█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[JaredKaragen]

So for the future all of the individual algos will be <algo>.mine.zpool.ca?

thats right.

Ok I see 3.8 gh I'm hopping in 1.4gh.
How long will the old command lines work for Crackfoo?

I'll keep the port forwarding open a couple more weeks probably

Gives me time to go to SF and re-config the machines up there =)

Ok
So  -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3334   becomes  -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.zpool.ca:3334
correct?

Nope:
lbry.mine.zpool.ca

[1714934736]

1714934736

[1714934736]

1714934736

[1714934736]

1714934736

[1714934736]

1714934736

[1714934736]

1714934736

[tbearhere]

So for the future all of the individual algos will be <algo>.mine.zpool.ca?

thats right.

Ok I see 3.8 gh I'm hopping in 1.4gh.
How long will the old command lines work for Crackfoo?

I'll keep the port forwarding open a couple more weeks probably

Gives me time to go to SF and re-config the machines up there =)

Ok
So  -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3334   becomes  -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.zpool.ca:3334
correct?

Nope:
lbry.mine.zpool.ca

oooooo ok I see..

[tbearhere]

A little more hash on lbry algo for LBC  people ...paying well.

[JaredKaragen]

A little more hash on lbry algo for LBC  people ...paying well.

More hash that stays consistent is good.   I noticed that there's hash that comes and goes as if on profit switching... not really economical for long TTF coins.

I have begun changing my batch to account for the algo name changes.   since the way the batch is made, its a uniform change on one section.  not much to change really.

I have also begun working on making it multi-device compatible.  You can run more than one batch (one per-device);  specify which device(s) you want just like you do your payout address.  The devices being mined in that instance of ccminer will have the device numbers in the title bar.

A test version of batch V1.07 should come online sometime after the next lbry block.   Once that happens, Ill take the time to have my machine hash on the updated batch for a day before uploading and switching back to lbry once again.

[tbearhere]

 Yes a mess now for Minercontrol.

 "sparam1": "-o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca",
        "sparam2": "-p",
        "minprofit": 1.1,
        "algos": [            
            {
                "algo": "blake2s",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "blakecoin",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5743 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "c11",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",

[pallas]

A little more hash on lbry algo for LBC  people ...paying well.

More hash that stays consistent is good.   I noticed that there's hash that comes and goes as if on profit switching... not really economical for long TTF coins.

No, not that again.... this thread is already full of TTF nonsense.

[ComputerGenie]

I fried my good PC and ya'll just making me wish I had one that would be worth a damn to mine with.  

.... this thread is already full of TTF nonsense.

+1

[JaredKaragen]

Found a program that can convert a dos batch file into a .com file... basically converting the batch into assembly... and if things are picky its easy to port to .exe format....


Interesting.

Now that's system level!!  but not something the typical end user would be able to hex edit their settings into..... lol.  I'm not that sadistic.

Looking into some sort of way to config it with a live screen showing all the variables you can modify and give a way to do so while the batch is running.... but again... I am walking into the realm of "why don't I just code an app to return the data I want to implement".. cause my limitation is being able to take user input, and dynamically use it in the code.... and do major loops, file and database operations etc.... that's making a big project....

[permiepirate]

so i'm throwing my 3 gtx 1070's on lbry here. I keep getting illegal memory something on ccminer 1.8 win 7 x64 not sure why.

[crackfoo]

so i'm throwing my 3 gtx 1070's on lbry here. I keep getting illegal memory something on ccminer 1.8 win 7 x64 not sure why.

geez how much hash is that??? just went up a whole lot..

[permiepirate]

so i'm throwing my 3 gtx 1070's on lbry here. I keep getting illegal memory something on ccminer 1.8 win 7 x64 not sure why.

geez how much hash is that??? just went up a whole lot..

all maxed oc 800 MH/s had to set diff 768 good?

[crackfoo]

so i'm throwing my 3 gtx 1070's on lbry here. I keep getting illegal memory something on ccminer 1.8 win 7 x64 not sure why.

geez how much hash is that??? just went up a whole lot..

all maxed oc 800 MH/s had to set diff 768 good?

ahh ok! was gonna say... there's a jump of 10-12 gh now

[tbearhere]

so i'm throwing my 3 gtx 1070's on lbry here. I keep getting illegal memory something on ccminer 1.8 win 7 x64 not sure why.

geez how much hash is that??? just went up a whole lot..

all maxed oc 800 MH/s had to set diff 768 good?

ahh ok! was gonna say... there's a jump of 10-12 gh now

Someone maybe renting?

[scryptr]

Yes a mess now for Minercontrol.

 "sparam1": "-o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca",
        "sparam2": "-p",
        "minprofit": 1.1,
        "algos": [            
            {
                "algo": "blake2s",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "blakecoin",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5743 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "c11",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",

I THINK MINERCONTROL MAY NEED AN UPDATE--

I cant see how to insert a variable into the mining URL specified in "spararm1".  Essnetially, the program needs a different "sparamX" for each algo now.  TB, have you figured a way?

NOTE TO CRACKFOO:  MinerControl only functions if you have port forwarding configured at the pool.  I don't configure my ASICS to work with it, and have not tried.  But, the regular algos in the "switching" catagory will not be addressed properly with the current MinerControl.       --scryptr

[crackfoo]

I cant see how to insert a variable into the mining URL specified in "spararm1".  Essnetially, the program needs a different "sparamX" for each algo now.  TB, have you figured a way?

NOTE TO CRACKFOO:  MinerControl only functions if you have port forwarding configured at the pool.  I don't configure my ASICS to work with it, and have not tried.  But, the regular algos in the "switching" catagory will not be addressed properly with the current MinerControl.       --scryptr

yeah the port is forwarded at the pool.

can't you just add somethign like:

"algo1": "x11",
"algo2": "x13",

and in the argument line have:

"arguments": "_APARAM3_ _ALGO1_._SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",


etc....


edit... nevermind, I see the whole -o stratum+tcp:// is also included in sparam1

edit edit.... could you change the sparam1 to just mine.zpool.ca? and do:

"arguments": "_APARAM3_ -o stratum+tcp://_ALGO1_._SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",

[tbearhere]

I cant see how to insert a variable into the mining URL specified in "spararm1".  Essnetially, the program needs a different "sparamX" for each algo now.  TB, have you figured a way?

NOTE TO CRACKFOO:  MinerControl only functions if you have port forwarding configured at the pool.  I don't configure my ASICS to work with it, and have not tried.  But, the regular algos in the "switching" catagory will not be addressed properly with the current MinerControl.       --scryptr

yeah the port is forwarded at the pool.

can't you just add somethign like:

"algo1": "x11",
"algo2": "x13",

and in the argument line have:

"arguments": "_APARAM3_ _ALGO1_._SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",


etc....


edit... nevermind, I see the whole -o stratum+tcp:// is also included in sparam1

edit edit.... could you change the sparam1 to just mine.zpool.ca? and do:

"arguments": "_APARAM3_ -o stratum+tcp://_ALGO1_._SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",

Maybe Crackfoo .. but I haven't tried yet.
edit  maybe  "sparam3"  or "sparam4"  and break up the -o stratum+tcp://  not sure yet.

[crackfoo]

Found a program that can convert a dos batch file into a .com file... basically converting the batch into assembly... and if things are picky its easy to port to .exe format....


Interesting.

Now that's system level!!  but not something the typical end user would be able to hex edit their settings into..... lol.  I'm not that sadistic.

Looking into some sort of way to config it with a live screen showing all the variables you can modify and give a way to do so while the batch is running.... but again... I am walking into the realm of "why don't I just code an app to return the data I want to implement".. cause my limitation is being able to take user input, and dynamically use it in the code.... and do major loops, file and database operations etc.... that's making a big project....

so would that contain everything in one executable? like the miners and the batch etc...??

[ComputerGenie]

Found a program that can convert a dos batch file into a .com file... basically converting the batch into assembly... and if things are picky its easy to port to .exe format....

Who dafuq is still using DOS in 2016? 

[JaredKaragen]

so would that contain everything in one executable? like the miners and the batch etc...??

If I decide to go full-ham I would do that...

Or maybe I can figure out a way to code a #include library that can add the batch functions to any miner compiled....   That would prevent me from needing to learn most of ccminer's code I would think...

Who dafuq is still using DOS in 2016?  

Who isn't?!?!?!   Lol


I am trying to stay close to system level with the mining scripts/apps.  Keep dependency to a minimum and simplicity to maximum.



*note*  15Gh on lbry right now =)

[Spiffy_1]

Found a program that can convert a dos batch file into a .com file... basically converting the batch into assembly... and if things are picky its easy to port to .exe format....

Who dafuq is still using DOS in 2016? 

pretty much anyone that grew up before windows 7 and still understands the usefullness of a command line.  Oh, and every linux/unix user out there.  The power given to you far exceeds a pretty gui.