Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[Easteregg69]

You take it to a level where I can't keep up. I be humble. And rich. Stacking sats.

It's a good excuse for not being doing the dishes. I see that now.

Check my status. I merited the most GPU intensive. (Mining rig rentals) I paid for blowing top of the hashrate. Beginners stuff.

Tell Poul we don't die when he gets to that part.

On this one you have to use the thinker. Be the gas man. You have the problem. Find the solution. Root boy in control. In comes the 2 to the three and the one.

[GTX1060x2]

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?

bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
__https://i.imgur.com/reTwOd9.png

[digitalbear]

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?

bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
__https://i.imgur.com/reTwOd9.png

For puzzle 67 on website we can see the same address:

Code:

Bitcoin:
W bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
0  0  0

but how can we find the other addresses that have the same private key for bitcoin like we have for puzzle 66 without having the private key?

Code:

Bitcoin:
U 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs
0  0  0
S 3PdQoXyQwWmerpt3SbF7Hbh3aukC5w28GP
0  0.00046714  4
W bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn
0  0.00006001  2
T bc1pgchl8k5hhxnlcfd3tmxp8vfk9jks438msjkth5lg93fzmskwy6js0kuqd2
0  0  0

[GR Sasa]

I am assuming, that the creator of the puzzle is very very aware of what is going on here and is between us. I also assume, that puzzle 66 was not solved by anyone, but rather the creator himself did reveal it's private key after it's probably was taken by bots, to see test if bots are actually a threat for solved low-bits puzzles.

So i will not be surprised if we see puzzle 67 also out of no where gets it's private key revealed after sometime by the creator, sooner or later.

Mark my words.

[mcdouglasx]

I have posted a new idea for searching for pubkeys, I hope it can be of some use to you, greetings.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5509916

[Tepan]

PROOF #1 RANGE 95

1237940039285380274899124223 -- upper ranges key

868012190417726402719548863 <- actual priv key  

848970019642690143254478847 -> scaled for sequence start  

PROOF # 2 RANGE 100

1267650600228229401496703205375 -- upper ranges key

868221233689326498340379183142 <- actual priv key  

863825300114114781320059027455 -> scaled for sequence start  

PROOF # 3 RANGE 105

40564819207303340847894502572031 -- upper ranges key

29083230144918045706788529192435 <- actual priv key  

25282409603651667990095585083391 -> scaled for sequence start  

this decimal from priv key was used for learn to scaled down the ranges, and i'll make some precision to these math.
sorry if i'm not provide the formula to this.

Just still same, if doin search with CPU, it takes whole time to hit the correct privkey.

[benjaniah]

67 also has 0.67 of BCH associated with it. Are there any other forked coins that have a balance linked to 67's private key?

[COBRAS]

PROOF #1 RANGE 95

1237940039285380274899124223 -- upper ranges key

868012190417726402719548863 <- actual priv key  

848970019642690143254478847 -> scaled for sequence start  

PROOF # 2 RANGE 100

1267650600228229401496703205375 -- upper ranges key

868221233689326498340379183142 <- actual priv key  

863825300114114781320059027455 -> scaled for sequence start  

PROOF # 3 RANGE 105

40564819207303340847894502572031 -- upper ranges key

29083230144918045706788529192435 <- actual priv key  

25282409603651667990095585083391 -> scaled for sequence start  

this decimal from priv key was used for learn to scaled down the ranges, and i'll make some precision to these math.
sorry if i'm not provide the formula to this.

Just still same, if doin search with CPU, it takes whole time to hit the correct privkey.

where is 94,93,92,91 etc bits privkeys rabges ?

[GTX1060x2]

67 also has 0.67 of BCH associated with it. Are there any other forked coins that have a balance linked to 67's private key?

670005.46 XEC ~$22 https://explorer.e.cash/address/ecash:qpeegdam8htdrxp7ve3fchcgcu89ya5nwyzlapcczk
0.67 BTG ~$15.5 https://btgexplorer.com/address/GUP3gXvjtWA6kQkCB779uCWbBuBhmJ3wde

[ihsotas91]

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?

bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
__https://i.imgur.com/reTwOd9.png

For puzzle 67 on website we can see the same address:

Code:

Bitcoin:
W bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
0  0  0

but how can we find the other addresses that have the same private key for bitcoin like we have for puzzle 66 without having the private key?

Code:

Bitcoin:
U 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs
0  0  0
S 3PdQoXyQwWmerpt3SbF7Hbh3aukC5w28GP
0  0.00046714  4
W bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn
0  0.00006001  2
T bc1pgchl8k5hhxnlcfd3tmxp8vfk9jks438msjkth5lg93fzmskwy6js0kuqd2
0  0  0

https://privatekeys.pw/address/bitcoin/1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9

For other addresses you can check using hash:

Public Key Hash (Hash 160):
739437bb3dd6d1983e66629c5f08c70e52769371

Based on the puzzle's statistics, the private key for 67 is likely around 95XXXXXX. If anyone finds it within this range, I’d be more than happy to accept some gifts!

bc1q4xj4maw4csvn084zwjtrgzg8tk08660mxj6wnw

[gygy]

https://privatekeys.pw/address/bitcoin/1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9

For other addresses you can check using hash:

Public Key Hash (Hash 160):
739437bb3dd6d1983e66629c5f08c70e52769371

Based on the puzzle's statistics, the private key for 67 is likely around 95XXXXXX. If anyone finds it within this range, I’d be more than happy to accept some gifts!

bc1q4xj4maw4csvn084zwjtrgzg8tk08660mxj6wnw

Your statistics must be fantastic (none of them are working because the you was generated randomly), but it is very unlikely the private key for 67 is likely around 95XXXXXX because it is out if it's range. If I were you I wouldn't expect too much gifts.

[Tepan]

where is 94,93,92,91 etc bits privkeys rabges ?

oh sorry i'm not provide the next data, I count that from big bit into small bit range like 60, dont worry.

[nomachine]

Just still same, if doin search with CPU, it takes whole time to hit the correct privkey.

The prediction should be very precise, a deviation on the level of puzzle 30 size to be a bingo. Which is statistically impossible. Or let's say we know that puzzle 67 WIF starts precisely with:

"KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qa"  - but 18 characters are missing.

(or at least the next eight  characters to make brute force effective)

Which is again impossible to solve.

Or is someone gifted with "Remote viewing" so that they can see the creator's WIFs.   

[kTimesG]

Or is someone gifted with "Remote viewing" so that they can see the creator's WIFs.   

Be careful about this, you don't want the CIA at your door. Parapsychological intelligence collection is a real thing. But no agency will ever admit it, it would cause global population panic instantly.

[ihsotas91]

https://privatekeys.pw/address/bitcoin/1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9

For other addresses you can check using hash:

Public Key Hash (Hash 160):
739437bb3dd6d1983e66629c5f08c70e52769371

Based on the puzzle's statistics, the private key for 67 is likely around 95XXXXXX. If anyone finds it within this range, I’d be more than happy to accept some gifts!

bc1q4xj4maw4csvn084zwjtrgzg8tk08660mxj6wnw

Your statistics must be fantastic (none of them are working because the you was generated randomly), but it is very unlikely the private key for 67 is likely around 95XXXXXX because it is out if it's range. If I were you I wouldn't expect too much gifts.

The range for 67 is between 73786976294838206463 and 147573952589676412927. I did not give HEX range, I shared the numeric one.

[Tepan]

Just still same, if doin search with CPU, it takes whole time to hit the correct privkey.

The prediction should be very precise, a deviation on the level of puzzle 30 size to be a bingo. Which is statistically impossible. Or let's say we know that puzzle 67 WIF starts precisely with:

"KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qa"  - but 18 characters are missing.

(or at least the next eight  characters to make brute force effective)

Which is again impossible to solve.

Or is someone gifted with "Remote viewing" so that they can see the creator's WIFs.   

RANGE 30

1073741823 -- upper ranges key

1033162084 <- actual priv key

1006870921 -> scaled to start search.



i need speed.

[nomachine]

i need speed.

My brute force Rust script with "use rand_chacha::ChaCha20Rng"

# time ./puzzle -p 40 -a 1EeAxcprB2PpCnr34VfZdFrkUWuxyiNEFv

• Puzzle search
• Script started at:2024-09-22 14:36:57
• concurrency:12
• range:549755813888 to:1099511627775
• target:1EeAxcprB2PpCnr34VfZdFrkUWuxyiNEFv
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• KEY FOUND! 2024-09-22 14:41:06
• decimal: 1003651412950
• private key: KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYjgd9aFJuCJDo5F6Jm7
• public key: 03a2efa402fd5268400c77c20e574ba86409ededee7c4020e4b9f0edbee53de0d4
• address: 1EeAxcprB2PpCnr34VfZdFrkUWuxyiNEFv
• --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

real   4m9.203s
user   11m5.293s
sys   0m0.276s

look
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.msg64301108#msg64301108

It cannot be faster than this in random mode on my PC.

p.s.
There are various types of RNGs in Rust, each with its own set of trade-offs and speed.

Here is a list:

https://rust-random.github.io/book/guide-rngs.html

You need Nvme & motherboard fast as hell to go 8 GB/s

[Tepan]

can the code has parameter to setup ranges with decimal ? even though is random, i want it like random through ranges.

[Kelvin555]

My brute force Rust script with "use rand_chacha::ChaCha20Rng"

I have a Rust code, can you help me optimize it ?

[Marcel.]

It makes my day every time an intended troll post or unintended wrong statement results in some flame war 

My bad... haven't slept much and i've must've seen something else on the time stamp and hurried to post what i've "found"  )
Sorry 'bout the fake news