Am not the casino person to advice on this , but from the numerous videos I have watched on this bonus buys I would say it's a 50-50 thing which can be said to be the fastest way to lose money or the fastest way to make some good money depending on how lucky you are...
And truth be told, such game plays aren't for people with one game hand to play...you need to keep playing to give yourself a winning chance which is the unfortunate thing!
But all in all, you know what they day...of you don't play you can't win.
I guess that’s always the case not just in slots but in different gambling games, if you don’t dare to play, you can’t be winning for sure. And the more you decide to play, the bigger chances you’ll have to lose, or the bigger chances you’ll have to win. At the end of the day, it’s the luck that matters. Without it, no matter how hard you play, you will never have the chance to be in profits. Most especially for slots, where luck plays a big role in winning. |
|
|
|
CP3 playing time to time makes sense, plus if they can put him in the games early on the season, even if he doesn't see the end of the season they could build a team that would handle the early season part easily and win some games, get ahead, and then CP3 could rest a bit and play less games and then end the season stronger.
What I think will happen is that CP3 will probably get about 20-25 minutes per game for about 30 or so games the start, and then he is going to start playing 50% of the other games, which would be about another 20 or so, and finish the season with 50 games like mentioned but at least be well rested for the playoff time. Their small ball line up could definitely be decent if they adjust well.
They will start the season by having some experiment because they need it even if they have managed to build some plans during the training camp. They still need to execute those said plans in-order to know if it will really work against any other team and instead of letting Klay, Curry and CP3 play together, I guess Kerr will make it by pair so that they will be safe if in case either one of the said three will be burned out, we know that they cannot have those incident together as they cannot afford it. Anyway, what we have right now are just mere speculations because the Warriors are somehow a mystery to us. We will know about it more as the season will commence. |
|
|
|
For countries that have laws that made gambling legal, it has some speculative age bracket given to it before you can start gambling. It is believed that at that age, your kind of reasoning should be matured, because for any decision you take, it's believe your well informed.
People's opinions will only be secondary. As a gambler, I'm conscious of myself, I discuss my gambling activities to my cycle of friends and I don't see anyone admonishing me, because I play responsible.
Although not all people get mature at the same time, the government just decides on the age of a person depending on research where the person can have a full grasp of what is offered in front of him, Those who are considered immature 17 years old and below may have a problem of understanding several changes that appear in his actions and decisions. So in a country where gambling is legal, I do not think that there is a need to hide their gambling activity. But of course, in a place where people are biased towards gambling, it is best to keep the gambling habit a secret since some countries might implement heavy penalties when caught or exposed to gambling. 18 years of age is considered legal to the government and that is a law but I'd say that the best age for someone to start his journey in gambling should be at least 20 years of age and older because at that time, not only they are matured enough, they are also responsible enough to face any consequence in case that they are not that lucky in any given day. And when it comes to the positive side, they already have priorities and so they can spend the winnings more carefully rather than wasting it in a luxury that doesn't have any value. |
|
|
|
I'm not really viewing Takuma as a threat because he doesn't have that one punch like his brother does.
We should disregard Takuma Inoue being the younger brother of Naoya Inoue when it comes to analyzing the fight. Instead, we can consider saying that Takuma might not be a threat to Ancajas because of; a) fighting experience b) not a Knock Out specialist c) the WBO Bantamweight title he owned was vacant prior But personally for me, threat or not, I don't want to think that Takuma Inoue should be an easy fight for Ancajas. He is now a champion and will defend his first-ever WBO Bantamweight title in front of his fellow countrymen. It will fuel more to unleash his best performance as a champion. Right, weighing the options whom to bet while also thinking that Takuma got the name of an Inoue as he is the younger brother will somehow cloud our judgement and that will not help us in determining which player got more chances because having the Inoue name will somehow speak louder rather than knowing the real facts to give our bets a better chances. Although, I couldn't help but think what does Takuma felt? I mean, people will always see him in Naoya's shadow because they both share the same name and people will always compare them because they are opposite. To say the truth, I know that it doesn't feel right but that is his reality as they are both in the same industry. |
|
|
|
An update on this fight: Frank Martin has pulled out and Stevenson is now looking to fight #6 ranked fighter Edwin de los Santos. https://www.boxingscene.com/shakur-stevenson-seeks-new-opponent-wbc-lightweight-title-fight-frank-martin-out--177598My guess is that Haymon has managed to pull some strings and another one of Haney's belts will suddenly be declared vacant so that Martin can face an easier opponent instead. Stevenson has called himself the most ducked fighter in boxing and that claim may be accurate. None of the top fighters in the division seem too interested in fighting him. Thanks for the heads up mate! Tough guess and I'd say that maybe that was really the case but even we say that Al Haymon wasn't the one pulling the strings behind the scenes, we still cannot blame Frank Martin for pulling out from this fight that could land him a belt once Haney will be stripped if he continue his journey at 140 pounds because he himself already know the chances and that the belt that he will be fighting for is not that realistic to obtain because he will be facing Shakur Stevenson, who is touted to be more intelligent and stronger than Haney. But this is Frank Martin's chance to show the world if he has what it takes to become a champion, whether this is just for the interim belt. But his team pull out in the last minute as we have thought that everything has been settled down verbally as this didn't go on purse bid and so we've thought that this is a go fight already. Perhaps Frank Martin doesn't want to take the risk here, as they know that Shakur might win and obviously will put a dent on Martin's career. Anyhow, let's see how will be the replacement, they will have to find someone else. And for sure, Shakur will go to social media and tell that Frank duck them very clearly. It was Frank Martin's chance to show what he is made of but he cannot accept to take the trouble and risk his career in-front of Shakur because for him, just imagining it, he just cannot defeat the latter. He wasn't that confident that is why they pulled the plug before these things will be fixed and they no longer can take a U-turn up ahead. Anyway, I'm already expecting what you said because Shakur just proved it again that the guys are ducking him, including Haney. Now, nobody can argue that because that's what happened. |
|
|
|
In my country there are no casinos operating because it is an illegal activity. However, many online gambling sites operate and have many users from our country. So, even though I often play on online gambling sites, I have absolutely no experience playing gambling in real casinos. I often watch YouTube about gambling in real casinos, especially about slot machines. I noticed that in real casinos, slot games do not have a buy free spins feature
Do you have experience playing at real casinos and online gambling sites? Is there a difference playing there? I want to know.
Online and offline casinos certainly create different gambling experience. With online, you will have more convenience playing with your favorite games at the comfort of your home or wherever you are. There are more variety of games listed and there are higher number of rewards and promotions that you can receive. However, with offline casinos, what you will gained is definitely an authentic experience. What you see is what you get. Though there are less variety of games compared to online, but the experience is still worthwhile. And if you prefer to mostly engage with physical casinos, the chances to be scam is very rare compared to the scam cases that are so rampant in online. |
|
|
|
|
You must be very lucky. I don’t know what’s the intention of Rollbit for giving you an unexpected bonus but good thing you’ve withdrawn it before banning of your account. So your point of this post is to make us aware that if there’s unexpected bonuses or rewards that enter into our account, at least we should be ready for its consequences. But I don’t see it from your post. It seems like they have an error sending it or whatsoever. At least if you bet it all in and then you lose, you have nothing to regret since it was never your money in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Physical casinos should really have an emergency kit and someone on standby that knows how to do proper first aid for people who will experience health concerns. Although it's not really mandatory for every establishment to have a medical personnel, I guess, but it's much better to have one just in case this scenario happens, especially casinos involve a risky decision that could make the emotions go rollercoaster causing sudden collapse and panic attacks.
It's just so unfortunate that the dealer didn't notice it easily. I bet if he knew, he would have called 911 immediately since cardiac arrest is a serious health condition that needs to be attended to ASAP. Perhaps they were oblivious since they were too engrossed and focused on the game. Somehow, the casino plays a fault on the death since they weren't able to notice and give first aid then call the emergency hotline. Hopefully, next time they will do better such as be more wary of the surroundings and the players behaviour so this won't happen again.
Although I agree that physical casinos should have their medical practitioner on duty so that if there’s heath problems that suddenly occur, then the patient will receive immediate medication. However, putting the casino at fault is probably less reasonable. The gambler should be more responsible of his health condition more than the casino. If he thinks consistent gambling will definitely trigger his condition, then he should be responsible enough not to engage in physical casinos but prefer to just do it online. At least his family can immediately cater to his health needs. |
|
|
|
In my neighborhood, a neighbor breeds chickens for food and shelter before selling them to those who enjoy placing bets on the chicken fights he will attend. Therefore, the person who looks after the chicken will also wager on the chicken he sold on the day of the fight. In addition, he will receive a tip if the chicken he sold triumphs.
When the chicken you chose to bet on wins, rumor has it that you'll also win a sizable sum of money. However, I have never gambled in a cockfight since I may not enjoy the manner of gambling because I feel bad for the chicken.
Everyone should feel bad for the chickens involved because they are beating each other to death and one of them has to die only to get some people to win their bets and to entertain an audience. What kind of people would enjoy watching a poor animal die like that? There are thousands of games and sports in the world and there are people who are interested in watching and participating in cockfighting. Governments should ban such unethical and inhuman sports. Some people compare cockfighting with boxing or martial arts and when you tell them that this is unethical and it shouldn't be enjoyed or should even be a sport, they will say that the same thing happens in boxing where two men beat each other, but they don't consider the fact that a human doesn't have to die in that game for the other one to win, it's just knocking out your opponent. Cockfighting is clearly an animal cruelty. Who would love to raise a chicken and give him food and shelter, and at the end of the day bring him to a cockfighting where one's life is already at risk of dying. I have witness some cockfighting events near our place and people are actually shouting and yelling on it every time their cock hits the opponent, but honestly I just can't enjoy watching the game seeing one or both of them are already bleeding. Good thing it's now banned online but physical areas are still allowing cockfighting till now. |
|
|
|
I think they need to verify it first before they act or refund you. I doubt if they'll refund you on that unless it's proven because if that bet have won they wouldn't definitely get it on your account. If you've been phished that's definitely not stake''s fault in the first place.
If the link you clicked has gone through and you input your credentials the hacker should have get it. You have been so lucky you probably have good security on your account set or else that would have been wiped out. Again, you're still just speculating and you don't have any proof/s yet if it was really done by Stake itself.
True. You can't just accuse Stake without showing valid proofs and yet you come to warn other bettors to stay away from Stake. You know I've known Stake for long and I know they're reputable enough not to resort into wrong acts that will damage their credibility. After all, what you have are just speculations and maybe false accusations so we cannot agree on your post. Just learn to improve the security of your account by not disclosing your personal details easily, that way you don't get easily scam. |
|
|
|
I dislike people requesting for tips when they watch us winning. They don't know the reality behind our win. They just watch us winning and request tip. I don't say they're wrong, at times we'll be very down due to big losses and slowly we'll be making something to compensate what we've lost. By the time they gamblers request tip and sometimes this itself create some fear, if we don't tip we might loss. Nowadays we've got features that can be used to avoid these kind of acts.
That is actually annoying for us gamblers but we should always know that giving tips is not our obligation but it's an individual's choice. Only give tips if you know you are seeing yourself winning but learn to refuse if you are in loss. After all, they don't have the right to demand some tips because we are not using their money to gamble in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
Casinos are actually addictive in its sense most especially for those who gamble without gaining the right information. The only way not to fall for scams in casinos particularly in online casinos is to stay informed and always have the due diligence to increase and improve the prior learning. Otherwise, since beginners are mostly impatient and are lazy to acquire right information because of their hunger of profits, they end up in wrong casinos and get scammed.
|
|
|
|
Being a responsible gambler means you are disciplined. You can control your emotions, you can pause your greed, you can live with losses and still sleep well at night. So yes, it has a lot of effects.
It's not easy at first because there will always be that demon that tells you to gamble more and increase the profits even though you already doubled or tripled your balance. But if someone could stop at some point and withdraw it then that means he can control himself from greed and I think that's healthy for his own lifestyle as a parent or an individual.
I don't actually just play for 2 to 3 hours, I let the autobet run but I don't watch it the whole day. Just let it do the wager and wish it could get lucky at some point. Watching it will just add some stress. Just take the wagering bonus, rakeback, and others because it's really difficult to win against the house. Do something instead while letting it run by itself.
The key to being a responsible gambler is having discipline in all gambling activities that you do. As long as you stick to your limits and set boundaries, the more you become a responsible gambler. Personally, being a responsible gambler has made my life more balanced and more open to gambling opportunities and profits. That is because I never gamble with so much greed but I always make sure that every time I gamble, I have my certain budget and once it's lose, then better luck next time. I never see gambling as a main source of living, probably the reason why I can easily stop myself any time if I don't have good motivation to gamble. |
|
|
|
Dennis Schroder - Tissot FIBA 2023 MVP
He deserved this; he can really be trusted. He was their best player, and he didn't fail the team in the Finals game. It's the great interior defense of Germany that made the Serbians focus their offense outside, and when the shots aren't falling, it's easy for Germany to capitalize on it. I was a bit happy with Serbia's run; they were able to trim the lead of Germany to 3 points only in the 4th quarter. But Germany did not panic; they remained composed and were really eager to bring home the trophy. Franz Wagner was instrumental to the success of Germany. Well, what can I say? Schroder literally deserved the award as he was a team player and not just a star player who cannot make an impact to make a positive outcome from the games they had and even up to this point, he didn't made huge mistakes to make the team suffer. In fact, he was the one who helped the team to remain their composure because they know the Serbian's weakness and made those weaknesses as their strength. So in the end, Germany took home the gold. What a nice game to end the night, congratulations to all bettors out there who wagered with Germany. |
|
|
|
With regards to the potential Canelo vs. Bud next year, it sounds crazy but really doable if Canelo approves it. If I were Canelo, I would take it since it is the biggest fight in boxing right now. He will be bashed a lot though if he wins and it could be worse if he loses to someone who moves up two divisions. I like Bud to win but I believe Canelo will be too much and destroy him. If I'm not mistaken, Canelo already welcomed the idea where he could face Crawford next considering that he will win in his upcoming fight against Charlo. It's just a matter of time though, what we need to know now is if Crawford is still that powerful and fast at 154 against Spence before he proceeds towards 168. I know that he's big and so 154 or 168 will be okay for him but that alone can't make him win. All I heard and read before was that Canelo seemed interested but at 168. But after Crawford changed his tune and became interested in making that ambitious historic feat, Canelo is showing some hints that he is uninterested because he wouldn't get any credit if he wins. But I felt like Canelo is just trying to make an impression to the public that he is not the one pushing this mega fight. Canelo will propose this fight if Bud wins his rematch with Spence. I believe Crawford no matter how good he is in his current division, will be at a whole new level at 168. Financially, he is high-reward and low-risk fight for Canelo at 168. And Crawford at 36 with lesser reflexes, Canelo is not a welterweight and might just eat his punches just to land his own big punishing shots. It's all part of Canelo's plan including that one where he seemed not interested because there's no benefit for him if he will fight Crawford but in reality, it's the opposite thing because he just wanted to make the people more hungry and thirsty so that their fight will be a headline for sure. And while that statement is true, Canelo should know his position mainly now that boxers in this industry are already looking at him down as he was showing some signs of weakness lately. And if I were Canelo and knows personally that there is nothing goin on aside from getting older in the daily basis, then I'd say that I'll be happy to accept their invitation if they are really that interested because either way, it's a win-win situation and a huge paycheck for me is waiting, and lastly, the last laugh will always belong to me. I agree with that. Canelo surely knows how to make people attracted even if the fight is still an idea, the fact that it's not yet declared, he will do something to make the people interested towards it so that they can generate as much money as possible and if they can build enough hype then that is the time where they will make it into a reality. Next step is to market the fight but since we're talking about a future Canelo vs Crawford fight. I don't think that they really needed to market it because people will surely look forward in seeing that fight as there is also a chance that a history will happen again. Well, considering that Crawford will win. Canelo is the cash cow of boxing still, only boxer that kind of rival him as far as bringing fans to their seat is Ryan Garcia and Tank Davis. And that's why we've the two fought, it was the biggest fight of this year. But for sure, if Canelo vs. Crawford pushes for next year, there will be a lot of maybe casual fans that are interested and intrigue by the match and it could produce millions of revenue in the PPV alone. So yeah, the Canelo hype is still here although his last fight by standards against Ryder is way below what is expected. We thought that the Crawford vs Spence might be a much bigger fight than Garcia vs Davis but when it comes to PPV buys, their digits aren't really close to somehow chase the latter's fight on what they did. But yes, I agree, if ever a Crawford vs Canelo fight will happen, there is a good chance that it will be much bigger than them and it could be the biggest fight of the decade as well. How's that? |
|
|
|
The Lakers are very good when AD plays at the Center position, and in fact, he's the leading rebounder last season with at least 12 per game. Yes he said in one of the interviews that he's more comfortable playing with the 4 spot, but he's efficient when playing at 5 as well.
I don't know what will happen with the team now knowing that they have Hayes, and Wood. Will one of them be a starting center, and AD will play at 4? Or Davis will be convinced by Coach Darvin Ham to play again at the 5 spot alongside Rui, LBJ, Reaves, and Russell as their starting 5. I mean that would be more efficient than any other starting 5 for the Lakers out there. I can't imagine the starting 5 of the Lakers would be if Davis will play at 4. Who will be benched?
Coach Ham will most likely be experimenting with the starting lineup repeatedly throughout the regular season. Personally, I think it would be preferable for the Lakers if Hachimura is benched and Wood plays center in the starting lineup. In this case, the starting lineup of the Lakers could be as follows: Russell as PG, Reaves as SG, James as SF, Davis as PF, and Wood as C. I think that is the nearest thing to happen because why would the acquire big players all of a sudden in just one off-season, first they acquired Hayes from the free agency and in the following month, here's Wood as well who are likely to be in-charge at the center just like Hayes. Seeing Davis's latest photos, we can assume already that the team is inclined to make him play as PF and not as a center anymore as even if we say that he's efficient in the center. That's not what his original role is, it's just that the Lakers just had to do it because there was nobody left to man the center. But this time, it will be a different, same faces but there will be some changes specifically in the center. |
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to ask about how if I giving football or other predictions in this forum. Is it allowed? No feelings. I don't have any purpose and just wanna share what I can.
I don't force anyone to use my prediction because it is just a sharing prediction with all of you.
Thank you.
This forum is widely open for all sports predictions so you don’t need to worry about it. As long as you don’t force others to believe in you, then that’s fine. You know that’s a good thing also because you may open some ideas that other gamblers fail to think, so it’s quite helpful I think. At the end of the day, we all have different predictions based on our knowledge and understanding on the game. At least you don’t influence others to bet on your prediction too. |
|
|
|
Lottery is difficult for people to get addicted to, that's because the lottery organizers will limit the maximum amount per person to place in the lottery cmiiw, in contrast to slots or other types of gambling games which do not limit you from playing and spending money. Many people still feel hesitant about gambling because some people have high empathy, but that's all just your thoughts, when you live in an area where gambling is legal, you will often see the phenomenon of people who are poor because of gambling and also rich because of gambling, so this attitude The mixture that you experience when gambling is generally created as a result of the environment (its dominance).
Not all lotteries are giving one ticket for one gambler, there are many casinos are offering people to buy their ticket as much as possible e.g. Freebitco.in. This will make them become an addict if they don't have a good self control because they think if they have a lot tickets, they will win. Obviously this isn't really correct because there's a chance even you have a lot tickets, you can still lose due to unlucky. The only way to win 100% in lotteries is bought all of the tickets. Even if you are only limited to 1 ticket per gambler, the fact that you spend money to gamble per day, that makes you addicted in gambling. Because of your anticipation to hit the jackpot prize, you end up losing more a lot each day. Although I’m not against to those who are fond in betting lottery, but if you are seeing the reality in lottery, it’s very rare to win some profits. It might take 20-30 years I guess before you will become very lucky that you’ll be able to win the jackpot prize that makes you instant millionaire or billionaire. |
|
|
|
/// but also an obvious attempt of trying to justify something that they should not be doing.
It's true that what is wrong should not be justified or distorted. I am not a Muslim, but I believe that the teachings from the church and the Bible have specific meanings and should not be interpreted differently. Not everyone is highly educated, which is why a straightforward interpretation can be easily understood. What would happen if actions that were originally declared as sins were justified as 'okay'? 'Okay' can be subjective and may not always align with what is right or wrong. I think there should be clear distinctions between right and wrong. Muslims have always been devoted to their own rules and tradition, that is why it’s rare to them breaking their rules and justifying those negative over positive actions. But let’s face the reality that these new generation Muslims have been more trying to distort things what has been established. Gambling is always not allowed for Muslims but look at them now, a lot of casinos are actually seen with Muslim gamblers and it’s like they have started to change their rules for their own convenience, even if gambling is a big sin in their religion. |
|
|
|
I think it's happening every now and then that members here are betting against each other for a particular outcome of a match. It doesn't break any rules, even if the members decide not to pay each other up. You can use escrow to hold the bets until the game is done to help settle the win/lose so there's that. Anyway going back, this can be done, it's just that there isn't a lot of trusting going on these days between the members that aren't as established compared to the old heads here.
True. Members are actually betting with each other especially if both are actually fond on the same sports, so they agree with an amount that one is capable to pay when lose. However, this only happens if both have known each other in the forum well. Otherwise, there will surely be trust issues, as some may only appear good and honest when they are still betting, but when they start losing from their bet, then they suddenly vanish like thin air and it’s like there’s no betting that is happening at all. So if you are too trusting to other members, you will be taken advantage for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
