|
drnash85
|
 |
October 19, 2016, 01:39:13 PM |
|
The attacker is a rookie - Especially if Ethereum set the trap. Such newbies.  smh. |
|
|
|
|
boestin
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 19, 2016, 01:46:59 PM |
|
The attacker is a rookie - Especially if Ethereum set the trap. Such newbies. smh. Rookie? Apparently the attacker is using an address which mined ETH 433 days ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
pedrosoft
|
|
October 19, 2016, 01:51:37 PM |
|
The attacker is a rookie - Especially if Ethereum set the trap. Such newbies. smh. Rookie? Apparently the attacker is using an address which mined ETH 433 days ago. I think that someone knows who is he... |
|
|
|
|
|
drnash85
|
|
October 19, 2016, 01:53:31 PM |
|
The attacker is a rookie - Especially if Ethereum set the trap. Such newbies. smh. Rookie? Apparently the attacker is using an address which mined ETH 433 days ago. Wow 433 days  a year and some change. -rookie in my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
XbladeX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 19, 2016, 01:55:44 PM |
|
...
I think that someone knows who is he...
He is god :-) he is threatening 1 billion industry like boss trashing RTH reputation HARD at end few more such forks and will be fun. Instead of developing something ETH dev will fight with exploits and fix problems sometimes problems will create new problems and we are in infinite loop of fixing shit. I bet he have more tricks to play with ETH |
Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
|
|
|
|
bones
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:00:10 PM |
|
As planned ? The second planned fork was to clear out all the empty accounts used in the attacks. Not fix something that could have been fixed in the first fork,if it had indeed been anticipated. #clusterfuck |
|
|
|
|
XbladeX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:15:00 PM |
|
...
As planned ?
The second planned fork was to clear out all the empty accounts used in the attacks.
Not fix something that could have been fixed in the first fork,if it had indeed been anticipated.
#clusterfuck
And that 2nd fork was not even mandatory to do it. they could skip it now they won't becouse another security hole have to be patched. I wonder how many tricks have that guy in hands. |
Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
|
|
|
|
p4xil
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:19:11 PM |
|
...
As planned ?
The second planned fork was to clear out all the empty accounts used in the attacks.
Not fix something that could have been fixed in the first fork,if it had indeed been anticipated.
#clusterfuck
And that 2nd fork was not even mandatory to do it. they could skip it now they won't becouse another security hole have to be patched. I wonder how many tricks have that guy in hands. It doesn't matter really. HF is like update... Like Apple posts update for iOS. So if they need to make 100 HFs to make blockchain stable and impenetrable, let them do it and move on. In the end we will have perfect product. |
Nothing! Nothing! Nothing! Selling Nothing for only 1.99 ICN
|
|
|
|
bones
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:30:46 PM |
|
It doesn't matter really.
HF is like update... Like Apple posts update for iOS. So if they need to make 100 HFs to make blockchain stable and impenetrable, let them do it and move on.
In the end we will have perfect product.
people spreading disinformation doesnt matter ? glad i dont live in your world |
|
|
|
|
Piston Honda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1070
Juicin' crypto
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:31:02 PM |
|
...
I think that someone knows who is he...
He is god :-) he is threatening 1 billion industry like boss trashing RTH reputation HARD at end few more such forks and will be fun. Instead of developing something ETH dev will fight with exploits and fix problems sometimes problems will create new problems and we are in infinite loop of fixing shit. I bet he have more tricks to play with ETH yup exactly! LOL ETH will never be the same. dead |
$ADK ~ watch & learn...
|
|
|
|
p4xil
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:41:44 PM |
|
Everyone can always make an ETH fork and fix all the bugs and create best blockchain if they want. But it is easier to complain, right?
|
Nothing! Nothing! Nothing! Selling Nothing for only 1.99 ICN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
October 19, 2016, 02:54:14 PM
Last edit: October 19, 2016, 03:06:36 PM by Daparski |
|
...
As planned ?
The second planned fork was to clear out all the empty accounts used in the attacks.
Not fix something that could have been fixed in the first fork,if it had indeed been anticipated.
#clusterfuck
And that 2nd fork was not even mandatory to do it. they could skip it now they won't becouse another security hole have to be patched. I wonder how many tricks have that guy in hands. It doesn't matter really. HF is like update... Like Apple posts update for iOS. So if they need to make 100 HFs to make blockchain stable and impenetrable, let them do it and move on. In the end we will have perfect product. I think hard fork does matter. A lot. HF is not just another Apple update. You forgot to mention the most important part - community consensus (miners, devs, etc). Today's fork is due to security flaw in the protocol. The previous one was a moldy bailout for some "poor" funded application running on top of the protocol. So if another bailout fork like that will come some (sunny) day - we may see another group of the community forks. |
|
|
|
|
|
bones
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:05:16 PM |
|
"It was anticipated. Fix set for 2nd fork (as planned):" that wasnt the plan for the 2nd fork - misinformation..... https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/10/18/faq-upcoming-ethereum-hard-fork/"second hard fork is expected to address a number of less urgent matters such as removing empty accounts which the attacker used to flood the Ethereum network, and which caused the size of the blockchain to inflate." |
|
|
|
|
|
JamesSany
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:13:20 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:16:07 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. |
|
|
|
|
Frosxh
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Tipsters Championship www.DirectBet.eu/Competition
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:18:16 PM |
|
So there is another attack, does this mean there will be more delays for the launch?
|
|
|
|
|
drnash85
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:19:09 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. How does one know the hash if they do not have the address?? So Proof of name to tx is not needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
JamesSany
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:20:09 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. Not easy bro.there was an email conversation stored in escrows inbox.you should ask refund from the same email. |
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 19, 2016, 03:33:10 PM |
|
So there is another attack, does this mean there will be more delays for the launch?
doubt the new attack is has as much impact as the first. hope there will be no further delay |
|
|
|
|
