Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2024, 12:43:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XCT] C-Bit - Elegantly Solving Bitcoin's Blocksize Problem [SHA256][POW]  (Read 66817 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Pyramusx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250

Following on Twitter @pyramusx


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2016, 07:23:45 PM
 #501

Keep in mind that sunerok is a dev working on a coin that is doing very damn well for itself right now with strong community backing. So yes serious developers are taking an interest in XCT. If they can keep up the same level of transparency and involvement with the community, I can see this becoming very successful.

Martens58
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 07:38:58 PM
 #502

Let me get this straight. The premise of this coin is that in the event of a Core/Classic split in Bitcoin, either Core or Classic devs would move over to C-Bit development because this coin is a clone of Bitcoin?

This is just a minor side benefit of C-bit, not a
major point. If Bitcoin Classic were to do a
hostile takeover of Bitcoin Core, and Bitcoin
Core were to die as a fork, and some of the
developers and members of the community
were not too particularly happy about the
Classic takeover, they could move over to
C-bit and continue to work on Core without
any problem. C-bit IS Bitcoin Core, without
any of the problems, issues, or baggage
currently surrounding Bitcoin Core.

However, again, it is just a side note, not a
major issue of C-bit. The major point of C-bit
is to come up along side of Bitcoin Core and
be a smaller denomination coin. If Bitcoin is
the $ 100 bill, then C-bit can be the $ 10 bill.
C-bit is already building the Merchant Suite
for C-bit to be able to trade as a retail coin,
in addition to an exchange or currency coin.

Further down the road, C-bit is working on the
idea of joining itself to Bitcoin in a symbiosis
relationship like a DNA strand. We think it is
possible to create a much faster network with
a combined Bitcoin / C-bit structure.

So, C-bit is an interesting idea, and we'll see
where it goes.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

Seems like a very naive idea. 

The Wright brothers had a very naive idea
too, it was called "flying".
Martens58
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 07:55:07 PM
 #503

Now that you got me going......

What a silly idea.

Bill gates : actually thought that people
would use that silly software to use that
silly computer in their house for something.

Steve Jobs : actually thought that people
would buy his silly sounding Apple machine
to use in their house to do some calculating
with. What a silly idea.

Oh, and the silly Space X thing. Actually
thought the government would risk sending
their equipment into space on a private
rocket. What a bunch of drugs he was on.

Then there is the electric car guy. Actually
thought he could build an entire car company
from scratch and compete with GM and Ford.
Now that took guts. Can't be done. Will absolutely
fail. Watch him and count the days.

Of course don't even think about Uber, you can't
compete with taxis. That's regulated and protected
by the government and the unions. They won't
allow and of course the public would never get
in a strangers' car. OPPS. Wrong. It worked. How
can that be ?

Then, of course, there's Bitcoin. Who in there
right mind would buy an anonymous coin over
the internet, that has nothing backing it except
trust ? No gold,  silver, or anything but computer
bits. Can't work. Never will. OPPS. It worked.

So, when you say C-bit can't work, watch out.
When you least expect it, it will sneak up on you
and bite you in the ass.

William Martens
Founder C-bit
sunerok
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 629
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2016, 08:08:13 PM
 #504

Keep in mind that sunerok is a dev working on a coin that is doing very damn well for itself right now with strong community backing. So yes serious developers are taking an interest in XCT. If they can keep up the same level of transparency and involvement with the community, I can see this becoming very successful.

yeah i was already looking into getting some more resources going for c-bit, and thanks for the kind words.. i try =]

_///// [XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON  THE VERGE ★★★★★ [SCRYPT] /////_
_//// TOR // I2P // LINUX . WINDOWS . MAC . ANDROID . ELECTRUM . WEBWALLET . GITHUB // WEBSITE // RADIO // IRC ////_
jc12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 08:19:08 PM
 #505

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.
daggerpunt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 08:20:43 PM
 #506

I understand it is discouraging to see people unloading cheap XCT in cryptopia, however there is no need to get upset by this. Obviously there were some desperate people that were merely trying to make a quick buck off of their mining efforts. I believe this community will continue to grow and Mr. Martens will continue to use his resources to ensure C-bit is a successful coin. I hope the current community can see this and will continue to support Mr. Martens endeavor.

_///// [XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON  THE VERGE ★★★★★ [SCRYPT] /////_
_//// TOR // I2P // LINUX . WINDOWS . MAC . ANDROID . ELECTRUM . WEBWALLET . GITHUB // WEBSITE // RADIO // IRC ////_
sunerok
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 629
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2016, 08:38:58 PM
 #507

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.

you do realize there are over 300 bitcoin developers right? i mean, i'm a developer, and i'm interested. i think there's room for a coin like this. just look how many coins are built from old versions of bitcoin/ppc that are complete shit. this one is built from .12, which is the newest release.

_///// [XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON  THE VERGE ★★★★★ [SCRYPT] /////_
_//// TOR // I2P // LINUX . WINDOWS . MAC . ANDROID . ELECTRUM . WEBWALLET . GITHUB // WEBSITE // RADIO // IRC ////_
Martens58
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 08:43:43 PM
 #508

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit
jc12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 08:50:07 PM
 #509

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.

you do realize there are over 300 bitcoin developers right? i mean, i'm a developer, and i'm interested. i think there's room for a coin like this. just look how many coins are built from old versions of bitcoin/ppc that are complete shit. this one is built from .12, which is the newest release.

Ok then. I give him the benefit of the doubt.

but I am out and good luck to all. Smiley
danonthehill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 08:56:54 PM
 #510

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
blackwat3er
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 09:06:23 PM
 #511

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere
danonthehill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 09:11:34 PM
 #512

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere

I asked earlier twice about the contributors to this coin development, but my question was avoided.  Since then the names of the contributors have been removed from the website. Why?
theboccet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 12, 2016, 09:42:12 PM
 #513

For the moment there is only pools,one exchange and the interest of the community in this coin.
Why don't we let C-bit staff do their work and release what they promised instead of taking debates here.It's a cryptocurrency,if someone doubt or afraid of it,he can sell his coins at a profitable price and move on,those who trust,can hold their coins or speculate and accumulate.
If this C-bit will fail,we can only blame ourselves.cryptoworld is full of coins and everyone can choose the coin that fit his perspectives and his intellectual or financial level.
At least all these dev's are contributing to the growth of the crypto technology in many ways;So let's let them do their work and watch the progress Wink

Sorry for my bad English  Grin

¦¦¦¦¦¦¦______
¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_
¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¯¯¯¯¯
   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦


¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  

¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
¦¦¦¦¦¯
   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
MONETARYUNIT
.......for Me, U & Everyone.......
[/
Martens58
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 11:33:11 PM
 #514

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere

I asked earlier twice about the contributors to this coin development, but my question was avoided.  Since then the names of the contributors have been removed from the website. Why?

Very simple.

Based upon reactions from Bitcoin
trollers, and our developers relations
within the Bitcoin community, they will
remain Ghosts. Judge C-bit upon the
source code, what we add to the coin,
our development as a coin, and our
actions; not on any personalities. This
is about the coin, and it will never be
about us.

If you must tie C-bit to personalities,
then this is not the coin for you.

After next week, the Bitcoin trollers, who
hate competition, will explode on this
board in an attempt to destroy C-bit.

Get ready, it's coming.


William Martens
Founder C-bit
danonthehill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 12:14:25 AM
 #515

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere

I asked earlier twice about the contributors to this coin development, but my question was avoided.  Since then the names of the contributors have been removed from the website. Why?

Very simple.

Based upon reactions from Bitcoin
trollers, and our developers relations
within the Bitcoin community, they will
remain Ghosts. Judge C-bit upon the
source code, what we add to the coin,
our development as a coin, and our
actions; not on any personalities. This
is about the coin, and it will never be
about us.

If you must tie C-bit to personalities,
then this is not the coin for you.

After next week, the Bitcoin trollers, who
hate competition, will explode on this
board in an attempt to destroy C-bit.

Get ready, it's coming.


William Martens
Founder C-bit

The people on the website were coders who contributed code to C-Bit and working in the Bitcoin space?
Martens58
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:23:12 AM
 #516

I was interested in this coin but as soon as the dev started talking about "bitcoin devs" (yeah right) being involved and all the time and effort and money to just do a clone, I started handling it with skepticism. It was not necessary for the dev to say those things because it placed a "far fetched" tag on the coin and caused people to doubt what he says.


Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.
sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere

I asked earlier twice about the contributors to this coin development, but my question was avoided.  Since then the names of the contributors have been removed from the website. Why?

Very simple.

Based upon reactions from Bitcoin
trollers, and our developers relations
within the Bitcoin community, they will
remain Ghosts. Judge C-bit upon the
source code, what we add to the coin,
our development as a coin, and our
actions; not on any personalities. This
is about the coin, and it will never be
about us.

If you must tie C-bit to personalities,
then this is not the coin for you.

After next week, the Bitcoin trollers, who
hate competition, will explode on this
board in an attempt to destroy C-bit.

Get ready, it's coming.


William Martens
Founder C-bit

The people on the website were coders who contributed code to C-Bit and working in the Bitcoin space?

*********
Yes to code
*********

Also, I need to clarify my last statement above a little.

Any Developers interested in helping C-bit are more
than welcome to help. The more brains we have, the
better. Just PM me with a return e-mail address and
I'll have the head developer contact you. We are not
trying to hide. Come join us with your talents.

The point I was trying to make was that we will not
be publicly broadcasting our developers names or
their forum names or any other details. They will
remain anonymous and in the background forever.
They will not be appearing at conventions or roundtables.
Based upon the rabid Bitcoin trollers out there, our
developers do not need their websites, forum pages,
nor their careers turned upside down by the crazies
out there; or shunned because of their participation
in what might be considered a "taboo" project by some.
They just want to help an interesting project and be left
alone.

In addition, even within the C-bit development group,
you can be anonymous. It's the work you do that is
important, not who you are. When you PM, just be sure
to start with either an anonymous name or your real
identity, you choose.

If you, as a Developer, want fame and recognition,
outside the immediate C-bit group, then C-bit is not
for you.

Our Developers like the feeling that they can sit right
next to Gavin Anderson in his office and listen to him
rant about C-bit; then know that Gavin has no idea that
at night they're working on C-bit.

William Martens
Founder C-bit
danonthehill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:55:48 AM
 #517

How about yourself? You appear to be using your real name. Do you have Linkedin?
blackwat3er
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:15:58 AM
 #518

How about yourself? You appear to be using your real name. Do you have Linkedin?

dude. why dont you just give up on this and GTFO already.
look at your posts here, you are just a troll, doing nothing but trying to dig up info on those involved with c-bit
now GTFO and be a troll somewhere else
sunerok
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 629
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2016, 02:17:00 AM
 #519

How about yourself? You appear to be using your real name. Do you have Linkedin?

dude. why dont you just give up on this and GTFO already.
look at your posts here, you are just a troll, doing nothing but trying to dig up info on those involved with c-bit
now GTFO and be a troll somewhere else

seriously this fuckin guy sounds like a stalker lol

_///// [XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON  THE VERGE ★★★★★ [SCRYPT] /////_
_//// TOR // I2P // LINUX . WINDOWS . MAC . ANDROID . ELECTRUM . WEBWALLET . GITHUB // WEBSITE // RADIO // IRC ////_
danonthehill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:37:03 AM
 #520

How about yourself? You appear to be using your real name. Do you have Linkedin?

dude. why dont you just give up on this and GTFO already.
look at your posts here, you are just a troll, doing nothing but trying to dig up info on those involved with c-bit
now GTFO and be a troll somewhere else

seriously this fuckin guy sounds like a stalker lol

It's called due diligence. 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!