Bitcoin Forum
November 29, 2025, 08:40:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 ... 758 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839408 times)
MCWey8
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10

[ Poor Miner ]


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 06:03:50 AM
 #10621

after few days with 9.7, my rigs crash and i dont know why

congrats.

maybe you misread something in your configs like you misread when you made this post ?



tell us about v11 or get out Tongue
xneoenx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 06:10:25 AM
 #10622

after few days with 9.7, my rigs crash and i dont know why

Wrong Thread ?
023dgagi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 06:41:23 AM
 #10623

It may look bat file for rx 470 which is best shown with Clay v11
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:32:34 AM
 #10624


Very nice, thx for sharing !
chohav
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:33:01 AM
 #10625

No idea why the speeds vary so much but here are my results after 12 hours of mining. Very stable and no rejects or incorrect shares.
R9 290 are a disappointment however compared to the 280x.



What driver are you using? 15.12 or 16.11?

15.12

Hey adaseb, can you please post your settings from the config file and tell us if you use modified bios on these 280Xes. I am only doing 250-255 H/s with mine 280x. Any answer would be appreciated  Smiley
ffthomas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:34:53 AM
 #10626

It may look bat file for rx 470 which is best shown with Clay v11

Hm?
falz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:35:32 AM
 #10627

Thankx claymore. Nice work!! Kiss Working rly good but one of my rig ( 2x r9 390 + 1x r9 380 says display adapter stop working, if i try this version. Do you know why? 9.3 beta working rly good with that rig. Thanx anyway, you are my hero.  Grin
BenCodie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1164


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:53:44 AM
Last edit: January 13, 2017, 08:52:06 AM by BenCodie
 #10628

what maximum value of -asm we can set? 1234?
Golku
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 07:57:27 AM
 #10629

No idea why the speeds vary so much but here are my results after 12 hours of mining. Very stable and no rejects or incorrect shares.
R9 290 are a disappointment however compared to the 280x.



What driver are you using? 15.12 or 16.11?

15.12

looks like the old cards are much better then the newer cards
hope that the new cards will get the boost what they deserve
capler
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 08:37:27 AM
 #10630

Claymore, We wait Linux v.11
espressodelisi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 08:48:13 AM
 #10631

Claymore, We wait Linux v.11

me too...

Please do not make us linux users unhappy.
Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1294

Huh?


View Profile WWW
January 13, 2017, 08:49:55 AM
 #10632

Claymore, We wait Linux v.11

me too...

Please do not make us linux users unhappy.


Us linux users have Optiminer for now, which is still faster.

Gaglam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 08:59:03 AM
 #10633

Did anyone compare the power consumption between V11.0 and other versions?
It's about 100W more for me.
twente-mining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 09:10:43 AM
 #10634

I have 16 x R9 280x Vapor-x 3 GB running on ZEC with windows 10.

There are 2 versions of memory,  Hynix and Elpida

No bios changes, All Stock, no tuning with clocks or memory setting.

Hynix memory cards get around 252 sols
Elpida memory cards get around 237 sols

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
batko
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 09:14:58 AM
 #10635

I have 16 x R9 280x Vapor-x 3 GB running on ZEC with windows 10.

There are 2 versions of memory,  Hynix and Elpida

No bios changes, All Stock, no tuning with clocks or memory setting.

Hynix memory cards get around 252 sols
Elpida memory cards get around 237 sols


True I have same card  Wink

Donation: ETH: 0x0c8ce94dd3d1bfd09c0f887559c61d1b551e4b4d
capler
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 09:31:18 AM
 #10636

Claymore, We wait Linux v.11

me too...

Please do not make us linux users unhappy.


Us linux users have Optiminer for now, which is still faster.

Optiminer 1.3.2  r9390 give 250 s/s, r9280x - 200 s/s
CM v10 r9390 - 330 s/s, r9280x - 240 s/s

Optiminer is a faster Huh?
lucasan123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 09:46:14 AM
 #10637

what about elemere card?

twente-mining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 10:01:24 AM
 #10638

I have 16 x R9 280x Vapor-x 3 GB running on ZEC with windows 10.

There are 2 versions of memory,  Hynix and Elpida

No bios changes, All Stock, no tuning with clocks or memory setting.

Hynix memory cards get around 252 sols
Elpida memory cards get around 237 sols


True I have same card  Wink

and the nicest part, they are very cheap ...85 euro each ..... lol

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
donvitoff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 10:01:54 AM
 #10639

Please anybody to write, with which parameters have to run v11 for better performance of Gigabyte R9 390.
For now me is v9.3 better...  Huh  Undecided
Maxikosw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 10:09:20 AM
 #10640

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

Pages: « 1 ... 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 ... 758 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!