█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[JarBinks]

had to hard reset my S7 a few min ago.  But so far, pretty solid.

also, you can see how much nicehash gets rejected by the pool.  The extra rewards is what's offsetting it I think.

Against my initial assumption I am still just about breaking even; and have generated as much as I have spent thus far. (NH fee included and considered covered first)

Hope it helps.  Looks like that rental will push on for another day or two...... I may top it off a little if I feel like pushing it further.

I agree it seems to be more stable than it was before.

Your delta line seems more red than what I am getting and all of those dead bars seem unusual to me.
Are you using a d= password parm?

[1715004350]

1715004350

[1715004350]

1715004350

[1715004350]

1715004350

[1715004350]

1715004350

[1715004350]

1715004350

[1715004350]

1715004350

[JaredKaragen]

I agree it seems to be more stable than it was before.

Your delta line seems more red than what I am getting and all of those dead bars seem unusual to me.
Are you using a d= password parm?

yep.  I have it at max that nicehash allows....  I remember before zpool stratum would start below min diff nicehash allows and it would never connect... its the same as it was when Ive done rentals in the past before the major stratum issues.

*edit  my S7 just dropped again.... looks like its getting pointed elsewhere;  I cant be around 24/7 to reset it all the time XD

[JarBinks]

yep.  I have it at max that nicehash allows....  I remember before zpool stratum would start below min diff nicehash allows and it would never connect... its the same as it was when Ive done rentals in the past before the major stratum issues.

The graph I showed represents about an 8% market loss, I would suspect, based on the amount of red, yours is higher.
I do not run at the maximum d= allowed by NH, I use something reasonable.

[JaredKaragen]

yep.  I have it at max that nicehash allows....  I remember before zpool stratum would start below min diff nicehash allows and it would never connect... its the same as it was when Ive done rentals in the past before the major stratum issues.

The graph I showed represents about an 8% market loss, I would suspect, based on the amount of red, yours is higher.
I do not run at the maximum d= allowed by NH, I use something reasonable.

From this perspective:  a difficulty of 8000, for a hashrate of 5-10Th, is WELL within reason.  I have run 16.5K on my S7 with no issues and good hashrates reported at the pool.  my machine would just never get the smaller blocks.  I am trying to keep diff high so that it doesn't flood stratum with shares unnecessarily.  If I try to create an order and the pool settings are wrong;  the nicehash fee is forefit.....  most people didnt notice that caveat.

to add further;  my share percentage really hasn't dipped much.  it has just wavered with the hashrate that nicehash is giving me.

FYI I am selling on NH for a minimum of  .4BTC/Ph/day than what I am paying for their service.  Kinda funny when you think of it.  point hashrate at them, and get paid a little to use the hashrate by proxy.

[JarBinks]

From this perspective:  a difficulty of 8000, for a hashrate of 5-10Th, is WELL within reason.  I have run 16.5K on my S7 with no issues and good hashrates reported at the pool.  my machine would just never get the smaller blocks.  I am trying to keep diff high so that it doesn't flood stratum with shares unnecessarily.  If I try to create an order and the pool settings are wrong;  the nicehash fee is forefit.....  most people didnt notice that caveat.

Oh yes, lots of caveats with nicehash but, they can be managed with assistance.
I agree something in the range you are talking is reasonable, I was just wondering why your delta line is so much redder than mine, hence decreasing your potential.

[JaredKaragen]

See;  the extra rewards line;  it is credited hashrate;  thus not counting towards my hashrate.   I may have found a small loophole in their system that works to our benefit.

and crackfoo;  those red bars are dead pool indicators.

[JarBinks]

See;  the extra rewards line;  it is credited hashrate;  thus not counting towards my hashrate.   I may have found a small loophole in their system that works to our benefit.

Pretty sure that Extra Rewards are paid to the hash selling not us, the buyer, no different than stale shares.
Again Pretty sure all of the items below Delta %, in the table, are penalties for us, the buyers.

[JaredKaragen]

See;  the extra rewards line;  it is credited hashrate;  thus not counting towards my hashrate.   I may have found a small loophole in their system that works to our benefit.

Pretty sure that Extra Rewards are paid to the hash selling not us, the buyer, no different than stale shares.
Again Pretty sure all of the items below Delta %, in the table, are penalties for us, the buyers.

NH is failing hardcore.

I have my S7 with a password of p=2.8

which equates to 2.8BTC/Th/Day minimum rental rate;  this feature used to work.

sadly;  it no longer is.  They want us to be shafted in paying the lower prices...

[JarBinks]

and crackfoo;  those red bars are dead pool indicators.

AND/OR when the connection between NH and pool has issues for one reason or another.
  I have seen this also happen when the d= setting is not quite right, and when using vardiff on a few algos

[joblo]

Problems with DNET? Seems to be stuck loading blocks.

[Kazadar]

A question on payouts.

I was mining with payout in amber. While mining it you ran out of amber and it turned red so I switched back to BTC.

Later on other people have mined amber increasing the number of amber needed.

My question is, is the payout done in the order that the coin was earned? Will get my coin before the others as mine were earned first?

[AngryDwarf]

A question on payouts.

I was mining with payout in amber. While mining it you ran out of amber and it turned red so I switched back to BTC.

Later on other people have mined amber increasing the number of amber needed.

My question is, is the payout done in the order that the coin was earned? Will get my coin before the others as mine were earned first?

Payouts are delayed until all miners can be paid at once as I understand it.

[AngryDwarf]

Problems with DNET? Seems to be stuck loading blocks.

Probably needs to add some nodes:

addnode=108.61.151.69
addnode=173.245.158.8
addnode=coin-server.com
addnode=185.117.72.180
addnode=164.132.25.216
addnode=5.39.8.251
addnode=164.132.143.9
addnode=46.8.44.81
addnode=104.172.24.79
addnode=2.230.243.216

[AngryDwarf]

See;  the extra rewards line;  it is credited hashrate;  thus not counting towards my hashrate.   I may have found a small loophole in their system that works to our benefit.

Pretty sure that Extra Rewards are paid to the hash selling not us, the buyer, no different than stale shares.
Again Pretty sure all of the items below Delta %, in the table, are penalties for us, the buyers.

NH is failing hardcore.

I have my S7 with a password of p=2.8

which equates to 2.8BTC/Th/Day minimum rental rate;  this feature used to work.

sadly;  it no longer is.  They want us to be shafted in paying the lower prices...

Maybe its the change to GH/day for sha256?

[crackfoo]

Problems with DNET? Seems to be stuck loading blocks.

Probably needs to add some nodes:

addnode=108.61.151.69
addnode=173.245.158.8
addnode=coin-server.com
addnode=185.117.72.180
addnode=164.132.25.216
addnode=5.39.8.251
addnode=164.132.143.9
addnode=46.8.44.81
addnode=104.172.24.79
addnode=2.230.243.216

Nope not sure what the issue is.... I have lots of nodes...

addnode=192.99.217.64:51472
addnode=158.69.12.230:51472
addnode=164.132.151.108:51472
addnode=52.77.254.46:51472
addnode=149.56.165.130:51472
addnode=72.49.184.206:51472
addnode=5.39.8.234:51472
addnode=149.56.154.73:52643
addnode=164.132.176.111:56925
addnode=164.132.238.69:40840
addnode=158.69.137.243:37347
addnode=173.245.158.8:57661
addnode=164.132.189.223:54186
addnode=158.69.12.232:53800
addnode=212.112.125.134:49483
addnode=201.37.163.183:13877
addnode=142.4.193.125:60236
addnode=164.132.189.210:58674
addnode=173.245.158.8:58985
addnode=173.245.158.8:43012
addnode=164.132.176.69:52847
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=149.56.165.135:53716
addnode=164.132.176.101:57979
addnode=192.99.217.94:55544
addnode=52.89.174.139:59560
addnode=164.132.151.103:44187
addnode=192.99.217.87:39912
addnode=68.172.251.98:53110
addnode=54.169.152.71:54343
addnode=178.254.23.111:40515
addnode=173.245.158.8:54557
addnode=192.99.217.111:39690
addnode=158.69.12.231:40769
addnode=91.141.1.143:51168

[Kazadar]

A question on payouts.

I was mining with payout in amber. While mining it you ran out of amber and it turned red so I switched back to BTC.

Later on other people have mined amber increasing the number of amber needed.

My question is, is the payout done in the order that the coin was earned? Will get my coin before the others as mine were earned first?

Payouts are delayed until all miners can be paid at once as I understand it.

Thats a shame. It will mean that it will likely never be paid as the coin isnt worth mining anymore and people keep on trying get get paid in amber anyway.

[AngryDwarf]

A question on payouts.

I was mining with payout in amber. While mining it you ran out of amber and it turned red so I switched back to BTC.

Later on other people have mined amber increasing the number of amber needed.

My question is, is the payout done in the order that the coin was earned? Will get my coin before the others as mine were earned first?

Payouts are delayed until all miners can be paid at once as I understand it.

Thats a shame. It will mean that it will likely never be paid as the coin isnt worth mining anymore and people keep on trying get get paid in amber anyway.

Encountered similar problems before. With time it usually gets rectified.

[AngryDwarf]

Problems with DNET? Seems to be stuck loading blocks.

Probably needs to add some nodes:

addnode=108.61.151.69
addnode=173.245.158.8
addnode=coin-server.com
addnode=185.117.72.180
addnode=164.132.25.216
addnode=5.39.8.251
addnode=164.132.143.9
addnode=46.8.44.81
addnode=104.172.24.79
addnode=2.230.243.216

Nope not sure what the issue is.... I have lots of nodes...

addnode=192.99.217.64:51472
addnode=158.69.12.230:51472
addnode=164.132.151.108:51472
addnode=52.77.254.46:51472
addnode=149.56.165.130:51472
addnode=72.49.184.206:51472
addnode=5.39.8.234:51472
addnode=149.56.154.73:52643
addnode=164.132.176.111:56925
addnode=164.132.238.69:40840
addnode=158.69.137.243:37347
addnode=173.245.158.8:57661
addnode=164.132.189.223:54186
addnode=158.69.12.232:53800
addnode=212.112.125.134:49483
addnode=201.37.163.183:13877
addnode=142.4.193.125:60236
addnode=164.132.189.210:58674
addnode=173.245.158.8:58985
addnode=173.245.158.8:43012
addnode=164.132.176.69:52847
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=149.56.165.135:53716
addnode=164.132.176.101:57979
addnode=192.99.217.94:55544
addnode=52.89.174.139:59560
addnode=164.132.151.103:44187
addnode=192.99.217.87:39912
addnode=68.172.251.98:53110
addnode=54.169.152.71:54343
addnode=178.254.23.111:40515
addnode=173.245.158.8:54557
addnode=192.99.217.111:39690
addnode=158.69.12.231:40769
addnode=91.141.1.143:51168

The one's I listed are on the DNET ANN page, and the wallet synced ok. Unfortunately, no getwork support to have fun solo mining the low diff.

[JaredKaragen]

Maybe its the change to GH/day for sha256?

You mean the change from**

Their site still says its based off a price/Th/Day.  Which is roughly around 3.3BTC/Ph/Day recently as far as pool profitability.

But even so;  I am requesting (as per their instructions) 2.8 BTC/Th.  Which is insanely expensive.  
I switched it up from 0.0028 which was the old value that worked months ago.  (2.8mBTC/Th/day was a good base minimum for when pool profitability was dipping below 0.0000021 per Gh.)

So even if I switch it to p=5000, it still shows pool up and stratum connects giving me low value work.

I am almost done with NH.   The main reason I like them is the "in-between-clients time" is managed quite well.

[AngryDwarf]

Maybe its the change to GH/day for sha256?

You mean the change from**

Their site still says its based off a price/Th/Day.  Which is roughly around 3.3BTC/Ph/Day recently as far as pool profitability.

But even so;  I am requesting (as per their instructions) 2.8 BTC/Th.  Which is insanely expensive.  
I switched it up from 0.0028 which was the old value that worked months ago.  (2.8mBTC/Th/day was a good base minimum for when pool profitability was dipping below 0.0000021 per Gh.)

So even if I switch it to p=5000, it still shows pool up and stratum connects giving me low value work.

I am almost done with NH.   The main reason I like them is the "in-between-clients time" is managed quite well.

Oops, yes the change from. Not that impressed with NH. Poor deal for miners, renters can't make a profit easily. And they charge both parties 3%. I started to use it as a back up pool before hp went offline, since the returns there were even worse towards the end.