[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[johhnyUA]

NOBODY in the project is unhappy with it, and it's obvious you are here for no other reason but spreading misinformation.

Of course you're right, lol. Max and Oliver have taken investors money. You and other delegates (i didn't see any real work except sitting here and disputing with haters) forging LISK and taking from this real profit. Everyone in this project (except ordinary investors who didn't sell their LISK at the beginning) is happy! 
you're goddamn right! 

[staticinstance]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

Where will be used this banners?

https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1381&p=10206#p10206


10) The 3 winning banners will then be randomly displayed on CoinMarketCap!

[BitBanksy]

Hello Liskers!

I'm doubling the Lisk Banner Contest's REWARDS

Before: 5 winning contestant / 100 LSK per winner...

Now:

1st prize: 500 LSK
2nd prize: 300 LSK
3rd prize: 200 LSK

Simply create and submit a banner that promote Lisk.io

More info at: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1381&p=10206#p10206

I'm not a delegate, can I participate anyway?

Yes you can

[MrPresident]

NOBODY in the project is unhappy with it, and it's obvious you are here for no other reason but spreading misinformation.

Of course you're right, lol. Max and Oliver have taken investors money. You and other delegates (i didn't see any real work except sitting here and disputing with haters) forging LISK and taking from this real profit. Everyone in this project (except ordinary investors who didn't sell their LISK at the beginning) is happy!  
you're goddamn right!  

Uuuuhm... The price of a Lisk coin never went below fiat ICO value, and very few delegates have sold any forged Lisk. so.... your entire statement is moot.
Try again.

You obviously also have no clue what it means to be a Swiss Non-Profit Organization.

[BitBanksy]

Hello Liskers!

I'm doubling the Lisk Banner Contest's REWARDS

Before: max 5 winning contestant / 100 LSK per winner...

Now:

1st prize: 500 LSK
2nd prize: 300 LSK
3rd prize: 200 LSK

Simply create and submit a banner that promote Lisk.io

More info at: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1381&p=10206#p10206

Too cheap for work, lol. Ordinary graph. designer will take at least 30-40 $ per banner))) And you offer only 8 dollars per banner (for first place of course)   Not to fair for job like this, lol. Jews are jews whatever there is.  

It's not a job but a contest. For a real job, you can always search @ freelance.com

[BitBanksy]

BITBANKSY:
Check your Lisk chat PM and contest thread... you're up late!

A special thanks to @corsaro & @Phoenix1969 who are sponsoring the rewards as follow:

1st prize: 1500 LSK
2nd prize: 900 LSK
3rd prize: 600 LSK


More info @ https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1381&p=10206#p10206

[MalReynolds]

The majority of Lisk delegates are lazy shit. They want a lot of money for nothing. It's true.

I would not say the majority.
If you take a look into the forum you'll see a lot of them have done good work for lisk in the past.
But some positions are totally wrong, some delegates are only there for $$$$

Let's change the rewards to .1 and you'll see the rest of the real supporter.

So...with rewards of 0.00 Lisk per block, testnet delegates are the real supporters of Lisk....  Hey, we agree!

PLEASE VOTE ON LISK MAINNET FOR THESE TESTNET DELEGATES WHO RAN FOR NODES FOR MONTHS WITH 0.00 LISK REWARDS...AND STILL DO TODAY !!!

https://testnet-explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor

anamix
atreides
axente
bangomatic_test
bawga_testnet
bigfisher
bioly
bitbanksy_testnet
bitseed
cad789@testnet
carolina
cc001
cointrader83
corsaro
crodam
cryptostorms_test
dafricash_test
devasive
digitron.testnet
diplo
distro_testnet
eclipsun
forrest
goldeneye
gordo
gr33ndrag0n
grajson_test
grumlin
hitobb_testnet
hmachado
hoop
hua
isabella
joel
lamar
liberspirita
liskdapps
liskgate
liskisawesome
liskit
liskjp_test
liskseed_test1
litcoincollector
malreynolds
metal494
movecrypto
mrgr
mrv
nerigal
ntelo
odsejen
oliver
ondin
ottobene
peanhoy
phinx_r
phoenix1969
polycrypto_test
popcornbag
punkrock
qbanow
qbanow_testnet
redsn0w
rmelo
rooney
samuray
seatripstestnet
sgdias
shinekami
slasheks
sonobit
sousel
splatters
staticinstance
stellardynamic
stoner19
techbytes
tembo
tharude_testnet
theredhawk
thrice.pi_prometheus
traderbill
vega
vi1son
vipertkd
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron
will
xujian

PS....THERE'S LOTS OF ROOM ON TESTNET FOR YOU TO BECOME A NEW DELEGATE RIGHT NOW AND LEARN LISK NODE RUNNING SKILLS....UNLESS YOU ARE LAZY....

[thandie]

The majority of Lisk delegates are lazy shit. They want a lot of money for nothing. It's true.

I would not say the majority.
If you take a look into the forum you'll see a lot of them have done good work for lisk in the past.
But some positions are totally wrong, some delegates are only there for $$$$

Let's change the rewards to .1 and you'll see the rest of the real supporter.

So...with rewards of 0.00 Lisk per block, testnet delegates are the real supporters of Lisk....  Hey, we agree!

PLEASE VOTE ON LISK MAINNET FOR THESE TESTNET DELEGATES WHO RAN FOR NODES FOR MONTHS WITH 0.00 LISK REWARDS...AND STILL DO TODAY !!!

https://testnet-explorer.lisk.io/delegateMonitor



PS....THERE'S LOTS OF ROOM ON TESTNET FOR YOU TO BECOME A NEW DELEGATE RIGHT NOW AND LEARN LISK NODE RUNNING SKILLS....UNLESS YOU ARE LAZY....

Fine, you're twisting the facts.
If the prospects are just .1 (REAL LSK, not testnet tokens), I'm sure only 20% would get involved for the Testnet and Meinnet.

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

[BitBanksy]

So...with rewards of 0.00 Lisk per block, testnet delegates are the real supporters of Lisk....  Hey, we agree!

Not to mention that the early supporters have spent a huge amount of cash to keep the tesnet up & running.

Consider: Let assume that each delegate oversee minimum one server @ $10 per month X 101 = $1010/month thrown into testnet only... some pals like @Phoenix1969 or @Liberspirita manage about 5 different servers each (if not more...) and are here since the beginning.

Let's remember also that while no one ever paid attention to testnet, GDT were there since day one, running the servers at their own expense!

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

Mal is an early founder of Lisk, has contributed a lot and still contribute to this day.

[Poly#Crypto]

 
The first International Conferences in 2017:


San Francisco Bitcoin Meetup | 31st January - San Francisco/CA/USA
Sidechains and Lisk - An evening with Max Kordek
Info | Facebook
.
New Finance Meetup NYC |1st February - New York City /USA
Info


Visit the Forum Topic Lisk: Conferences and Meetings, Infos and Summaries

[MalReynolds]

If the prospects are just .1 (REAL LSK, not testnet tokens), I'm sure only 20% would get involved for the Testnet and Meinnet.

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

Dude, I was running a Crypti testnet node way before Max and Oliver forked Crypti into Lisk.  I was in your "20%" that got involved in this sidechain project when the PROSPECT of profit was ZERO.

Sure, I'm a profit hunter.  If you're not, you are not playing this crypto game correctly.  But I'm not "just" a profit hunter.  The reason I am sticking around to run a Lisk node is because I hate wasteful mining and I believe in javascript sidechains as a key future technology worth developing.

[MrPresident]

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

If you're not "profit-hunting", you're in the wrong place.

[thandie]

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

If you're not "profit-hunting", you're in the wrong place.

You're not the right person for a serious discussion about "profIT" & crypto.
How many accounts you have on Bitcointalk?  ... Phoenix, sockpuppet, scammer  or whatever.

[thandie]

If the prospects are just .1 (REAL LSK, not testnet tokens), I'm sure only 20% would get involved for the Testnet and Meinnet.

And you're not there. I've read your comments to Lisk and Iconomi, you're just a profit hunter

Dude, I was running a Crypti testnet node way before Max and Oliver forked Crypti into Lisk.  I was in your "20%" that got involved in this sidechain project when the PROSPECT of profit was ZERO.

Sure, I'm a profit hunter.  If you're not, you are not playing this crypto game correctly.  But I'm not "just" a profit hunter.  The reason I am sticking around to run a Lisk node is because I hate wasteful mining and I believe in javascript sidechains as a key future technology worth developing.

I remember you were very active at the beginning, especially with your fat fat lyrics.

What are you doing now for Lisk?
I read the forum(Lisk, not Iconomi  ), I have a chat account, but you are absent.
Okay, some stupid questions like "How can I reload the client" but otherwise?
Some nonsensical lists like "I'm the best donor, vote for me" here, but otherwise?

Honestly? I would vote for you. You're not unsympathetic. But please do not make the Lisk-BigMac.

[wariner]

Hi guys,

I wanted to thank everyone who voted for me, thank you for your trust.

Good luck for the banner contest! I do not have a lot of creativity   

[BitBanksy]

The first International Conferences in 2017:


San Francisco Bitcoin Meetup | 31st January - San Francisco/CA/USA
Sidechains and Lisk - An evening with Max Kordek
Info | Facebook
.
New Finance Meetup NYC |1st February - New York City /USA
Info


Visit the Forum Topic Lisk: Conferences and Meetings, Infos and Summaries

Great sum up Poly! Busy week ahead

Let's not forget about the first 2017 Community Meeting on January 29th, 2017 at 18:00 CET: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=1373

[MalReynolds]

In other news....the entire crypto world changed forever last night.....the Chinese government has forced new rules on BTC trading.

“The exchanges are cutting their arms off to stay alive,” said Zhou Shuoji, whose Fintech Blockchain Group runs a bitcoin hedge fund and venture capital fund.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/chinese-bitcoin-trading-volumes-crash-90-overnight

[Poly#Crypto]

The first International Conferences in 2017:


San Francisco Bitcoin Meetup | 31st January - San Francisco/CA/USA
Sidechains and Lisk - An evening with Max Kordek
Info | Facebook
.
New Finance Meetup NYC |1st February - New York City /USA
Info


Visit the Forum Topic Lisk: Conferences and Meetings, Infos and Summaries

Great sum up Poly! Busy week ahead

Let's not forget about the first 2017 Community Meeting on January 29th, 2017 at 18:00 CET: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=1373

Yes, busy... I'm on work yet with tablet 

Notes on upcoming meetings are also listed in the forum topic.
Below are listed all the Conferences and Meeting of 2016, including the links to the announcements and summaries.

[carolinaliskdelegate]

This is a follow up on my recent post with some more details. I will also later do another post in reply to some of the recent responses that were given.

As is documented here I was voted out of GDT https://electionbuddy.com/elections/37932/results/ud2fkynx7 . The reasons were that I had not voted one particular individual with my personal holding, and that allegedly I wrote negative words about GDT in my transparency report.

In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided).

There was also the issue that at that time GDT had brought in many other new members based on their voting weight without requiring them to make a significant distribution or contribution for the benefit of Lisk. This was the reason for my comment in the transparency report.

Then there was also the issue that GDT was never interested in choosing certain qualified delegates. For instance I previously had made the proposal to support some developers from Shift (only with votes from forging reserves). As many might not be aware of, Shift is developing an ambitious project based on Lisk https://www.shiftnrg.org/newsletter. Some developers from Shift also work on the code for Lisk, while Shift is much worse funded. I also made the proposal to consider a candidate who had a background as cryptographer and was one of the winners for his delegate proposal (he even had some voting power). There was also the issue that they ignored a certain other candidate who could claim some trajectory in Lisk based on early participation. In the months that I participated in Lisk a number of developers showed up in the chat and forums, but there were no visible attempts by GDT to acquire valuable human resources. The concept of high block rewards actually attracts qualified developers, but GDT is preventing it from how it could work.

If some might want to know why I was in GDT. The answer is that I previously was in a different group that was merged with GDT, without me personally consenting to it and being left with no other choice. At that time it also appeared that GDT was in a new beginning. Some might recall that I had posted a critical comment about the governance of GDT on the Lisk forum in May, pointing out that the list of members is created by a single individual, Vega.

The short outline above is a summary of my experience with GDT. In addition, I would like to be explicit on why I see GDT as a scam and a threat:

• GDT is centralizing delegates, as basically a single individual is doing the list of delegates. GDT has no statute or real democratic organization.
• GDT is a cartel. They are not just a group of some mutual voters. They deliberately seek to maintain a number of 80+ members in order to seize all forging rewards and prevent competitors.
• GDT is a buddy scheme. Everything goes if it is to the liking of the leadership.
• GDT is undermining the consensus mechanism and is practicing collusion. With most recent conduct there is direct enforcement of the voting of its delegate members.
• GDT has no benefit for Lisk. GDT is not operating in a way that it seeks to return a surplus for Lisk from forged LSK. In particular it is not attempting to acquire valuable developers for Lisk projects as it was envisaged for the forging rewards.
• GDT is not preventing whales, or the “rich from getting richer”. Recently they rushed in many high stake holdings, even some of those they had previously labeled as their adversaries. The members of GDT themselves are striving to amass a holding from forging rewards that would make each a whale.
• GDT is not a better alternative to pools (as they promote themselves). In fact, GDT is associated with pools, used them for pushing some of their members, and members even proposed to launch GDT pools.
• GDT is not essential for the operation of the testnet and the mainnet. While in fact a lot of work was contributed to this, most work on scripts, applications, snapshot servers, real feedback on testing etc. is done by only a relatively small number of participants.

https://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.com/

[hagie]

In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided).

To make this short. Please anyone who believe these words, please go and read the chat log posts from carolina about our conversations and build your own picture. Yes at one particular time I lost my manners and say some bad things .. more than just the a-word , but please read the logs and you will understand.

Thanks
Regards