ocminer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
 |
January 07, 2017, 06:36:41 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow...  Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova  have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
|
January 07, 2017, 06:58:20 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours I want to keep using ssl but when I ping it I get avg 122 when I ping normal us-zec I get avg 22 is there anyway to due auto detect like miningpoolhub or different port on the us server thanks |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:00:41 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours I want to keep using ssl but when I ping it I get avg 122 when I ping normal us-zec I get avg 22 is there anyway to due auto detect like miningpoolhub or different port on the us server thanks SSL will always be a little slower than normal connections, 122ms is fine, everything above 200ms would make me think but 122 or even 130ms is totally fine. I'll check the autorouting once more though. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
BenCodie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
6.25 ---> 3.125
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:05:33 PM |
|
can anyone share their hash rate of SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 Fury NTOC+SR 4GB 4096-Bit HBM TRI-X OC+ (UEFI) please
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:06:29 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours I want to keep using ssl but when I ping it I get avg 122 when I ping normal us-zec I get avg 22 is there anyway to due auto detect like miningpoolhub or different port on the us server thanks SSL will always be a little slower than normal connections, 122ms is fine, everything above 200ms would make me think but 122 or even 130ms is totally fine. I'll check the autorouting once more though. ok thanks wasn't sure if ssl was the reason |
|
|
|
|
|
ccccccc7
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:22:55 PM |
|
what a bunch of mother fakers huh
Which pool? supernova? I think all suprnova pools are trustworthy. I get the best returns there out of all the pools I have used (coinmine.pl, nanopool.org, flypool.org) and they have 0% fee active right now for orthodox xmas |
|
|
|
|
Lokken86
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:25:56 PM |
|
can anyone share their hash rate of SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 Fury NTOC+SR 4GB 4096-Bit HBM TRI-X OC+ (UEFI) please
My Sapphire TriX Fury gets 350 at stock. |
|
|
|
|
BenCodie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
6.25 ---> 3.125
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:33:35 PM |
|
can anyone share their hash rate of SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 Fury NTOC+SR 4GB 4096-Bit HBM TRI-X OC+ (UEFI) please
My Sapphire TriX Fury gets 350 at stock. Thanks mate  |
|
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
January 07, 2017, 07:58:40 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours I see for last 24hrs luck 93.7%.. that's not 5 times. 5 Times is 20% luck. So what you are talking about!? |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:05:04 PM |
|
What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...
Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Last 5 days (120hours) sunday 16:00 to friday 16:00 dwarfpool = 0,51337148 => 0,102674296 per day for 1400 Sol/s seems to be a lot less than the week before christmas ?? (with my calculation 20% less than two weeks ago) or is the difficulty 20% higher than the week before christmas ?? Next week i will try suprnova have a nice day P.S.: 1400 Sol/s -3% Dev-Fee - 0,5% rejected - 1% pool fee = 1337 Sol/s ----> should be 0.1337 zec per day ---> 0,6685 zec for the 5 days For last 12 hours, while I see that every sec my card is finding new shares, faking pool didn't get me any profit... They are faking thiefs! what a bunch of mother fakers huh Which pool? supernova? Luck on suprnova for the past hours is 5 times as lucky as normal, so if you're talking about suprnova you should have 5 times what you have normally, at least for the last hours I see for last 24hrs luck 93.7%.. that's not 5 times. 5 Times is 20% luck. So what you are talking about!? Last hours, not 24h.. Check the last blocks (blocks 41212 - 41243) |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:36:01 PM |
|
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
|
|
|
|
melfice123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:38:16 PM |
|
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
Thanks Claymore! Good job! |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:48:43 PM |
|
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
good job  and don't worry alot of people will test it for you |
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:51:46 PM |
|
Would you specify more details on using this parameter: - added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU. |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:53:53 PM |
|
Would you specify more details on using this parameter: - added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU. Read Readme.txt. If you want to know what -a value is the best for your card - currently you have to try them all. |
|
|
|
akaRev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:58:29 PM |
|
rx 470 4gb his (1300/2000) - 22 h/s
WTF?
|
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:59:41 PM |
|
Tell me best settings for xfx rx 470 4gig and rx 480 nitro 8gig. Not so good :/
ZEC - Total Speed: 706.005 H/s, Total Shares: 91, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ZEC: GPU0 246.236 H/s, GPU1 233.392 H/s, GPU2 226.377 H/s
|
|
|
|
|
mistercashking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050
@MRCASHKING
|
|
January 07, 2017, 09:00:34 PM
Last edit: January 07, 2017, 09:19:23 PM by mistercashking |
|
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
Thanks claymore im now getting about 270 -272 h/s on my Msi RX480 4GB's with modded bios. EDIT: nevermind seems to be dropping down now though. hmmm  |
|
|
|
|
|
kurbeks
|
|
January 07, 2017, 09:05:02 PM |
|
Thanx m8!
|
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2017, 09:05:53 PM |
|
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
Thanks claymore im now getting about 270 -272 h/s on my Msi RX480 4GB's with modded bios. Can you send you bios settings and mod program . . . ? |
|
|
|
|
|
