Where did you read that? It's not true, BTCD is not a fork of BTC, it exists since 2014 when forks were not fashionable. The devs just moved on to a new Platform/coin named Komodo and a swap took place a couple of years ago to swap BTCD for KMD. BTCD has been officially abandoned when the swap ended, the remaining (unswapped) coins are not movable, so it's just a playground for speculators on Poloniex right now.

It will dump as easily as it pumped. BTCD is a dead coin and these kinds of spikes have happened in the past and we all know how they ended up.

Yes that's it. In Agama right now, it's not possible, each asset has to be activated manually.

There are no masternodes, but there are witnesses. No specific amount of coins is needed to run one of these. Anybody can run one (or many), but users are the ones who choose to add a witness to their list. So to be chosen, you have to somehow campaign to earn the trust of the users so that they add you to their witnesses' list.

I hope it will have the functionality to display Komodo assets related to addresses of the wallet natively. Actually, this would be a nice feature to have in Agama (in SPV mode) as well.

Nice to see that. Keep up the good work.
Was wondering if it would be possible to have all (non-zero balance) assets that are related to a Komodo address (or multiple addresses) automatically listed in the wallet without having the need to manually add/activate them (as it is the case now with Agama).

Nothing is impossible, the recent rise was apparently a buy-the-rumor-sell-the-news type of up and down due to GBYTE being on Binance's radar now (I think they will add it at some point without it winning a vote or Tony paying fees). In many cases, the price goes back to where the pump started, it was around $45 for GBYTE, I'm not saying it will but that's a possibility.

According to the voting page https://www.binance.com/vote.html: Deadline: 2018-08-31 12:00:00 (the time zone is not specified ...)

Well as it stands, GBYTE does not seem to have a chance of winning the vote. Not an issue imo, sooner or later it will be listed there and elsewhere.

From the announcements channel in discord:



In text for clickable links:

Technically, your NEO is on the blockchain, the (encrypted) private keys to access your NEO addresses are on the Ledger Nano S. As long as nobody else gets a hold of your private keys/passwords/seeds/pins your coins are safe.

Come on meterse, Guffy is very obviously just using marketing to encompass all the expenses ... No need to be insulting. The constructive answer is simply that the 110K are not for marketing only but for the foundation for various purposes ...

Btw, if anyone wants to track the undistributed funds, here is the address https://explorer.byteball.org/#MZ4GUQC7WUKZKKLGAS3H3FSDKLHI7HFO.

There is something I don't quite understand with the foundation projected expenses, since they were determined in dollars at a given time and then converted to the ~110433 GB, what was the reason why they were not sold at that time to secure the funds once and for all and move on? Those estimations were made with a price of $124 per GB, there was no guarantee whatsoever that the price would stay at those levels, as a matter of fact we are at $48 and there still is no guarantee that a bottom is reached. What would the plan be if the price continues to tank (and it can)? What if the entirety of the undistributed funds are not enough to cover the estimated expenses? Are there plans to use the community fund or to call for donations or something else?

Also, I think the images with quotes that are published from time to time are useless. On one hand, the image doesn't have much to do with the quote, on the other, we can see that the quote is intended to be somehow clever but it actually is not. Maybe they actually have an effect and serve a purpose, I just don't see it and I don't really have a better alternative, just pointing out that I think they don't add value, I may be wrong of course.

Isolani159 what is this airdrop you are talking about? I have no memory whatsoever of such a thing, did you do it using another thread? If so, can you give a link please?

I remember ChessCoin going under 10 sats on Yobit at some point, I don't remember if it went to 5 sats though. Are you referring to that as the airdrop?

Edit: I just checked CMC and it did fall down to 4 sats.

And as ZzzzeyeZzzz asked, you said you gave coins to some developer who dumped them on Yobit without your knowledge.

At least clarify the airdrop please. Thx.


Well technically only those who sold benefited ...

Just to be clear, there is no switching or swapping, Chess token will be airdropped to Chess coin holders who register.

We still need a (better) vision concerning how Chess token will work and how it will help Chess coin ...

There are multiple milestones in the roadmap that are upcoming in 2018. Is it possible to have more info about their progress? Thank you.

Isolani159, Have you read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1510517.msg41165732#msg41165732 or this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1510517.msg41208304#msg41208304?

The way you are doing the airdrop lacks security, privacy and transparency. As said before, a screen shot to prove the balance is not a valid proof, I agree that making a small transaction proves the balance, but that's not necessary if a message is signed (this can be done via the wallet). Well both methods could exist, in either of them a screen shot is not needed.

Also you should make the registered addresses public, that's the least you can do to be taken seriously ... You are claiming that addresses holding 37% of the the circulating supply have registered, how do we know it's true?

Please reconsider, taking the necessary measures to ensure security and transparency should be your top priority and will give you more credibility.

Just wondering where you guys get the data you are basing these conclusions on. (I'm implying that they are far from accurate .)

Just a technicality: That's not the ETF that has made news recently and that everybody seems to be expecting. It is actually said in the article you linked:

So you are saying that it's okay to sell shitcoins knowing that their value has a high chance of going down to 1 sat? It's like selling something in real life knowing that it will vanish after a short time. How can people be okay with that? Or am I missing some angle here?

scowlface is clearly making that face cuz her supposed boyfriend is looking at the smiling girl. Under other circumstances scowlface would surely not be scowlface ... The guy isn't looking at the smiling girl cuz she's smiling (he can't see that by the way), neither is he ignoring scowlface cuz she is scowling.

Having said that, I do agree that the meme is, at some extent, not well-suited. Mainly cuz the accurate explanation that's complex is never/hardly at the reach of most of us.

Sorry but no ... You don't do something like Apple just because Apple does it, that's not a valid argument. Apple and Byteball do not target the same kind of users/markets so what works for them doesn't necessary work for everything. Generally (not this specific announcement), announcements of announcements in the crypto community might create hype and may drive up the prices to high (artificial) levels, that's not good since they will fall down aggressively after that in a "buy the rumor, sell the news" type of pump and dump. In the current context (correction/bear) news/rumors may not necessarily have that effect, yet I can't really see a positive side to this. You seem to think announcements of announcements are a good thing in general, if so, can you please explain why you think that? Thank you.