⚡[ANN]⚡ ▐░Espers [ESP]░▌▐░PoW/PoS░▌▐░HMQ1725 Algo░▌ ▐░New Features░▌

[Hangterisaan]

anyone want to provide blockchain snapshot? i need it, it's too long to sync manually

copied the entire appdata/roaming/esp map except the wallet.dat. here is the link
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AgDE8bHTh83thjwY4mzt4lrhU6g6

[1714645000]

1714645000

[1714645000]

1714645000

[fikihafana]

anyone want to provide blockchain snapshot? i need it, it's too long to sync manually

copied the entire appdata/roaming/esp map except the wallet.dat. here is the link
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AgDE8bHTh83thjwY4mzt4lrhU6g6

thanks guys, i think i got correct chain now. my chain same as with http://espv2.miningalts.com/ blockheight

[UGC]

What do you think guys, will Dev made needed updates and proced with new technical features

[BelgianBoy]

What do you think guys, will Dev made needed updates and proced with new technical features

Yes he is, he has also other projects runnig and can't do everything at same time. This takes a little longer than expected in my opinion. But he will deliver.
Btw its only alpha stage. So a lot of potential.

[Griffith]

Hi, Griffith, what's going on with your ECC coins?
In the POS function may you can guide CryptoCoderz
His skill is poor

Don't do that.  It is one thing to ask for help from another dev to see if they can take a look at a coins code, but dont insult the coins current main dev while doing so. That's just fud and isn't needed.

That being said, considering both PoW and PoS worked the same way you would expect to see them in other coins before he added velocity, the current behavior is more than likely affected directly by the new velocity code and based on CC's explanation it is working the way it should be working. Different developers approach the blockchain differently and this coin doesnt behave quite like a lot of the others.  
I personally don't think you should hard code lower limits as extra checks after a block is mined/minted. I also think that the concept of difficulty and difficulty adjustments (with the right algorithm) were designed to address the exact same problem that velocity was implemented to fix (blocks mining/minting too fast). But, this is not my coin and I'm sure CC will make an update to ease some of the complaints of the ESP users soon.

[Hangterisaan]

So, anybody know when depositing on nova will work again?

[CryptoCoderz]

Hi, Griffith, what's going on with your ECC coins?
In the POS function may you can guide CryptoCoderz
His skill is poor

Don't do that.  It is one thing to ask for help from another dev to see if they can take a look at a coins code, but dont insult the coins current main dev while doing so. That's just fud and isn't needed.

That being said, considering both PoW and PoS worked the same way you would expect to see them in other coins before he added velocity, the current behavior is more than likely affected directly by the new velocity code and based on CC's explanation it is working the way it should be working. Different developers approach the blockchain differently and this coin doesnt behave quite like a lot of the others.  
I personally don't think you should hard code lower limits as extra checks after a block is mined/minted. I also think that the concept of difficulty and difficulty adjustments (with the right algorithm) were designed to address the exact same problem that velocity was implemented to fix (blocks mining/minting too fast). But, this is not my coin and I'm sure CC will make an update to ease some of the complaints of the ESP users soon.

Couldn't have said it better myself if I tried Griffith!

Thank you very much for your view and input it is very valuable to us as we try to consider many things while developing for Espers.

As you mentioned Velocity currently is indeed the control freak of the chain so to speak and because of it controlling the chain vs allowing the current incorrectly configured diff retarget system things do report incorrectly despite the chain functioning and moving quite nicely.
         We do not intend to keep it this way of course and have just been busy as we do work on other projects as well and assist other developers from time to time as I'm sure many do around here.
         Ultimately the difficulty retarget system is being overhauled this week, we had to clear the schedule out so to speak as personal family issues had caused a major backlog in workload since for almost two weeks no work was done.
         This way Velocity will merely be a check, I know we all have our different views on projects and their development and this is the route that we believe will be most beneficial to this blockchain for the future.

Thank you for supporting the project Griffith, saw you helping a user out in thecryptochat.net as well, big thanks! It actually resolved his issue!

And to the rest of you, thank you immensely for hanging in there through the slow development recently, we're working on it don't you worry!

[Simple858]

Hi, Griffith, what's going on with your ECC coins?
In the POS function may you can guide CryptoCoderz
His skill is poor

Don't do that.  It is one thing to ask for help from another dev to see if they can take a look at a coins code, but dont insult the coins current main dev while doing so. That's just fud and isn't needed.

That being said, considering both PoW and PoS worked the same way you would expect to see them in other coins before he added velocity, the current behavior is more than likely affected directly by the new velocity code and based on CC's explanation it is working the way it should be working. Different developers approach the blockchain differently and this coin doesnt behave quite like a lot of the others.  
I personally don't think you should hard code lower limits as extra checks after a block is mined/minted. I also think that the concept of difficulty and difficulty adjustments (with the right algorithm) were designed to address the exact same problem that velocity was implemented to fix (blocks mining/minting too fast). But, this is not my coin and I'm sure CC will make an update to ease some of the complaints of the ESP users soon.

Couldn't have said it better myself if I tried Griffith!

Thank you very much for your view and input it is very valuable to us as we try to consider many things while developing for Espers.

As you mentioned Velocity currently is indeed the control freak of the chain so to speak and because of it controlling the chain vs allowing the current incorrectly configured diff retarget system things do report incorrectly despite the chain functioning and moving quite nicely.
         We do not intend to keep it this way of course and have just been busy as we do work on other projects as well and assist other developers from time to time as I'm sure many do around here.
         Ultimately the difficulty retarget system is being overhauled this week, we had to clear the schedule out so to speak as personal family issues had caused a major backlog in workload since for almost two weeks no work was done.
         This way Velocity will merely be a check, I know we all have our different views on projects and their development and this is the route that we believe will be most beneficial to this blockchain for the future.

Thank you for supporting the project Griffith, saw you helping a user out in thecryptochat.net as well, big thanks! It actually resolved his issue!

And to the rest of you, thank you immensely for hanging in there through the slow development recently, we're working on it don't you worry!

Thank you CC.... Maybe it would be a good sign from you to make a brief roadmap for things to come

[Hangterisaan]

Anybody knows when nova wallet will be available again?

[satlqt]

do pascal move

ESP is the next pascal 

Pascal coin came out with their wallet and it contains a messaging system like the one that was being worked on for ESP. pascal beat esp to release with this feature.

perhaps in an initial feature release, though I have not seen pascal to be honest. Our features are different than what others offer. As some of the current ones already show. There's more than one way to bake a cake and not all ways are a good way.

Thank you for clarifying that messaging has been attempted before. We just want to perfect it

Features are important, but there are so many innovative coins which just die or are not solid enough ;-)
ESP is growing steadily and, IMHO, is going to be a solid and long living coin.

many issues are coming in the way and are part of all that but with good and sound mind we have to work over it.

[my luck]

do pascal move

ESP is the next pascal 

Pascal coin came out with their wallet and it contains a messaging system like the one that was being worked on for ESP. pascal beat esp to release with this feature.

perhaps in an initial feature release, though I have not seen pascal to be honest. Our features are different than what others offer. As some of the current ones already show. There's more than one way to bake a cake and not all ways are a good way.

Thank you for clarifying that messaging has been attempted before. We just want to perfect it

Features are important, but there are so many innovative coins which just die or are not solid enough ;-)
ESP is growing steadily and, IMHO, is going to be a solid and long living coin.

many issues are coming in the way and are part of all that but with good and sound mind we have to work over it.

Apparently someone has already lost faith in this coin. At the novaexchange put a wall of 358 LTC for 200 litoshi.

[Gandalf86]

Apparently someone has already lost faith in this coin. At the novaexchange put a wall of 358 LTC for 200 litoshi.

"Someone".   Come and get my 70 lit buy order if you have lost your faith.

[mineru]

Apparently someone has already lost faith in this coin. At the novaexchange put a wall of 358 LTC for 200 litoshi.

"Someone".   Come and get my 70 lit buy order if you have lost your faith.

If "someone" considers offer too low, "someother" wants to buy all you have for sale at 71 lit. Of course, with much respect to Gandalf86's position in the line but the market is the market. Come to us! :-)

[Gandalf86]

but the market is the market.

Exactly. But I'm just part of the market, and "the market" thinks that 200 lit is way too much at this point.

[mineru]

but the market is the market.

Exactly. But I'm just part of the market, and "the market" thinks that 200 lit is way too much at this point.

Sure. We agree. With my comment about the market I meant "will place an order @71 to buy just before you and that is part of the game". Yes 200 lit are high expectations considering the state of affairs.
Like "someone", at some point I would like to sell too but not before 2 sats. :-)

[callback]

Would you make a Mac version, please?

[4emily]

Pleased to see that this coin is still very much alive and kicking. Will continue to hodl 

[cryptomass]

Apparently someone has already lost faith in this coin. At the novaexchange put a wall of 358 LTC for 200 litoshi.

"Someone".   Come and get my 70 lit buy order if you have lost your faith.

Or maybe "someone" just has to pay some bills and needs to sell, but doesn't want to undersell it... and was checking if
someone made an offer that was not too low, since this coin will be soon worth much much more....

[vagsun]

It is necessary to wait, everything will be fine

[WhiteManWhite]

It is necessary to wait, everything will be fine

A year is already waiting, how much longer do we have to wait? So you have to leave ESP to your grandchildren, maybe they will wait, when everything will work and the price on the exchange will rise.