Well, I totally agree with what you said, what I think is that they need a very good marketing strategy and promotional material that will make viewers excited about the platform and the games and products it provides. Even if the business model isn't very new, they can still do pretty well using it if they know how to manage things initially.

If their platform proves to be good, especially with the rewards and interesting games, they might even gain some popularity within this forum as well after they launch the platform and manage to get some popularity outside with their marketing.

Though I agree that consistency plays a great role in getting success, I think one should also be adapting to new techniques that can be utilized in a good way only to maximize the chances of gaining better results. Maybe don't change the existing strategy or get influenced by anyone, but one can keep making updates to an existing strategy.

Or maybe one can also try something different at times only to see if that works or not, but only with a small amount if you are not very confident and don't have enough knowledge about it. I believe change is required over time, for whatever you are doing, or you may stay behind while the world moves ahead.

That is a must, there is no doubt about it. I understand that some countries may have some different rules than others, but one thing that is surely the case for every single nation in the entire world is the simple fact that when you get maybe millions, if not at least tens of or hundreds of thousands of people into a nation to just have fun, there is bound to be some trouble.

It's not even just about drinking, although that does make it harder of course because of what it does, but even if there are zero drinking, if you bring in 100k+ people together to just have fun, there will be some case of chaos, and you have to control that very carefully. So each nation that hosts, should spend the most money on security without a doubt.

The thing about local games is that most gamblers will not be able to play them or they will find it hard to master the games since they've never played them, and people mostly tend to play games that they know pretty well, especially in gambling since they are betting real money in those games and no one would like to play a game they don't know with real money.

Most online casinos operate on a global level, and they have players from all around the globe, and that is probably the reason why they never think of adding local games to a single locality, they can't add every game of course since there are a lot.

CNZ was committed about this tour of Pakistan but at this point mostly New Zealand top ranked players are involved in IPL because they have better money from this league, and we have few boards those can't force their players for any tour this all create mess-up just because of this New Zealand selectors send this team with their reserve players which are not capable of competing with Pakistan first priority team and lost these two matches badly most chances we will have this series one-sided because Pakistan is involved with their all top players which are giving their best and difference is surely having his own impact.

Weather conditions are also not favorable for them as well because right now we have heat which is hurting them badly as this is their off season, and they are still playing in Pakistan just because of their commitment.

Well, it basically depends on where you live and how much money is considered rich in your country/region. The definition of being rich is probably different for different people living in different parts of the world, so it's not really guessable if a person will be rich by having a certain amount of money if the place of their residence is unknown.

And financial freedom doesn't only mean having a lot of money, especially when it comes to Bitcoin. Financial freedom also means that you are totally free to spend your money anywhere you want without any restrictions or problems or being questioned by anyone, and by anyone I mean a central authority.

I think regret and disappointment are very close to each other. Surely we would have done it again if we had the chance, it is not like we would have guessed it could end in a draw, there are surely some people who did but I do not think that it should matter that much. I personally feel like the best thing to do right now would be just focusing on how we could have fun, and own goals after own goals, having this type of game was definitely entertaining so we shouldn't be disappointed but more like have fun watching it.

All that aside, I think it is important to also realize that you can regret it, but not really have a huge reaction to it, just like "meh" and move on, that is how I approach the losses, I regret them not ignore them.

Stake is the leading now but not all people prefer them like the user that you quoted there. BC.game has lots of supporters. In the gambling sites that I visit, there's always people who talk about BC.games. Cloudlet is also a famous gambling site here in the forum. I can feel that these three are going to be on the leading vote but the other two are going to be left behind.

There might be reason on why the OP have came with such a list. Could be that it was sponsored but I check his other post about casino awards, and he include more sites there. By there, I see that stake have won for 2 years straight. Let see if they still gets it. Majority of the users here are carrying a sig on their profile but many of them are not biased so the competition can still be fair.

It's basically greed that makes people use new casinos with big deposits since those casinos promote big bonuses in their advertisements and those with high greed start to imagine that they will win big by claiming that bonus but it actually backfires and they get scammed even if they manage to win something extra with the claimed bonus.

One should simply use an existing platform that is trusted and already has a reputation within the community to stay safe from such things, if it's just about the bonus, I don't really think it's worth it considering you will lose your deposited money only for that.

That doesn't sound sweet coming from a guy who is wearing a paid signature himself which is not yet paid since he applied for a campaign without having earned 5 Merits in the last 120 days . One shouldn't blame others for something that he does himself too, that makes you a hypocrite.

It is better if you just accept the fact that you are also fond of signature campaigns since you want to get into one yourself to earn money while you post around the forum, so better not to target others for doing that .

Actually, as soon as it's deposited in a casino, it's not your money anymore, lol.  Jokes aside, you are right that one should have no restrictions on the money that has been deposited, or even if they do have such requirements, it should be higher than 1x of the deposited amount which is reasonable, but 5x is way too high and a gambler will probably lose the money before that requirement is filled.

And that probably is the motive behind this rule, so that a gambler that deposits money should not be able to take anything out unless they are extremely lucky to complete the 5x wagering requirement and still have anything left to withdraw.

Though Crash might seem to be the easiest game to get a 1.01x or 1.1x, it can be deadly as well. I've seen it happen myself, though my bet wasn't really big as I was just trying the game at a new casino that I signed up and I was playing with a bonus, I've seen it crashing even before starting, and that is when people lose everything they've betted on the game.

The best thing is simply to have a limited budget for your gambling activities, if you are well-doing, you can have a daily budget, and if you don't earn that much but still love gambling, you can have a weekly or a monthly budget which if you lose, you won't gamble more in that week or month.

Surely this was easy win for the Titans as Gill was doing amazing job and leading his team from the front which helps them for having third win from their fourth match the target 153 was really not enough for PBK as they lost few early wickets and Titans bowlers were also on their strategy which helps them for not allowing PBK batsmen for playing freely or having anything difficult for the winners.

In 19th over Arshdeep Singh done decent bowling and give just 6 runs which create some hype but still this was not enough for the PBK to have any chance in this match with the presence of Miller and Tewatia.
Now after few hours we have another exciting match with high-flying KKR going to host SRH which have their first in last game against PBK.

If you expect the market to behave exactly the way you want it, sorry but you will never be able to get that. There are multiple reasons why a market behaves in a certain way, and behaviours tend to change over time, just like how a human cannot always stay happy or sad, the market cannot always keep going up or constantly go down.

That is the reason why it is called unpredictable. And of course, everyone has to suffer from losses, no trader can claim that they have never had to face a loss in cryptocurrency trading, especially if they were not experts as every expert was once a beginner.

After having few entertaining matches right now we have another one-sided match with disciplined bowling from GT give them good advantage and now their batsmen are also doing good job for the third win of this season from their fourth match after winning toss a good decision by Hardick Pandya to bowl first give them good advantage, and they take few early wickets specially inform Dhawan were cheaply bowled out by Mohammad Shami which helps them for restricting PBK for having target like this 153 all bowers were on target.

Now as they were chasing this target lost two wickets with 91 runs in 12 overs mean things completely under their control Gill and Captain Pandya both are at crease which mean we will have early ended of this match as well.

When I first came to know about Bitcoin, it was priced at around $400 if I remember correctly, I don't remember the year though. No one told me about it to be precise, but I found out about it from the internet when I was searching for opportunities to earn money online, lol, one of the biggest reasons why newbies think that Bitcoin is a way to get rich.

At that time, I couldn't afford to buy Bitcoin, nor I had any idea what it is and how it works, and whether it is something that can grow this high in the future, but I did some research and new that it is something useful, so I used to claim free Bitcoin from faucets. I was only able to purchase Bitcoin years after that when the price was already pretty high.

Slots from any provider or at any casino have a slightly higher house edge than any other gambling game, so it's obvious that you will lose more than you win unless you are too lucky and hit a very huge multiplier at the start of your spinning session and then you simply exit and withdraw the money you have just managed to win.

But that doesn't happen all the time or to everyone. I personally change the game if I don't hit a normal win within 10 spins or so, that makes you feel like you are not going to get anything from there. I also take breaks, like 10 or 15 minutes off, and then start with another game to try my luck again.

Lol, that happens with me too, a lot. It was just yesterday when I was playing Crash on TrustDice with an initial bet of $1, I set my auto cash out at 2x, but I usually cash out before that, so sometimes it crashes even before 2x, but at times when I have cashed out already, it goes beyond 200x or something and I feel very bad for why I cashed out so early.

But that is just how much we basically are destined to get, even if I wouldn't set an auto cash-out limit in the hope of getting a higher multiplier, it would probably crash before I would press the cash-out button and the result for me would be zero instead of something at least.

You said it yourself, it was your fault that you didn't bother reading the complete terms and conditions before going ahead and making a deposit. A trusted and reputable casino shouldn't have a wagering requirement for a normal deposit of about 5x, most of the time they don't have a wagering requirement for deposits but even if they do, it shouldn't be more than 1x of the deposit amount.

So in a normal casino when you deposit $1000, you will be required to have a wagered $1000 before you can request a withdrawal, even if the withdrawal amount is higher than the deposit, if you have met the wagering requirement, you should be good. If the amount is too large, they might ask for KYC.

It isn't only because of lack of Bitcoin education, but because of lack of education in general. A very large population of every third-world country is in the lower middle-class category that mostly doesn't have good devices or barely has access to good internet connections, and we all know that Bitcoin cannot be learned or used without both of these things.

People from Europe or America have proper education and all other facilities as well which makes them way ahead for things that are only available online, sometimes, even things that are also available in real life tend to reach third-world countries very late.