▂▃▅▆▇⫷[🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰]⫸⫷[!Paying 10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸▇▆▅▃▂

[OldDriver]

I got very low hash for the x17 showed on the zpool wallet page. I have 50ishMH hash but it only showed me 1MH on the website. Does anybody has same situation as me? I tried different ccminers it's same situation. Thanks

I did, but it appears to have fixed itself within the past half hour or so.

Thanks, it's back to normal for me too. Any idea why this happened? Is this just the delay of database or are we losing that much hash power. Don't want this happen again it's so unstable.  

[BitcoinGeekBoy]

I have 2 payouts being late. One is late for over a day, another is 6 hours. I checked the transaction, but both are unconfirmed. Usually, it takes about 1 hour to get through, those 2 of my payouts are longer than usual. Is that normal?

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

So, that means, all the transaction will go through lately? I'm new to the pool, so, I dont really know how a multi-pool works or payout.

there is a growing global queue of BTC transactions. All you can do it wait, and have a coffee. The BTC was sent from the pool and now waits.

The transactions FEEs for BTC are incredibly expensive and no end in sight...  BTC transaction processing is so ridiculous right now!!

Is there anyway that the POOL can change your primary payout currency to something other than BTC???  Like LTC, BCH, DASH or ETH?

I know individually you can change your worker password to get another currency but that only works if there is enough in the pool's wallet for that coin.  Is anyone doing this and this works without issue?

The BTC transactions are killing the small miner's profit...!

For pool miners the transaction fees are not a big deal, at least as far as getting the bitcoin.
The last payment transaction from zpool had a total transaction fee of 0.1 BTC = $1563 USD which sounds like a LOT BUT
there were 2851 miners paid in this transaction - So the Per Miner Fee was only 53 cents, reasonable even for the smallest miner.
The confirtmation delay is a bit of a pain but considering it probaly took multiple days to min the coin even an extra day for the transaction to confirm is not horrible.
and the best bit, the pool pays the transaction fee in any case, obviously it comes out of the total but this benefits the smaller miners
because they would have had a smaller share of the pool and hence payed a smaller share of the total fee.
All in all it seems to work OK. Unless you have a better plan ?

I did not realize this was the process.  Thanks for clearing it up for me!

[OldDriver]

I got very low hash for the x17 showed on the zpool wallet page. I have 50ishMH hash but it only showed me 1MH on the website. Does anybody has same situation as me? I tried different ccminers it's same situation. Thanks

I did, but it appears to have fixed itself within the past half hour or so.

Thanks, it's back to normal for me too. Any idea why this happened? Is this just the delay of database or are we losing that much hash power. Don't want this happen again it's so unstable.  

No, the hash showed on website is a little bit higher but still 1/3 of my actual hashing power. I am gonna give up x17 on zpool.

[jb7032]

I have 2 payouts being late. One is late for over a day, another is 6 hours. I checked the transaction, but both are unconfirmed. Usually, it takes about 1 hour to get through, those 2 of my payouts are longer than usual. Is that normal?

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

So, that means, all the transaction will go through lately? I'm new to the pool, so, I dont really know how a multi-pool works or payout.

there is a growing global queue of BTC transactions. All you can do it wait, and have a coffee. The BTC was sent from the pool and now waits.

The transactions FEEs for BTC are incredibly expensive and no end in sight...  BTC transaction processing is so ridiculous right now!!

Is there anyway that the POOL can change your primary payout currency to something other than BTC???  Like LTC, BCH, DASH or ETH?

I know individually you can change your worker password to get another currency but that only works if there is enough in the pool's wallet for that coin.  Is anyone doing this and this works without issue?

The BTC transactions are killing the small miner's profit...!

For pool miners the transaction fees are not a big deal, at least as far as getting the bitcoin.
The last payment transaction from zpool had a total transaction fee of 0.1 BTC = $1563 USD which sounds like a LOT BUT
there were 2851 miners paid in this transaction - So the Per Miner Fee was only 53 cents, reasonable even for the smallest miner.
The confirtmation delay is a bit of a pain but considering it probaly took multiple days to min the coin even an extra day for the transaction to confirm is not horrible.
and the best bit, the pool pays the transaction fee in any case, obviously it comes out of the total but this benefits the smaller miners
because they would have had a smaller share of the pool and hence payed a smaller share of the total fee.
All in all it seems to work OK. Unless you have a better plan ?

I agree to a point. Keep in mind once we have the btc in our little miner wallets if we want to move it for whatever reason it hurts us then. I tried to move $500 worth the other day and the fee would have been 40 bucks. I would be 100% on board with moving to LTC for example where the fee's are tiny and speed is much improved. All exchanges and coinbase take LTC. Seems like it would result in less fee's and better experience for everyone or am I missing something?

[jb7032]

I'm still new to zpool so maybe I can just change my mining address to an LTC address and update the password argument? If so, any reason not to do that?

[sconklinbtc]

I got very low hash for the x17 showed on the zpool wallet page. I have 50ishMH hash but it only showed me 1MH on the website. Does anybody has same situation as me? I tried different ccminers it's same situation. Thanks

I did, but it appears to have fixed itself within the past half hour or so.

Thanks, it's back to normal for me too. Any idea why this happened? Is this just the delay of database or are we losing that much hash power. Don't want this happen again it's so unstable.  

I'd guess there were likely stratum issues, which happen from time to time, though I can't confirm. If you look at the x17 hashrate, the pool hashrate dropped during the same time period. I thought I had a driver crash and was losing severe profitability until I got home to fix it, 6 hours after it happened.

[guytechie]

Looks like Magi Coin is back.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg26742447#msg26742447

[OldDriver]

I got very low hash for the x17 showed on the zpool wallet page. I have 50ishMH hash but it only showed me 1MH on the website. Does anybody has same situation as me? I tried different ccminers it's same situation. Thanks

I did, but it appears to have fixed itself within the past half hour or so.

Thanks, it's back to normal for me too. Any idea why this happened? Is this just the delay of database or are we losing that much hash power. Don't want this happen again it's so unstable.  

I'd guess there were likely stratum issues, which happen from time to time, though I can't confirm. If you look at the x17 hashrate, the pool hashrate dropped during the same time period. I thought I had a driver crash and was losing severe profitability until I got home to fix it, 6 hours after it happened.

that's bad, same thing here, I looked at other x17 pools listed on the verge official website. none of them has vast drop of hash power. I think you are right. zpool has issues to the x17 pool.

[alnash]

Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?

* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?

[JaredKaragen]

Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?

* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?

ill break it up for you:

* values in mBTC/MH/day,
per PH for sha256
& GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit
kS for equihash

[alnash]

Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?

* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?

ill break it up for you:

* values in mBTC/MH/day,
per PH for sha256
& GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit
kS for equihash

I know how to break it up.
I just want to be sure that e.g. x17 is per MH, and not something like "x17 is also per GH, because it's a variant of x11, bla, bla..."
Also I'd like to be sure about keccak.

[sconklinbtc]

Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?

* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?

ill break it up for you:

* values in mBTC/MH/day,
per PH for sha256
& GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit
kS for equihash

except that Keccak is GH per day see this tweet

https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/942398598557388800

[alnash]

Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?

* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?

ill break it up for you:

* values in mBTC/MH/day,
per PH for sha256
& GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit
kS for equihash

except that Keccak is GH per day see this tweet

https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/942398598557388800

Yup, that's what I'm talking about...
Thanks!

[jb7032]

Does anyone use LTC, ETH, Zcash or anything other then BTC for their auto convert and payout method? It doesnt look like LTC is mined much so that may not work for payout method.

[cryptominer420]

Does anyone use LTC, ETH, Zcash or anything other then BTC for their auto convert and payout method? It doesnt look like LTC is mined much so that may not work for payout method.

I'm mining for verge payouts right now have a feeling the price will continue to rise.

[Straya1]

when this guy gonna fix this f.. website mining in dark

[H4gb4rd]

What is the problem with the difficulty setting at this pool?!
Doesn't work anymore. Can't set lower difficulty (d=xxx) at some algos!
Smaller miners are no longer welcome?!
 

[sconklinbtc]

What is the problem with the difficulty setting at this pool?!
Doesn't work anymore. Can't set lower difficulty (d=xxx) at some algos!
Smaller miners are no longer welcome?!
 

Don't know what you're talking about, I'm mining with an Asus Rog laptop with an 860m for one of my rigs and it adjust down to an acceptable difficulty.

[Frankie001]

So when did this pool operator decide to up the payout threshold from 0.002 to 0.0025, not a lot i know but i mined to that point (0.0020xxx) to get that btc off the pool on Wednesday and it stated (Payouts are made automatically every 2 hours for all balances above 0.01 and balances more than 0.0020 are paid several evenings each week ) and now see it's been increased, (in b4 payout fees are high), has it even been mentioned here or anywhere else? seems if you're an operator you can do as you please. Shouldn't i get my payout at 0.002 as that's what it stated when i was finished on the pool, they now changed it afterwards and i'm expected to mine to that point, a threshold that was brought in after i mined to the original threshold.

[crackfoo]

So when did this pool operator decide to up the payout threshold from 0.002 to 0.0025, not alot i know but i mined to that point to get that btc off the pool on wednesday and now see it's been increased, (in b4 payout fees are high), has it even been mentioned here or anywhere else? seems if you're an operator you can do as you please.

yes, I'll do as I please when there are issues and congestion in the mempool. Sorry, it's not the stone age, nothing is set in stone.