[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[Bitdonator]

BTC rise is main reason why Lisk droping
We will not see any upward trend before
SDK launch and first dapps

[1714658255]

1714658255

[1714658255]

1714658255

[1714658255]

1714658255

[1714658255]

1714658255

[1714658255]

1714658255

[Block_303]

Wow, I didn't even realize devs were from Crypti, holy shit I'm glad I didn't invest in this shitcoin.

After 12 months? Logically, most of you trolls have no idea what they are doing here.
Investing in a project without knowing it. Holy shit, how stupid you can be?!

Now you're angry. But instead of beating yourself, you spread FUD here.

lol We need a certificate for Bitcoinforum user.

[Calabi–Yau Manifold]

Why three graves? U dont have to blame trex but ur image is still highly relevant to the situation with lisk. Just like any other altcoin lisk tries to get rid off a smell of being scammy piece of shit, and stopping that smell remains a hurdle for lisk. This one is still the worst-offending fraud of all altcoins ever listed on this board.

Each grave for each "LSK" ticker letter.

[Calabi–Yau Manifold]

Wow, I didn't even realize devs were from Crypti, holy shit I'm glad I didn't invest in this shitcoin.

After 12 months? Logically, most of you trolls have no idea what they are doing here.
Investing in a project without knowing it. Holy shit, how stupid you can be?!

Now you're angry. But instead of beating yourself, you spread FUD here.

Are you fucking dumb or just Hilary fan?

He wrote he didn't invest...

Btw. Change avatar, Lisk avatar is passe now...

[Calabi–Yau Manifold]

Lisk ex-advisor telling truth about Lisk crap?: https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.ca/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html 

[souljah1h]

Lisk ex-advisor telling truth about Lisk crap?: https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.ca/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html  

From that article

Second, I requested an immediate increase in staffing. To facilitate the advice, I recommended several recruitment options from outsourcing some development components to a trusted Ukrainian shop to directly recruiting using some talent scouts that I've worked with in the past.

The lack of a legal entity and lack of access to funds seems to have greatly slowed this process. I still cannot understand why they don't have more developers. For example, IOHK hired seven full time scala developers in three months time for ETC.

And this

Third, I requested that they get a security audit of the existing source and protocols. As it was inherited and written in a very dangerous language (javascript), I speculate that is a high probability there exists at least one ticking time bomb in the github repo. To the best of my understanding an audit hasn't been done. I could be wrong.

Makes me feel worried. Please address these concerns Lisk team.

[s0nix]

Wow, I didn't even realize devs were from Crypti, holy shit I'm glad I didn't invest in this shitcoin.

After 12 months? Logically, most of you trolls have no idea what they are doing here.
Investing in a project without knowing it. Holy shit, how stupid you can be?!

Now you're angry. But instead of beating yourself, you spread FUD here.

bullshit

He wrote he didn't invest...

crap

Yes, he did not.
But I have spoken for all trolls and especially for those who cry "I lost ..."

[Grumlin]

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

• 4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
• 3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
• 2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
• 1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
• disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
• change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

[s0nix]

I for a short time had seen his other account 

[Thereisnospoon]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

How do you think about it, Max? You need to respond it. And need to edit lisk.io   

We are issuing an official statement today.

Max,if you are real man and you genuinely care about your project you need to come up with some sort of statement at some point and not about Charles, what you've failed to do today, but about your concrete plans of development, preferably with a new road map and some time frame.
I know in crypto you can get away with everything but it is always better to finish your quest in a honourable way rather then giving up or hiding in a cave-in crypto live is short and live is full of black swans...

[Bitdonator]

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

• 4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
• 3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
• 2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
• 1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
• disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
• change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

Its best to disable reward since Lisk have infinity supply

[sofu]

why the price just go down and down? I bought LISK at 0.00044000BTC, and now It is 0.00011000BTC!!!

Sell now and buy back at 5-8k and double you LSK  



Don't mess with the dump bot

Update 

[s0nix]

Its best to disable reward since Lisk have infinity supply

I am not a delegate.
But I don't think that the present delegates would advocate this.

Also for some time the Lisk team and the community discounted about changes to the DPoS.

https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/353

[GinnaGinna]

Next stop 5k around mid. March  

[s0nix]

Next stop 5k around mid. March  

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

[GinnaGinna]

Next stop 5k around mid. March  

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

NO.
Im waiting 1. April to buy @ 2k.  

[s0nix]

Next stop 5k around mid. March  

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

NO.
Im waiting 1. April to buy @ 2k.  

I do not think so, but anyway.
That also means, your statement yesterday Lisk is a shitcoin was not the truth.
Because you would buy a shitcoin. (apart from cv2)  

You've recognized the great potential of Lisk for the future, congratulations.

[Undermood]

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

• 4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
• 3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
• 2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
• 1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
• disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
• change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

You could talk to the team your ideas. I think your polls are meaningless. I remember in the community the team may change DPOS or increase the number of delegate after the relaunch of SDK

[Calabi–Yau Manifold]

.............

You must be high-class bagholder, don't you...? So angry each time people telling "bad" truth about Lisk...

[s0nix]

Hello!

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

You could talk to the team your ideas. I think your polls are meaningless. I remember in the community the team may change DPOS or increase the number of delegate after the relaunch of SDK

Here are some ideas: https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/353

Much better I think.

And what Grumlin does with it now: the installation of six new pools, not more.
A paradoxical thought would be. People vote "disable_reward" in the top 101 and get rewards.