Bitcoin Forum
April 01, 2023, 04:37:41 PM *
News: New CAPTCHA now required before posting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will we see a new ATH?
2023 - 52 (23.7%)
2024 - 87 (39.7%)
2025 - 59 (26.9%)
2026 - 4 (1.8%)
2027 - 2 (0.9%)
After 2027 - 4 (1.8%)
Never - 11 (5%)
Total Voters: 219

Pages: « 1 ... 22770 22771 22772 22773 22774 22775 22776 22777 22778 22779 22780 22781 22782 22783 22784 22785 22786 22787 22788 22789 22790 22791 22792 22793 22794 22795 22796 22797 22798 22799 22800 22801 22802 22803 22804 22805 22806 22807 22808 22809 22810 22811 22812 22813 22814 22815 22816 22817 22818 22819 [22820] 22821 22822 22823 22824 22825 22826 22827 22828 22829 22830 22831 22832 22833 22834 22835 22836 22837 22838 22839 22840 22841 22842 22843 22844 22845 22846 22847 22848 22849 22850 22851 22852 22853 22854 22855 22856 22857 22858 22859 22860 22861 22862 22863 22864 22865 22866 22867 22868 22869 22870 ... 32078 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26087369 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 5 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Phil_S
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1389


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 07:03:06 AM

2018 January: top at Jan 6.
2018 February: bottom at Feb 6.

2019 January: top at Jan 8.
2019 February: bottom... soon?

2019 February: bottom at Feb 8.

Pattern holds up so far...
1680367061
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1680367061

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1680367061
Reply with quote  #2

1680367061
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1680367061
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1680367061

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1680367061
Reply with quote  #2

1680367061
Report to moderator
1680367061
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1680367061

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1680367061
Reply with quote  #2

1680367061
Report to moderator
kenzawak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 851



View Profile
February 26, 2019, 07:37:19 AM

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016

Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1512


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2019, 07:38:52 AM

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016



yes because of LN. Grin

EDIT: LN is off-chain and you cannot measure numbers. within a channel payments are not visible.
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1512


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2019, 07:39:48 AM

https://twitter.com/BigMacIndexBTC



███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC   
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC   
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
kenzawak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 851



View Profile
February 26, 2019, 07:47:40 AM

lol at the coindesk fully fledged xrp/coinbase article just 1 minute after the ann.
fuck off Barry, fuck off Brian you silly little turds

What is this XRP i’m suddenly Reading much about?

A centralized database which calls itself a blockchain. You can call it just "shitcoin".

kurious
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1618



View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:27:09 AM

https://twitter.com/BigMacIndexBTC



███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██


██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC  
  ●
  BTC
  BTC  
.
   ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
    BTC
  BTC    
  ●
 BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████



Sig ad files above the sig?  

I hope this ain't the future... Sort of bad form, old chap? Nothing personal, just I love it that sig ads are not visible in here.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2982
Merit: 1593


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:42:56 AM

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016



yes because of LN. Grin

EDIT: LN is off-chain and you cannot measure numbers. within a channel payments are not visible.

Hey, Gyrsur - you seem LN conversant. Maybe you can help me with something I've been puzzling over. 1ML (https://1ml.com/statistics) publishes something they call 'Updated Channels (24h)'. Are you aware of a definition of this term?
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:43:30 AM

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016



Because it’s February 2015 in the Bitcoin price cycle you big goose.  That’s like saying transactions are lower than 2017.  Well duh.

Come back in February 2020 and measure against February 2016.  

And yes we are way ahead of February 2015 - thanks for asking.
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1512


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2019, 08:44:21 AM

*snip*



Sig ad files above the sig?  

I hope this ain't the future... Sort of bad form, old chap? Nothing personal, just I love it that sig ads are not visible in here.

apologies! just added the sig ad for posts of the Bitcoin Big-Mac-Index which is a project I'm working on and to reach a balanced cost history there.

If I post comments and other stuff here I won't add the sig ad manually to my posts.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:46:31 AM

All sigs are banned in this thread. Please keep it that way. 
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:50:31 AM




Edit:




I made a lot of money out of Dentacoin back in the day...
kenzawak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 851



View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:52:49 AM



Cryptoscamhub strikes again.
Globb0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2029


Free spirit


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 09:13:36 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1)

ZOMG!


Olegya199
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 129


HODL


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 09:25:17 AM



So small, and already ready to lose money on investments. Charm!
Cryptotourist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 755


Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 09:26:01 AM

Mornigzzz.

Still catching up & the storm is not helping.
Probably the worst weather I've ever seen around these parts of the world & the shit keeps coming.
Hit a falling rock with the car. Water in the house. Electricity down. Internet antennas need re-alignment. Peachy.

#



Actually if you combine the first three, it turns out that:

1 BTC = set for life Tongue

Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1512


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2019, 09:27:53 AM
Last edit: February 26, 2019, 09:40:00 AM by Gyrsur

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016



yes because of LN. Grin

EDIT: LN is off-chain and you cannot measure numbers. within a channel payments are not visible.

Hey, Gyrsur - you seem LN conversant. Maybe you can help me with something I've been puzzling over. 1ML (https://1ml.com/statistics) publishes something they call 'Updated Channels (24h)'. Are you aware of a definition of this term?

sorry, at the moment I have no idea what it could mean. unfortunately 1ML do not have an explanation of the statistic values so far.
Lightblock
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 40


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2019, 09:48:04 AM


yes because of LN. Grin

EDIT: LN is off-chain and you cannot measure numbers. within a channel payments are not visible.

Hey, Gyrsur - you seem LN conversant. Maybe you can help me with something I've been puzzling over. 1ML (https://1ml.com/statistics) publishes something they call 'Updated Channels (24h)'. Are you aware of a definition of this term?

It means that some of the channel parameters have changed over the past 24 hours. Most of the time it is the capacity that changes - for example it could increase.
somac.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 978

Never selling


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 09:50:05 AM

Bitcoin is Processing Fewer Payments Per Month Than It Was in 2016

https://www.longhash.com/news/bitcoin-is-processing-fewer-payments-per-month-than-it-was-in-2016



yes because of LN. Grin

EDIT: LN is off-chain and you cannot measure numbers. within a channel payments are not visible.

Hey, Gyrsur - you seem LN conversant. Maybe you can help me with something I've been puzzling over. 1ML (https://1ml.com/statistics) publishes something they call 'Updated Channels (24h)'. Are you aware of a definition of this term?

sorry, at the moment I have no idea what it could mean. unfortunately 1ML do not have an explanation of the statistic values so far.

Well shit, Transactions per day are almost at the ATH. So shit ain't too bad is it

JSRAW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1492



View Profile
February 26, 2019, 10:11:39 AM

Yeah fuck all that TA stuff, were fine, price is going to zoom up.
Sitting duck is good sometimes.




Not touching anything!

Hodl guy did a good job, price did close above the trend line, i entered long potions, as long as we don't close below it we should head back to 4200$ , but i am keeping a tight a SL below the trend line, i will also be taking partial profits along the way

TP targets on BTCUSDT ;

1- 3913
2- 3990
3- 4180

those who want to go long could wait for a retrace , enter when price touches the trend again at around  3820$


overall view is still very bearish, i also think 4400$ will be a good shorting opportunity back to the 200SMA on the weekly (3300-3400) .

good luck.
Hodor saved the Bran and he held the line for us too Cheesy

I am not much into trading but do have a couple of order pending already with fresh fiat and not taking any new position till my previous orders get filled. so no fomo if it hits $4200 mark again.

Personally, I don't mind entering in $3300-$3600 price range if it stays the same for a couple of months or next 6 months.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1347


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 10:31:01 AM

When the dump happened I wondered if we would see a huge BSV rise soon after... I kind of wish I had posted when I thought it so I'd look extra geniusy. Wink  

But I am wondering if the big seller(s) might not be a BSV insider?

yes you were right..BSV rebounds violently...

This has been a recurring pattern, and at times it has also coincided with an interesting bump in the privacy coin sector.  But I think we saw this with the first BTC/BCH fork, and I think we are seeing it now.  Not sure if this is Calvin Ayre, CSW, or someone like Daniel (hyperbitcoinization) whassisname who probably sits on a big stack of BTC.  I doubt our own resident BSV lover has quite *that* many bitcoin to cause this sort of drop.  Not to mention the fact he *has* to be waking up to the reality that BSV is being run by the circus.

Krawisz?

You're kidding, right? While all the Core Cognoscenti are narrow-mindedly focused upon how else they can belittle CSW, the real work is being done by the scores of BSV devs.

Oglegasm at the public shaming sideshow. Ignore the progress -- accomplishments overlooked by the cryptoverse -- to your own peril. Until one day you wake to a new world with BTC again suiciding itself by strangulation, and BSV taking up the vast demand for an uncensorable, permissionless, decentralized, and boundless incorruptible worldwide ledger.

And no, I don't have enough BTC to move markets. But other thoughtful people do.

It could also happen that one day you wake up and not only LN is being widely used as a cache for (most) of small tx's but Bitcoin has doubled it's blocksize (something that should happen sometime in the future) and BSV proofs to have only been a failed experiment.

Yes, I am and have always been in favour of a moderate and reasonable gradual block size increase. I was in favour of Segwit2X IF it had had enough consensus. First things first, and that was Segwit and LN. Now any time they decide to double (only double for now) the blocksize would be welcome.

I am sure you are well hedged against that scenario and will do fine no matter what.
Pages: « 1 ... 22770 22771 22772 22773 22774 22775 22776 22777 22778 22779 22780 22781 22782 22783 22784 22785 22786 22787 22788 22789 22790 22791 22792 22793 22794 22795 22796 22797 22798 22799 22800 22801 22802 22803 22804 22805 22806 22807 22808 22809 22810 22811 22812 22813 22814 22815 22816 22817 22818 22819 [22820] 22821 22822 22823 22824 22825 22826 22827 22828 22829 22830 22831 22832 22833 22834 22835 22836 22837 22838 22839 22840 22841 22842 22843 22844 22845 22846 22847 22848 22849 22850 22851 22852 22853 22854 22855 22856 22857 22858 22859 22860 22861 22862 22863 22864 22865 22866 22867 22868 22869 22870 ... 32078 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!