Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)

[brg444]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

[1714826914]

1714826914

[1714826914]

1714826914

[1714826914]

1714826914

[Zarathustra]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

[muyuu]

As you see, we write wherever we want; until we are banned. That ruins the reputation of the Politbüro and its cheerleaders more and more.

You keep dreaming that. 

[brg444]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

Unfortunately, Peter's piss poor research will never make it past peer-review seeing how his original "Spherical cows exist without block size limit" was dismantled by Greg Maxwell.

I guess having one of your pal's credentials next to some mildly important (effectively irrelevant) academic circlejerk makes your crew feel warm and fuzzy.

Rational observers couldn't give less of a fuck

[hdbuck]

ah finally!



 "Leader of Tomorrow"



besides the vitalik scammer, never heard of any of them whatnots cryptographic wannabes:

http://ledger.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ledger/about/editorialTeam

these are not devs, nor early contributors to bitcoin.. just some pompous academic parasites.

and lol most of them from MUUURICAAAAA

[muyuu]

http://ledger.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ledger/about/editorialTeam

these are not devs, nor early contributors to bitcoin.. just some pompous academic parasites.

and lol most of them from MUUURICAAAAA

Andrew Miller is sound. Vijay Pande IIRC is a philosopher/politologist/sociologist. Other than Vitalik, I don't know much of the rest but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, except for Peter R. whose ramblings have completely discredited him already. I hope he doesn't ruin the publication with made up pie charts and stupid made up markets that don't exist to support his political ramblings about XT.

[Zarathustra]

ah finally!

Yes. that's the difference between him and a '50 posts a day spammer' like that brg0815.

[Peter R]

... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

Ledger was a group effort and I only played a small part, but thank you! Also, I had nothing to do with the mention in Nature [but I have a feeling I know who did ]

[brg444]

ah finally!

Yes. that's the difference between him and a '50 posts a day spammer' like that brg0815.

Peter might be competent in his own field.

Unfortunately when it comes to Bitcoin he's in way over his head 

[hdbuck]

http://ledger.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ledger/about/editorialTeam

these are not devs, nor early contributors to bitcoin.. just some pompous academic parasites.

and lol most of them from MUUURICAAAAA

Andrew Miller is sound. Vijay Pande IIRC is a philosopher/politologist/sociologist. Other than Vitalik, I don't know much of the rest but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, except for Peter R. whose ramblings have completely discredited him already. I hope he doesn't ruin the publication with made up pie charts and stupid made up markets that don't exist to support his political ramblings about XT.

relevant cryptographic material are only to be within the scope of cypherpunks (szabo et al.) and 20+ years experienced researchers with actual published WP on the subject.
relevant bitcoin material are only to be within the scope of core devs, and more commonly to real sound contributors to bitcoin.
(and not to some teenage scammer running out of money that vitalik is)

bitcoin is about trustlessness, so im very not going to fall for the USG academics giving lessons and asking to trust their judgement about how relevant a piece might be, and especially regarding bitcoin.
seriously, when it comes to my precious, this kind of circlejerking initiative is typical menthal diarrhea.
even MP seems more legit.

[Zarathustra]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

[hdbuck]

ah finally!

Yes. that's the difference between him and a '50 posts a day spammer' like that brg0815.

Peter might be competent in his own field.

Unfortunately when it comes to Bitcoin he's in way over his head 

meh, i doubt he would even be competent in his own field.
he does not seem to practice it in any way and instead spend his life on some internet forum and reddit.. + the GIF lessons 101!!1

[brg444]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.

From where I stand Core is healthy as ever and leading the charge of Bitcoin development. Having just disposed of its most toxic parasite I should expect it to thrive even more in the future!

You do understand Core is composed of more people than the Blockstream crew?

[Zarathustra]

even MP seems more legit.

Yes, this is the idol of the clowns with their vulgar language here. But you don't represent Bitcoin.

[brg444]

even MP seems more legit.

Yes, this is the idol of the clowns with their vulgar language here. But you don't represent Bitcoin.

Vulgar  

Your self-serving high horse moral judgments are the definition of vulgar

[Zarathustra]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.

Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:

[hdbuck]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.

Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:

lmao that double bottom 90% pullback coincides with the launch of XT and gavin officially attacking bitcoin with his budy hearn and all their fud, 'stress testing' and social diarrhea

then crediting peter or 21 to impact btc price highlight even more the critical delusions from you n00bs.

[knight22]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.

[brg444]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years.

Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge.
But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:

 

good one

we sure learned a lot from his 5th grader economics 101 class !

[coalitionfor8mb]

vomits his bile

Everybody out there is talking laughing about the ideas of Peter R.
Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod.
Which is no surprise.

FTFY

While irrelevant laughing clowns are exposing their irrelevance with their laughter ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjNUPhIrt24&spfreload=10


... Peter R.'s Ledger is already mentioned in Nature.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/ledger-a-journal-about-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-research.55/#post-1636

That's the difference between Peter R. and irrelevant clowns.

The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be.

The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant.
At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.

By whom?

By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation.

'Cause they're Unforgiven II