Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[marcus_of_augustus]

"... until computers are built from something other than matter and occupy something other than space".

Qbits exploit weird quantum effects like one atom being able to be in two places at the same time. The qbits in a quantum computer occupy something strange that might be considered "other than space". Existing in two places at the same time is a departure from the standard three dimensions of space we all know.

Photons, which can be used for qubits, are massless particles and have no volume. Hence, I assume, where the "built from something other than matter and occupy something other than space" comes from. However, you can implement quantum computers with particles which do have mass and volume, so his point is invalid.

The argument is based on minimum amount of energy required to flip a bit, quantum computers would effectively be violating Second Law of Thermodynamics because of Landauer's principle ... also known as the Landauer limit.

[yefi]

The argument is based on minimum amount of energy required to flip a bit, quantum computers would effectively be violating Second Law of Thermodynamics because of Landauer's principle ... also known as the Landauer limit.

My understanding is that they don't need to perform that many computations though, namely because of Shor's algorithm. I'm no quantum physicist though.

[Mervyn_Pumpkinhead]

What is that picture, anyway? Looks like one of those foam hand exerciser balls with lint on it.



Bitcoin. Your money is secured by the laws of the universe.*
*Unless you're Satoshi, in which case a kid named Thermos can take it from you,

It's a stress ball. An essential tool for bitcoin owners. Without it, markets would fall.

[r0ach]

The Jewish fiat shills are back again (3 of them spamming at the same time) using their textbook playbook of try to create infighting among Bitcoin users.  Hmm I wonder why:

Let's examine a nice passage from Paul "Jewbastard" Krugman's paper titled "Bitcoin is Evil":

BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mind

God forbid someone should prevent bankers from scamming!

[Mervyn_Pumpkinhead]

The Jewish fiat shills are back again (3 of them spamming at the same time) using their textbook playbook of try to create infighting among Bitcoin users.  Hmm I wonder why:

Let's examine a nice passage from Paul "Jewbastard" Krugman's paper titled "Bitcoin is Evil":

BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mind

God forbid someone should prevent bankers from scamming!

ETH is also on the rise again *conspiracy intensifies*

[r0ach]

ETH is also on the rise again *conspiracy intensifies*

Yes, Eth is being elevated for the classic noob destroying move known as "the hammer":

[Mervyn_Pumpkinhead]

ETH is also on the rise again *conspiracy intensifies*

Yes, Eth is being elevated for the classic noob destroying move known as "the hammer":

Totally different from bitcoin. Isn't it?
EDIT: Also please post the updated graph of ETH, where the price has already risen to 0.02435. Thank you.

[Cassius]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

[marcus_of_augustus]

Operation Icarus

[r0ach]

Operation Icarus

99.9% chance it will be the government performing a black swan event on itself since they know it's coming down anyway and then blaming "renegade hackers".  Either way, bullish for Bitcoin so I don't give a fuck.  Proceed to black swan yourself jew bankers!

[Elwar]

Operation Icarus

99.9% chance it will be the government performing a black swan event on itself since they know it's coming down anyway and then blaming "renegade hackers".  Either way, bullish for Bitcoin so I don't give a fuck.  Proceed to black swan yourself jew bankers!

So far it's been mainly people DDoSing bank websites in various countries for a few hours at a time.

So...people will have to wait a little bit to do their online banking if their bank is chosen that day.

[Denker]

Moving up again it seems.
Another attempt to attack the $460s/3000CNY within the next few hours?

[JayJuanGee]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error. 

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?   

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.

[Cassius]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error. 

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?   

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.

Yeah, it was gibberish. I was just making the point that I can say nothing in a single line, I don't need a wall of text. Supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but whatever. Take it how you want.
I've been here roughly as long as you, though I only swing by occasionally and this kind of thing is why. I do wonder whether you have the insight to recognise how much your personality has changed in the last 2 years, and whether that ever concerns you.
Feel free to use as many words to reply as you like, I'm checking out again and I doubt anyone else will read them either.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error. 

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?   

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.

[soullyG]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if I may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve certain objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error.  

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, that is to say remaining invariably long under any and all circumstances, remain invariably long. You may or may not have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no? Or yes?    

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose, because, as I have emphatically stated and/or typed in this very post, which I am currently in the process of typing, I am currently in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My patterns never vary, fuckhead! To use many words is within my discretion, and that's what I discretion to do.
That's how I roll.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, to which I answered you that "I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post consequently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a different variety of scenarios." You seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and/or assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, which is to day I typed, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, remain invariably long under any and all conditions. You, asshole, learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd possessing the consistency of clam chowder. It should be clear from my previous lengthy posts (of which this post, the one I am currently in the process of posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, will soon become), if you have even bother to read them, which is unlikely, jusdging from the dum things you say because of your lack of comprehension, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences. Which you don't. So I won't. Fuck you.



“No one I know has listened to it all the way through, including myself. It is not meant to be.” --Lou Reed, liner notes

Well played Lambie, well played

[Elwar]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

[Darkbot]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Lambie is a noob who's copy/paste other one's text. Pretty much pathetic little kid crying for here lollypop. This shill got hundreds of banned acounts under here name, makes me wonder how here social real-life looks like, it must be very bad.

[Fatman3001]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Whooosh!

[USB-S]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Whooosh!