Yet another analyst :)

[lucif]

Weekly volume bars trolling. Hehe.

[1713575202]

1713575202

[1713575202]

1713575202

[1713575202]

1713575202

[1713575202]

1713575202

[1713575202]

1713575202

[1713575202]

1713575202

[ElectricMucus]

Do you think so?

remember this?


Even as a fellow bear, I think so too.
You really failed here buddy.

[lucif]

really? 

[ElectricMucus]

I just had to emphasize.

[lucif]

Please explain what did you emphasized? That ending picture is more accurate than initial draft?

The continous double wedge (tripple zigzag) we tracing out are really heavy brearish figures. Plus the last seems to be  ending diagonal.

[ElectricMucus]

Please explain what did you emphasized? That ending picture is more accurate than initial draft?

The continous double wedge (tripple zigzag) we tracing out are really heavy brearish figures. Plus the last seems to be  ending diagonal.

You can always draw a line above to form a triangle the way you did in the recent chart, independently of the course. The first one was a possibility, a valid one, there was a chance that it would occur but it didn't.
The recent one is just a revised version of something that already didn't play out.

[lucif]

Allright  Lets just wait... Shhh

[oakpacific]

If he does not set targets, everything he says are just unfalsifiable statements. He could just keep on saying "Let's wait and see...", and since there is never a forever bullish market in the world, eventually there will be a crash and then he could tell people" See, how right I was", even if the crash took place only after we hit $100. And no, before anyone misquote me, I didn't mean we will hit $100.

[lucif]

If he does not set targets, everything he says are just unfalsifiable statements. He could just keep on saying "Let's wait and see...", and since there is never a forever bullish market in the world, eventually there will be a crash and then he could tell people" See, how right I was", even if the crash took place only after we hit $100. And no, before anyone misquote me, I didn't mean we will hit $100.

Hehe. Listen, here is not required to be very expirenced to define a targets. The wave W 760 low, then wave X at around 1500, then what? Read books

Actually I expected wave XX of X to be at around 1200, but market shown massive resistance at 1300 and defined XX there. Did it harmed overall picture? No. XX of X was at 1287. Market always right.

The decreasing volume along with moving up shows weakness of this bullish trend and confirming we are tracing out this wedge.

The daily adx says we are near the top. Probably, the top of 2013 year.

[lucif]

This prediction sounds good for you?

From all what happening now in community I see we are sitting on a box of fans powder keg. The powder keg confirming in chart figures.

I will not trade until it either blow or be neutralized.

Either way price move - breaking or confimrming wedges - we will see massive daily and weekly volume bars. Red or green - depending on situation.

But as long as we have <=50k daily volume - I just see bombs are ticking.

[oakpacific]

I will not post targets here anymore, as this ruins my own interests. Only direction. You might have your subscriptions with existing analysts for targets.

That was what YOU said.

[lucif]

and...?

[oakpacific]

and...?

Oh, I get it, you did not post any target, they are all just in the charts, great.

Congratulations for making the 666th post by the way.

[pent]

Wow. 666 post. I will keep licif silent to keep it for some time

This is public speculation flood thread. With comics, trolling and whatever. I don't offer services, so you can't abuse me that I missing something.

I posted enough pics for thoughts.

[oakpacific]

Wow. 666 post. I will keep licif silent to keep it for some time

This is public speculation flood thread. With comics, trolling and whatever. I don't offer services, so you can't abuse me that I missing something.

I posted enough pics for thoughts.

I didn't abuse you for anything. I just said what you made are unfalsifiable statements if you don't post target, and that's all.

[pent]

So what?

Btw, thanks to naima pointing out who pushes price up. ASIC refunds. This is the end.

[arepo]

yall better check yourself. lucif is right about the divergences. prices are beginning to look unsustainable. order book looks like it did before the crash from the $7.20 top...

[klaus]

lucif, happy birthday 

post #666

[pent]

Hehe, thanks. I temporarily will write from this account to keep this number Please don't abuse pent, he is Angel

[klaus]

it might be a sign for you to change to bullish now?


s3052 is it forawhile and we subs went very good with it ...