Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[Chef Ramsay]

American socialism’s day in the sun
Popularity of the more radical Democrat Sanders is dragging Clinton to left in presidential race

Leftwing politicians are in electoral retreat across most of the western world. The one exception is the United States. At 15 per cent in the Democratic polls, Bernie Sanders, the senator from Vermont, is riding higher than any US socialist since Eugene Debs ran for the White House a century ago.

The fact that Mr Sanders has very little chance of unseating Hillary Clinton is beside the point. His popularity is dragging her leftward. If he flames out, other left-wingers, such as Martin O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland who entered the race at the weekend, are ready to pick up the baton. Elizabeth Warren, the populist Massachusetts senator, will continue to prod Mrs Clinton from outside the field. The more Mrs Clinton adopts their language, the harder it will be for her to reclaim the centre ground next year. Yet she is only following the crowd. A surprisingly large chunk of Democrats are happy to break the US taboo against socialism.

To most students of US politics, the phrase American socialism is an oxymoron — like clean coal or the Bolivian navy. A century ago, Werner Sombart, a German scholar, asked “Why is there no socialism in America?” It was a question that confounded Marxists. As the most advanced capitalistic society, the US was most ripe for a proletarian revolution, according to their teleology.

More...http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9867696e-05dc-11e5-b676-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3bqrLR4eA

[Wilikon]

Dude. this^ is virtually the same thing that went on under Bill's regime when he had a chinese dude (DNC fundraiser type person) at the head of the commerce dept and the Chinese communist Army/govt was sending money to Bill's campaign in exchange for export waivers that allowed companies like Loral Technologies and Hughes Communications to sell encrypted missile guidance systems and the like to the Chi-coms. http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1998/040798b.htm There are more links but this is the first I rustled up. The John Birch Society was covering this treason and bribery back in the 90s but the impeachment hearings refused to bring this stuff up. Go figure that in recent times the Clintons' would do the same thing but on a larger scale thus showing their entitlement and traitor status once again using govt to pad their books.
[/quote


As a president she will have total power. The first thing she will do is to target all the liberals who stabbed the billary's back when they chose 0bama... I am sure 0bama is trying to protect them somewhat and the clintons know that...

[Wilikon]

Hillary Clinton unfavorable numbers highest in 14 years

Hillary Clinton is seeing her highest unfavorability ratings in 14 years, according to the latest CNN/ORC poll released Tuesday.

Just 46 percent said they view the Democratic presidential front-runner favorably, compared to 50 percent who said they have an unfavorable view. In the preceding April survey, Clinton polled with 53 percent favorable, compared to 44 percent unfavorable.

Despite holding a commanding lead among declared and potential Democratic opponents, the public has not viewed Clinton this unfavorably since March 2001, when the former first lady was in her third month as a New York senator. Just 44 percent said they had a favorable view of Clinton at that time, with 53 percent seeing her in an unfavorable light.

Clinton grabbed 60 percent of the primary field among Democrats and independent-leaning Democrats, with Vice President Joe Biden, who has not declared an intention to run, a distant second with 14 percent and independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders at 10 percent. Sanders officially launched his campaign as a Democrat late last month.

Voters are also skeptical about Clinton in other ways — they are split on whether she “inspires confidence” (49 percent say that applies to her, 50 percent do not) and on whether she “cares about people like you” (47 percent say it applies, 52 percent it does not apply).

Consistent with other polls on the issue, just 42 percent say they think the former secretary of state is “honest and trustworthy,” compared with 57 percent who say they do not.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/poll-hillary-clinton-unfavorable-numbers-118532.html

[Chef Ramsay]

Clinton to autograph seeker: ‘Go to the end of the line’

An eager autograph seeker was ready for Hillary -- but Hillary Clinton apparently wasn't ready for her.

In a seemingly awkward encounter captured on video, the Democratic presidential candidate tells a woman seeking an autograph to "go to the end of the line."

The clip was captured by a tracker -- operatives who trail candidates in search of potentially embarrassing footage -- during a recent campaign stop in New Hampshire, and posted on Vine by the conservative America Rising PAC. In it, Clinton is seen walking by a receiving line of supporters outside the popular Smuttynose Brewery. One of them approaches her to ask for her signature.

"Sign this please?" she asks.

Clinton responds, "If you go to the -- go to the end of the line."

She again says, "Why don't you go to the end of the line."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/02/clinton-to-autograph-seeker-go-to-end-line/

[funtotry]

American socialism’s day in the sun
Popularity of the more radical Democrat Sanders is dragging Clinton to left in presidential race

Leftwing politicians are in electoral retreat across most of the western world. The one exception is the United States. At 15 per cent in the Democratic polls, Bernie Sanders, the senator from Vermont, is riding higher than any US socialist since Eugene Debs ran for the White House a century ago.

The fact that Mr Sanders has very little chance of unseating Hillary Clinton is beside the point. His popularity is dragging her leftward. If he flames out, other left-wingers, such as Martin O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland who entered the race at the weekend, are ready to pick up the baton. Elizabeth Warren, the populist Massachusetts senator, will continue to prod Mrs Clinton from outside the field. The more Mrs Clinton adopts their language, the harder it will be for her to reclaim the centre ground next year. Yet she is only following the crowd. A surprisingly large chunk of Democrats are happy to break the US taboo against socialism.

To most students of US politics, the phrase American socialism is an oxymoron — like clean coal or the Bolivian navy. A century ago, Werner Sombart, a German scholar, asked “Why is there no socialism in America?” It was a question that confounded Marxists. As the most advanced capitalistic society, the US was most ripe for a proletarian revolution, according to their teleology.

More...http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9867696e-05dc-11e5-b676-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3bqrLR4eA

Martin Omalley is completely irrelevant. He doesn't even poll well in his own state, and no one knows about him. Its either Hillary or Sanders (very unlikely) in the 2016 election.
In my opinion, America will be and ALWAYS be a center-right country. Its just the way the country is set up and most of the population believe in.

[AlgoSwan]

Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

How did you put these two contradictory words in same sentence: politician and trustworthiness?

[Wilikon]

Texas University To Media: They Will NOT Get To Question Hillary, “Her Speech Will Be The Interview”

-------------------------------------------------------------
This is how, ladies and gentlemen, the progressive ideal dies...

[Spendulus]

....A century ago, Werner Sombart, a German scholar, asked “Why is there no socialism in America?” It was a question that confounded Marxists. As the most advanced capitalistic society, the US was most ripe for a proletarian revolution, according to their teleology.....

But their hubris was quite clear when their hyperinflation hit as a result, in part of their socialism and in particular their socialized medicine.  Only a few years later....1921-1922. 

[Bitware]

No.

[Chef Ramsay]

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton charity took up to $10 MILLION donation from African church which called homosexuals 'devils' - despite Hillary's support for gay marriage

Hillary Clinton's charity accepted a substantial donation from an anti-gay African church which has likened homosexuals to the Devil, Daily Mail Online can reveal.

The 2016 Presidential candidate took money for her sprawling health nonprofit from the Cameroon Baptist Convention whose official policy is that being gay 'contradicts God's purpose for human sexuality'.

The devout Christian organization has in the past compared being gay to committing incest and human trafficking. Its leaders have also railed against US attempts to promote gay rights in Cameroon.

Despite this, the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Board gave between $1million and $10million between 2010 and this year, according to the latest list of donors from the Clinton Health Access Initiative.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3110165/Clinton-charity-took-multi-million-donation-African-church-called-homosexuals-devils-despite-Hillary-s-support-gay-marriage.html#ixzz3c97dqlII

[bryant.coleman]

Just 46 percent said they view the Democratic presidential front-runner favorably, compared to 50 percent who said they have an unfavorable view. In the preceding April survey, Clinton polled with 53 percent favorable, compared to 44 percent unfavorable.

WTF is wrong with the American people? 46% of the population views the Pinocchibitch favorably? After all these years, despite blunders such as the Bosnia sniper incident, murder of Vince Foster, and the Benghazi Jihadi attack (in which Christopher Stevens and Sean Smith were killed), if the Americans still vote Hillary Clinton to the post of POTUS in 2016, then even god won't be able to save the United States.

[Chef Ramsay]

Just 46 percent said they view the Democratic presidential front-runner favorably, compared to 50 percent who said they have an unfavorable view. In the preceding April survey, Clinton polled with 53 percent favorable, compared to 44 percent unfavorable.

WTF is wrong with the American people? 46% of the population views the Pinocchibitch favorably? After all these years, despite blunders such as the Bosnia sniper incident, murder of Vince Foster, and the Benghazi Jihadi attack (in which Christopher Stevens and Sean Smith were killed), if the Americans still vote Hillary Clinton to the post of POTUS in 2016, then even god won't be able to save the United States.

I'm not standing up for these boobs but the good news is that 15-20% of Hillary's favs have eroded over the last 6-9 months so that's a plus. The two bolded incidents are highly forgotten or unaware of by virtually all of those folks like they never happened. And when it comes to Benghazi or military stuff in general, much of the left is totally either unconcerned or so detached from any of it that there's no personal relation to it at all. Yet, much of the right is obsessed w/ military matters and the neocons want that to be paramount despite the record high debt which typically consumes the minds of only the conservative/libertarian base.

[muhrohmat]

well i dont mess much with usa policies they rule the world a bit but i mean from RPC bush and obama and hillary you select some more for wars some more for people some more for money but love its not that policies they all do not even a woman soo its genericly the same man or woman black or white more war guy or more people guy usa policies do not afect in more that 30 per cent the all world like chinese or europe
i kind a like a woman in power and im a guy. soo hillary its ok

[bryant.coleman]

i kind a like a woman in power and im a guy. soo hillary its ok

Wonderful argument. 

Hillary should be the POTUS, just because she is a female. IMO, the most capable candidate should be elected as the POTUS, without any preference being given to other factors such as race, gender, language, religion.etc. I know most of the males vote for the best candidate.. but a large number of the women can be swayed by playing the gender card.

[Chef Ramsay]

The Coming Democratic Panic
Watch what happens if Hillary Clinton falls behind in the polls.

When a CNN poll last week showed Hillary Clinton leading Rand Paul by a single percentage point (48-47) and only three points ahead of Marco Rubio (49-46) and Scott Walker (49-46), it was mildly shocking. In April, her lead over the three Republican presidential candidates had been in double digits: Paul (58-39), Rubio (55-41), and Walker (59-37).

But wait. If the next CNN survey shows Clinton actually behind one or two or three of the GOP candidates, it won’t be just shocking. It will send Democrats into a near-panic over the possibility of losing the White House in 2016, even with their preferred candidate, Clinton, as nominee.

Such a poll result isn’t far-fetched as we watch Clinton’s campaign deteriorate. True, head-to-head matchups this early in the presidential cycle are almost never predictive. But in this case, it’s the psychological impact that matters.

That Clinton’s candidacy is in trouble is indisputable. She’s not threatened with losing the Democratic nomination—at least not yet. She has the well-financed Clinton machine and a national network of supporters on which she can rely. The campaigns of her Democratic opponents are small and weak in comparison.

But the rationale for her bid for the presidency, the strategy of her campaign, and the tactics she’s adopted—all have failed to stop her steady decline. The expectation of Clinton’s glide into the White House in 2016 is gone.

More...http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/coming-democratic-panic_965001.html

[Chef Ramsay]

Hillary Clinton Traces Friendly Path, Troubling Party

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to be dispensing with the nationwide electoral strategy that won her husband two terms in the White House and brought white working-class voters and great stretches of what is now red-state America back to Democrats.

Instead, she is poised to retrace Barack Obama’s far narrower path to the presidency: a campaign focused more on mobilizing supporters in the Great Lakes states and in parts of the West and South than on persuading undecided voters.

Mrs. Clinton’s aides say it is the only way to win in an era of heightened polarization, when a declining pool of voters is truly up for grabs. Her liberal policy positions, they say, will fire up Democrats, a less difficult task than trying to win over independents in more hostile territory — even though a broader strategy could help lift the party with her.

This early in the campaign, however, forgoing a determined outreach effort to all 50 states, or even most of them, could mean missing out on the kind of spirited conversation that can be a unifying feature of a presidential election. And it could leave Mrs. Clinton, if she wins, with the same difficulties Mr. Obama has faced in governing with a Republican-controlled Congress.

More...http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/us/politics/hillary-clinton-traces-friendly-path-troubling-party.html

She is running scared w/ her tail between her legs. I mean, who doesn't go out and try and win over independents unless you know you're just gonna go the class warfare/fearmongering route w/o bringing anything new to the table. Democrats are right to be concerned especially if Rand starts breaking out of the pack in the GOP.

[bryant.coleman]

When a CNN poll last week showed Hillary Clinton leading Rand Paul by a single percentage point (48-47) and only three points ahead of Marco Rubio (49-46) and Scott Walker (49-46), it was mildly shocking. In April, her lead over the three Republican presidential candidates had been in double digits: Paul (58-39), Rubio (55-41), and Walker (59-37).

Unfortunately none of these three candidates are likely to secure the GOP nomination. In the end, some war crazy psychopath, such as Jeb Bush or Ben Carson will win the Republican nomination, and Hillary will have an easy walkover. But if anything to go by, this survey once again confirms the fact that Rand Paul is the only candidate capable of defeating Hillary.

[ThEmporium]

lol if you pay you are logged, if you don't you get harassed or colored. hard choices. for the American, you are slaves, she is one of your master, her husband goes on l. express... so it depends, if you are with the billionaires raping underage girls on your private jet, she is the best, if you are not? you don't have the capacity to understand... so.

As for my understanding, Hillary would be good politician or leader in her Own Country for Domestic purposes, When it comes to the foreign policy, or foreign management, I feel that she is total failure for these administration, she cannot able to take any beneficial decision regards to the foreign countries. she needs more knowledge and history to know about the world.

[Wilikon]

lol if you pay you are logged, if you don't you get harassed or colored. hard choices. for the American, you are slaves, she is one of your master, her husband goes on l. express... so it depends, if you are with the billionaires raping underage girls on your private jet, she is the best, if you are not? you don't have the capacity to understand... so.

As for my understanding, Hillary would be good politician or leader in her Own Country for Domestic purposes, When it comes to the foreign policy, or foreign management, I feel that she is total failure for these administration, she cannot able to take any beneficial decision regards to the foreign countries. she needs more knowledge and history to know about the world.

... her Own Country for Domestic purposes.... Nice!


 

[Chef Ramsay]

Scandals Only Make the Clintons Stronger
This is the funniest thing i have heard in ages ... bwhahahhahahahahah. This ad brought to you by the Clinton Foundation.

One has to wonder: When Republicans gathered earlier this year to scheme the defeat of Hillary Clinton, who was the genius who stood up and said, “I know. We’ll challenge the Clintons’ pristine record on ethics. They’ll never see that one coming.”
But of course they did. We all did.

A little newsflash about our past (and probably future) First Family, who pundits, long predicting the Clintons’ coronation, are now suddenly beginning to count out: Scandal surfing is what they always do. They skip the top of the waves, sometimes even giving the impression they might succumb to them. But they never do.

The Clintons have been sent off to their certain doom more times than Tyrion Lannister. During their last sojourn on Pennsylvania Avenue, operators all but installed a new message on the White House switchboard, “If you’re calling with a subpoena for the Clintons, please press 7 now.”
Yet whatever the storm—from blue dresses to funny money from China to an actual impeachment trial—Bill and Hillary are this generation’s Six-Million Dollar Man (and Woman). They always rebuild faster, stronger, and a hell of a lot richer than ever.
Much is now being made of a CNN poll finding that a majority of Americans—57 percent—do not believe Hillary Clinton is honest or trustworthy. But is that really news? Roughly half of the country has felt that way for a long time. Forty-three percent of Americans said that a year ago. And forty-six percent said that back in 2007.

Under the headline, “Hillary Clinton’s honesty problem,” an earnest reporter for The Hill newspaper asks, “Is it possible to win the White House if more than half the electorate thinks you’re dishonest?” Uh, of course, it is, people. The Clintons do this all the time.

Clinton’s margins against her potential Republican contenders is thin, to be sure, but not much different than they have been for months. And, by the way, even in purplish New Hampshire, she’s still beating them all—from Bush to Walker to Rubio. Nationally, CNN has her beating Washington’s favorite Republican, Jeb Bush, by eight points.

More...http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/scandals-clintons-stronger-2016-foundation-president-118683.html?ml=tl_1&cmpid=sf#.VXUdFm5pJep