Get involved with the next major release of Peercoin, v0.7! We’ve opened discussion on all seven of our active RFCs. Feel free to contribute during the review process. You can find the open discussion threads on GitHub here...
https://github.com/peercoin/rfcs/issuesThanks for sharing. I'll share my position to all RFCs here:
- #0002 (Coinstake Transaction Split)- #0003 (Multisignature Minting)- #0004 (Removal of TX timestamp)... are necessary for the (important) "Cold Minting" feature. From my non-developer perspective I consider the reasoning behind them valid so I
support them.
- #0005 (Unspendable zero-value outputs) seems reasonable. (In my opinion, the 0.01 PPC minimum output value limit is too high though), so
support.
- #0006 (Remove Proof-of-Work Block Signature) - no opinion because I'm not understanding the implications fully.
- #0007 (Round Transaction Fees Up To 0.001) - Full
support, 0.01 became already a bit high for simple transactions when the coin's value reached $10 (Peercoin has a small supply, so in another, stronger, crypto boom an unit could easily reach $100 or even more), and the rounding to 0.01 in my opinion makes no sense as the size, not the transaction number, is the most important bottleneck of blockchains.
- #0008 (Increase OP_RETURN Size Limit) - In this case I'm undecided, is it needed for PeerAssets? Most likely it will incentive using the blockchain for data storage, but if the 0.01 PPC/kB fee is not changed, then there should be no severe negative consequences.
