Do I hear 5000 BTC for this bar?
|
|
|
Gah, why can't stalkers quote me properly...
|
|
|
im from britain so i find the amount of guns in america shocking, i think it needs to be reigned it because ive read about several high school massacres involving guns in america and we are yet to have one. its just my opinion but the rest of the world manage to 'protect their property' without such dangerous weapons
Your revisionist history to defend the indefensible violation of human rights, resulting in 3.31001528944831x more violent crimes per capita in the UK than the US (sources: Eurostat and the FBI's UCR, 2011), is duly noted. /ignore
|
|
|
STILL a stock pic, not the pic of YOUR bar YOU have in YOUR possession.
|
|
|
How about not posting duplicate topics? Disregard my PM.
|
|
|
Oh yeah! Let's make a point by taking one particular event I could answer with Columbine but I've got a litle more respect than that. And I'm talking about statistics. Not saying it's a eutopia, just saying that it's far less shitty than the USA You could answer with Columbine (and effectively did), because let's remember, Columbine's resource deputy, Neil Gardner, was off school grounds, which made it safe for the mass murder there for as long as it took him to get back. Security theater coupled with rendering all guardians defenseless (who are implicitly trusted not to harm children anyway), works with brutal consequences. The simple fact that you need resource deputies show that there is something wrong with your country man Oo Thanks for reminding me that, I forgot how incredible it is that you actually need armed people in your school to protect your children xD Never thought that without guns there wouldn't have been a mass murderer in the first place? At least that's the case in Europe... Another Holocaust/democide (prerequisite: gun control) denier, I see. /ignore
|
|
|
Oh yeah! Let's make a point by taking one particular event I could answer with Columbine but I've got a litle more respect than that. And I'm talking about statistics. Not saying it's a eutopia, just saying that it's far less shitty than the USA You could answer with Columbine (and effectively did), because let's remember, Columbine's resource deputy, Neil Gardner, was off school grounds, which made it safe for the mass murder there for as long as it took him to get back. Security theater coupled with rendering all guardians defenseless (who are implicitly trusted not to harm children anyway), works with brutal consequences.
|
|
|
Even though I don't live in the US. I do think there should be some gun control over there. It's not a hobby anymore, everyone can own a gun and everyone has easy access to it, it's just way too dangerous
The right to self-defense is infringed to oblivion for law-abiding, mentally-sound, sober people in the US, and you still say that BULLSHIT?!
|
|
|
u think middle east a dangerous place , its not ,US is the most dangerous place
The 11 000 deaths every year in the USA by firearms and the 90 000 non lethal injuries due to guns
Cite or perish, along with the violent criminals (100% of them) who support "gun control" and any means to achieve that end. Cite or perish? I don't understand sorry. So whe should do just the opposite of what criminals want? Damn, it's a shame most of them are more than happy to be able to use internet to buys illegal stuff. Well let's ban the internet then! Criminals are more than happy to get prosecuted for buying illegal stuff over the internet, since law enforcement could be 99.99999% of the "sellers" of same (or running DNMs as honeypots), behind the internet's cloak of anonymity? Criminals want the #1A-protected internet banned/infringed, because that's exactly how the human right to self-defense, and all other human rights defended by same, are gaining ground! Yes, we should do exactly the opposite of what violent criminals want. They don't want to be shot? They can stop fucking being violent criminals.
|
|
|
Mental disorders are genetics, so, a DNA test is necessary if someone wants to buy a gun.
So the only place guns can be sold is the black market then, because DNA tests being used for pre-crime is Philip K. Dick-level science fiction. It's just wrong for civilians to carry weapons. People that are trained constantly and know and see the repercussions from carrying weapons and the damage they do day in and day out should be the only ones to carry them. Because it takes just one mistake and someone loses their lives. There are a lot of non-lethal alternatives that can be used for self defense.
Bold-faced sociopathic bullshit. u think middle east a dangerous place , its not ,US is the most dangerous place
The 11 000 deaths every year in the USA by firearms and the 90 000 non lethal injuries due to guns
Cite or perish, along with the violent criminals (100% of them) who support "gun control" and any means to achieve that end.
|
|
|
I honestly feel guns should only be possessed by the army and police. I don't like the idea of civilians owning a gun, it's very risky going out keeping in mind that someone walking besides you would have an armed pistol in their pocket and would be ready to trigger it at any time at their willingness and you wont be able to do anything about it. It only builds Chaos, if you honestly need protection inform the cops, no guns for civilians.
A lot of people feel exactly like you do, then something bad happens to them. Then they change their mind. Such as the report from Pakistan as of today. A chemistry teacher who tried to shield his students by opening fire on Taliban militants during a deadly attack at a Pakistani university was known as "The Protector" even before his death in a hail of bullets Wednesday. Lecturer Syed Hamid Husain, a 32-year-old assistant professor of chemistry at the Bacha Khan university in Charsadda, ordered his students to stay inside as Taliban gunmen stormed the school near the city of Peshawar on Wednesday, leaving at least 21 people dead. Students told of how the father-of-two opened fire on assailants as they rampaged across campus, giving the young people time to flee before he was cut down by gunfire. "We saw three terrorists shouting, 'Allah is great!' and rushing towards the stairs of our department," one man told reporters. "One student jumped out of the classroom through the window. We never saw him get up." He described seeing Husain holding a pistol and firing at the attackers.I am just curious. Why would you not have allowed Husain to have his gun? Because it FEELS bad to see violent criminals get shot or stopped at unfired gunpoint by civilians, and FEELINGS always trump the human right to self-defense.
|
|
|
Dead, never to return? Had BTC0.0332 (house-comped) in the bank there, pre-shutdown.
|
|
|
Only in USA: people walking down the street with assault rifles to the grocery store. What do you want to defend yourself against with a weapon that soldiers go to war with? You'd think they live in Uganda or something. Jeez! I'd be afraid to even open my windows there. Talk about protection...
Almost all weapons that soldiers go to war with, including your bogus example, are infringed out of civilians' hands in the US. People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.
It's odd to see people wearing guns aside from cops.
Not possible to control people without exterminating the human race. Good thing cops are robots, and all government statistics that show cops commit more crimes than civilian gun owners, are fake.
|
|
|
Hmm, how much would it take to ship all the crossword/puzzle books to Zone 1 (Texas)?
The box is over 8 pounds. $20 parcel post. $12 for medium priority box. Thanks $6.22 Media Mail (if they qualify)
|
|
|
|