|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:09:30 PM |
|
Yes, it's the second time that Wright has attempted this. An FT blog article from a month ago about the preparation for this try is hereAs Gavin says in his blog, part of that preparation was flying him to London to meet Wright I’d want to see: A message signed with the same PGP key Satoshi used back in 2010. (…but his computer could have been hacked) A message signed with keys from early Bitcoin blocks (…but his wallet could have been stolen). Email or private forum posts he sent to me in 2010 (… but email could have been hacked). A conversation about technical stuff, ideally via email, so I can see if it feels like the same person I communicated with in 2010. Arguments about signed messages sure, but Andresen seems to put a lot of weight on the face-to-face After spending time with him I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi. Overall, presumably he thinks that Wright ticked enough of those boxes to convince him.... The FT article says that Matonis has also known this has been coming for a month at least and presumably done, as he says here, his due dilligence, before coming out in favor of Wright's 'proof' “I have been contacted by a private group and I am under a strict NDA [non-disclosure agreement] and press embargo during due diligence phase.”
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
phreaky
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:30:50 PM |
|
Yeah the last week I have read many stories about people revealing the real identity of Satoshi. I do not know how they did it and if it is even true but these people take it very serious.
|
|
|
|
deepceleron
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1036
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:31:09 PM |
|
The blog post is also incoherent nonsense about procedures to verify a signature meant to spoof non-tech journalists. Compare to the clear communication of Satoshi emails and white paper, which I have HTMLized here: http://we.lovebitco.in/how-bitcoin-works/bitcoin-paper/ - or any of Satoshi's year of posting on the forum https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=340 - biggest bullshit artist that now deserves NOT to get left alone. Gavin's blog site is also serving up a bad cert, so it's a decent conclusion that the message confirming Wright's identity is a hack: gavinandresen.ninja uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: armanjon.com, aspires.xyz, blog.alexmaccaw.com, blog.johncollison.ie, blog.sam.vg, blog.wjd.io, chasedittmer.com, dcurt.is, domleca.com, drhod.es, irvingooi.com, ninjasandrobots.com, plusbryan.com, sachinag.com, sashmackinnon.com, support.svbtle.com, takeaswig.com, wstraf.me, www.armanjon.com, www.aspires.xyz, www.chasedittmer.com, www.dcurt.is, www.drhod.es, www.irvingooi.com, www.plusbryan.com, www.sachinag.com, www.sashmackinnon.com
|
|
|
|
Hugroll
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:33:02 PM |
|
hmm personally i dont think hes telling the truth but this quote has me confused "Jon Matonis, a founding director of the Bitcoin Foundation, was given a private proof session by Wright in late March. Matonis deemed the proof conclusive".
|
|
|
|
BruceSwanson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:35:06 PM |
|
Good point. I think anyone claiming to be Satoshi must prove authorship of the paper. Such proof would take precedence over anything involving technical implementation. No proof of authorship, no proof of Satoshi.
|
|
|
|
BitconAssociation
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:35:44 PM |
|
BitconAssociation would lie to publicly and emphatically deny this false fact.
If Craig Wright is truly Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, we've been living a lie!
|
|
|
|
ibminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1853
Merit: 2896
Goonies never say die.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:36:32 PM |
|
just skimmed through the thread and couldn't find any proof (or an explanation of what it is.). the article are also lacking citations/sources for the important parts. so, bottom line, the media are just being stupid again, am I right?
Pretty much. Nothing was shown/proved in the BBC article. I'm sure a laymen could easily be fooled but what is more concerning is Gavin Andresen seemingly buying this bullshit. Very alarming.What really Craig wants ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEMZF4DL.png&t=665&c=sHAz_9C5iAZK7A) Imagine how much hes gonna win on sign campaign ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Lol. I'm sure that account could be sold for a fair bit. Satoshi or not.... he seems like a bit of a cunt doesn't he?
Yep. I really don't think the real satoshi would behave like this, though it's a good reason why he should likely remain anon. You could be the nicest/smartest guy in the world but people would still hate you for it. Alarming indeed. My initial feelings here are that Gavin needs a key supporter to move people from core, even if temporary and proven to be false down the road... his prior attempts have not worked. How do you round up all of the old original community members and get them to follow you?... Bring back Satoshi and have him support your plans. I think its an attempt to harness the 'reaction' and pull one over on the bitcoin community to get them to move, I would expect Wright to soon reveal what he's been "working on" with his staff of people that don't want to be bothered and I think it will fall in line with projects that Gavin is pursuing... XT, Classic, "Unlimited" *I'm taking off my tinfoil hat now*
|
|
|
|
Inedible
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:39:25 PM |
|
Alarming indeed.
My initial feelings here are that Gavin needs a key supporter to move people from core, even if temporary and proven to be false down the road... his prior attempts have not worked. How do you round up all of the old original community members and get them to follow you?... Bring back Satoshi and have him support your plans. I think its an attempt to harness the 'reaction' and pull one over on the bitcoin community to get them to move, I would expect Wright to soon reveal what he's been "working on" with his staff of people that don't want to be bothered and I think it will fall in line with projects that Gavin is pursuing... XT, Classic, "Unlimited" *I'm taking off my tinfoil hat now*
But Gavin is smart enough to realise the current level of 'proof' wouldn't last an hour under scrutiny. Why would he stake his reputation on something so flimsy? Is a 12 hour window enough time time to convince core devs to do this? Wouldn't core devs check the 'proof' for themselves? A good theory but it doesn't seem like it would be sufficient time to do what you're suggesting.
|
If this post was useful, interesting or entertaining, then you've misunderstood.
|
|
|
RawDog (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:41:42 PM |
|
Satoshi or not.... he seems like a bit of a cunt doesn't he?
No. That's just how Australians are. It is normal for them.
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:45:06 PM |
|
And another "atmosphere" blog post from the BBC which I haven't seen linked yet http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36185267He accused journalists of threatening to make up stories about him if he did not cooperate and said lies had been told that would affect his family and his staff. But he bridled at my suggestion that he could be a figurehead for the currency, making clear that this was the first and last television interview he would do. Having emerged from the shadows, Craig Satoshi Wright now wants to return to them as quickly as possible. How ridiculous is that? The genie is out of the bottle, all that remains to be seen is if it's real, or smoke and mirrors.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
Inedible
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:46:23 PM |
|
...all that remains to be seen is if it's real, or smoke and mirrors.
Have you read none of this thread?
|
If this post was useful, interesting or entertaining, then you've misunderstood.
|
|
|
log2exp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 01:54:07 PM |
|
Wonder if anyone has informed the Australian Taxation Office about this...
I'm sure Mr. Wright already planned out how to deal with the ATO, what kind of manoeuvre he's playing out with the government is more interesting in the coming days. As he proclaimed to be the one, he can also claim that he lost all his keys in a boating accident. What kind of taxation consequence would he face?
|
|
|
|
sbogovac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1192
I don't believe in denial.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:00:55 PM |
|
I have the proofs. Signed messages will be released soon. "soon"... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) As: "in two weeks"... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
0x7442A5c37E513D335F53843cD20c00F77eAC7867
|
|
|
albert11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:05:40 PM |
|
GAVIN IS COMPROMISED EXACTLY LIKE THE BBC PROPAGANDA BULLSHIT CHANNEL.
I suggest core don't get too distracted by this, there is an ongoing effort to make bitcoin centralized and it is becoming more and more obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
mayax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:14:24 PM |
|
well, the end of BTC is near once the creator was revealed . the myth that attracted people is over. BTC is like Litecoin or Shitcoin ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
BitcoinHodler
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:17:51 PM |
|
Can some1 give me a clear answer: did he sign the blocks with the private key or not?
The BBC and other news outlets say yes but no evidence of it has been provided. no $hit, news agencies don't care if the news is really true or not as long as it is a hot news. and there is nothing hotter that this news, everybody in bitcoin world is curious to know who satoshi really is but also most of us that are using bitcoin know to ask for a signed message first and we will also detect fake satoshi
|
Holding Bitcoin More Every Day
|
|
|
zeroday
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:18:43 PM |
|
Oh holy shit, I was not aware that he was proclaiming it was him on his website, I thought it was just Gavin being a lunatic and falling for shit fake proof. LOL, $signiture will always have empty value ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 02, 2016, 02:19:10 PM |
|
...all that remains to be seen is if it's real, or smoke and mirrors.
Have you read none of this thread? Yes, I've read it all. I think it's bullshit too, but still in the "interested to see how they answer that" phase. I suppose I'm still a little reluctant to accept that Andresen and Matonis seemed to have bought, or are complicit in, a lie. If they have/are, the reasoning/motivation would be interesting to see. Not that my opinion matters. Or yours.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
|