Flat Earth

[Filos]

1. You've just changed your angle of attack increasing the apparent size of the object being viewed thus bringing it back within the angular resolution limit of the eye.

2. From your perspective on the ground you can only see a small section of the sky.

3. Ships dispersal from view due to atmospheric refraction and the angular resolution limit of the eye.

4. Maps all use projections.

5. Observation of planets shows them to be twinkling points of light not spheres.

6. WGS84 is based on unpublished data from the Apollo program.

7. GPS uses triangulation from cellphone towers.

8. Make sure the rope is long enough that the fall snaps your neck or you'll just choke to death.

8 ) Thanks for the tip

7 )No your phone's GPS might. Professional GPS can have signal in no cellphone signal zones. (used in topography)

6 )There are vast topographic networks used every day by professionals based on Geodesical rules

5 ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOlVtC-1q8I  NOT spheres, spheroids...

4 )Yes, Projections of what? the curved surface on paper

3 )Nope, use a telescope. Same effect. refraction isn't as strong all the time. There are prerequisites..

2 )Ofc. But as much as you try, you can't see southern hemisphere constellations in the northern hemisphere and vice versa

1 )also nope. Edit: If an angle was the only thing you changed, you wouldn't be able to see the sun again...

I would not suggest to any flattard to see the following video. They would not be able to understand it.

Anyhow pretty interesting. (another simple way to prove that the earth is not flat...) Add it to my list above.(prev page)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZ-Ab9-WHI

IF and only if, you manage to give a persuasive explanation(lol) for 2 out 7 (except the one you think you understand). I might give you the courtesy of explaining why what you say is totally retarded, with proper maths.

And don't tell of the weather baloon staff. Retarded answers don't count

[1569014199]

1569014199

[notbatman]

^^^ "The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

a) liar,
b) stupid.

Choose one and only one!

[Filos]

You think by being insulting or a smartass will win you an argument... You are truly an idiot..  I rest my case

Not my fault that your little flat brain is overwhelmed with evidence

[notbatman]

^^^ Are you insinuating that because I'm insulting you for being an idiot or a liar, that somehow means I'm wrong?

[Filos]

Ad hominem

[BADecker]

^^^ Proof you're a fool or a liar?

   You're literally disregarding how optics works, you allow the angular resolution limit of specifically the human eye (1 minute) to be falsely attributed to a sphere below your feet. The globe can literally be debunked with a powerful zoom lens (less than 1 minute) such as a Nikon P900 or P1000.

Pegging the horizon at a distance far beyond the 3 miles a 6 foot person would see it, with a landmark of known distance, using the zoom lens, this debunks the globe.


https://i.imgur.com/qnH21Jd.jpg
Image source:
   https://www.puregrenada.com/explore/scuba-diving/underwater-sculpture-park/

You're the one who totally disregards how optics works.

The horizon never rises to meet the eye. It's an optical illusion when it seems that it does.

On FE or GE, at 90 degrees to the ground, the eye views only the same height that it is above the ground. This means that what it sees is always above the ground, except when the eye is at the level of the ground. You forget simple geometry and trig. You base your thinking on an optical illusion.

The only way the eye can see the horizon is to look down a little. If the earth were flat, the horizon would be a never-ending distance away. The proof for this is evident when you are using a telescope.

Rather than accept common trig and geometry, you want to invent a form of perspective that doesn't match what is seen, or what can be seen.

[notbatman]

@Filos,

   Video of the horizon far beyond the 3 mile prediction of the globe taken with a Nikon P900 zoom lens:

Simple Flat Earth Distance to the Horizon Test - Part 1 - 1st Test -- https://youtu.be/X8YrYoCyw0g

You sir are a loser, you have words backed by nothing. I show documented empirical evidence replicated by anybody with a good zoom lens that falsifies the globe.

I can keep backing this empirical evidence with more empirical evidence, you've got bullshit lies. All you can do is blah blah blah.

Ultimate Flat Earth Proof Stationary Flat Earth – The Gyroscope Doesn't Lie -- https://youtu.be/gHkL96uS35Q

[BADecker]

@Filos,

   Video of the horizon far beyond the 3 mile prediction of the globe taken with a Nikon P900 zoom lens:

Simple Flat Earth Distance to the Horizon Test - Part 1 - 1st Test -- https://youtu.be/X8YrYoCyw0g

You sir are a loser, you have words backed by nothing. I show documented empirical evidence replicated by anybody with a good zoom lens that falsifies the globe.

I can keep backing this empirical evidence with more empirical evidence, you've got bullshit lies. All you can do is blah blah blah.

Ultimate Flat Earth Proof Stationary Flat Earth – The Gyroscope Doesn't Lie -- https://youtu.be/gHkL96uS35Q


https://i.imgur.com/675T0fi.png

Do you remember the movie Starship Troopers? There are bugs out there on other planets in other solar systems. The movie showed it, and it made way more sense than FE. But, I do like your movies.

[notbatman]

^^^ The globe is black magic:

[BADecker]

^^^ Blah, blah, blah. I say just the opposite.     

[sirazimuth]

@notbatman, do you really believe that the Earth is flat or you are just trolling around??

After 4 plus years of obsessive nonsense, do you actually think the FE clown is gonna answer that question truthfully...much less actually respond? (spoiler alert ...there'll be no response)
It's like one of those "nudge,nudge ,wink wink" kind of things.... know what I mean ?

You see, you can maintain a charade like this in an anonymous intertoobz thread.
But do you think this buffoon actually espouses this ridiculous flat earth fairy tale amongst friends IRL?
Not a chance....well, that is, if he actually has any real life friends, which I doubt.

[notbatman]

^^^ You've got gaslight for me, how thoughtful. Flat Earth isn't a charade, it was a eureka! moment for me.

[Filos]

No flattard. I have the empirical evidence you only have a couple of stupid youtube videos. And since you did not manage to answer me and you only threw new crap. Here i go with some actual evidence:

http://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Geoid

--------------------------------------------------------------

astronomic evidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOlVtC-1q8I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj-P031VlbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTsua0oHPZw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZ-Ab9-WHI

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This dude was smarter than all the flattards together back at 1500 CE

https://www.britannica.com/science/Mercator-projection

--------------------------------------------------------------------
satellite bathymetry

https://www.eomap.com/services/bathymetry/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
satellite barometry


https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018JC013847

-----------------------------------------------------------------
satellite altimetry

https://www.academia.edu/17837477/THE_OCEAN_SURFACE_TOPOGRAPHY_CONSTELLATION_THE_NEXT_15_YEARS_IN_SATELLITE_ALTIMETRY

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKm2FX9kKZ4 (that girls has all the answers for your dumbass)


And i'll stop spamming the thread. I could fill pages and pages of academia on the subject... You can believe all the crap you want. There are multi-trillion dollar industries depended from the true shape of the earth and you post me a video with a frackin nikon camera. How stupid are you?

[notbatman]

^^^ The pigeon, it struts around the chess board and knocks all the pieces off, then proclaims victory.

Your hand off to a long corrupt authority that points up at the stars as a diversionary tactic when the question of the shape of the earth comes to bear is ridiculous.

Also this holy geoid you keep proclaiming is based unpublished data from the Apollo program, just FYI.

[BADecker]

No flattard. I have the empirical evidence you only have a couple of stupid youtube videos. And since you did not manage to answer me and you only threw new crap. Here i go with some actual evidence:

http://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Geoid

--------------------------------------------------------------

astronomic evidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj-P031VlbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTsua0oHPZw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZ-Ab9-WHI

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This dude was smarter than all the flattards together back at 1500 CE

https://www.britannica.com/science/Mercator-projection

--------------------------------------------------------------------
satellite bathymetry

https://www.eomap.com/services/bathymetry/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
satellite barometry


https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018JC013847

-----------------------------------------------------------------
satellite altimetry

https://www.academia.edu/17837477/THE_OCEAN_SURFACE_TOPOGRAPHY_CONSTELLATION_THE_NEXT_15_YEARS_IN_SATELLITE_ALTIMETRY

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKm2FX9kKZ4 (that girls has all the answers for your dumbass)


And i'll stop spamming the thread. I could fill pages and pages of academia on the subject... You can believe all the crap you want. There are multi-trillion dollar industries depended from the true shape of the earth and you post me a video with a frackin nikon camera. How stupid are you?

You need to realize that it's his religion. It's very hard to break someone away from his religion. One of the only ways to do it is to kidnap him, and then use Stockholm Syndrome on him. Other than that, you are wasting your time. But it's fun playing with him.

[Filos]

Also this holy geoid you keep proclaiming is based unpublished data from the Apollo program, just FYI.

No dumbass. Every freakin UNI in the world with Geoscience as a subject, is conducting and validating measurements all the time.

You need to realize that it's his religion. It's very hard to break someone away from his religion. One of the only ways to do it is to kidnap him, and then use Stockholm Syndrome on him. Other than that, you are wasting your time. But it's fun playing with him.

There are things in this world that are not a matter of belief. Frakin facts.

But you are correct. I wouldn't hope to make a dogmatic person look at real evidence. I'm just trying to save the next dumbass that may believe the flattard's crap.

Maybe he is just a troll. In any case i enjoyed it too

[notbatman]

^^^ Our saviour!

[Filos]

You'r personal jesus christ

[BADecker]

^^^ See? What did I tell you? It's a religion with him.    

[Filos]

^^^ See? What did I tell you? It's a religion with him.     

lol, amen