Topic is misleading, NEO is far from top 10, currently #40
Yeah, the topic dates back to 2018. The last time Da Hongfei was seen here is three years ago. You can modify the topic's title when you write a reply like I did. You can also PM Da, maybe he'll change it. |
|
|
|
That is great. Thank you for working on that. I have some questions: - Since there is a new client, do you know why the GitHub releases page is still showing September 25, 2020? - Does the virustotal diagnosis on the Windows file guarantee that the macOS and Ubuntu files are okay as well? - Are clients of the old chesscoin 1.0 still available somewhere? Also I promised a bounty and I will stand by my promise. Let me know how much you think the work was worth and why. As soon as I run a client I'll send you some coins. |
|
|
|
I could ask for that, so this means they would need to spend the output from the unconfirmed transaction with a higher fee and send it to one of their addresses, right?
yes. I actually wrote a tutorial a while back on how to execute an cpfp as a sender using electrum. For a receiver, it's actually more or less the same... If you point them towards this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5285192 they can ask for help in case they don't succeed (depends on which wallet they're using tough... It might require them to export private key(s) from their current wallet and import them into electrum if they want to follow the walktrough... In which case they need to be extra carefull not to compromise their keys) Great thanks, I'll refer them to that if needed. Yes I've seen some of those but they charge way too much. Do you have some that you could recommend?
I've seen good things from viabtc... They have a free and a payed accelerator service, and they're legit... They own a pretty big pool, so they're able to deliver what they promise Yes I know about their free service but it requires a minimum fee which my transaction doesn't have. So I guess I'll have to use their paid service if I don't succeed in getting the receiver to perform a CPFP. Thanks. Pruning happens if the limit of the mempool is over the limit set by the node operator OR if the unconfirmed transaction is older than x hours (default 2 weeks). So it should be pruned from most mempools in 2 weeks no matter what the feerate was
Provided it's not rebroadcasted... To be honest, i have no idear if wasabi automatically rebroadcasts transactions... Maybe you can restore your wasabi wallet from seed by creating a new wallet but re-using the same seed... Not reopening the original wallet untill the transaction has been dropped.
It's also possible you keep rebroadcasting the transaction by your efforts to fix the issue tough... For example: sometimes people start using those "free" rebroadcasting websites because they think it'll fix their problem, but all those sites do is fetch the raw transaction and rebroadcast it, making it harder to double spend or to require more time to wait untill the transaction dissapears from most mempools.
Yes that's why I didn't use those "free" accelerators. The only transactions I intentionally broadcasted were my double spending attempts. However I haven't kept my wallet shut down for 2 weeks so either it might be rebroadcasting in the background or some other service which I have no control over is doing it... |
|
|
|
Can the person receiving it create a CPFP transaction or is it to an exchange / business?
I could ask for that, so this means they would need to spend the output from the unconfirmed transaction with a higher fee and send it to one of their addresses, right? There are paid transaction accelerators out there and some free ones that might help.
Yes I've seen some of those but they charge way too much. Do you have some that you could recommend? How low a fee did you use? The fees have dropped below 10/sat b a few times over the last few weeks.
It was lower than that. At some point I hoped for it to get purged but it didn't, so it's not low enough for it to get purged but not high enough to get confirmed...
The default setting on the reference client is 2 weeks not 3 days (at least, it's 2 weeks in the version i'm running, which is not 0.21.0, but still i'm running a relatively recent version)...
Indeed, I found this https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9312, so it appears 3 days was the old value and now it's 2 weeks. So, if you stop rebroadcasting, most (but not all) nodes should have dropped your transaction after 2 weeks...
I'm not intentionally rebroadcasting but it seems to be happening, https://live.blockcypher.com displays a received field for transactions and for my transaction it's regularly updated. Do you know how I can know the whereabouts of the rebroadcasts, what triggers them and how many times and when my transaction was rebroadcasted? |
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have a transaction that has been stuck for a couple of weeks because of a low fee. The transaction doesn't have change so I can't use CPFP and since it was built using Wasabi it's not tagged as an RBF so I can't replace the fee and broadcast it using another wallet or service. I've read somewhere that a transaction that stays in a mempool for 3 days gets ejected but it looks like my transaction is broadcasted regularly. I've removed Transactions.dat from Wasabi's Data Folder to have the coins appear back in my wallet and tried double spending them with a higher fee, to myself and to the original address. I tried it with Wasabi, Electrum and broadcasting through blockchain.com, nothing works and I get either an error of double spending or conflict, which was somehow expected.
Any idea on how I can unstuck it?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
This shows just how shit the altcoin performance is. Someone spread $1000 over top 10 cryptos and held for 39 months:  Without BTC he would be down to $843 despite the bull runs (from $900 invested). If he had invested his $1000 in only BTC he would be up to $4560. People just don't get it. Maybe 1 in 50 in the comments on reddit see what's happening. Unbelievable. I predict there will be millions of poor people after the next bear market and upswing considering what's going on with altcoins right now. But of course also millions of rich BTC holders and probably already some trillionaires. This data is really not relevant, picking a random date to buy and a random date to sell will give you a random PNL. What if that was invested a year or two years before, what if those prices were updated during spring 2018 when many altcoins boomed, what if we wait some more months or years. I mean nobody really knows and I don't see how you can get anything of substance from that data. If anything it looks like the bull market is not ending anytime soon so not sure why picking a date around now to sell would be any good. Yes I agree that the next bear market could produce many poors and many riches as did the last one and the one before it, but not necessarily because one chose Bitcoin over whatever altcoins or vice versa. |
|
|
|
Thank you for your answers. For the virustotal false positives, I'm prepared to offer a bounty to anyone who could work on fixing them. I could also offer a bounty (less than for fixing) for anyone who would explain for each false positive why it is a false positive and why it's safe to install the wallet. If anyone is interested let me know here how much you think this deserves. |
|
|
|
I've read through the thread and before jumping in I have some questions: - Who can I consider the team to be behind this? It seems AKKP initiated this, AKKP account was created back in 2013 but no activity in that time, the account became active in the old chesscoin thread during the organization of the chess tournament. Any more info about the account would be highly appreciated. I can also see that ZzzzeyeZzzz is on board with this, that account was quite active in the old thread. And finally the releases https://github.com/AKKPP/ChessCoin/releases are done by lasergun, this account seems to be involved in something called 42, but no previous involvement in chesscoin, is this somewhat related to CC032? Any information on the accounts involved and the projects interacting with CC032 would be very helpful. - The virustotal scan is detecting some issues, are they all false positives? Can anyone explain why we shouldn't be alarmed by virustotal detections? - Does anyone have experience with the exchanges listing CC032, anyone successfully deposited and withdrawed from there, anyone know if they do KYC? I'll DMOR but wanted to know the experience others have. - Finally do we know who actually did the hard fork? Thanks to anyone who can provide any info. |
|
|
|
I think NEO is a crap, I regret I hadn't sold it when it was at least 40usd..
Now it seems ETH is the King, and neither Eos nor Neo has good future as daap cryptocurency:(
Why do you think that? If it's only because of price performance, price should not be an indication of the crappiness of a crypto. If you invested during the ICO, you are still in tremendous gains. Every crypto you can think of went down, some way more than NEO, some less. These are just market cycles that repeat over and over again. When the time comes, I believe the gains will be worth the wait. This goes for many cryptocurrencies which are not your typical shitcoin and have solid and involved teams behind them. It's okay to have regrets not selling at ATH or when the price was higher than now, you should realize that you only have regrets in hindsight, nobody knows the future. Try and use that regret and the crypto history to make better decisions, and not give in to emotions. Unless you are extremely lucky, you will not sell the top and you will not buy the bottom, we should just all make peace with this and move on. If you have other elements that make you think NEO is crap and has no future, feel free to share them here, everybody would be very interested I think. |
|
|
|
I'd argue that proving control of the address right now wouldn't be necessary. Proving control by signing a message when the account is hacked is what matters in the end. Or is there more to it than meets my eye? |
|
|
|
Very nice find.
It’s obviously a typo no one noticed until now. It might be originated from an earlier version of the article referring to different data and probably not correctly updated.
I corrected the text and now should be pretty clear.
Thank you for pointing out.
Anytime. I was starting to wonder if I missed some easy or complex calculations. Thank you for updating it and thank you for writing it. Now I can go back to reading  . |
|
|
|
On the CME we get both informations:  On the 25th of September 5,824 contracts were traded on the September expiry, there are a total of 1171 contracts open, 171 less than yesterday close (actually OI are not updated on real times, so both those figures relate to one day before, but you get the concept). Can anyone please explain how we get these figures there are a total of 1171 contracts open, 171 less than yesterday close from the displayed data? Thank you |
|
|
|
is the storage system already working?
Yes. How many users are there at the moment?
How many Terabytes is the platform already storing?
Here https://siastats.info/ you have a lot of useful stats. 330 hosts, almost 84k active contracts, 750 TB of used storage and more than 2 PB of network capacity. |
|
|
|
There's a rather large buy order on Bittrex:
~snip~
Seems to go down in price a bit every day.
If anyone is interested in selling 1000GB or more, I'll give a better price.
You will not find any seller here. Why don't you just go into an exchange and set a buy order with your "better price". In that sense, you will not have to go into hiring some escrow and do those cumbersome things. It is much easier doing such things in an exchange. Lortz if you are concerned with Bittrex's KYC, you can go to cryptox.pl, someone might sell in your order there. |
|
|
|
Not that it will change anything if the next token is not listed anywhere,
Easy is already listed here https://exenium.trade/ We will catch two more exchanges next year. That's a step in the right direction. Just make sure the exchange activates trading only once the token sale ends and all tokens are distributed, otherwise it's gonna be a shit show. |
|
|
|
I can't believe they have the nerve to ask for funding for another project before sorting out the mess eGaaS/Apla created. Their first preoccupation should be to, at least, grant eGaaS/Apla investors access to their tokens and work towards providing some kind of liquidity for the token. Rather, they are launching a new project with a 2-month old vague comment about a supposed swap: Coming Up
1. Swap Schedule for APL & GEN holder: TBA
2. Bounty Phase 1. Signature, Social Media & Blog Campaign (10 Days): TBA
Not that it will change anything if the next token is not listed anywhere, this could be Apla all over again, investors finding themselves with tokens they can't exchange. I'm not saying this is going to happen, but given the history of Apla, why would anyone who had that experience actually trust you with anything? Seriously guys, before asking for funding, sort out the Apla mess to try and restore a bit of trust. |
|
|
|
What about the other rounds?
Other round pages were never persisted. The transition page kept changing with each round. The only thing I can find is a summary of distribution rounds here: https://obyte.org/#dist (in Previous distributions). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
