gembira
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:31:07 PM |
|
From ICONOMI delay blog post on medium: As a substantial number of ICONOMI ICO investors intend to move ICN tokens to exchanges, we do not want to launch into an environment where investors might have to wait an excessive period of time to access ICN tokens; furthermore, this might also hinder the listing of ICN tokens at exchanges. This is a no sense, first do the genesis then, also after month you can hit the exchange. Like a lot of project have done in the past years. Devs are trolling us or are they so unpreparated? No one is trolling. Factors you should consider: - gas/network... least of a problem, but to consider - unsynced wallets of some users. problem to a certain degree. i have synced one, you might have it too. we had quite some support email with that issue. there are also few posts here regarding that. all users should have same starting position (or close to all) - people inputting addresses of exchanges / jaxx wallets / who knows what else (see in this thread only). this is worrisome because it can mean that someone might burn ICN completely. and when not burned there will be tons of questions how to get ICNs back. The last one is where we got caught unprepared. Instructing users how to prepare for ICN. You should had posted which wallet you recommend that people should use with the pictures you had there on the blog in the first place and something that confirms that you did set it up correctly. If that was done days ago, there would had been less problems. And the fact that there are so many people with problems, it probably means that alot of people didnt get the message properly or that the guide isn't good enough. I'd guess that something like this would happen, some people will surely use some addresses are not recommended to get token ICN ..I hope dev making an article clearly to simplify everything
|
|
|
|
pedrosoft
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:31:26 PM |
|
Augur was released. Please release
|
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:32:26 PM |
|
From ICONOMI delay blog post on medium: As a substantial number of ICONOMI ICO investors intend to move ICN tokens to exchanges, we do not want to launch into an environment where investors might have to wait an excessive period of time to access ICN tokens; furthermore, this might also hinder the listing of ICN tokens at exchanges. This is a no sense, first do the genesis then, also after month you can hit the exchange. Like a lot of project have done in the past years. Devs are trolling us or are they so unpreparated? No one is trolling. Factors you should consider: - gas/network... least of a problem, but to consider - unsynced wallets of some users. problem to a certain degree. i have synced one, you might have it too. we had quite some support email with that issue. there are also few posts here regarding that. all users should have same starting position (or close to all) - people inputting addresses of exchanges / jaxx wallets / who knows what else (see in this thread only). this is worrisome because it can mean that someone might burn ICN completely. and when not burned there will be tons of questions how to get ICNs back. The last one is where we got caught unprepared. Instructing users how to prepare for ICN. You should had posted which wallet you recommend that people should use with the pictures you had there on the blog in the first place and something that confirms that you did set it up correctly. If that was done days ago, there would had been less problems. And the fact that there are so many people with problems, it probably means that alot of people didnt get the message properly or that the guide isn't good enough. What is wrong with people withdrawing to exchanges? As long as the exchange added Iconomi, it shouldn't be a problem, or should it? Just like withdrawing rep or any other ethereum based coin to polo should be fine as far as I'm concerned. Myetherwallet or mist will probably provide a same type of address anyway. Can you please clarify this?
|
|
|
|
kliown
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:33:15 PM |
|
iconomi sites seem problematic, I do not get the code 2FA sms, what anyone has the same events with me
Take a look at your authenticator. I did not get a sms from 2FA had to wait several hours no sms 2FA code I received, so I can not sign into my account contact support via email, then verfication via skype problem solved
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:34:10 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider".
|
|
|
|
pedrosoft
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:35:38 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ?
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:37:43 PM |
|
Augur was released. Please release
Doesn't matter when/how Augur was released. If we worry that certain amount of our investors might burn ICN because of wrongly put address it's a thing to consider!
|
|
|
|
pedrosoft
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:39:31 PM |
|
Augur was released. Please release
Doesn't matter when/how Augur was released. If we worry that certain amount of our investors might burn ICN because of wrongly put address it's a thing to consider! errors happen.
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:41:05 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that.
|
|
|
|
tazmantasik
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:43:10 PM |
|
I hope the problem can be resolved as soon as possible
|
|
████▄██████████▄ ███▄████████████ ▄███▀ ████ ████ ████ ▀███▄ ███▀████████████ ████▀██████████▀ |
▄██████████▄ ████████████ ███████████▀███▄ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ▀███▄███████████ ████████████████ ████▀██████████▀ |
▄██▄█████████▄██▄ ▀████▄█████▄████▀ ▀████▄█▄████▀ ███████████ ▄████▀█████▀████▄ █████████████████ █████████████████ █████████████████ ▀███████████████▀
|
▄███████████████▄ █████████████████ ████▀███▀██████▀ ███████▄█████▀ ████▄▄██████████▄ █▀▀██████▀███████ █▄██████▄███▄████ █████▀███████████ ▀██▀███▀████████▀ |
████▄███████████ ████████████████ ▄███▀███████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ███████████▄███▀ ████████████ ▀██████████▀ | | | | ████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ | |
██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████████
| | | | | | . Listed on
| | BINANCE KUCOIN Gate.io | | |
|
|
|
Vinz421
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:43:38 PM |
|
From ICONOMI delay blog post on medium: As a substantial number of ICONOMI ICO investors intend to move ICN tokens to exchanges, we do not want to launch into an environment where investors might have to wait an excessive period of time to access ICN tokens; furthermore, this might also hinder the listing of ICN tokens at exchanges. This is a no sense, first do the genesis then, also after month you can hit the exchange. Like a lot of project have done in the past years. Devs are trolling us or are they so unpreparated? No one is trolling. Factors you should consider: - gas/network... least of a problem, but to consider - unsynced wallets of some users. problem to a certain degree. i have synced one, you might have it too. we had quite some support email with that issue. there are also few posts here regarding that. all users should have same starting position (or close to all) - people inputting addresses of exchanges / jaxx wallets / who knows what else (see in this thread only). this is worrisome because it can mean that someone might burn ICN completely. and when not burned there will be tons of questions how to get ICNs back. The last one is where we got caught unprepared. Instructing users how to prepare for ICN. You should had posted which wallet you recommend that people should use with the pictures you had there on the blog in the first place and something that confirms that you did set it up correctly. If that was done days ago, there would had been less problems. And the fact that there are so many people with problems, it probably means that alot of people didnt get the message properly or that the guide isn't good enough. What is wrong with people withdrawing to exchanges? As long as the exchange added Iconomi, it shouldn't be a problem, or should it? Just like withdrawing rep or any other ethereum based coin to polo should be fine as far as I'm concerned. Myetherwallet or mist will probably provide a same type of address anyway. Can you please clarify this? The problem is no exchange confirmed adding ICN yet. Therefore, there is no 'ICN deposit option' on exchanges yet. So what kind of exchange adresses do you think those users put in their ICN account ?? Eth ones ? Btc ones ? Those tokens would just end up lost forever.. I wouldn't mind decreasing the supply already but I think those investors would.
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:45:01 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. great I see ur active. Single word as an output, but OK. Does that make sense to you? Or would u suggest anything else?
|
|
|
|
Vinz421
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:45:03 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. Yay. This way sounds great !
|
|
|
|
pedrosoft
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:46:27 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. great I see ur active. Single word as an output, but OK. Does that make sense to you? Or would u suggest anything else? I think that is a good idea: "great" in one world
|
|
|
|
RMfuckbarca
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:47:27 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. Yay. This way sounds great ! We all hope ICN will officially launch today, don't let us down, gogogo.
|
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:49:47 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. Team, what if we don't want to withdraw to a certain wallet (I don't trust myetherwallet due to claims at reddit & no space for mist) and keep the balance until it launches on an exchange. Isn't it possible? I seriously don't want to buy additional ether so I can send my coins to an exchange. If this is a must can someone inform me how much ether I would need for a single transaction.
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:52:24 PM |
|
From ICONOMI delay blog post on medium: As a substantial number of ICONOMI ICO investors intend to move ICN tokens to exchanges, we do not want to launch into an environment where investors might have to wait an excessive period of time to access ICN tokens; furthermore, this might also hinder the listing of ICN tokens at exchanges. This is a no sense, first do the genesis then, also after month you can hit the exchange. Like a lot of project have done in the past years. Devs are trolling us or are they so unpreparated? No one is trolling. Factors you should consider: - gas/network... least of a problem, but to consider - unsynced wallets of some users. problem to a certain degree. i have synced one, you might have it too. we had quite some support email with that issue. there are also few posts here regarding that. all users should have same starting position (or close to all) - people inputting addresses of exchanges / jaxx wallets / who knows what else (see in this thread only). this is worrisome because it can mean that someone might burn ICN completely. and when not burned there will be tons of questions how to get ICNs back. The last one is where we got caught unprepared. Instructing users how to prepare for ICN. You should had posted which wallet you recommend that people should use with the pictures you had there on the blog in the first place and something that confirms that you did set it up correctly. If that was done days ago, there would had been less problems. And the fact that there are so many people with problems, it probably means that alot of people didnt get the message properly or that the guide isn't good enough. What is wrong with people withdrawing to exchanges? As long as the exchange added Iconomi, it shouldn't be a problem, or should it? Just like withdrawing rep or any other ethereum based coin to polo should be fine as far as I'm concerned. Myetherwallet or mist will probably provide a same type of address anyway. Can you please clarify this? The problem is no exchange confirmed adding ICN yet. Therefore, there is no 'ICN deposit option' on exchanges yet. So what kind of exchange adresses do you think those users put in their ICN account ?? Eth ones ? Btc ones ? Those tokens would just end up lost forever.. I wouldn't mind decreasing the supply already but I think those investors would. Exchanges will open ICN deposit addresses not more than 24h before launch. U'll be then able to withdraw ICN directly to exchanges once we unlock the contract.
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:53:23 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. Team, what if we don't want to withdraw to a certain wallet (I don't trust myetherwallet due to claims at reddit & no space for mist) and keep the balance until it launches on an exchange. Isn't it possible? I seriously don't want to buy additional ether so I can send my coins to an exchange. If this is a must can someone inform me how much ether I would need for a single transaction. why don't you just keep them at iconomi? it's no different to an exchange
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:53:50 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. Team, what if we don't want to withdraw to a certain wallet (I don't trust myetherwallet due to claims at reddit & no space for mist) and keep the balance until it launches on an exchange. Isn't it possible? I seriously don't want to buy additional ether so I can send my coins to an exchange. If this is a must can someone inform me how much ether I would need for a single transaction. In that case, turn 2FA on. Leave them on ico.iconomi.net and when we unlock the contract transfer them anywhere you want without buying any extra ETH to pay for gas cost. However, keep in mind. We'll charge 1 ICN for sending ICNs out of ico.iconomi.net
|
|
|
|
ICONOMI (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2016, 04:54:39 PM |
|
So we are delaying distribution because it might be difficult for some people to send tokens to an exchange as fast as possible?
It is a problem. But as I said before "least of a problem, but to consider". So. You release smart contract tomorrow ? Most likely today. With dummy distribution in order for anyone who entered their own address can check if he can access it. I can't think of any better way right now to do that. great I see ur active. Single word as an output, but OK. Does that make sense to you? Or would u suggest anything else? I think that is a good idea: "great" in one world Hahaha good one! Thx for feedback.
|
|
|
|
|