EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[jpl]

ewbf twitter thread?.. https://twitter.com/radix42

[1715516690]

1715516690

[Raimy]

Yes, EWBF is a great Zcash miner, but I was also wondering if there are going to be future updates. Seems he earns a decent fee, curious as to why he abandoned the project.

[selfblumpkin]

people know that a certain tag related to fee still works right?

[monexe]

Hi Everyone, this my config :

http://i63.tinypic.com/98zi3c.png

Is good? Thanks. 

[litecoinbeast]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

[flip4flop]

My rig eventually just starts reporting 0 sols and looping that with listing GPUs temps. Is there a way to auto restart when this happens and if so what do I add to the bat?  Thanks in advance.

[R0mi]

My rig eventually just starts reporting 0 sols and looping that with listing GPUs temps. Is there a way to auto restart when this happens and if so what do I add to the bat?  Thanks in advance.

Yes, I think there is.

Go here: https://vegamining.blogspot.co.uk/

Check out the free script.  With what I think would be minor editing, you could adapt that to EWBF.  Take a look.  XMR-STAK and EWBF work pretty much the same way on displaying output to the http port of your choosing.

[boo50]

flip4flop, you can just try the .bat from the top of the page, with restart and --eexit 3

[mymining888]

Wow i actually got it working, i have tried a few miners but could never get them working,  i got the virus warning to from kaspersky and chrome but forged ahead anyways i set up my btc gold with coinomi and shazam i hope i did everything right hahahaha otherwise other are getting my btc gold's hehe, the card is running a little hot needs to be cleaned out i haven't overclocked anything this is just running standard , thanks to the dev for this  i can see your dev shares getting paid too on the window

i have GTX 1080
Temp: GPU0: 66C
GPU0: 545 Sol/s
Total speed: 545 Sol/s
INFO 02:13:52: GPU0 Accepted share 402ms [A:216, R:2]
INFO 02:14:07: GPU0 Accepted share 424ms [A:217, R:2]
Temp: GPU0: 66C
GPU0: 544 Sol/s
Total speed: 544 Sol/s
INFO 02:14:34: GPU0 Accepted share 414ms [A:218, R:2]
INFO 02:14:42: GPU0 Accepted share 478ms [A:219, R:2]
INFO: Detected new work: 17112225
Temp: GPU0: 65C
GPU0: 548 Sol/s
Total speed: 548 Sol/s
INFO 02:14:50: GPU0 Accepted share 455ms [A:220, R:2]
INFO 02:14:56: GPU0 Accepted share 415ms [A:221, R:2]
INFO 02:14:58: GPU0 Accepted share 449ms [A:222, R:2]
Temp: GPU0: 66C
GPU0: 545 Sol/s
Total speed: 545 Sol/s
Temp: GPU0: 65C
GPU0: 549 Sol/s
Total speed: 549 Sol/s
INFO 02:17:21: GPU0 Accepted share 410ms [A:237, R:2]
INFO 02:17:27: GPU0 Accepted share 423ms [A:238, R:2]
INFO 02:17:36: GPU0 Accepted share 400ms [A:239, R:2]
INFO 02:17:36: GPU0 Accepted share 420ms [A:240, R:2]
INFO 02:17:38: GPU0 Accepted share 425ms [A:241, R:2]
INFO 02:17:46: GPU0 Accepted share 429ms [A:242, R:2]
Temp: GPU0: 65C
GPU0: 551 Sol/s
Total speed: 551 Sol/s
INFO 02:17:56: GPU0 Accepted share 413ms [A:243, R:2]
INFO 02:18:01: GPU0 Accepted share 428ms [A:244, R:2]
INFO 02:18:13: GPU0 Accepted share 455ms [A:245, R:2]
INFO 02:18:13: GPU0 Accepted share 439ms [A:246, R:2]
Temp: GPU0: 65C
GPU0: 547 Sol/s
Total speed: 547 Sol/s
INFO 02:18:20: GPU0 Accepted share 397ms [A:247, R:2]
INFO 02:18:21: GPU0 Accepted share 411ms [A:248, R:2]
INFO 02:18:23: GPU0 Accepted share 452ms [A:249, R:2]

[QuintLeo]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

 well over 5000 posts later, and you ask this?

 Thread would not have lasted this long if this was a virus.

[Crypto_Punk]

Hey guys, i got 2x 1070 and i'm getting some lower results than all of you

i had to put power on 90% +130 clock +680 memory in order to get 435sol

can anyone share how they managed to get the best results for a 1070? thanks

power 85
core clock 120
memory 700
fan 80%

getting 965 sol/s with 150W -> 3.25 SOL/W

or

power 61
core clock 150
mem 400
fan 70%

getting 855 sol/s with 108W -> 3.9 SOL/W

or

power 58
core clock 150
mem 400
fan 50%

getting 825 sol/s with 101W -> 3.9 SOL/W

it just depends how do you have to pay per KW/Hour ... just try your cards, and after every change you made, wait about 10-15 mins to get a accurate data from the miner. I also let the miner restart every 30 Mins and take care, that my cards are still under 60C, because i still use them for gaming.

Changing fan from auto makes a difference? I have 8x evga gtx 1070 in getting around 3500 sols with power at 75 - CC at 138 - Memory C at 750.
Cant get em over 150 Core Clock without crashing or 800 Memory Clock. Same on other miners...

[Creamss]

Whats your guys overclocks on 1080TIs and 1060 6gb?

[Crypto_Punk]

Hey guys, i got 2x 1070 and i'm getting some lower results than all of you

i had to put power on 90% +130 clock +680 memory in order to get 435sol

can anyone share how they managed to get the best results for a 1070? thanks

power 85
core clock 120
memory 700
fan 80%

getting 965 sol/s with 150W -> 3.25 SOL/W

or

power 61
core clock 150
mem 400
fan 70%

getting 855 sol/s with 108W -> 3.9 SOL/W

or

power 58
core clock 150
mem 400
fan 50%

getting 825 sol/s with 101W -> 3.9 SOL/W

it just depends how do you have to pay per KW/Hour ... just try your cards, and after every change you made, wait about 10-15 mins to get a accurate data from the miner. I also let the miner restart every 30 Mins and take care, that my cards are still under 60C, because i still use them for gaming.

Changing fan from auto makes a difference? I have 8x evga gtx 1070 in getting around 3500 sols with power at 75 - CC at 138 - Memory C at 750.
Cant get em over 150 Core Clock without crashing or 800 Memory Clock. Same on other miners...

Actually, this is mining komodo... will start testing with zcash instead but I thought it'd be very similar results...

[Crypto_Punk]

Well i kinda answered my own question. Running on 80 pl, 150 CC, 700 mc for a while now with fan at 45%. 3600+ sols mining kmd. Guess that's about right for the evga 1070 .

[litecoinbeast]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

 well over 5000 posts later, and you ask this?

 Thread would not have lasted this long if this was a virus.

Lol you aren't running national security. It looks like the source isn't available. Has someone looked at it. You never ass--u--me

[JDSmith14]

I can set the drivers to not update in win10. Which nvidia drivers are the most stable?

Can anyone please confirm which drivers are the best for 6 * nVidia GTX 1070 G1 Gaming 8GB for Windows 10 & EWBF nVidia.miner.0.3.4b.

Is seems like whenever I go above driver version "385.41-desktop-win10-64bit-international-whql" the miner becomes unstable and i have to reduce the OC.

Thanks

[sublimus]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

 well over 5000 posts later, and you ask this?

 Thread would not have lasted this long if this was a virus.

Lol you aren't running national security. It looks like the source isn't available. Has someone looked at it. You never ass--u--me

By asking that question YOU assume that we are all complete idiots.
I do not have Windows source code but I still use it nonetheless.

[litecoinbeast]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

 well over 5000 posts later, and you ask this?

 Thread would not have lasted this long if this was a virus.

Lol you aren't running national security. It looks like the source isn't available. Has someone looked at it. You never ass--u--me

By asking that question YOU assume that we are all complete idiots.
I do not have Windows source code but I still use it nonetheless.

Wow awful touchy. If you can't see past you own ignorance I have nothing more to say to you. I ask a very simple question, yet you seem to think "just cause" is a good enough answer to my question or that some how me asking a straight forward question is targeting your intelligence? One does /= the other. Have a great day.

[QuintLeo]

I can set the drivers to not update in win10. Which nvidia drivers are the most stable?

Can anyone please confirm which drivers are the best for 6 * nVidia GTX 1070 G1 Gaming 8GB for Windows 10 & EWBF nVidia.miner.0.3.4b.

Is seems like whenever I go above driver version "385.41-desktop-win10-64bit-international-whql" the miner becomes unstable and i have to reduce the OC.

Thanks

 No reason to use anything more recent than 373.06 on a mining machine, unless you have 1080 ti cards or 1070 ti cards that aren't supported by that old of a driver version (possibly some of the Pascal-based Titan version as well).

[sublimus]

Can anyone confirm this isn't malicious?

 well over 5000 posts later, and you ask this?

 Thread would not have lasted this long if this was a virus.

Lol you aren't running national security. It looks like the source isn't available. Has someone looked at it. You never ass--u--me

By asking that question YOU assume that we are all complete idiots.
I do not have Windows source code but I still use it nonetheless.

Wow awful touchy. If you can't see past you own ignorance I have nothing more to say to you. I ask a very simple question, yet you seem to think "just cause" is a good enough answer to my question or that some how me asking a straight forward question is targeting your intelligence? One does /= the other. Have a great day.

Answer to your simple question = Yes it is full of viruses.