It sometimes happens that the outcome of a sports event goes against the odds and the team that had very high odds of winning will lose to a team that doesn't have a very good performance in the competition, and it is never guessable whether it's you or an AI making the prediction because such outcomes come by surprise and all of a sudden.

As you said, AI can be your best companion that will help you with the research and analysis for a specific match that you are willing to place a bet on, but it can only do that if it has the latest available data in it's training.

I will definitely not do it if it's now allowed by the platform, I would rather use a different platform which is allowed from where I'm at that moment only to avoid any problems because most of the times, your accounts that you've been using for a long time are very dear to you, especially if there is ranking and VIP and other stuff involved and if you lose your account, you lose all of it and everything that you've wagered so far from that account is all gone, hence, no privileges.

This is the reason why one should have accounts in at least two or three different trusted and reputable platforms, so that if you can't access one of them when you are out of country, etc. You can use the other ones in that time.

I completely agreed about this all there is no point to have matches like these because it's completely waste of sources and energy with nothing positive is also coming from these one-sided matches as well ICC is trying to commit suicide through these poor decisions which are not helpful for the cricket and countries here still we have good time for bringing changes and help to countries like Ireland and many more which are trying to adopt with just allowing them to play in t20i instead of giving them full test status which is not fair.

After watching test matches against Bangladesh and Sri Lanka all were clear as they are still not able to perform, so now we are watching how things are going against team like England with now this match is going to end today without any entertaining just some good personal records for the English players which is surely matter of shame.

Messi has left, lets see what PSG will do, they need better midfield and now they will need someone to replace Messi, which we all know will be hard, no matter how old he was, he was still messi and did some pretty magical stuff anyway, but missed some games. I am guessing that Neymar will be a no-show next season as well so I am guessing that its going to be something a bit more important, it will probably be something to care about and I believe that it wouldn't be really an easy fill.

Neymar and Messi gone, need of a midfield, and how much money could they even spend? I am not even talking about just their budget, which is of course limited even if its a lot, but I think they have financial fair play they will need to think about as well.

I don't really see anything having the slightest possibility of interrupting the chances of Bitcoin prolonging its value over time because it basically doesn't have any disadvantages or vulnerabilities as a technology, even if there are a few vulnerabilities like 51% attacks and stuff, they are more likely not reachable for anyone to compromise or interrupt the network.

The only thing that people might consider a disadvantage of Bitcoin is its volatility which is basically there in all cryptocurrencies and it's because their prices go up and down based on demand and supply and because of the flow of the money invested.

Professional poker players never gamble online AFAIK, they always do it in land-based casinos or in tournaments where they can play against other humans face to face so that they can know and understand each and every move of other players, see their facial expressions, and whatever that makes a difference and can give them an idea of what kind of a hand they have got.

About ChatGPT, it obviously won't be able to reach their level, it's based on machine learning algorithms that can search and find answers and information based on a keyword provided, it is not specifically created for the purpose of gambling.

I don't think there is a perfect gambling strategy especially in gambling when we know that gambling owners always have the advantage over the gamblers. The article suggested to stick on a style but I think it depends.

If the style is working properly, definitely we will stick on it. Looking for others might only affect the momentum you're getting. In case it's not working well, that must be the time to look for another. On the number 6 in the list, it says to have enough money.

I think this can also mean to have more money than usual which is wrong. Having huge bankroll still won't guarantee you a winner. In fact I think I am more lucky with a tiny bank roll.

It might be easy to identify an action that is done as a result of a match of spot-fixing if it's done in a clear manner which shows the player has done something unusual, but there are also players who even do cheating but they do it in a way that they get away undetected and even the officials can't suspect them of being cheaters.

And about bans and fines, I think authorities are pretty strict with that these days, as said by OP in his post above, they can even ban players for life from soccer and also fine them for what they did, fines might not be an issue but a ban for a lifetime will surely make every player scared.

I think a vast majority of gamblers don't gamble only for the money but they also enjoy gambling while having the thought that they might win something from it, and even those who gamble for money would probably like to do it themselves, someone using AI to bet on their behalf should simply try something else like trading where they can use a bot to get profit.

The essence of gambling gets lost if we use bots or AI for betting even if they are generating good results, I mean what's the fun in that? I personally would never do that even if I know that might increase the probability of winning.

Such cases are really difficult to manage, people who don't acknowledge themselves that they have an issue will never listen to anyone advising them or telling them that they need help because as you said, they will get angry and start arguing or fighting with you, these are very severe cases and it's very difficult, in fact, impossible to talk them out of that situation.

There needs to be some kind of therapy and hypnosis sessions for these kinds of people because they surely need help but they don't realize it themselves nor do they let others help them, they just stick to what they like to do which is basically dangerous for them.

The ads you see on any platform depend on what you surf on that particular platform, whether it's YouTube, Google, Facebook, or any other platform. They track your activities through cookies and then use those cookies to show you personalized ads based on your interests which in this case are related to what keywords you've searched or what kind of videos and pictures you've interacted with.

It might be frustrating but that's what it is, if we don't want to see those ads, we will obviously need to clear the cache and cookies of our apps and browsers and try not to interact with videos or posts of the nature that we don't want to see anymore.

Well, I pretty much agree with the logic here, if the family isn't so well-to-do and doesn't have a lot of money, rejecting such an amount is sheer stupidity, because as you said, beliefs or culture or any other thing won't pay the bills and money is a basic requirement for today's world, you can't do anything at all without it, and if wealth is knocking on your door, you should welcome it with open hands.

Such a thing can be understood if the father is already rich and doesn't need money, he is feeding his family well, all their expenses are covered and they even have savings for bad times which can come all of a sudden, but if this is not the case, he shouldn't have rejected the money.

Well, I believe Bitcoin used to be the first choice of gamblers for gambling on online crypto gambling platforms, but nowadays, most gamblers use stable coins like USDT or USDC, and the reason for that is because they are not volatile so there is no devaluation in between your gambling sessions which might happen with Bitcoin since it's volatile and can drop value any time.

Another reason for choosing stable coins is to be able to easily understand your betting amount, your wins and losses, how much was your bankroll initially and how much it is when the session is ended, it will be pretty difficult with Bitcoin since you can't see the USD value that way.

KYC doesn't have any function to prevent your account from account breakers or anything else, and the money laundering thing is for the platforms and authorities and it isn't a benefit for you, it's just that they want to keep tracking your activities to know whether you are involved in money laundering or not and if they suspect anything like that, things can go wrong with you.

I personally don't mind doing KYC but only if the platform that I'm using is trusted and I know that they won't misuse my information for their own gains, if I can do KYC in a centralized exchange to access all the features, I can do it on a gambling platform as well so that I don't face any issues with my withdrawals and deposits.

Even if he isn't neglecting her financial needs and fulfills every single requirement and even provides her with the best that is possible, being his life partner, she still has all the right to know what he is doing on her back and if he lies or hides something from her and she finds out about it herself, such a reaction is reasonable, I would say that she reacted pretty leniently and some wives would go way harder than just a threat.

One should imagine being in her shoes and then thinking how they would react to find out that their partner has been hiding something this big from them all this time and even at the end, he didn't tell her himself but she found out about it herself.

That's not entirely correct and I don't agree with that. Not all gambling platforms or casinos cheat their players so that they can get more revenue through the games being played by gamblers. Most reputable casinos, such as Stake, don't really need to cheat the gamblers so that they can earn more because they already earn enough revenue from the platform that they don't need to do it.

Only the new and untrustworthy platforms will think of such negative ways of increasing their earnings from players because they understand that they don't have a user base big enough to earn them a lot of money so they use such methods.

This attitude reminds me of Elon Musk. You know Elon right? He is also good at making false promises but there are times he did it and then revised it. Don't know if he is confused or he is only playing tricks on us.

I think Eddie said it so that those peeps will hold on and continue playing on his site but they can always remind him again. If he still did not implement the feature, that should be the time for them to leave the casino. If they won't add it, it simply means they are not interested with it and they might be contented on what their existing features has to offer. Maybe they are earning decent with it?

So, why will they prioritize a single request coming from a normal user but as you said, there are casinos who has a poker room on them, so why can't the user go them instead? And maybe that is also the reason on why Eddie didn't bother making one.

The moderators obviously have nothing personal with you or your platform, what they are doing is to keep the forum organized and keep every thread where it belongs, and since you said yourself that people can use wBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin) for gambling on your platform, that makes it an altcoin casino because wBTC is actually an altcoin and not the original Bitcoin.

So I don't see moderators being the bad guy here as they are doing their job, nor do I say that your platform is bad or anything, it is just that they did what should be done. For suggestions, I can't give any as I haven't used your platform yet, will do that once I'm done trying it out anytime soon.

I use a Android smartphone and a desktop PC, I have noticed that what we look for using google search engine will impact how our phones react in giving out information, news and advertisements, it's like those gadgets are build in a way that they know their users better than anyone, once I look into Chelsea football club, my prebuilt news app will always give me updates about Chelsea football club and important information going on with the football club.

What you use your gadgets for will be the way it will function on the users behalf, It doesn't take a thing to find out if your friends are fraudsters or por* addicts, just get a hold of their phone of PC, without looking into their search or browser history you will know what they have been up too.
[/quote]
That's how invasive all these social media platforms and search engines have become, they use us to run their businesses and our privacy is not of their concern at all because we give them the right to do whatever they want with us because we always agree with their terms and conditions and agree with them at the time of registration.

Cookies used by websites and apps track our activities and then use that to provide us with news and updates and advertisements based on our searches which are considered to be our interests, our interests are even sold to other companies so that they can target us for selling their products.

Well, the decision depends on us if we want to stick with a casino or not after reading their terms and conditions, because we can't really object against their actions and even if we do, that wouldn't really make a difference for them and they will still do whatever they want. That is basically the reason why every gamblers should first read the terms and conditions before using a platform.

A trusted and reputable casino that cares about their reputation more than anything would obviously make some change but they would notify their users beforehand or at least after the changes have been made.