on a long break"? Quickseller chronicles his life activities by the millisecond, so 100ms IS a "long break", AND YOU FUCKING AGREED TO HIS CARTE BLANCHE ALLOWING FOR ABSOLUTE REJECTION OF COMMONSENSE. |
|
|
|
|
You could move this topic to Marketplace and leave a redirection topic behind.
|
|
|
|
When everyone thinks that it was over and almost back to normal, a new revelation appears and no one knows what will happen next.
This forum is better than Game of Thrones last days
(grabbing popcorn)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjzC2DRgEo4 |
|
|
|
In Canada I have the right to know my accuser, so yes, I would probably get his identity.
But it's a moot point. He has nothing to stand on, and he won't be suing anybody.
If he doesn't sue, then what is going to happen to the 20 BTC that TF gave him? Since the BTC was specifically for the use in a lawsuit against you, then if no suit happens and the BTC isn't returned, QS would then be scamming, right? QS can staart an internet court (IRC chan or a self-mod thread on bitcointalk), and pay himself to be the judge. and 12 members of the jury, because there's no reason why the judge and the jury can't all be the same person. and hire a dream team of attorneys (also all him/herself). TL;DR: I see no problem. Yep, the defender of the indefensible should see no problem with a kangaroo court, just as a kangaroo excrow. |
|
|
|
I wonder if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-dealing is the term most apropos. lol... are we to go back and forward all night? You admitted to pulling the escrow scam many times. When a person pleads guilty in court, there is no need for further evidence.
B-but... in the United States federal system, before entering judgment on a guilty plea, the court must determine that there is a factual basis for the plea So another escape route is set. LOL you should first put the 10btc to a trusted escrow (Quickseller) since you are dealing with QS ROFLMAO
BAHAHAHAHA |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
