manoe
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 12, 2017, 12:08:36 AM |
|
Thanks for v.11 with -asm claymore, good job!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:12:35 AM |
|
Why on 280X with 3Gb VRAM maximum intensity 7, for 8 not enough memory. But on my 270X 4Gb on 8 intensity is only 2,4Gb VRAM is used during mining?
|
|
|
|
|
BALTA00
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:17:26 AM |
|
R9 Fury v11.0 working with Claymore 12.15 in 345 Sol/s with v10.0 working 380 Sol/s  R9 Fury work better with v10.0 |
|
|
|
|
stoon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:19:14 AM |
|
For all the Fury and Nano people. You have to roll back to 15.12 drivers and they work awesome. 280/290/295x2 all work without having to use 15.12.
For first impressions looks like only miner power increase for the hash increase.
Great work Claymore!
Edit:
v 10
6 x furys = 1915s/s @ 812watts 2.35
-a 2 900/400 -96mV
v11 15.12
6 x furys = 2002s/s @ 822watts 2.43
900/400 -96mV
v10
5 x Nanos + 290 = 1853s/s @ 990watts 1.87
-a 1 Nanos 900/400 -96, 290 900/1125 -75mV
v11 15.12
5 x Nanos + 290 = 1931s/s @ 996watts 1.94
Nanos 900/400 -96, 290 900/1125 -75mV
|
|
|
|
|
|
D8V1D
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:20:29 AM |
|
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.11.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:31:32 AM |
|
wow wow wow 258 sols on the 7950
|
|
|
|
|
|
TR8888
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:33:24 AM |
|
245-255 sol/s per 280x, Thanks for the hard work Claymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gloupsy
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:39:06 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2017, 01:40:43 AM by gloupsy |
|
WOW got a real 312h/s on one of my 280x (Sapphire triX, modded 015.044 bios) edit: stabilized to 280h/s...still correct  the 4 others on this rig are around 250 / 255 h/s, and my only r9 290 is a little slower than V10. Congratulations Claymore ! Good job ! |
|
|
|
|
DebitMe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1011
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
|
|
January 12, 2017, 12:48:16 AM |
|
My 280x's are steadily running 250 h/s. Great job Claymore!
|
|
|
|
|
Acguy
|
|
January 12, 2017, 01:16:28 AM |
|
Wow this update is great thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Toninho
|
|
January 12, 2017, 01:23:18 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2017, 03:00:48 AM by Toninho |
|
Hi,My
2-» 280x's are steadily running 2x -» 254 h/s.
1-» 260x -» 95 h/s
1-» 270x -» 152 h/s.
1-» 380x -» 177 h/s.
Great job Claymore!
|
|
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
January 12, 2017, 01:23:33 AM |
|
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.11.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect. My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s |
|
|
|
|
Jjohnwick
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
January 12, 2017, 01:33:20 AM |
|
for me V10 is good. 2x480 550-560 sol
v11 2x480 540-550 sol
|
|
|
|
|
ginmac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
January 12, 2017, 01:40:33 AM |
|
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.11.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect. My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s R-380 with 15.12 only 165 H/s. Cryptonight is much better. |
|
|
|
|
|
D8V1D
|
|
January 12, 2017, 02:16:21 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2017, 02:53:54 AM by D8V1D |
|
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect. My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s R9 Nano and Fury wont work on the 16.11.5 drivers. I'll try the new 16.12 drivers and see if it works. Just tested: R9 Nano and Fury, aka Fiji cards will not work on 16.11.5 nor 16.12.2 drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
YIz
|
|
January 12, 2017, 02:32:19 AM |
|
I'm having issues with Fiji cards, the miner shows 0.00H/s on them while it works fine with Hawaiis.
update: seems to work okay with -asm 0, but I'm observing the exact same speeds as 10.0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
melt7777
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 5
|
|
January 12, 2017, 03:29:38 AM |
|
Linux version will be available in 1-2 days.
No Linux version planned anymore.
Why would you remove support for thousands of loyal Customers? The PiMPs deserve to have Claymore, and you deserve to earn the dev fee that you get from us. Please release linux support. Thank you very much. |
|
|
|
|
|
D8V1D
|
|
January 12, 2017, 04:14:20 AM |
|
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
|
|
|
|
|
kilo17
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
January 12, 2017, 04:17:41 AM |
|
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6 |
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
|
