minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:05:03 PM |
|
Wow! Thanks for the continued support and updates to newest miners. This has become my go-to setup for all of my rigs.
: )
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:06:38 PM Last edit: January 22, 2018, 09:19:18 PM by minerx117 |
|
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ---- ccminerpolytimos X17 36.52 MH/s 1.577 0.00158 18.075 0.04319 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Skein 1.84 GH/s 1.382 0.00138 15.839 0.00075 zpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 104.03 MH/s 1.130 0.00113 12.945 0.01086 zpool- CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 55.74 MH/s 1.099 0.00110 12.590 0.01971 zpool- ccminerpolytimos poly Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00589 zpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Groestl Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00355 zpool- DSTM Equihash Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 573.61000 zpool- PalginHSR NeoScrypt Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.41134 zpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.02237 zpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Timetravel Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00314 zpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00048 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Nist5 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00930 zpool- ccminerAlexis78 Sib Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00493 zpool- CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.06559 zpool- ccminerAlexis78 MyriadGroestl Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00030 zpool- ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00002 zpool- ccminerAlexis78 Hsr Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.03283 zpool- CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.02448 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Lbry Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00020 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00630 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Keccak Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00014 zpool- ccminerpolytimos Blake2s Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00009 zpool- ccminerpolytimos C11 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.02056 zpool-
Running: Failed: 1
Speed Exited Active Cnt Command ----- ------ ------ --- ------- 0.00 PH/s dd:hh:mm 00:00:00 Once Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a polytimos -o stratum+tcp://polytimos.mine.zpool.ca:8463 -u 14rEu3oaRyfF7z6R869rDL54dABUEza1Xz -p ID=NemosMiner-v2.4.1,c=BTC -d 0,1,2,3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last Refresh: 01/22/2018 05:48:35 Sleep 30 sec --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
need help guys i tried everything i know and i cant figure out why i am getting this error. this rig has 2x1060 6gb 1x1070 1x1070ti Mining on zpool bat on latest release version 2.4.1 downloaded fresh copy again an hour ago benchmark for poly fails ....it opens the miner window and closes it right after
have been using nemosminer since 2.3 never had no issues even when i updated to pre-release versions or whenever i noticed nemo update the github i would download the latest update and never had any issues until now so thats why its really weird that this is happening
if i remove the algo from bat or turn off the polytimos in the miner then it just removes it from benchmarking and all is set with the rest
anyone know what might be causing this?
@cr3moon thanks i'll fix that soon https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/210
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:07:50 PM |
|
Why disable Klaust?! I'm still on 2.31 and it works just fine 0-o Because PalginHsrNeo is 5-15% faster.... tested with 10603gb 1070 1070ti 1080ti
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:08:52 PM |
|
In the folder there are new files, what are they needed for?
miner.cmd start.bat restart.bat stop.bat
help NemosMiner-v2.4 open and close miners correctly
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
Zikkson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:11:14 PM |
|
Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:14:27 PM |
|
Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.
yeh benchmark time is 8min per Algo apart from PalginHSR which is 10-18mins
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
Zikkson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:21:34 PM |
|
Its worth that extra hash speed
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:23:51 PM Last edit: January 22, 2018, 09:42:06 PM by minerx117 |
|
minerx117
Honestly I'm not seeing any improvement with this new phi client..
NemosMiner 2.4 - using ccminer 2.2.4 [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.23 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.00 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.85 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:47] GPU #4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.80 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913 [2018-01-22 02:00:02] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.29 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:00:03] accepted: 280/280 (diff 0.549), 132.14 MH/s yes! [2018-01-22 02:00:10] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.01 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:00:10] accepted: 281/281 (diff 2.054), 132.13 MH/s yes!
NemosMiner 2.4.1 - using phi-1.0 (which has some built in donation system) [2018-01-22 01:58:27] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/23/23, diff: 1.765, 130.51 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:58:33] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.26 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:58:40] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.33 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:14] phi block 157318, diff 21635.913 [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.46 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.22 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.21 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.19 MH/s [2018-01-22 01:59:56] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/24/24, diff: 1.871, 131.11 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913 [2018-01-22 02:00:32] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.32 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:00:57] phi block 157320, diff 21044.053 [2018-01-22 02:01:12] phi block 157321, diff 21044.053 [2018-01-22 02:01:25] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s [2018-01-22 02:01:25] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/25/25, diff: 0.563, 131.35 MH/s
These are identical rigs, identical cards, identical overclock settings, identical power settings
thanks i'll double check today and confirm are you running lower tdp? i have two 6x1070ti rigs with 69%tdp (124watt) +125core +505mem and i got a slightly better hashrate with Alexis-Phi over Tpruvot 2.2.4 "which has some built in donation system" Does it? i did not know that (can you elaborate more on that please millsys) i may remove it very soon... Seems clean to me i checked through source code Source Code: https://github.com/216k155/ccminer-phi-anxmod
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
Max3k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:26:50 PM |
|
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig. Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)? By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:28:45 PM |
|
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig. Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)? By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0. i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
Zikkson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:42:35 PM |
|
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig. Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)? By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0. No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.
|
|
|
|
Max3k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:59:27 PM |
|
i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice
Nothing serious, i thought maybe I have something wrong and the speed is the same. Skunk and ccminer-x86-2.2 - it would be possible to start using the new version (ccminer-x86-2.2.4-cuda9), speed should be more. For Bitcore can use for example SP2, he is now lying around everywhere, in order to exclude CcminerTpruvot.ps1 =)) No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value?
No problem then, just good to compare in parallel and 2-3 weeks.
|
|
|
|
passteque
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 22, 2018, 10:43:28 PM |
|
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig. Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)? By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0. No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example. you can't do that, run at the same time to compare; 2 gpu on each pool. payout move too much in a week to compare that way
|
|
|
|
HardBlockMiner
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 2
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:02:57 PM |
|
Do you have your number of GPU configured properly? Yes, I have only one GPU for the moment, my bat: powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\NemosMiner-v2.4.1.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0' -SelGPUCC '0' -Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 30 -Username blacklpk -Workername lpk2 -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -PoolName miningpoolhub -Type nvidia -Algorithm cryptonight,keccak,lyra2z,skein,equihash,groestl,MyriadGroestl,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt -Donate 5 Which GPU are you using?
|
|
|
|
car1999
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:33:10 PM |
|
Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.
what's your most runned algo in MPH?
|
|
|
|
Mike011
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:46:10 PM |
|
"tribus" = " --cpu-priority=3 -d $SelGPUCC" #Tribus
This is working like a charm! Thanks!
What is it for? Actually benchmarking for 4*1070 ti. Very nice job nemos your miner is great Sometimes this solves "does not validate on cpu", or lowering intensity helps. However, i get the same message on i5 too sometimes, so duh...
|
|
|
|
car1999
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:46:38 PM Last edit: January 23, 2018, 01:40:05 AM by car1999 |
|
@minerrx117, v2.4.1, ahashpool24hr It showed Stats 'Phi' -> 202.51 MH/s after xxxxx sec
but the stats never changed in the list, it's always Phi 194.25 MH/s 4.917 0.00492 52.548 .........
is it a bug?
|
|
|
|
Zybane
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 12:55:56 AM |
|
When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"
What does that mean? Is that an error?
|
|
|
|
Mike011
|
|
January 23, 2018, 01:25:21 AM |
|
When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"
What does that mean? Is that an error?
Omg! If you get that message, your rig could explode any minute! I suggest that you stop mining immidiately! Sell all your gpu`s to me!
|
|
|
|
Zikkson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 04:58:59 AM |
|
Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.
Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results: Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day
I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.
what's your most runned algo in MPH? I think its equihash, then neoscrypt and skein. But i will check it later today after i get back home
|
|
|
|
|