testbug
|
|
September 28, 2016, 08:57:07 AM |
|
I am manually unlocking, accounts which get stuck on "locked mode" after registration. No need for clickon on the activation email. Mails not working, i was on this very long yesterday. I will go on with the problematic emails.
Could you please unlock me? I mine ore machine must be properly connected to the pool by VPN no, there is no need for a vpn email notifications tested and is finally working
|
|
|
|
Danielson187
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2016, 08:58:10 AM |
|
I am manually unlocking, accounts which get stuck on "locked mode" after registration. No need for clickon on the activation email. Mails not working, i was on this very long yesterday. I will go on with the problematic emails.
Could you please unlock me? You just have been unlocked. Still working on mails but i am tracking it down Thx! What miner do you advise for Windows Server 2012R2?
|
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 28, 2016, 09:05:26 AM |
|
I am manually unlocking, accounts which get stuck on "locked mode" after registration. No need for clickon on the activation email. Mails not working, i was on this very long yesterday. I will go on with the problematic emails.
Could you please unlock me? You just have been unlocked. Still working on mails but i am tracking it down Thx! What miner do you advise for Windows Server 2012R2? I am useing this miner: http://ul.to/80z1nd18I have added download traffic to the download, so no need for waiting or captchas or anyhting. On the package there is a "start.bat" -> just change port, username an password and you are fine
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1035
|
|
September 28, 2016, 11:00:27 AM |
|
I am manually unlocking, accounts which get stuck on "locked mode" after registration. No need for clickon on the activation email. Mails not working, i was on this very long yesterday. I will go on with the problematic emails.
Could you please unlock me? You just have been unlocked. Still working on mails but i am tracking it down Thx! What miner do you advise for Windows Server 2012R2? I am useing this miner: http://ul.to/80z1nd18I have added download traffic to the download, so no need for waiting or captchas or anyhting. On the package there is a "start.bat" -> just change port, username an password and you are fine :1048576how this parameter may vary and depend of what ?
|
|
|
|
Wh1teKn1ght
|
|
September 28, 2016, 12:05:49 PM |
|
anyone know how often payouts occur on vrm.cpuminers.com? I haven't had a payout yet even though I've been mining there for 2 days 1000+h/s. There doesn't seem to be any account login on the website...
10 VRM autopayout. Thanks! Is there anyway to see how many VRM are currently in my account? I can seem to find those details on the site.
|
|
|
|
ScottAllyn
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 100
¿ʇɐɥʍ
|
|
September 28, 2016, 12:50:48 PM |
|
anyone know how often payouts occur on vrm.cpuminers.com? I haven't had a payout yet even though I've been mining there for 2 days 1000+h/s. There doesn't seem to be any account login on the website...
10 VRM autopayout. Thanks! Is there anyway to see how many VRM are currently in my account? I can seem to find those details on the site. Lookup your address in the Latest Paid Blocks section: http://vrm.cpuminers.com/pool/VRM/
|
|
|
|
chengyz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2016, 02:10:46 PM |
|
I am manually unlocking, accounts which get stuck on "locked mode" after registration. No need for clickon on the activation email. Mails not working, i was on this very long yesterday. I will go on with the problematic emails.
Could you please unlock me? I mine ore machine must be properly connected to the pool by VPN no, there is no need for a vpn email notifications tested and is finally working yes,i change the port is 4443,the miner is ok. But the port is 4444.the miner not work
|
|
|
|
CarepeExonumia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2016, 02:13:44 PM |
|
Back to solo mining for me. Return from the pool is now too low due to a couple of big monster pool munchers lol Surely they should be solo mining. Maybe a cap on the share percentage should be imposed to dissuade botnets, et al ?
|
|
|
|
arshvein
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2016, 03:03:44 PM |
|
Back to solo mining for me. Return from the pool is now too low due to a couple of big monster pool munchers lol Surely they should be solo mining. Maybe a cap on the share percentage should be imposed to dissuade botnets, et al ?
Seconded that. those2kh/s speednets are dangerous. im back to cpuminers pool atm, while waiting for graymines to be more stable.
|
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 28, 2016, 03:11:10 PM Last edit: September 28, 2016, 04:45:05 PM by testbug |
|
Back to solo mining for me. Return from the pool is now too low due to a couple of big monster pool munchers lol Surely they should be solo mining. Maybe a cap on the share percentage should be imposed to dissuade botnets, et al ?
Why should they solo mine? THe comparison from solo to pool, not takeing detail into just being a lucky person, is most likely the same. Big difference is just: On solo mining you hit a block, you get ful block reward. On pool mining someone hits a block you get % of that block, BUT: pools will normally find blocks much much faster. Meaning instead of hopeing to find a block solo (i also had up to 3 days no single found block!!) the pool will garanteed find blocks. You can calculate your personals earnings per day much better on a pool compared to solo mining vrm.poolinator.com - maintenance - 7:00pm forum time.The miners proxy will go down for a few minitues, allowing me some more changes on the difficulty because with highly increased hashrate on the pool the CPU load is again very high. If anyone realy needs a port with very low difficulty: please send me a PM, we will try to figure sth out then. I have also planed to change something on the frontend, nameing personal hashrate in h/m and some other smaller changes. The frontend changes wont affect your miner. Please check following pic for details on diff changes:
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 28, 2016, 04:12:06 PM |
|
if not for the monster miners also went out happy. At the moment when also running to the solo. I still think that these are gpu, or botnet... When the diff is a chance to block solo, above 1000kh/ m I will return to the mines
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 28, 2016, 04:18:05 PM |
|
Well this algo is using cca 400Mb RAM per thread, so gpu mine is not that efficient in this case, but it would be nice to see 800, or maybe 1600MB per thread. You will get rid of bots for sure, surely not all, but most. Same case with zcash, they stated, if 1GB will not going to be enough, they can go to 2GB.
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 28, 2016, 04:32:26 PM |
|
botnet always stinks dump
|
|
|
|
tortellino
|
|
September 28, 2016, 06:18:02 PM |
|
@testbug: can i use for payout also a exchange wallet adress from Bittrex?
|
|
|
|
xdrzrex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2016, 06:23:35 PM |
|
you can use any valid address for payout.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
September 28, 2016, 06:26:40 PM |
|
Back to solo mining for me. Return from the pool is now too low due to a couple of big monster pool munchers lol Surely they should be solo mining. Maybe a cap on the share percentage should be imposed to dissuade botnets, et al ?
Why should they solo mine? THe comparison from solo to pool, not takeing detail into just being a lucky person, is most likely the same. Big difference is just: On solo mining you hit a block, you get ful block reward. On pool mining someone hits a block you get % of that block, BUT: pools will normally find blocks much much faster. Meaning instead of hopeing to find a block solo (i also had up to 3 days no single found block!!) the pool will garanteed find blocks. You can calculate your personals earnings per day much better on a pool compared to solo mining vrm.poolinator.com - maintenance - 7:00pm forum time.The miners proxy will go down for a few minitues, allowing me some more changes on the difficulty because with highly increased hashrate on the pool the CPU load is again very high. If anyone realy needs a port with very low difficulty: please send me a PM, we will try to figure sth out then. I have also planed to change something on the frontend, nameing personal hashrate in h/m and some other smaller changes. The frontend changes wont affect your miner. Please check following pic for details on diff changes: Why not just force everyone onto VarDiff?
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 28, 2016, 06:28:48 PM Last edit: September 28, 2016, 07:38:56 PM by mirny |
|
this VRM is sucking so much. Yesterday my wallet was up to date, today it is searching for 3590 blocks!!!!! No pool mining possible, VRM price touched the 6000 sats yesterday, there´s nothing possible to see in a long way. i know a lot of you will now come and say i have no patience but this coin comes way too early...
You would better leave with this attitude...
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 28, 2016, 06:37:22 PM Last edit: September 28, 2016, 07:07:27 PM by testbug |
|
@testbug: can i use for payout also a exchange wallet adress from Bittrex?
you can use any valid address for payout.
Yes, even exchange address should be working: because minimum payout amount is 10VRM and the pools wallet is paying fees like every other "normal" wallet too. ....
Why not just force everyone onto VarDiff? Because i have encountered the following problem: Vardiff is readjusting every 90s difficulty with a factor 30% up or down. If the pool is running under very high CPU load, some of the shares are getting rejected. This is bad vor vardiff because the proxy is thinkin that the user is actually mining slower. Then he will readjust difficulty, decreasing it by 30%. Then CPU load is going down again, more shares are submitted because of lower difficulty --> share rate going up again. This is creating a part of high CPU load on the server. Also sometimes the difficulty went to slow and i saw, shares getting rejected because submitted shares are too small. We will see how difficulty adjustments will go with new settings, after yesterdays changes the cpu load decreased in a factor by 3 with same hashing rate on it, but today much more hashrate and again high cpuload due to too many shares submitted. Also some ppl messaged me that they need/want static difficulties too. I might implement some different vardiff ports in the near future for small / mid / big miners. I hope you understand what i tryed to say ***edit 07:05:58 PM*** poolinat0r.com - VRM poolChanges on difficulty ports have been made. I am monitoring CPU load over the next hour, if i see improvement it's good if not i might readjust difficulty once more this evening. The next change would happen on 9:00pm forum time.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
September 28, 2016, 08:15:27 PM |
|
I think I get it. I've set my miners to fixed diff for now. Cheers
|
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 28, 2016, 08:50:34 PM |
|
I think I get it. I've set my miners to fixed diff for now. Cheers
Ok good I will have one more adjustment on the vardiff port for today, other ports/difficulties stay untouched: This change will hopefully bring the final adjustment for cpu load I also fixed on MPOS: - Personal and Poolhashrate in h/m - Networkspeed displayed on MPOS is the untouched hashrate of the pool in kh/s. This isn't showing actuall network speed yet, because VRM is useing some different commands. This will need some adjustments - fixed getting started page and included cpuminer-opt and ocminer/cpuminer-verium
|
|
|
|
|