You don't need "good surveillance" to capture a fingerprint, when a photo is enough. Just someone who has a camera.
Another problem with a fingerprint is: Once compromised you can't change it. Imagine a service, where you can't change your password.

And it doesn't matter if you are a politician or not. You have money people want to steal. They don't care about you, they care about the money. If you are an easy target, people will steal from you.

You are right. That is why the hackers put in such high transaction fees into the transaction, so miners would process them pretty fast.

Sometimes I wish the price of Bitcoin would stay that low for the next years, so a lot of this speculators would have to sell and would loss money.

As far as I know(I am not an expert on that) there is not much money in cp.
Your example about children are raped on the streets is just ridiculous. Cp is not produced on the open street. If it is send via your post office or via the internet or traded on the street is also pretty much irrelevant for the children.

Don't do that. That is the worst password ever. Do you have any idea, how easy it is to fake fingerprints? The faked fingerprints in Germany using photos of politicians they found on the internet not even being near them.

That is really getting boring. The price went up, since the incident.
Nobody cares, who doesn't have funds on Bitstamp and business goes like usual. The times where hacking one Exchange can crush the BTC-price are over.

I also have the problem that Amazon stole my money. € 1000 in gift cards I (which was my big mistake) had loaded completely on my Amazon account. I guess that one or maybe two of that (€ 100) gift cards where bought illicit, and Amazon just invalidated all of them. Amazon doesn't provide any information. So, currently the European Consumer Interest Council is looking into it, but something like this always takes time. (It it more than a month now).
I also contacted purse and they told me, they would refund it, but I rather get the money back from Amazon(the part that was bough legally and Amazon just stole in the process)

That is just wrong. Ask anybody:
Do you want that everybody can look at all your transactions you have ever made? Most people will say no.
Do you want that the government/courts can look at all your transactions you have ever made? There might be slightly less people, who say no.

I just had that discussion yesterday and the guy who proposed this complete transparency told us, that nearly everyone he talked to about this, disagreed with him.

So, you describe the problem your self. When people don't know the problem you first have to explain the problem before you can explain the solution. It is a quite complex problem.

First Impression:
What the fuck is with this snowflakes?
I really try to read the info but this snowflakes are just annoying. Who those something like that?

So, they knew, that Bitstamp was hacked before the coins were moved?
Seems plausible

Gibt es irgendwo einen Beweis dafür, dass die Miner die Coins sofort verkaufen?
Bis jetzt konnte mir niemand einen bringen.

And it actually worked. Price is going up since the hack.

People should just stop trying to see something in Bitcoin, which is not there.
There are some things, Bitcoin can do for poor people.
- Poor people are those, who pay the highest fees. With Bitcoin everybody pays the same(small) fees.
- A bank can freeze your account. If you don't have the money to pay a lawyer, there is not much you can do about it. Nobody can freeze your Bitocoin.
- A country can increase inflation by printing money. Most of the time the rich are better informed about it and they have a lot of their money in assets anyways. It's the poor, who get hit by that, not so with Bitcoin.

So, Bitcoin is already doing a lot for the poor, if they are able to use it and stop  whining about, that it didn't make them rich.

If we would give 1 Bitcoin to every person on earth, it would look the same in a year.
Most people would just sell it and a few people would see the potential and buy everything up, they can get.

Some people in here, know that I am a socialist. I don't believe in a completely free market. But even I, think you are delusional.

I think, you are behind, about what is cool nowadays. Justin Bieber should promote Bitcoin. That would really give it a boost.

I don't think many people who don't have funds on Bitstamp are panicking.

Yeah, that is something I also always struggle about.
My gf knows, that I am really interested in Bitcoin. She is a complete technical noob, but still often asks about technical thinks.
Being a programmer, I don't think my explanations are really understandable for here. I see that, especially when she asks certain thinks again, I already explained several times over the past years(which sometimes really annoys me).

I think another problem about Bitcoin is, that it is quite complex to understand why it is better than fiat. It is easy understandable, that an E-Mail is better than a letter you send via a your post office. Since it is instant and you can just read it from everywhere with a lot of devices.
What makes Bitcoin better than fiat?
You can't just explain it in a few sentences. If you just say, it is faster than fiat and has less fees, people might tell you, they are ok with the speed and fees of fiat, since the can instantly pay with their credit card and mostly don't see the fees involved directly.
If you want to describe, that it is better since it is not controlled by banks or the government, you have to go into detail, why it is bad, that fiat is controlled by banks and the government. That is not something most people agree on in the first place and might also not agree after an explanation.

Everybody is talking about the price crash of Bitcoin because of the Bitstamp hack, and I am just sitting here mastur ... ahm ... looking at the price going up again ...

They use their mobile phone balance as a currency, but that is centralized, even pretty much a monopoly.