Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 07:57:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 »
5501  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 09, 2017, 01:57:45 AM


I solved this problem without having to spend money on a hardware wallet by
1- removing SIM card and factory-resetting my old phone, immediately putting it into airplane mode (wi-fi, bluetooth and everything else also manually disabled) and ENCRYPTING WITH STRONG PASSWORD (not draw pattern);
2- installing Electrum via APK stored on micro-SD;
3- generating new wallet in this air-gapped phone, then I imported x-pub to everyday brand new phone.

Now I can see balance, receive bitcoin and create unsigned transactions on the connected phone, then old phone signs transactions via QR-code.

Cheap and easy.

Ok, not bad, you basically have a DIY hardware wallet. Still not as much secure (physical access to phone and chip-off technique among others) and certainly not as convenient to use as a commercial hardware wallet.... But yes, its ok.

Hardware wallets are now less than $100 anyways.... That's still cheap, and easier.

Not forgetting that I always have Electrum's seed (written down, memorized, hidden, scrambled within books, etc)

Oh yes, I also have the seed of my hardware wallet conveniently stored... But I prefer not to talk much about how. I guess that's something everyone can figure the better way for them.
5502  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 09, 2017, 01:34:19 AM
Also, if you have 12BTC on a software wallet my advice inmediately changes to: Buy a hardware wallet NOW!
What's wrong with a software wallet? Mine is password protected, stored in a veracrypt volume, which is stored on my encrypted /home partition, and included in several backups stored in different air-gaped locations and only ever connected one at a time. (and most importantly, I'm not running a toy operating system.)


Well, you are describing it perfectly. I can have better security with my hardware wallet without needing any special security measures. I could even use it on "public" computer.

I say "better security" because no matter how many layers of encryption you may be using... at some time you would need your computer to access the wallet in "plaintext" to sign the transactions and that opens an attack vector.

It's much better to have the signing be done inside a specialized hardware....

Plus it is amazingly more convenient to use.



I solved this problem without having to spend money on a hardware wallet by
1- removing SIM card and factory-resetting my old phone, immediately putting it into airplane mode (wi-fi, bluetooth and everything else also manually disabled) and ENCRYPTING WITH STRONG PASSWORD (not draw pattern);
2- installing Electrum via APK stored on micro-SD;
3- generating new wallet in this air-gapped phone, then I imported x-pub to everyday brand new phone.

Now I can see balance, receive bitcoin and create unsigned transactions on the connected phone, then old phone signs transactions via QR-code.

Cheap and easy.

Ok, not bad, you basically have a DIY hardware wallet. Still not as much secure (physical access to phone and chip-off technique among others) and certainly not as convenient to use as a commercial hardware wallet.... But yes, its ok.

Hardware wallets are now less than $100 anyways.... That's also cheap, and easier.
5503  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 09, 2017, 01:26:38 AM
Also, if you have 12BTC on a software wallet my advice inmediately changes to: Buy a hardware wallet NOW!
What's wrong with a software wallet? Mine is password protected, stored in a veracrypt volume, which is stored on my encrypted /home partition, and included in several backups stored in different air-gaped locations and only ever connected one at a time. (and most importantly, I'm not running a toy operating system.)


Well, you are describing it perfectly. I can have better security with my hardware wallet without needing any special security measures. I could even use it on "public" computer.

I say "better security" because no matter how many layers of encryption you may be using... at some time you would need your computer to access the wallet in "plaintext" to sign the transactions and that opens an attack vector.

It's much better to have the signing be done inside a specialized hardware....

Plus it is amazingly more convenient to use.



I have been saying this same thing for four years, but I would take it a step further. Easiest and best way to secure your Bitcoin is printing your address and putting two copies in different safe deposit boxes. Then return 10 years later a millionaire.

Software wallets for even moderately competent tech people are complete jokes: passwords, veracrypt?, home partition encrypted, multiple backups, air gapped storage, military grade cement vaults, across continents, different governing body, multi sig, documented access protocol, protocol encrypted, protocol stored in multiple backup locations......OMFG

You are missing my point. Paperwallets also have its use case but... HOW DO YOU PLAN TO CONVERT THEM BACK TO BTC (MOVE THEM) WITHOUT USING A SOFTWARE WALLET?!??!!?

For god's sake, why can't people just follow my advice and buy a damn hardware wallet! Smiley
5504  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 11:42:06 PM
Also, if you have 12BTC on a software wallet my advice inmediately changes to: Buy a hardware wallet NOW!
What's wrong with a software wallet? Mine is password protected, stored in a veracrypt volume, which is stored on my encrypted /home partition, and included in several backups stored in different air-gaped locations and only ever connected one at a time. (and most importantly, I'm not running a toy operating system.)


Well, you are describing it perfectly. I can have better security with my hardware wallet without needing any special security measures. I could even use it on "public" computer.

I say "better security" because no matter how many layers of encryption you may be using... at some time you would need your computer to access the wallet in "plaintext" to sign the transactions and that opens an attack vector.

It's much better to have the signing be done inside a specialized hardware....

Plus it is amazingly more convenient to use.

5505  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 10:39:46 PM
At this point you need to stop sending more transactions until the previous ones settle. The problem here is that you have sent a transaction that used coins that you just received but were not confirmed before sending again.

Maybe someone has a better solution for this, but I would just wait and next time don't use unconfirmed coins as inputs for sending.

But. but. but...  The coins have been in my wallet for a month at least.
I had an issue in my wallet two months ago when it showed un-confirmed balance.
As per the wallet support people, I emptied my wallet to a new one and then created a new wallet where I sent my coins.  That cleared the unconfirmed balance.
But now a month later when I want to send my coins to an exchange I run into this problem.
Maybe it is a wallet problem..  How to fix it?  I dont want to lose my 12 BTC!

What software wallet are you using?

Also, if you have 12BTC on a software wallet my advice inmediately changes to: Buy a hardware wallet NOW!

Either Ledger Nano S or Trezor.

And for your current problem, make sure you have copy of the seed words and/or backup the wallet. Wait for transactions to settle as any time you keep sending new transactions using your unconfirmed change you are making the problem worse (no coin loss though, except for the fees).
5506  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 10:19:06 PM
i read now the last replies regarding the fees and how long you wait etc etc...
i maybe live in another world because the maximum i wait when deposit to exchange or send back etc is never more than 1 hour about....
and i never have problem to pay some small amount...
the question is .. where do we go from now regarding the price??

With the current fee fiasco I suspect we are going down.

Which fiasco? I am trading all day long and have several feeds open... Haven't read anything about a "fiasco". Source?

No particular source... I am just an average user that is having huge problems getting the BTC transferred from a wallet to an exchange.  That is a fiasco, and from what I have read many other people have the same problem.

Ok, I thought you were refering to something new.

Also I wouldn't consider it a "fiasco". I mean, are you sure the problem isn't in the exchange end?

Have you checked the transaction in blockchain explorer to see if it is already confirmed but the exchange is not acknowledging it?

Did the transaction include a proper fee? Unless you set it up manually, it should be ok though.

Anyways, yes, Bitcoin needs to solve the scaling problem asap. But that is already "discounted" in current price. Once that get solved expect the price to skyrocket.


All the transactions show in bitcoin.info as Unconfirmed.  I have been raising the fees manually because my wallet was sending 0.0001 for all transactions.
In my latest transaction I sent 0.25 with 0.0005 (240 satoshi/byte) but when this gets processed it gets added to another 0.5 BTC and then the fee per byte drops to 96??

see the tx: https://blockchain.info/tx-index/44af690b488daae59c2ca4bd055a6dc29378e11e51853de4e0763e72f8dd3e3e

Ya. This one has a low (96 sat/B) fee, and 3 inputs so it might be unexpectedly delayed. The following one with the right fee (~220 Sat/B) will not confirm because it tries to spend the unconfirmed output from the delayed one.

edit: just saw that the one you posted has 3 unconfirmed inputs too! You seem to have a basic misunderstanding of how this all works. Smiley

edit2: Ahh. Do you have 'spend unconfirmed change' set in your wallet? That, and a bit of impatience, might have caused this chain of unconfirmed transactions (plus the low fees paid earlier).


a different kind of fiasco it seems.

I have contacted the wallet people but no response except that the fees are too low.. I sent the last transaction with max fees and still nothing.
I am not dev so I dont understand the techno lingo so well.
Right now I have a total of 7 transactions sent in the last 24 hours with increasing fees but none of them have confirmed!

At this point you need to stop sending more transactions until the previous ones settle. The problem here is that you have sent a transaction that used coins that you just received but were not confirmed before sending again.

Maybe someone has a better solution for this, but I would just wait and next time don't use unconfirmed coins as inputs for sending.


5507  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 08:39:49 PM
Oh look. Another ATH... $1630USD at Stamp.

How nice.  Cheesy

At this rate... are you so sure in a few years 21 BTC won't be "enough"? Smiley
5508  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 08:18:12 PM
i read now the last replies regarding the fees and how long you wait etc etc...
i maybe live in another world because the maximum i wait when deposit to exchange or send back etc is never more than 1 hour about....
and i never have problem to pay some small amount...
the question is .. where do we go from now regarding the price??

With the current fee fiasco I suspect we are going down.

Which fiasco? I am trading all day long and have several feeds open... Haven't read anything about a "fiasco". Source?

No particular source... I am just an average user that is having huge problems getting the BTC transferred from a wallet to an exchange.  That is a fiasco, and from what I have read many other people have the same problem.

Ok, I thought you were refering to something new.

Also I wouldn't consider it a "fiasco". I mean, are you sure the problem isn't in the exchange end?

Have you checked the transaction in blockchain explorer to see if it is already confirmed but the exchange is not acknowledging it?

Did the transaction include a proper fee? Unless you set it up manually, it should be ok though.

Anyways, yes, Bitcoin needs to solve the scaling problem asap. But that is already "discounted" in current price. Once that get solved expect the price to skyrocket.


All the transactions show in bitcoin.info as Unconfirmed.  I have been raising the fees manually because my wallet was sending 0.0001 for all transactions.
In my latest transaction I sent 0.25 with 0.0005 (240 satoshi/byte) but when this gets processed it gets added to another 0.5 BTC and then the fee per byte drops to 96??

see the tx: https://blockchain.info/tx-index/44af690b488daae59c2ca4bd055a6dc29378e11e51853de4e0763e72f8dd3e3e

I think you are sending unconfirmed transactions as inputs for your transaction. Can someone please confirm this?

5509  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 07:35:37 PM
i read now the last replies regarding the fees and how long you wait etc etc...
i maybe live in another world because the maximum i wait when deposit to exchange or send back etc is never more than 1 hour about....
and i never have problem to pay some small amount...
the question is .. where do we go from now regarding the price??

With the current fee fiasco I suspect we are going down.

Which fiasco? I am trading all day long and have several feeds open... Haven't read anything about a "fiasco". Source?

No particular source... I am just an average user that is having huge problems getting the BTC transferred from a wallet to an exchange.  That is a fiasco, and from what I have read many other people have the same problem.

Ok, I thought you were refering to something new.

Also I wouldn't consider it a "fiasco". I mean, are you sure the problem isn't in the exchange end?

Have you checked the transaction in blockchain explorer to see if it is already confirmed but the exchange is not acknowledging it?

Did the transaction include a proper fee? Unless you set it up manually, it should be ok though.

Anyways, yes, Bitcoin needs to solve the scaling problem asap. But that is already "discounted" in current price. Once that get solved expect the price to skyrocket.
5510  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 07:17:20 PM
i read now the last replies regarding the fees and how long you wait etc etc...
i maybe live in another world because the maximum i wait when deposit to exchange or send back etc is never more than 1 hour about....
and i never have problem to pay some small amount...
the question is .. where do we go from now regarding the price??

With the current fee fiasco I suspect we are going down.

Which fiasco? I am trading all day long and have several feeds open... Haven't read anything about a "fiasco". Source?
5511  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 08:26:40 AM
Oh, it was. And it took almost two years to start recovering.

We should first agree on what we mean by 'tulip mania' first. I like to keep it distinct from 'speculative bubble'. 'Tulip mania' to me means risingonce, then never getting back again anywhere near its former glory.

Ok, I can agree on that. Bitcoin obviously wasn't, as it has been shown. But it certainly was a case of unsustainable mania, like it is happening right now with many alts. Time will tell.
5512  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 08:16:24 AM
[...] When is it going to pop and who is going to be left holding these bags?

That's some serious lack of self-awareness, right there. All of the arguments can be, and have been applied to btc earlier as well. I didn't believe them back then, and as time progresses, that position is only confirmed. That said, nothing per se means that a bubbling alt market is a tulip mania, just like the bubbling btc market wasn't in itself a necessary signal for tulip mania back then.


Oh, it was. And it took almost two years to start recovering.
5513  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 07:11:10 AM
What is happening with Btc-e ? Used to be behind every exchange
Any idea ?

Yes. They used to lag behind because it was extremely dificult to make deposits there.

What has changed?

Well, now there is a LOT of money coming from other coins (eth, dash, ltc, ...) so trader there are faster reducing the spread.

If it is coming from other coins then the price of other coins should have been dumped but that isn't the case here

It's more complex than that. If we would experience a BIG pump on BTC you would see it more clearly. ALTS are continually pumping and dumping and there is always traders with liquidity on their BTC-e accounts. There's no need to be an inmediate connection between a rise in Bitcoin and a dump in altcoins.

When I used to trade BTC, then BTC-E / Stamp price correlation was an important indicator to me. If stamp was a lot higher then BTC-E, then it meant that new fiat was flowing in the market. When the difference started to decrease, then it meant that the flow of new fiat is starting to stop. People rarely use BTC-E to deposit or withdraw fiat. That's why it's always lower when new cash is flowing in and always higher when people are cashing out.

That was correct when BTC was responsible of the majority of the volume and liquidity, but now "deposits" can come from other alts, withdraws can go to them too. And funds on trader's accounts can go to Bitcoin or other altcoins. ie: a trader may chose to buy bitcoin instead of ethereum if he sees the spread makes it "cheap".

As I said, its more complex than that, but the dynamics of the liquidity flow has changed greatly in the past months.
5514  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 06:39:53 AM
What is happening with Btc-e ? Used to be behind every exchange
Any idea ?

Yes. They used to lag behind because it was extremely dificult to make deposits there.

What has changed?

Well, now there is a LOT of money coming from other coins (eth, dash, ltc, ...) so trader there are faster reducing the spread.

If it is coming from other coins then the price of other coins should have been dumped but that isn't the case here

It's more complex than that. If we would experience a BIG pump on BTC you would see it more clearly. ALTS are continually pumping and dumping and there is always traders with liquidity on their BTC-e accounts. There's no need to be an inmediate connection between a rise in Bitcoin and a dump in altcoins.
5515  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 06:30:15 AM
What is happening with Btc-e ? Used to be behind every exchange
Any idea ?

Yes. They used to lag behind because it was extremely dificult to make deposits there.

What has changed?

Well, now there is a LOT of money coming from other coins (eth, dash, ltc, ...) so trader there are faster reducing the spread.
5516  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 06:26:08 AM
Even though I mostly agree... I find it quite funny and ironic that we are here talking about Tulips when that is the same they all were saying about Bitcoin some years ago Smiley
I never said Bitcoin had anything related to the Tulip mania. Whoever did clearly didn't understand anything at that point of time. Looks awfully similar, doesn't it (the more you zoom out, the worse it gets)?


Yes, but now swap that altcoins market cap graph for the one of Bitcoin until november 2013.

In fact that's exactly the comparison they used to do.
5517  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 06:08:36 AM
Altcoins are absurd. 99% are scams, vaporware or have no use-case. This is a full blown out Tulip Mania: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania ; Just a small heads up to those who do not know what happened with the Tulip bubble:




Even though I mostly agree... I find it quite funny and ironic that we are here talking about Tulips when that is the same they all were saying about Bitcoin some years ago Smiley
5518  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 08, 2017, 06:02:47 AM
What exchange is that ETH dump based?

Kraken. But it only hapenned on the USD/ETH trading pair, not on ETH/EUR.

Kraken USD order books are very thin as its mainly EUR.
5519  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 07, 2017, 11:19:20 PM
And this is exactly what I was talking about a few hours ago when I posted my wall of text about free-float and liquidity of altcoins vs Bitcoin.

5520  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: May 07, 2017, 06:32:26 PM
Japan thinks alts are Pokemon. They want to collect them all!

I don't blame them... They buy any shit and see it rise, and buy and see it rise higher, and....

This goes to our lesson today, for those who don't already know: Free-Float and liquidity.

Free-Float: "Free float is a term in stocks trading. It describes the proportion of shares of a publicly traded company that is traded in the stock market. Note that not all free float shares may be actively circulating on the market at any given time as many traders purchase shares as a long-term investment."

Liquidity: "In the market, liquidity has a slightly different meaning, although still tied to how easily assets, in this case shares of stock, can be converted to cash. The market for a stock is said to be liquid if the shares can be rapidly sold and the act of selling has little impact on the stock's price."

So what do these two terms have to do with recent boom of the altcoins?

Let's just take Ripple as an excellent example of this... Ripple has one of lowest free float of all cryptocurrencies. That means that even if there is a gigantic numbers of coins (38 billions!) almost all of them are in the hands of the issuers/partners.

Only a minuscule amount of that 38 billion coins are in the exchanges for trade. How many XRP's do you or people you know have? Exactly... not much, if any. Yet the market cap has risen from around 200 million to around 5 billion now. That is an impressive 25x price increase in a couple of months!

How is that possible then? Well, as I said, only a very small of those 38 billion coins are being traded. So the price keeps rising while there is more people demanding that "scarce" coins that the issuer is offering to the market.

But, I can hear you: a 25x price increase? Fuck that, I am doing BIG money on it! Who cares about that free-float thingy?

Well, you should care, because that's where Liquidity comes to give you a reality lesson. As soon as the demand is higher than the offer, price can keep rising, but when that happens and more people want to sell, the ridiculous small free-float turns into a gigantic volatility that can easily undo most of the artificial and unrealistic high price. Not to mention what would happen if the issuer decides to sell some additional chunk on the market causing an epic dump.... but they won't probably do, cause that would be pointless considering the low liquidity.

This is where Bitcoin differs from most altcoins because:

1) The free-float, after all this years maturing in the market, is orders of magnitude bigger. And the only "scarcity" that there might be is NOT artificial, as it comes from LONG TERM investors. That is healthy.

2) The liquidity is also orders of magnitude higher. As this long journey has taken good care of most weak hands and short time holders.

Market cap means nothing unless we are comparing assets with similar free-float and liquidity.

In the short term you can profit greatly in altcoins, but in the long term everything comes back to an equilibrium point.

So yes, you could perfectly create a PokemonCoin tomorrow and fool everyone into believing its the next big thing.... until people want its money back and the castle crumbles.


* Not all altcoins are the same. There are also some fundamentals behind, and also some coins whose free-float is not that bad, but none compares to Bitcoin. Also, it is very possible to make some big bucks trading altcoins, even the shittiest PokemonCoin... but you can lose it equally fast. It's your game.

Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!