█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[tbearhere]

Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.
Your pool is the best. 
Thx so much.

[joblo]

Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.
Your pool is the best. 
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

[tbearhere]

Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.
Your pool is the best. 
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one.

[joblo]

Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.
Your pool is the best.  
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one.

Must have had a brain fart when I wrote that, I meant below the wallet.

Edit: While on the topic the expanded wallet details (pending coins) could use alphabetizing.

[tbearhere]

Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.
Your pool is the best.  
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one.

Must have had a brain fart when I wrote that, I meant below the wallet.

Edit: While on the topic the expanded wallet details (pending coins) could use alphabetizing.

Yes like I said up above ..  ...Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please.

[Lazyriver]

Hi, crackfoo.
I mine x11 on zpool using cgminer 3.5.6. It definitely has extranonce.subscribe support, but I never saw it is active on the miner detail section. Am I do something wrong? Should I write something in the options to make it work?

[toptek]

nm on the btc i went back and looked better how does ltc payout work. for btc i need 0.0025 mybad read it wrong .
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.

[crackfoo]

btc  13Xb4RvqoeRumYbzNpe4a8jNLb7N3qhFNZ total unpaid 0.00226129 been that way for a few days payout is 0.0001 ?
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.

Payouts are made automatically every 3 hours for all balances above 0.0025 and balances less than 0.0001 are paid on Sunday.

We don't have enough hash yet to mine LTC so might be a while for that payout.

From the main page:

Non-BTC payouts depend on that coin being mined as your BTC balance is traded internally by our system to your currency of choice. If we have not or are not mining that currency your payouts will be delayed until the pool has mined the blocks for you to get paid. If you notice in the pools status that the currency is red, it means there is not sufficient amount of the currency to pay miner(s). It's recommended to use BTC as any other coin could be removed at anytime and payouts will not occur.

[crackfoo]

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.

[pallas]

lyra2, quark, qubit, groestl, myr-gr are all faster than x11.
dmd-gr is like groestl, not like myr-gr, and is slower than myr-gr (not the other way around).

[toptek]

btc  13Xb4RvqoeRumYbzNpe4a8jNLb7N3qhFNZ total unpaid 0.00226129 been that way for a few days payout is 0.0001 ?
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.

Payouts are made automatically every 3 hours for all balances above 0.0025 and balances less than 0.0001 are paid on Sunday.

We don't have enough hash yet to mine LTC so might be a while for that payout.

From the main page:

Non-BTC payouts depend on that coin being mined as your BTC balance is traded internally by our system to your currency of choice. If we have not or are not mining that currency your payouts will be delayed until the pool has mined the blocks for you to get paid. If you notice in the pools status that the currency is red, it means there is not sufficient amount of the currency to pay miner(s). It's recommended to use BTC as any other coin could be removed at anytime and payouts will not occur.

i re read about the btc i missed it about the ltc or wouldn't have asked ty .i putting a 256 mh miner i hope online some time next week it's being delivered Monday according to the tracking i got for it, it will take me two days to set it up right and decide what pools to mine etc at first i may solo mine on nice hash then hit here a few days if the ltc hash picks up . i want to save some  ltc really never know what could happen.

[joblo]

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.

I think your normalization is for AMD. Here are some hashrates for Nvidia that can be used as a guideline.

http://cryptomining-blog.com/6369-ccminer-spmod-release-cuda-6-5-vs-cuda-7-5-performance-comparison/

[tbearhere]

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.

Must be for AMD....no wonder my profits went down...I think.
750ti does x11 3.2 mh/s  for one of many that are wrong.

[AngryDwarf]

Normalisation strings are going to be quite a bit different for an AMD or NVIDIA GPU, and for CPU's. But they are also going to be quite different for different cards within the same brand depending on how memory intensive or processor intensive an algo is. I wouldn't recommend anyone using the build in normalisation factor table. The algos at the top right of the page might as well be fixed in some order as has been discussed in the hashpower thread. Currrently got one CPU on neoscrypt and the other on x15. One GPU is on neoscrypt and the other on qubit.

[semajjames]

My multi algo password has "neoscrypt" set to "neoscrypt=0" but somehow I still mine neoscrypt how can this be ?

cheers

[subvectus]

Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

[crackfoo]

Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

We appear to have some creative DDoS'er sweeping through. Should have it sorted tonight with new rules on the firewall.

[crackfoo]

Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

We appear to have some creative DDoS'er sweeping through. Should have it sorted tonight with new rules on the firewall.

Should improve now actually. New monitor in place and banning ip's already

[subvectus]

Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

We appear to have some creative DDoS'er sweeping through. Should have it sorted tonight with new rules on the firewall.

Should improve now actually. New monitor in place and banning ip's already

Is there any place to get my IP whitelisted to not get banned? . .  . just in case for multiple miners connection from one IP . . .

[blackpalm]

guys did u know why I get some problems with my stats on zpool.ca I get some stats but the hasherates are not the good ones and there is some missing miners in my list any way to fix this? sometimes I get 0 miner and after my all miners come back, thank you!