At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.
this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it. This is called Gun Control  To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.  My humble take on this is that government is controlling its people and avoid people from uprising against the government with the use of guns. Come to think of it, if people can freely access to high powered guns and almost every individual get to have a possession of it, it would be difficult for the government forces to stop them when people are fed up with their government and want to overthrow an administration. It would be bloody as hell. Well, I was just exaggerating. But isn't it make sense? I mean, the government are afraid of the people when it will convene and fight against the former, period. Using the "gun control" advocate's logic: No government with enough nuclear weapons to extinct the human race should be afraid enough of lesser weapons to feel the need to ban them for their own safety. So logically, that only leaves government wanting to watch violent criminals safely victimize we the disarmed with impunity, so they can dance in our blood and on our graves as they "justify" disarming even more of we the people for violent criminals to safely victimize us. |
|
|
|
|
Will the real xbox slim shady please stand up?
|
|
|
|
|
Typically cable ISPs just ask you for the MAC ID of the modem you're going to connect to their coax, and it's dynamically assigned an IP. You'd have to ask them if you can add a second IP to your account, or if it would require a second account. One would think each modem would select different frequencies to be able to share the same coax.
|
|
|
|
Do you ship the buyer an immortal chicken?
 |
|
|
|
but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the the supporter of gun control programe?
The US government needs to give guns to violent criminals so it can "justify" "gun control". See "Operation Fast & Furious". |
|
|
|
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.
Yes, only the army and hunters need guns to hunt disarmed humans with and commit genocide against us. Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.
Has the jury reached a verdict? Yes we have, Your Honor. Will the Undead please rise? LMFAO |
|
|
|
The flaw in your thinking is twofold at least:
1. The perp used a hatchet. This means he was not using a gun in the first place. So, he was not as bad of a crook as he could have been. False premise. A deadly weapon is a deadly weapon. Use any deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder, and you are equally as bad of a crook as any other crook who uses any other deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder. I missed that the only legitimate death penalty, the instant death penalty in lawful self-defense, was administered by the Good Samaritan. Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers. Okay. Anybody can kill anybody passing him while walking down the sidewalk, without much or any training, if the murderer is fast enough. In our little story, it was assumed that the perp would be taken into custody if he lived. Then, hopefully the jury would do its job in court. Gun control? Anybody can kill anybody. Place everybody in strait-jackets and let robots feed us and wipe our behinds. That way we won't be able to hurt anybody. How much people control do some naive nuts want? The jury can do its job in court but ONLY in court, as it cannot control anything further than what what each juror says in their verbal and written verdict. A jury can say "we find the defendant guilty of attempted murder and order him to serve life in prison without possibility of parole, probation, pardon, or commutation" but the government can then immediately release him following that verdict and not only allow him to continue his criminal violence through neglect, but also affirmatively give him instruction and material support in committing more criminal violence. It's naive to think there can be ANY effective people control without at least 1:1, round the clock supervision by volunteers. |
|
|
|
The flaw in your thinking is twofold at least:
1. The perp used a hatchet. This means he was not using a gun in the first place. So, he was not as bad of a crook as he could have been. False premise. A deadly weapon is a deadly weapon. Use any deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder, and you are equally as bad of a crook as any other crook who uses any other deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder. I missed that the only legitimate death penalty, the instant death penalty in lawful self-defense, was administered by the Good Samaritan. Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers. |
|
|
|
So with no gun control lets imagine the knife attacker survived this ordeal, Should he then be allowed to buy a gun and then more than likely do the same thing he did here except with a gun? Because thats what no gun control means. Again i dont think anybody (maybe some are ive not read every page) is saying your guns will be taken away completely, only that some form of control is put in place.
That's up to a jury, on a case by case determination. No, no, NO! No gun control MEANS NO CRIMINAL CONTROL! After the "knife attacker" was discharged from the hospital, he would not serve a single day of confinement, despite his attempted murder/"knife attack" being a crime worthy of life imprisonment! If some guy hauls off and hits you, are you going to press charges? Or are you going to simply forgive him, especially if he knocks a tooth out, and you have to spend $1,500 to get it fixed? Let the guy go if you want. Don't press charges if you want. An attack that doesn't do any damage is still a threat, and actual threats are punishable by law if the one who was threatened presses charges. Press charges with a jury trial, and let the jury make the law for the case in question. Essentially, the jury can do whatever it wants - no guns ever, prison term, fine, etc. The jury can say "no guns ever" but unless they're willing to personally hold the perp at gunpoint in 6-12 member, 24/7/365 rotation for the rest of his life, they're not going to be able to stop him from having a gun outside a prison. |
|
|
|
So with no gun control lets imagine the knife attacker survived this ordeal, Should he then be allowed to buy a gun and then more than likely do the same thing he did here except with a gun? Because thats what no gun control means. Again i dont think anybody (maybe some are ive not read every page) is saying your guns will be taken away completely, only that some form of control is put in place.
That's up to a jury, on a case by case determination. No, no, NO! No gun control MEANS NO CRIMINAL CONTROL! After the "knife attacker" was discharged from the hospital, he would not serve a single millisecond of confinement, despite his attempted murder/"knife attack" being a crime worthy of life imprisonment! |
|
|
|
ALmost everything is for sale with bitcoins but you have to look to the right shops you know. There are allot of people
who dont even know that they can buy food and other things with bitcoins.
You are right, but I want to buy many things with bitcoin online. Here is my list: - gadgets - clothes - pizza - shoes And many more almost everything I want to buy with bitcoin online. I sell those, what country are you in? |
|
|
|
|
If there's ever a time when nobody's in your apartment and your neighbors are sleeping, you could get a WiFi smart switch, plug a radio with the bass turned up into it, and turn it on remotely. I would have said a jackhammer or some loud tool, but IDK if there's a smart switch with that much output power.
|
|
|
|
I would donate USD  worth of stuff to a charity's thrift store. |
|
|
|
A service where someone who lives in a Canada/US border city crosses into the US, goes to the nearest USPS post office to the border, picks up a general delivery/poste restante package with the name on the package the same name on their government ID, takes the package into Canada, and either reships it to the final recipient, or hands it over personally. |
|
|
|
|
Good luck, with trust in the shitter!
|
|
|
|
"Affordable" price= fence price? |
|
|
|
|
A sound grenade: jogger alarm, insert battery, screw cover on, glue cover on, pull pin.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
