Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[realr0ach]

and jews are once again being focused on as problematic

Uh oh, the Zerohedge goyim know!

[1715166707]

1715166707

[1715166707]

1715166707

[Ibian]

You know what I fear? I fear going down on a girl that I think is clean and looking in the mirror the next morning to find little balls of dirty toilet paper stuck in my beard that rubbed off of her taint.

Lifehack don't go down on girls. You are welcome.

[El duderino_]

What is this, Micgoossens poor investment advice 101?  
-

no man no advice ......



PS, only for you roach real Micg advice BTFD and own something in BTC as well

[RealMachasm]

You know what I fear? I fear going down on a girl that I think is clean and looking in the mirror the next morning to find little balls of dirty toilet paper stuck in my beard that rubbed off of her taint.

Got to be better than having the toilet paper stuck between your teeth.

[realr0ach]

It's a barrel of laughs watching the faggy Jew shills post on Zerohedge thinking they have any chance whatsoever of banning the 1st and 2nd amendment:



You can tell how close the system is to collapsing by how desperate they are to try and grab the guns so they can try and force a new debt based currency scam on people when this one blows up.  I really hope they continue this completely hopeless plan up until the very end.  The kikes could just take all their stolen wealth and try to flee somewhere else and change their last names like they always do, but if they stay and don't try to run, they're as good as toast because everyone knows exactly who is behind it.

So, please Jews, I beg you, do not attempt to flee America.  Stay in the US and continue your hopeless plan so you'll all be eradicated.

[El duderino_]

A =


B=



who's having what kind of weekend, during this DIP? 

[El duderino_]

the signs are coming FAST
Of the longterm/big-picture of that

[Phil_S]

I wonder why Putin said "EU army is a good idea, it makes sense"...

maybe to seperate NATO members?

Break NATO in two? Yeah, I see why he would like that.

[royalfestus]

I dont see any fight back in price in past days and am now submitting to the opinion that it might go deeper. Losing $800 in some hours and even the past weeks of resistance cant help to lift the coin scare me. The manipulators should take us to depth now if they can and stop just tossing with our investment and confidence. We should avoid reading and listening to those negative opinion, some of them are deceptive to acquire our treasury.

[Realerre]

Are we scared guys? Is blood in the streets?

[becoin]

I wonder why Putin said "EU army is a good idea, it makes sense"...

Macron said "We need EU army to defend against Russian aggression".
Putin said "It is a good idea, it makes sense".
Trump said "It is a very bad idea, doesn't make sense. We shall sanction EU if they get their own army".

[sirazimuth]

..... little balls of dirty toilet paper stuck in my beard that rubbed off of her taint.

I think I'll skip lunch....

[d_eddie]

Complete speculation but...

I believe that Craig Wright signed a very large monetary deal with some investors after giving them the impression that he was Satoshi and that he could not release his BTC until 2020.

Whatever deal this is, he is desperate to get as many bitcoins as he can before then. He tried to make BCH the "real bitcoin" but that didn't work...so now just make up some fear about Segwit the he will "reveal in 2019" to drive down the price so he can get as many coins as possible to fulfill his part of the deal. Looks like he needs the price to drop to around $1k to be able to pull that off. Not going to happen.

There is no FUD on segwit, the threat is real. Perhaps do some reading on the subject?

TL;DR plz?

If a malicious actor were to gain control of 51%+ of the network hash power, he could change the network rules, rescind segwit, and take all the coins that were in segwit addresses.

Of course, there's a significant chance no one would use the compromised network except the attacker, which would make the whole thing moot.

Ah so segwit's problem is that it's 51%-fuckable. Yawn.

(Not directed to you, infofront. I would have liked the OP PoolMinor to reply and argue.)

[bitserve]

Complete speculation but...

I believe that Craig Wright signed a very large monetary deal with some investors after giving them the impression that he was Satoshi and that he could not release his BTC until 2020.

Whatever deal this is, he is desperate to get as many bitcoins as he can before then. He tried to make BCH the "real bitcoin" but that didn't work...so now just make up some fear about Segwit the he will "reveal in 2019" to drive down the price so he can get as many coins as possible to fulfill his part of the deal. Looks like he needs the price to drop to around $1k to be able to pull that off. Not going to happen.

There is no FUD on segwit, the threat is real. Perhaps do some reading on the subject?

TL;DR plz?

If a malicious actor were to gain control of 51%+ of the network hash power, he could change the network rules, rescind segwit, and take all the coins that were in segwit addresses.

Of course, there's a significant chance no one would use the compromised network except the attacker, which would make the whole thing moot.

Ah so segwit's problem is that it's 51%-fuckable. Yawn.

(Not directed to you, infofront. I would have liked the OP PoolMinor to reply and argue.)

It's not just "51%" fuckable.... Segwit nodes/miners, exchanges, users, etc would never accept those blocks spending Segwit... so no, if you want to do that you don't need any particular hashrate, just create a fork with whatever hashrate and spend them. Good luck getting that chain accepted anywhere.

It's the same old anti-segwit FUD. Nothing to see here.

[jojo69]

Are we scared guys? Is blood in the streets?

not yet

another year and a 3 handle

[theymos]

Greg posted a detailed explanation of CSW's most recent fraud: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/81115/if-someone-wanted-to-pretend-to-be-satoshi-by-posting-a-fake-signature-to-defrau/81116#81116

I think that sometimes theymos, realist as he may seem to be, can sometimes end up arguing a bit too much on the bearish side of bitcoin matters.  It has been shown in the past.  hahahahahaha   in other words, take theymos's predictions with a grain of salt.  

True, I've historically erred much more on the side of bearishness. But since I mostly hodl, only speculating with smallish amounts if at all, that means that I'm rarely disappointed, and sometimes happily surprised.

[infofront]

You know what I fear? I fear going down on a girl that I think is clean and looking in the mirror the next morning to find little balls of dirty toilet paper stuck in my beard that rubbed off of her taint.

Lifehack don't go down on girls. You are welcome.

That's the worst advice I've ever heard.

[El duderino_]

^^
Can’t wait to be suprised again

Going finally to eat and get drunk .... they better suprise me with full glases and fine bottles of wine

[d_eddie]

Complete speculation but...

I believe that Craig Wright signed a very large monetary deal with some investors after giving them the impression that he was Satoshi and that he could not release his BTC until 2020.

Whatever deal this is, he is desperate to get as many bitcoins as he can before then. He tried to make BCH the "real bitcoin" but that didn't work...so now just make up some fear about Segwit the he will "reveal in 2019" to drive down the price so he can get as many coins as possible to fulfill his part of the deal. Looks like he needs the price to drop to around $1k to be able to pull that off. Not going to happen.

There is no FUD on segwit, the threat is real. Perhaps do some reading on the subject?

TL;DR plz?

If a malicious actor were to gain control of 51%+ of the network hash power, he could change the network rules, rescind segwit, and take all the coins that were in segwit addresses.

Of course, there's a significant chance no one would use the compromised network except the attacker, which would make the whole thing moot.

Ah so segwit's problem is that it's 51%-fuckable. Yawn.

(Not directed to you, infofront. I would have liked the OP PoolMinor to reply and argue.)

It's not just "51%" fuckable.... Segwit nodes/miners, exchanges, users, etc would never accept those blocks spending Segwit... so no, if you want to do that you don't need any particular hashrate, just create a fork with whatever hashrate and spend them. Good luck getting that chain accepted anywhere.

Well at least the miners would, indeed, accept it (we're assuming a 51% majority aren't we). But nodes, economic users, everyone else... good luck with that.

It's the same old anti-segwit FUD. Nothing to see here.

Yeah. Yawn.

[d_eddie]

You know what I fear? I fear going down on a girl that I think is clean and looking in the mirror the next morning to find little balls of dirty toilet paper stuck in my beard that rubbed off of her taint.

Lifehack don't go down on girls. You are welcome.

That's the worst advice I've ever heard.

@Ibian: "Lifehack don't go down on girls". You sound like a muslim, you know? Maybe reevaluate, depending on the girl.

@QuestionAuthority: "I fear going down on a girl that I think is clean". I think you can validate your assessment of cleanliness quite soon, unless you have a serious cold. Amended lifehack: don't go down on a girl you don't know if you have a serious cold!