[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[Vega]

I'm not saying this doesn't sting, but no new info there, his complains match most what is being brought up here, and his frustration of his advise not being followed are well known for the better part of a year now. And most things that hee talks about (the time wasted on german entity, and the result of this of not hiring developers much sooner, the slow progress, the headstrong determination how things should work) was already discussed to death countless times.

Most of these should really never have occured, but there is no fixing that now, they can only move forward. Although I still not sure that they are throwing enough manpower at  the problems. I mean, fine you want a good SDK, and that takes time (let's ignore why that is a process that just started). There is enough money to hire two full teams. How about one in Berlin one working over the net? One is brainstorming and trying to work out the best possible solution before coding. The other just do it showing fast progress. A few months from now see who came up with what, and combine the efforts.

Sure it's looks like a waste of resources but as resources go Lisk has a lot less time than money at the moment.

[damiano]

I should really have been asked if I wanted loob on this  I just keep digging, soon to be a fucking whale when its at 100sat and I have averaged down my life savings. Come on whales lets get this back on the radar.

Poor poor lisk <3

[seektree]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

oh shit. fucking max and oliver - thanks for reaching out to charles. you are idiots.

[logictense]

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

Thanks @Limx Dev

^^^sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my second

do not worry, your reports are always transparent.

Good work Poly

And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.

I totally agree with you

Delegates are in for ideological principles, most of them dont hold any lsk. Smart ones dont hold any alts, totally disregarding the superiority of the tech or potential to grow. But u wont understand that as u aint smart, quite the otherwise u are the puppet on strings and every ur move is dictated by my will.

[honolulumark]

More bad news for Lisk.

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.gr/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

[Equalizer1970]

More bad news for Lisk.

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.gr/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

Man, I hope Max takes this to heart. Everybody with a little common sense knew the hiring process was way too slow and legal entity should really have only taken a month with a good lawyer. Max's age and lack of experience is really showing.

[bangomatic]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction.

Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable.  You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating.

[seektree]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction.

Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable.  You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating.

exaclty. what the fuck have they been doing?  i wouldnt be suprised if another project beats list to the punch.  MAX, hire more people as suggested.  you just lost a HUGE asset to lisk. HUGE.  one of the main reasons I bought more lisk after charles was hired.  now im sitting on a bag of dicks. thanks max. a bag of dicks.  lol

[42savage]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction.

Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable.  You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating.

exaclty. what the fuck have they been doing?  i wouldnt be suprised if another project beats list to the punch.  MAX, hire more people as suggested.  you just lost a HUGE asset to lisk. HUGE.  one of the main reasons I bought more lisk after charles was hired.  now im sitting on a bag of dicks. thanks max. a bag of dicks.  lol

yeah but what about those byteballs?

[Johnny00]

I've been wondering why list keeps dropping. I'm glad I sold at 33. Seems slow development and I didn't like the idea of the delegates earning.

[Selsonblue]

Lisks MC is too low. They got 20m in capital, Ill invest in that.

TLDR: Dont listen to what people say on these forums... follow your plan!

[vested]

WTF is lightcurve and why did Lisk pay them €200k??!

Sounds like a shell company to launder their Bitcoin money through if you ask me.

[Bobo81]

So sad to see that price...

[Revelations86]

I've been wondering why list keeps dropping. I'm glad I sold at 33. Seems slow development and I didn't like the idea of the delegates earning.

I got at 25 unfortunately.   I think Lisk is below ICO price now.   Sad to see a project with great potential fail due to terrible execution.   

[lestherat]

I dont know if this price is good re entry point or wait for new ATL, maybe just wait few days.

Yes is sad this price, i remember start trading LSK at 200k on poloniex long time ago 

I dont think will go to 5k but who knows, crypto is crazy.

[nyanhtet]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

How do you think about it, Max? You need to respond it. And need to edit lisk.io   

[wavespump]

Lisk has no future, is the biggest scam alongside with waves created in last year. The devs got the fund but didn't release software in the roadmap. ICO investors lost tons of money, and the players who bought above ICO price has a huge losses on capitalization.

[LiskHQ]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

How do you think about it, Max? You need to respond it. And need to edit lisk.io   

We are issuing an official statement today.

[bitbitch]

WTF is lightcurve and why did Lisk pay them €200k??!

Sounds like a shell company to launder their Bitcoin money through if you ask me.

scary possibility. it's not a transparent entity. we have no idea where the money is going.

[PikachuYou]

HEY SONIX


LISK IS F U C K E D