Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[superpanos2]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

[Wilikon]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

No need to worry then...

[Racey]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

No need to worry then...

Would be better if you did worry, the US policy makers are warmongers, very fookin dangerous I must say.

It's those brain dead supporters of not just him, also others before him, and the present day.

[Wilikon]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

No need to worry then...

Would be better if you did worry, the US policy makers are warmongers, very fookin dangerous I must say.

It's those brain dead supporters of not just him, also others before him, and the present day.

I understand finding an image of Drone Obama next to the Israeli flag is impossible...?

[Wilikon]

Hillary Clinton: “I Love The Bike Racks Here”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IldCI72w5S8

[Racey]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

No need to worry then...

Would be better if you did worry, the US policy makers are warmongers, very fookin dangerous I must say.

It's those brain dead supporters of not just him, also others before him, and the present day.

I understand finding an image of Drone Obama next to the Israeli flag is impossible...?

Have I got news for you, plenty of them here lol

[Wilikon]

Who cares. Whatever the results of the next elections,
US will continue to be a police-state shitcountry with
many community roblems and issues. The US will still
promote their "we patrios will protect our country against any external threat" dogma
Those external threats change over time to promote the interests of the elite.
Currently we are concetrated against "medieval rights" Russia China, andextremists in middle east.
Excesive militarization and worldwide financial dominance.
So, no need to worry.
Every US president was, is, and will be the same.

No need to worry then...

Would be better if you did worry, the US policy makers are warmongers, very fookin dangerous I must say.

It's those brain dead supporters of not just him, also others before him, and the present day.

I understand finding an image of Drone Obama next to the Israeli flag is impossible...?

Have I got news for you, plenty of them here lol

Lots of opportunities to use any of them next time? Have I got news for you, in 2015 the 0 is president right now. Since US presidents are all the same to you anyway...

 

[Wilikon]

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell: Media Underestimated Impact of Clinton Email Scandal (video)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S45CoCgW71M


-------------------------------
No kidding...

[Racey]

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell: Media Underestimated Impact of Clinton Email Scandal (video)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S45CoCgW71M


-------------------------------
No kidding...

That is one sad news channel, if I remember right Andrea Mitchell is a liar, but that news show they are Liberals that love war 

[Wilikon]

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell: Media Underestimated Impact of Clinton Email Scandal (video)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S45CoCgW71M


-------------------------------
No kidding...

That is one sad news channel, if I remember right Andrea Mitchell is a liar, but that news show they are Liberals that love war 

Coming from this sad channel means they smell blood and it is maybe time for a plan B. Msnbc has been playing down the email scandal, protecting her, forever. This is not going away...

Also Fiorina was on foxnews. She was fighting a proxy female clinton lobbyist. Not clinton herself. No amount of money can make clinton a good presidential candidate... Not without an army of sock puppet soldiers.

[Wilikon]

A reported two-month gap in emails from Hillary Clinton's private account during 2012 coincides with a period of escalating violence in Libya and the obtaining of a special exemption by her top aide, Huma Abedin, to work for both the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

The Daily Beast reported late Tuesday that no emails between Clinton and her State Department staff for the months of May and June 2012 are among the estimated 2,000 messages that have been released from the Democratic presidential frontrunner's account.

A State Department spokesman told The Daily Beast that only emails related to the security of U.S. diplomats in Libya or the consulate in Benghazi were turned over to the House select committee investigating the deadly Sept. 11, 2012 attack. If true, that means neither Clinton nor her staff communicated via e-mail during a period that saw three attacks on international outposts in Benghazi, including one on the consulate itself.

That attack, on June 6, 2012, involved the detonation of an improvised explosive device outside of the consulate, prompting the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli to warn Americans about the "fluid security situation in Libya." Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed along with three others in the Sept. 11 attack, warned his superiors that "Islamic extremism appears to be on the rise in eastern Libya."

Two weeks earlier, on May 22, the International Red Cross office was hit by rocket-propelled grenades. Five days after the consulate bombing, a convoy carrying Britain's ambassador to Libya was attacked with rocket-propelled grenades, injuring two bodyguards.

The State Department plans to release Clinton's emails on a regular, monthly basis through January 2016 to comply with an order by a federal judge. The next release is tentatively scheduled for Friday. Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill released a statement saying "More emails are slated to be released by the State Department next week, and we hope that release is as inclusive as possible


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/29/reported-two-month-gap-in-clinton-emails-coincides-with-escalating-libya/?intcmp=hpbt1

[Wilikon]

'Hillary must NEVER become President', says the woman who exposed Bill's affair with Monica. Former Clinton West Wing assistant Linda Tripp says Democratic contender is a liar who treats the public with contempt

It was the scandal that saw Bill Clinton impeached and which threatened to bring down his presidency. For many, it continues to define it to this day.

But according to the woman who outed Monica Lewinsky as the president's mistress, the real story was never about Monica. It was about 'subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice… a true abuse of power.' And it was about Hillary.

Because, according to Linda Tripp, it was Hillary who manipulated and stage managed the story, converting herself from a lackluster First Lady with unimpressive approval ratings to admirable First Victim - the blindsided wife standing by her man.

She made him forgivable. She 'orchestrated the cover up' and she made damn sure that she moved on. Nothing, and no-one, was going to stand in her way.

Linda Tripp, whose recorded conversations with Lewinsky - submitted to independent counsel Kenneth Starr - exposed the truth of the affair that both Lewinsky and Clinton had sought to deny, has never spoken fully until now.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3176621/Lies-cover-ups-corruption-Linda-Tripp-West-Wing-assistant-outed-Monica-Lewinsky-s-sexual-liaison-Bill-Clinton-talks-time-Hillary-tells-never-President.html

[Wilikon]

Hillary Clinton Plays Dodgeball


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igk5M3OGR8k


--------------------------
"Mastery: comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment."...

[Racey]

Hillary Clinton Plays Dodgeball


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igk5M3OGR8k


--------------------------
"Mastery: comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment."...

Ha ha "all kinds of distraction"
"When I become President" She don't half squirm a lot

[Wilikon]

Hillary Clinton Plays Dodgeball


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igk5M3OGR8k


--------------------------
"Mastery: comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment."...

Ha ha "all kinds of distraction"
"When I become President" She don't half squirm a lot

I don't believe she would even tell us what's her favorite color...

[Wilikon]

Across nearly every key metric, from trustworthiness to caring about voters to leadership, Clinton has seen an erosion in public approval, as likely Republican rivals have erased her leads in the poll. Clinton has a net -11 favorability rating in the poll, with 40% of the American public viewing her positively and 51% negatively, with more than 50% of independents on the negative side.

If the election were held today, Clinton would be tied with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker in the poll—down from significant leads in a May 28 survey—but would top the current GOP frontrunner Donald Trump.

The poll, which was conducted amid new reporting on the existence of classified information on Clinton’s private email server, found further declines in Clinton’s perceived trustworthiness, with 57% of Americans now viewing her as neither honest nor trustworthy. And as Clinton has invested heavily in a campaign designed to appeal to Americans who feel left behind in the economic recovery, a majority of Americans now believe Clinton does not care about the needs or problems of people like them. But while the numbers have softened in recent months, Clinton is continued to be viewed as a strong leader by 58% of Americans.

Despite her struggles in general election match-ups, Clinton’s position as a front-runner for the Democratic nomination remains solid with 55 percent of Democrats supporting her—roughly unchanged from a year ago. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ gains, meanwhile, have slowed. The May poll found the avowed socialist’s support spiking from 8% to 15% from a month before; this month he has the backing of 17% of Democrats.

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, meanwhile, has struggled for recognition, with 76% of Americans and 78% of Democrats saying they don’t know enough about him to form an opinion of him. Despite intense campaigning and jabs at Clinton and Sanders, O’Malley only garners the support of 1% of Democrats, unchanged from two months ago.

The poll of 1,644 registered voters has a margin of error of ± 2.4 percentage points and was conducted from July 23-28. The smaller sample of 681 Democrats has a margin of error of ±3.8 percentage points.


http://time.com/3977941/hillary-clinton-poll-trump/

[Wilikon]

Data in Clinton’s ‘secret’ emails came from 5 intelligence agencies



Intelligence officials who reviewed the five classified emails determined that they included information from five separate intelligence agencies, said a congressional official with knowledge of the matter.

The public Benghazi email contained information from the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, a spy agency that maps and tracks satellite imagery, according to the official, who asked to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the matter.

The other four classified emails contained information from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA, the official said.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General’s office did not respond to questions about the matter. The five agencies either referred
questions about it to the inspector general’s office or declined to comment.

The Intelligence Community inspector general only looked at a sample of 40 emails even though a total of 30,000 emails were turned over to the State Department by Clinton.

In documents that were publicly released, Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III said State Department officials had warned that there were “potentially hundreds of classified emails” on Clinton’s private server.
Clinton’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment. Clinton has maintained she used a personal email account as a “matter of “convenience” and has denied she emailed any classified material.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article29519419.html

[Wilikon]

Michael Bay's Benghazi Movie Gets Release Date and Official Title

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CJBuUwd0Os

Paramount Pictures has announced a release date and expanded title for director Michael Bay’s next film, which does not involve robots. 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi will hit theaters on January 15, 2016, which is the same weekend that this year’s American Sniper went wide and subsequently became the highest grossing film of 2014 (it counts as a 2014 movie because it first opened in limited release on Christmas). It is currently unclear if Bay’s film will—gasp—get an Oscar-qualifying run in December, or if it’ll simply open everywhere in January. Regardless, it’ll be facing off against the comedy sequel Ride Along 2, the animation sequel The Nut Job 2 (this exists?!), and the YA film The 5th Wave.

As the subtitle suggests, 13 Hours tells the story of the six members of the security team that fought to defend the Americans stationed at the embassy in Benghazi when it came under attack. John Krasinski leads a cast that includes James Badge Dale, Max Martini (Pacific Rim), Pablo Schreiber (Orange Is the New Black), and David Denman (The Office). The screenplay was penned by The Strain author/writer Chuck Hogan, adapted from the book by Mitchell Zuckoff.




http://collider.com/michael-bay-benghazi-movie-13-hours-release-date-2016/

[Wilikon]

Clinton campaign complains of 'egregious' New York Times reporting errors


The Hillary Clinton campaign sent a nearly 2,000-word letter to the executive editor of The New York Times this week expressing "grave concern" with a recent and controversial report relating to the former Secretary of State's private email account.

"We remain perplexed by the Times’ slowness to acknowledge its errors after the fact, and some of the shaky justifications that Times’ editors have made," Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in the letter to Dean Baquet, which the campaign forwarded to the On Media blog late Thursday night.

"I feel obliged to put into context just how egregious an error this story was," Palmieri continued. "The New York Times is arguably the most important news outlet in the world and it rushed to put an erroneous story on the front page charging that a major candidate for President of the United States was the target of a criminal referral to federal law enforcement. Literally hundreds of outlets followed your story, creating a firestorm that had a deep impact that cannot be unwound. This problem was compounded by the fact that the Times took an inexplicable, let alone indefensible, delay in correcting the story and removing 'criminal' from the headline and text of the story."

The Times' report, from July 23, claimed that two inspectors general had sought a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state." It later altered the language to eliminate the suggestion that Clinton was the target in the potential criminal probe. Then, on July 24, all parties involved in the story—the two inspectors general, the Justice Department, and the Clinton campaign—issued public statements saying that the sought-after investigation was not "criminal." Despite the overwhelming evidence, the Times did not remove the word from its headline and its story, nor did it issue a correction, until the following day.

Baquet, the Times' executive editor and the recipient of Palmieri's letter, did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Thursday night. The Times has issued multiple corrections on the story and its public editor, Margaret Sullivan, has written an article examining the Times' errors.

In one correction, the Times rightly stated that its use of the word "criminal" was due to information provided "from senior government officials." The On Media blog independently confirmed last week that the error was caused by misinformation provided to the Times by a Justice Department official. 

That explanation hardly seemed to satisfy Palmieri, who accused the Times' reporters of relying on "questionable sourcing... without bothering to seek corroborating evidence."

"In our conversations with the Times reporters, it was clear that they had not personally reviewed the IG’s referral that they falsely described as both criminal and focused on Hillary Clinton," Palmieri wrote. "Instead, they relied on unnamed sources that characterized the referral as such. However, it is not at all clear that those sources had directly seen the referral, either. This should have represented too many 'degrees of separation' for any newspaper to consider it reliable sourcing, least of all The New York Times."

Palmieri's letter, which runs 1,915 words long, includes three other complaints: 1. That the "seriousness of the allegations... demanded far more care and due diligence than the Times exhibited prior to this article’s publication. 2. That the Times "incomprehensibly delayed the issuance of a full and true correction." And 3. That the Times' "official explanations for the misreporting is profoundly unsettling."

"I wish to emphasize our genuine wish to have a constructive relationship with The New York Times," Palmieri writes in closing. "But we also are extremely troubled by the events that went into this erroneous report, and will be looking forward to discussing our concerns related to this incident so we can have confidence that it is not repeated in the future."

Brian Fallon, the press secretary for the Clinton campaign, said Thursday that the campaign sent Palmieri's letter to reporters because Baquet refused to publish it in the Times after receiving it on Tuesday.


http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/clinton-campaign-complains-of-egregious-new-york-times-211575.html

[Wilikon]

U.S. intel fears hundreds of secrets leaked in Hillary’s private emails
Many more classified emails identified as Congress is notified



The U.S. intelligence community is bracing for the possibility that former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email account contains hundreds of revelations of classified information from spy agencies and is taking steps to contain any damage to national security, according to documents and interviews Thursday.

The top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committee have been notified in recent days that the extent of classified information on Mrs. Clinton’s private email server was likely far more extensive than the four emails publicly acknowledged last week as containing some sensitive spy agency secrets.

A U.S. official directly familiar with the notification, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity, said the notification of possibly hundreds of additional emails with classified secrets came from the State Department Freedom of Information Act office to the Office of Inspector General for the Director of National Intelligence.

The inspector general, the chief oversight watchdog for the entire U.S. intelligence community, subsequently sent a letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of the Senate and House intelligence committees, the official said.

“We were informed by State FOIA officials that there are potentially hundreds of classified emails within the 30,000 provided for former Secretary Clinton,” DNI Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III late last week wrote Sen. Richard Burr, North Carolina Republican; Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat; Rep. Devin Nunes, California Republican; and Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat.

“We note that none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked and transmitted via a secure server,” Mr. McCullough wrote the four lawmakers.



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/30/hillary-clinton-emails-us-intelligence-preparing-m/