What's your opinion of gun control?

[U.R.O.K]

my opinion about gun control is minimize the gun ownership... i agree the gun control law... because many gun owner abuse the right... as a gun holder you to very responsible and follow the law of gun ownership... don't abuse your authority given by gov't.

[Russelmain]

my opinion about gun control is minimize the gun ownership... i agree the gun control law... because many gun owner abuse the right... as a gun holder you to very responsible and follow the law of gun ownership... don't abuse your authority given by gov't.

The fact is that you need to have arms control always, but the issue of legalization for the population in Georgia will always be open. The fact is that people do not feel protected. Let the state control Who and how to issue it. But it should be free access.

[Xavofat]

If existing another weapon from guns, we must have a guns in homes. In this times with terrorism and evil... Im sad that in Poland we dont have a right to have a simple gun for selfdefense, im sad when Im looking in fb for my friends in UK or D in crowd of engry people who have only claims and ofen brute power

In England people are allowed to have weapons. They lost this right and now probably really regret it. I think this is a good example of the fact that the public should not trust government and to always defend their rights.

Regret it?!

Maybe they don't regret having a murder rate several times lower than the US...

[BADecker]

If existing another weapon from guns, we must have a guns in homes. In this times with terrorism and evil... Im sad that in Poland we dont have a right to have a simple gun for selfdefense, im sad when Im looking in fb for my friends in UK or D in crowd of engry people who have only claims and ofen brute power

In England people are allowed to have weapons. They lost this right and now probably really regret it. I think this is a good example of the fact that the public should not trust government and to always defend their rights.

Regret it?!

Maybe they don't regret having a murder rate several times lower than the US...

They are also far less populous. They are also far more enslaved by their government.

[Sithara007]

If existing another weapon from guns, we must have a guns in homes. In this times with terrorism and evil... Im sad that in Poland we dont have a right to have a simple gun for selfdefense, im sad when Im looking in fb for my friends in UK or D in crowd of engry people who have only claims and ofen brute power

In England people are allowed to have weapons. They lost this right and now probably really regret it. I think this is a good example of the fact that the public should not trust government and to always defend their rights.

Regret it?!

Maybe they don't regret having a murder rate several times lower than the US...

If the United Kingdom has the same demographics as that of the United States, then the murder rate in the UK will be several times higher than that in the US. Already crime rates in the immigrant infested cities such as London and Birmingham are starting to approach the rates in the US.

[JCowey34]

My opinion of gun control... I appreciate judicious marksmanship

[BADecker]

Homeowner Shoots Home Invasion Suspect

The 60-year-old female homeowner was watching TV in the living room when she heard a noise. She went to the bedroom and retrieved her gun. Hearing more noise, she went into the kitchen and found the intruder!

The first suspect shot at her and she returned fire, hitting him four times. That suspect fell to the ground and a second intruder kicked the back door open and both fled out the back of the home.

They both fled the scene towards the railroad tracks. A blood trail led police over railroad tracks to a patch of grass where the wounded suspect was laying. He was transported to a local hospital and is in critical condition. Police are still looking for the second suspect who is possibly wounded.

...

Note: There were multiple stories here, one sourced from the County Sheriff and one from the Police Chief. Each ignored the other’s investigation. It appears they are competitors rather than colleagues.

Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/07/no_author/lady-gunfighter-vanquishes-2-home-invaders/.

[C10H15N]

The first suspect shot at her and she returned fire, hitting him four times. That suspect fell to the ground and a second intruder kicked the back door open and both fled out the back of the home.

That, my friends, is gun control at its finest! 

[Okurkabinladin]

The first suspect shot at her and she returned fire, hitting him four times. That suspect fell to the ground and a second intruder kicked the back door open and both fled out the back of the home.

That, my friends, is gun control at its finest! 

As it should be.

A classic of gun ignorance: New York passed a law three years ago banning gun magazines holding more than seven bullets — without realizing that for most guns there is no such thing as a magazine for seven bullets or less.

And every time liberals speak blithely about banning guns, they boost the N.R.A. Let’s also banish the term “gun control”: the better expression is “gun safety.”

Research suggests that the most important practical step would be to keep guns away from high-risk individuals, such as criminals, those who abuse alcohol, or those who beat up their domestic partners.

Some public health approaches to reducing gun violence have nothing to do with guns. Researchers find that a nonprofit called Cure Violence, which works with gangs, curbs gun deaths. An initiative called Fast Track supports high-risk children and reduces delinquency and adult crime.

In short, let’s get smarter. Let’s make America’s gun battles less ideological and more driven by evidence of what works. If the left can drop the sanctimony, and the right can drop the obstructionism, if instead of wrestling with each other we can grapple with the evidence, we can save thousands of lives a year.

[Palmerson]

Gun ownership is not a panacea for the attacks of criminals, but this is the last and only chance to survive. Why do politicians have the courage to take the right to decide who can live and who not. They imagined themselves to be gods?

[C10H15N]

Gun ownership is not a panacea for the attacks of criminals, but this is the last and only chance to survive. Why do politicians have the courage to take the right to decide who can live and who not. They imagined themselves to be gods?

Yes, yes they do.  In their mind, they are smarter and better than you.   

[28days_ever]

I believe that every mentally healthy person should have a weapon so that he himself can protect himself from criminals, because criminals will not wait until the police arrive and protect.

[Patsakkyy]

I believe that every mentally healthy person should have a weapon so that he himself can protect himself from criminals, because criminals will not wait until the police arrive and protect.

The main thing is that you can definitely answer that because of the registered and real weapons no one commits crimes or robbery. Of course there are everyday crimes, but they are not enough. Compared to others. At the main goal of the implementation is the individual protection and protection of their housing and all property.

[joebrook]

I believe that every mentally healthy person should have a weapon so that he himself can protect himself from criminals, because criminals will not wait until the police arrive and protect.

The main thing is that you can definitely answer that because of the registered and real weapons no one commits crimes or robbery. Of course there are everyday crimes, but they are not enough. Compared to others. At the main goal of the implementation is the individual protection and protection of their housing and all property.

The real way to combat gun violence is to crack the illegal sales of guns and am munitions, as said earlier the registered guns don't commit crimes at all because it can be traced back quickly. 1

[Prettygirl01315]

I believe that every mentally healthy person should have a weapon so that he himself can protect himself from criminals, because criminals will not wait until the police arrive and protect.

The main thing is that you can definitely answer that because of the registered and real weapons no one commits crimes or robbery. Of course there are everyday crimes, but they are not enough. Compared to others. At the main goal of the implementation is the individual protection and protection of their housing and all property.

The real way to combat gun violence is to crack the illegal sales of guns and am munitions, as said earlier the registered guns don't commit crimes at all because it can be traced back quickly. 1

That's true. Legally registered guns are not the ones who are usually used in crimes but the illegal ones. Those who are not registered. If we really want to lessen the violence using guns, those who are appointed to issue gun ownership license must really keen in giving out those. And, they should follow the guidelines with regards to choosing the right person to give the license. And they should also know the purpose of use of the gun.

[flag39]

Gun Control for me means using technology in order to link a user to each gun on the street. This way it will ensure the legitimate use of gun power.
I have heard already for some fingerprint triggered guns, that will not fire unless the real owner is in possession.

[altcoinboss177]

If we make guns illegal, nobody will use them. Just like we did with drugs.

[Btcprofit1]

Depends. It's cool in Europe, but if we are talking about america, the "Control" bit of Gun Control is more sarcastic than serious. A suggestion at best

[Btctradercollctive]

We need to talk about mental health and guns. Suicide by gun constitutes the majority of gun deaths in the U.S. and the majority of suicides as well. Many of these deaths are preventable; with better mental health infrastructure coupled with smart gun laws, we could greatly reduce both gun deaths and completed suicides.

[danielpjTTP]

guns don't kill people, people kill people