What's your opinion of gun control?

[BADecker]

Not sure if there should be. Normally there should not be any, but on the other hand will not become so many murders. As have shown researches in America have fallen sharply, because hardly anyone would kill someone if he knew that the other has. But since there should be a largest control because now even small children can handle a gun.

The important thing is not the number of murders, and full statistics. How many people with weapons have saved his life, how many people died from legal weapons and how much from illegal.

If I say that Government guns are illegal guns, but all the rest are legal, what right does someone in Government have to counter what I say and I don't have the right to counter what he says? In other words, there are no guns that are illegal. Some government people simply say that they are.

[1715675787]

1715675787

[1715675787]

1715675787

[1715675787]

1715675787

[daiyuba1971]

Every person has the right to defend their lives with guns. The police have weapons, and that the life of the ordinary citizen is cheaper?

[birareru1988]

In car accidents kills more people than weapons so now to ban cars? Bans problems are not solved.

[dimonchik13]

No ban weapon. This is not in the interest of all. Just policy at this earn recognition. Then they will refuse the words.

[Sanekavg13]

In Switzerland, weapons from the population even more than in America, and such questions are no raises. Here's the other thing. Someone bribed and they want to weaken America.

[Bear Wire]

The only thing keeping the world free is American gun freedom. American gun freedom is the right of Americans to control their own guns in such a way that they can do anything with them as long as they don't harm anyone or damage his property. If Americans didn't have gun freedom, the world would have caved in to worldwide dictatorship long ago.

[Sanekavg13]

The more the country of freedom and democracy, the more liberal it the weapons act. Attempts to restrict access to weapons-a step toward dictatorship.

[birareru1988]

Except for the fact that people will not limit their rights, there's even more gun lobby which also does not allow the reduction of arms trafficking.

[yuiyuga]

The presence of weapons among the population is not only an opportunity to protect themselves from criminals, but also millions trained to handle weapons people are willing to defend their country.

[Winter1986]

Anyone had any problems. In America struggling with legal weapons, in Ukraine people are fighting for the right to have legal weapons. While illegal weapons in the hands of very many. What is better an illegal weapon on the hands or legal.

[TicTacTic]

Control over observance of safety rules of storage of weapons is needed, but a ban on weapons of this attack on fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens. I think that there has not been without corruption.

[lootz]

People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.

[BADecker]

People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.

Hitler want to control people.
Stalin want to control people.
Mao want to control people.
Many other want to control people.
Many people die from their control.
Gun freedom way better.
Let neighborhood people control neighborhood gun nuts, not Hitler, not Stalin, not Mao, not many other dictators, not Obama, not Hillary.

[lootz]

Gun control doesn't necessarily mean that civil people don't get access to guns.  It just means controls are put on them so that unauthorised people can't get hold of them.

[Hoor]

that is one of the main issue of the world is increasing from time to time, i think the UNO should take a strong action for controlling gun race that is really going to ruin the peace of the world.

[BADecker]

Gun control doesn't necessarily mean that civil people don't get access to guns.  It just means controls are put on them so that unauthorised people can't get hold of them.

Then when the authorizers have control, they will authorize nobody to have guns, except their military that they will use to enforce complete gun control.

It's called Hitlerism, Stalinism, Maoism, and China today-ism when necessary, and many other countries all around the world, and often in Africa.

[trollercoaster]

Gun control is a joke, except it isn't funny.
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.

It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.

Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.

Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.

t.Australian

[BADecker]

Gun control is a joke, except it isn't funny.
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.

It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.

Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.

Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.

t.Australian

Australia has at its base of law, English Common Law, although they may have changed it to Australian Common Law.

This means that properly done, as long as there is no harm or damage, peoples' rights are above the civil law of government.

The things that Karl Lentz does in America, Canada and the United Kingdom, apply to Australia, as well.

For starters:

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe.

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios.

http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page.

http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl.

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube.


Other Info

http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable.

http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness."

[trollercoaster]

The problem here and in the US is you end up exhausted financially, and mentally defending yourself against a crooked establishment, I know some very intelligent people who have lost everything, including custody of their children for attempting to defend their basic rights.

[BADecker]

The problem here and in the US is you end up exhausted financially, and mentally defending yourself against a crooked establishment, I know some very intelligent people who have lost everything, including custody of their children for attempting to defend their basic rights.

If you set your life up so that you don't own anything, but rather so that you control "your" stuff, they can't take anything from you. Why not? Because you don't own it.

It is true that we have ignored the fundamentals of common law. If we hadn't ignored it all along, we wouldn't be in the mess we are. But if some of us don't take up the cause, it will become worse in the future. Consider your children and grandchildren.

In addition, if you do it the Karl Lentz way and start small, you can win.