[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[bitcampaign]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

congrats to the winner, I hope there will be other trading sites were also added Lisk on their sites, at least this will also add a new society for the future Lisk in mind the objective of can make Lisk be great

[1714464842]

1714464842

[1714464842]

1714464842

[1714464842]

1714464842

[BitBanksy]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

great @MrPresident.

Now the contest is more interesting ;-)

Yes thanks to you guys! 7 banners submitted already

[Vega]

Vega great tool! Are you planning to release a web version?

Sadly, I'm not a developer, so I can't. The only language I know is AHK, because I personally needed it for everydays stuff countless times, so I got good at it.

Anything else is beyond me, but if anyone wants to make one, I'm happy to help if they need it.
Altought I'm not sure how such a tool would fair as a web service from a safetly perspective. As voting requires your passphrase (and your second one if you have set it), you would need to send it to that web service, it may even need to store it and thats just not safe.

[BitBanksy]

Vega great tool! Are you planning to release a web version?

Sadly, I'm not a developer, so I can't. The only language I know is AHK, because I personally needed it for everydays stuff countless times, so I got good at it.

Anything else is beyond me, but if anyone wants to make one, I'm happy to help if they need it.
Altought I'm not sure how such a tool would fair as a web service from a safetly perspective. As voting requires your passphrase (and your second one if you have set it), you would need to send it to that web service, it may even need to store it and thats just not safe.

True... I will try to run your tool from winebottler on my Mac.

[Vega]

True... I will try to run your tool from winebottler on my Mac.

Let me know how it goes. I know it (autohotkey) won't run on Wine.
Full fledged virtual machine solutions like Vmware Fusion work fine, but that may be an overkill for a voting app if someone doesn't use VMs otherwise.

[olejegcord]

More than 10 pages, a dispute over delegates with pools, and finally, it's over.
I don't want to reopen this topic, but I would like to recall that at the end of February, will be provided by the game elements (namely, the graphics portion) of the "Ballwars 1.0.0" platform Lisk (details in my topic https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=1245&sid=1de953e8db8cf78d9ba09f5b78d4a0e8 ). I hope the game will be a pleasure for users to help Lisk.

Just remind that I have two pools and I'd appreciate your votes.

Delegate name: olejegcord
Reward - 75%     https://adlisk.pro  (№ 118)

Delegate name: adliskpool
Reward - 100%    https://adliskpool.pro  (№ 143)

[Poly#Crypto]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

congrats to the winner, I hope there will be other trading sites were also added Lisk on their sites, at least this will also add a new society for the future Lisk in mind the objective of can make Lisk be great

Winners will be announced on February 8th. So you have enough time to participate, if you want.

[Poly#Crypto]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

great @MrPresident.

Now the contest is more interesting ;-)

Yes thanks to you guys! 7 banners submitted already

Great.
My banner will follow, I hope on the weekend. But so much work currently and a lack of concentration 

[thandie]

This is a follow up on my recent post with some more details. I will also later do another post in reply to some of the recent responses that were given.

As is documented here I was voted out of GDT https://electionbuddy.com/elections/37932/results/ud2fkynx7 . The reasons were that I had not voted one particular candidate with my personal holding, and that allegedly I wrote negative words about GDT in my transparency report.

In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided).

There was also the issue that at that time GDT had brought in many other new members based on their voting weight without requiring them to make a significant distribution or contribution for the benefit of Lisk. This was the reason for my comment in the transparency report.

Then there was also the issue that GDT was never interested in choosing certain qualified delegates. For instance I previously had made the proposal to support some developers from Shift. As many might not be aware of, Shift is developing an ambitious project based on Lisk https://www.shiftnrg.org/newsletter. Some developers from Shift also work on the code for Lisk, while Shift is much worse funded. I also made the proposal to consider a candidate who had a background as cryptographer and was one of the winners for his delegate proposal (he even had some voting power). There was also the issue that they ignored certain other candidates who could claim some trajectory in Lisk based on early participation. In the months that I participated in Lisk a number of developers showed up in the chat and forums, but there were no visible attempts by GDT to acquire valuable human resources. The concept of high block rewards actually attracts qualified developers, but GDT is preventing it from how it could work.

If some might want to know why I was in GDT. The answer is that I previously was in a different group that was merged with GDT, without me personally consenting to it and being left with no other choice. At that time it also appeared that GDT was in a new beginning. Some might recall that I had posted a critical comment about the governance of GDT on the Lisk forum in May, pointing out that the list of members is created by a single individual, Vega.

The short outline above is a summary of my experience with GDT. In addition, I would like to be explicit on why I see GDT as a scam and a threat:

• GDT is centralizing delegates, as basically a single individual is doing the list of delegates. GDT has no statute or real democratic organization.
• GDT is a cartel. They are not just a group of some mutual voters. They deliberately seek to maintain a number of 80+ members in order to seize all forging rewards and prevent competitors.
• GDT is a buddy scheme. Everything goes if it is to the liking of the leadership.
• GDT is undermining the consensus mechanism and is practicing collusion. With most recent conduct there is direct enforcement of the voting of its delegate members.
• GDT has no benefit for Lisk. GDT is not operating in a way that it seeks to return a surplus for Lisk from forged LSK. In particular it is not attempting to acquire valuable developers for Lisk projects as it was envisaged for the forging rewards.
• GDT is not preventing whales, or the “rich from getting richer”. Recently they rushed in many high stake holdings, even some of those they had previously labeled as their adversaries. The members of GDT themselves are striving to amass a holding from forging awards that would make each a whale.
• GDT is not a better alternative to pools. In fact, GDT is associated with pools, used them for pushing some of their members, and members even proposed to launch GDT pools.
• GDT is not essential for the operation of the testnet and the mainnet. While in fact a lot of work was contributed to this, most work on scripts, applications, snapshot servers, real feedback on testing etc. is done by only a relatively small number of participants.

https://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.com/

I don't really like posting here but this kinda ...
What a pathetic loser you are.

Says the troll of the year ^

Guys, Don't listen to the idiots like MrPresident and Cannabannana Trolls.

A part of the GDT members continue to support Carolina.
Because the respect this delegate for their courage and don't like the Mafia methods of the GDT leaders.



So please unvote the untrustworthy part of this GDT cartel.

[cannabanana]

This is a follow up on my recent post with some more details. I will also later do another post in reply to some of the recent responses that were given.

As is documented here I was voted out of GDT https://electionbuddy.com/elections/37932/results/ud2fkynx7 . The reasons were that I had not voted one particular candidate with my personal holding, and that allegedly I wrote negative words about GDT in my transparency report.

In the first weeks of January the Slack channels of GDT were given some bots for vote tracking (made by Hagie) that could indicate if a member of GDT had not given votes to another one. This bot was then played several times by a new member with name Hagie (who I did not know then) in order to make his cause that I would have to vote him. This came also with a threat from other sides that if I do not vote as they want there will be head-rolling by Jan. 15. It was then unclear to me why Hagie was in GDT and on what criteria he was selected. From what I found out he came into the Slack channel on invitation in the role of observer for another new member. From this status he gained permanent access to the Slack channel, and finally was declared a member from above. It then also came to my attention that he obtained many outside votes from the Robinhood pool where he was presented as “mentor”, through running a scheme that required to vote Hagie for getting a higher payout. Besides that, Hagie acted very bossy, was pressing for votes, calling me with the a-word and became the key-figure in establishing a totally new regime at GDT. There were many more red flags for me then (and even more later) for why I would not vote Hagie for personal reasons (more details can be provided).

There was also the issue that at that time GDT had brought in many other new members based on their voting weight without requiring them to make a significant distribution or contribution for the benefit of Lisk. This was the reason for my comment in the transparency report.

Then there was also the issue that GDT was never interested in choosing certain qualified delegates. For instance I previously had made the proposal to support some developers from Shift. As many might not be aware of, Shift is developing an ambitious project based on Lisk https://www.shiftnrg.org/newsletter. Some developers from Shift also work on the code for Lisk, while Shift is much worse funded. I also made the proposal to consider a candidate who had a background as cryptographer and was one of the winners for his delegate proposal (he even had some voting power). There was also the issue that they ignored certain other candidates who could claim some trajectory in Lisk based on early participation. In the months that I participated in Lisk a number of developers showed up in the chat and forums, but there were no visible attempts by GDT to acquire valuable human resources. The concept of high block rewards actually attracts qualified developers, but GDT is preventing it from how it could work.

If some might want to know why I was in GDT. The answer is that I previously was in a different group that was merged with GDT, without me personally consenting to it and being left with no other choice. At that time it also appeared that GDT was in a new beginning. Some might recall that I had posted a critical comment about the governance of GDT on the Lisk forum in May, pointing out that the list of members is created by a single individual, Vega.

The short outline above is a summary of my experience with GDT. In addition, I would like to be explicit on why I see GDT as a scam and a threat:

• GDT is centralizing delegates, as basically a single individual is doing the list of delegates. GDT has no statute or real democratic organization.
• GDT is a cartel. They are not just a group of some mutual voters. They deliberately seek to maintain a number of 80+ members in order to seize all forging rewards and prevent competitors.
• GDT is a buddy scheme. Everything goes if it is to the liking of the leadership.
• GDT is undermining the consensus mechanism and is practicing collusion. With most recent conduct there is direct enforcement of the voting of its delegate members.
• GDT has no benefit for Lisk. GDT is not operating in a way that it seeks to return a surplus for Lisk from forged LSK. In particular it is not attempting to acquire valuable developers for Lisk projects as it was envisaged for the forging rewards.
• GDT is not preventing whales, or the “rich from getting richer”. Recently they rushed in many high stake holdings, even some of those they had previously labeled as their adversaries. The members of GDT themselves are striving to amass a holding from forging awards that would make each a whale.
• GDT is not a better alternative to pools. In fact, GDT is associated with pools, used them for pushing some of their members, and members even proposed to launch GDT pools.
• GDT is not essential for the operation of the testnet and the mainnet. While in fact a lot of work was contributed to this, most work on scripts, applications, snapshot servers, real feedback on testing etc. is done by only a relatively small number of participants.

https://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.com/

I don't really like posting here but this kinda ...
What a pathetic loser you are.

Say the year ^

Guys, Do listen to MrPresident and Cannabannana.


So please vote the trustworthy part of this GDT.
*parts have been snipped

I love how you leave out everything important between the two quotes that I wrote. If you can edit my whole post to make it sound bad, I can do the same for yours.  See.

[Gr33nDrag0n]

If you want to change your mind a bit about the last days drama, take a look at my website.

https://lisknode.io

It's nothing fancy but regroup a lot of links in categories and sub-categories all linked to the lisk ecosystem.

I know visual and CSS need some love but I'm a sysadmin and a back-end developer. I have no skills for that.
Please focus on content and not container.  

Hope some of you will enjoy all the information in a one pager.

[rekcahxfb_foundation]

@cannabanana What are u doing here??

Are u ARK fan or LISK fan?

[cannabanana]

@cannabanana What are u doing here??

Are u ARK fan or LISK fan?

not sure if you know this, but most people can do more than one thing at a time.


You might think crypto is dog eat dog or all teams for themselves but the real supporters of cryptocurrency don't just dismiss everything at face value.  This is not a sporting event, we are not at war with each other.

Your greed makes you battle other coins so that the ones you've already invested in will hopefully get better results. 

Just because I am part of the ARK Crew doesn't mean I can't also do other things in crypto.  

Very narrow minded of you.  Most likely you are trying to start shit for your own greedy team who doesn't give a shit about causing trouble to make money.

[bangomatic]

[sidharta]

is there anyway to ban the GDT? maybe we have to publish all the involved names of the GDT more frequently in reddit and other threads that people know who those are...

[Digital_Currency_LTD]

is there anyway to ban the GDT? maybe we have to publish all the involved names of the GDT more frequently in reddit and other threads that people know who those are...

Yes there is a way, you can ban all of the GDT members if you want!

Just go to poloniex buy 20 million Lisks and you can choose all of the 101 delegates with your 20% supply 

[corsaro]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

it looks like @wariner is giving a contribute to the Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest



so new updated prizes are:

1st prize: a total of 1600 LSK
2nd prize: a total of 960 LSK
3rd prize: a total of 640 LSK

[BitBanksy]

Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest just got a couple more donations from delegate Corsaro and myself btw, tripling the bounty.
When he wakes up, the new prize numbers will be officially posted, but it should be somewhere around these numbers now...
calculated at 15 cent per lisk...
1st prize: a total of 1500 LSK  ($225)
2nd prize: a total of 900 LSK   ($135)
3rd prize: a total of 600 LSK    ($90)

it looks like @wariner is giving a contribute to the Bitbanksy's Lisk Banner Contest



so new updated prizes are:

1st prize: a total of 1600 LSK
2nd prize: a total of 960 LSK
3rd prize: a total of 640 LSK

Yes that's right!

The Lisk Banner Contest Rewards have increased as follow:

1st prize: 1600 LSK
2nd prize: 960 LSK
3rd prize: 640 LSK

Rewards SPONSORED by @corsaro (1000 LSK), @Phoenix1969 (1000 LSK), @wariner-lisk.pool.sexy (200 LSK) & myself (1000 LSK)

A big thank you to our sponsors!

[BitBanksy]

@cannabanana What are u doing here??

Are u ARK fan or LISK fan?

There's a new sheriff in town!

[Bitdonator]

For exactly 5 days we celebrate first Lisk birthday 

Any party in plan?